Breaking News

Bondi Beach Bloodbath: What Lit The Fuse?

Please share our story!


Bondi Beach, one of Australia’s most iconic coastal destinations located 7 km east of Sydney’s central business district, is at the centre of a national tragedy following a deadly terrorist attack on Sunday. What has stirred up Islamic terrorism in Australia?

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Father and son Sajid, a Pakistani immigrant, and Naveed Akram opened fire on 2,000 attendees at the Chabad ‘Chanukah by the Sea’ gathering near Archer Park, killing at least 15, including Rabbi Eli Schlanger, Alex Kleytman who was a Holocaust survivor and 10-year-old Matilda Poltavchenko.

Syrian-born Ahmed al-Ahmed, a 43-year-old bystander, tackled one attacker and saved lives despite being shot and injured.

In the wake of the tragedy, Australia is reigniting debates over gun control laws, with calls for stricter regulations echoing across political and public spheres. Vigils are being planned across major cities, including Sydney, to honour the victims. Some of which, “pro-Palestinians” are attempting to disrupt.

Further reading:

As expected, this horrific incident at Bondi Beach has sparked a plethora of comments and theories online – some of which can only be described as absurd, ridiculous or plain bizarre. 

It’s important at times like these to challenge social media commentators and ask them to justify their claims.  Many will be making outrageous comments to attract attention, for clickbait, and others will be posting comments to reinforce their pre-disposed beliefs and try to convince others to follow these beliefs. And, of course, some are either running a PsyOp for a broader agenda or will take the opportunity to push out propaganda for that cause under the concept of “never let a good crisis go to waste.”

Always ask who, what, where, when and how; just because someone posts a remark or comment, it does not make it true.  For example, if an image is posted with no reference to where it was taken, when it was taken and who it was taken by, how can you trust the sentence placed underneath it describing what it is showing?  Images can be generated by artificial intelligence programs, two or more images can be edited to appear as one and even genuine images can be taken out of context and used to spread propaganda and lies. Stop and think, don’t just blindly believe.

There is likely to be much discussion over the coming days and as more information becomes available, those discussions are likely to evolve.  In the meantime, below is a discussion between former IDF spokesperson Jonathan Conricus and journalist Michael Tracey.

Bondi Beach Bloodbath: What Lit The Fuse?

By Mario Nawfal

Netanyahu blamed Australia’s recognition of the State of Palestine.

Some Arab journalists blamed the war on Gaza.

Other Israeli journalists pointed at Iran.

Conspiracy theorists claimed it’s an Israeli false flag attack.

Today, I have former IDF spokesperson Jonathan Conricus and journalist Michael Tracey to discuss what led to this horrific attack and what the repercussions could be.

Conricus pulls no punches: he wasn’t surprised by the attack, seeing it as the grim payoff of “globalise the Intifada” rhetoric and an Aussie government that’s “weak and cowardly,” quick to bash Israel while letting hate fester.

He states examples, including chants like “gas the Jews” at Sydney protests right after October 7, unpunished synagogue attacks, and Jews told to ditch their kippahs for safety.

Tracey fires back: How can the recognition of a Palestinian State be the instigator of this hate, when similar attacks against Jews have been seen in the US, a country that has not recognised the state of Palestine?

A more plausible reason? The horrific war in Gaza, fuelling rage and hate globally.

He reminds Conricus of Trump’s many statements warning that the world’s perception of Israel is souring due to the war in Gaza.

And those hate speech chants?

That’s free speech in action, something every American values in their constitution.

This debate cuts to the heart of how foreign policy bleeds into domestic hate, with Australia now a cautionary tale during spiking global anti-semitism. Conricus fears more violence without crackdowns; Tracey warns that overreach could backfire on freedoms. Either way, it’s a wake-up call for leaders worldwide.

03:10 – “This is what it means when people say globalise the Intifada”

05:01 – Jewish Australians felt “betrayed by legislators, exposed by law enforcement”

08:00 – “Chanting ‘gas the Jews’ just miles from Bondi Beach”

10:25 – “Not one hate crime suspect brought to justice in Australia”

13:00 – “The line between pro-Palestinian and pro-Hamas is a fake distinction”

16:13 – “Today, Hamas is the dominant Palestinian political organisation”

18:11 – “Many protesters were literally paid to be there, on salary”

20:22 – “Islamists want to dominate the West, not integrate into it”

23:03 – Sweden went from open borders to zero immigration — a cautionary tale

25:00 – Muslim hero Ahmed Al-Ahmed saves lives in Bondi shooting

26:22 – “False flag theories? Claims Israel or Iran is behind the attack”

28:08 – “Attackers weren’t trained, could have caused much worse carnage”

30:59 – “Blowback from Gaza campaign is real, even Trump admits it”

33:17 – “Mass propaganda and fake news against Israel fuel lone wolf attacks”

35:45 – “Unarmed Jewish civilians around the world pay the price for incitement”

Bondi Beach Bloodbath: What Lit The Fuse? 15 December 2025 (36 mins) Source: Mario Nawfal on Twitter (now X)

Featured image taken from ‘Bondi Beach Attack: New video captures tense police standoff, the moment shooter was neutralised’, Times of India, 15 December 2025

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Please share our story!
author avatar
Rhoda Wilson
While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as: ,

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
93 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
:Stuart-James.
:Stuart-James.
22 days ago

Maybe the legal fiction state of Israel paid for it … to keep their bullshit claim going.

:Stuart-James.
:Stuart-James.
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
22 days ago

Funny, the same thought crossed my mind about you.

J Guti
J Guti
Reply to  :Stuart-James.
22 days ago

I agree with Stuart, this looks like a typical Zionist false flag. They have shown over & over again that they have no issue sacrificing their own people to advance their political agenda (holohoax, Oct 7).

Paul
Paul
Reply to  J Guti
21 days ago

do you live in Australia?

A Person
A Person
Reply to  J Guti
21 days ago

I personally wouldn’t have the confidence to say that Oct 7 was definitely a false flag!

But it was interesting how “The Economist” front cover of the 22 Dec 2012 – 4 Jan 2013 issue seemed to have a drawing of Benjamin Netanyahu and a guy from Hamas shooting at each other from demonic looking hang gliders 🤔.

Oliver J
Oliver J
Reply to  :Stuart-James.
21 days ago

freedomarticles.com
Bondi beach Terror Exposed video 264.

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Oliver J
21 days ago

Lol, for me, that vvebzite just diverted to a page about riding 🐴s 🤷‍♂️.

Oliver J.
Oliver J.
Reply to  :Stuart-James.
22 days ago

Why do so many Truthers think it`s the I.D.F. and mosaad, just because it has their prints all over it and its a carbon copy of previous shows, and the King of butchers had already warned Oz that this would happen.

It could actually be exactly how it is told in the media, and the media are speaking the truth for once.

Krzysztof
Krzysztof
Reply to  Oliver J.
18 days ago

media are speaking the truth for once.”
LOL

Islander
Islander
Reply to  :Stuart-James.
22 days ago

I don’t understand your terminology, that is “the legal fiction state of Israel”, for the Bible aka The Word of God unequivocally declares that that piece of real estate they occupy is their God given land. The Scriptures declare that Israel would enter their land in unbelief (this has happened), and will remain thus until Christ returns in glory and performs a work of grace – saving the remnant thereof (this will happen).

Perhaps you would be good enough to explain to a simpleton like me why Israel is “a legal fiction state”?

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
Reply to  Islander
22 days ago

Hi Islander,
Are you sure about what you say.
Israel was only created in 1948.
Before that it was Palestine.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Dave Owen
22 days ago

100%.

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
Reply to  Islander
21 days ago

Hi Islander,
So what was the Balfour declaration all about?
It created a home for Jews in Palestine.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Dave Owen
20 days ago

No!!!! God “created a home for the Jews in Palestine”!

The “Balfour Declaration” was just a man-made construct, nevertheless, God had His hand in it.

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Dave Owen
22 days ago

But Islander is quoting from God’s covenant with Abraham, from slightly before that by maybe a few thousand years – pardon my usual levity 🙃.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  A Person
21 days ago

You are of course correct to mention “God’s covenant with Abraham”, from whence his promises flow. But more specifically I was quoting from Ezekiel 36:24-5 & 37:21-28 and Zechariah 12:10 ff. Apologies for my brevity!

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Islander
21 days ago

Ah thanks, I didn’t know those scriptures – yes, referencing the land going to the descendants. I wish I could finish this with another word that rhymes with ‘evity’ but I can’t think of one 🙁.

Petra
Petra
Reply to  Dave Owen
22 days ago

No, you’re misinformed. Before that it was a BRITISH colony.

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
Reply to  Petra
21 days ago

Hi Petra,
So what was the Balfour declaration of 1917, carried out in 1948.
The declaration says it was to provide a Jewish home in Palestine.

:Stuart-James.
:Stuart-James.
Reply to  Islander
22 days ago

Simple, they aren’t Israelites. The definition of a Jew is one begotten from adultery. That precludes any claim of title of the land. If we go by the word of our creator.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  :Stuart-James.
21 days ago

Strange logic.

I note your ‘creator’ has a small c, mine a CAPITAL!

:Stuart-James.
:Stuart-James.
Reply to  Islander
21 days ago

Fair comment. Just following rules of English grammar by default.
By their own hand, Jews state that their forefathers included Esau. That means their line is one of adultery and precludes them from the line of Israel.

Chris
Chris
Reply to  Islander
22 days ago

The actual trooff with a double “f” is that God gave that land to the Jews on condition that they honour the Covenant he made with them – what we know as the Ten Commandments; and he said (paraphrasing) that if they honoured the Covenant, they would become known as “the Chosen of God – and if they’d honoured the Covenant, they’d have every reason to call themselves the Chosen of God because the Covenant is a blueprint for world peace. God also stipulated what would happen to the Jews if they violated the Covenant – they would be scattered all over the face of the world and would only be able to return once three specific conditions had been fulfilled, only one of which conditions they were to have any input into and that’s that whatever country they live in, they must be good citizens and cause no harm or trouble; and the other two, it seems, are things that no-one has direct control over but must happen as in the natural process of evolution – and they violated the Covenant virtually straight away! – and two of those three conditions have yet to be fulfilled, and they’ve had questionable success with the first one. Around 200 years later, they put it into the mouth of God, “Wipe out the Amalekites” (who were their cousins, incidentally) “to the last thing that breathes” – and you can compare that to one commandment from the Ten – “Thou shalt not kill” – so you tell me. And a certain faction of Jews have been putting into the mouth of God whatever they want ever since. And these were the people who Christ continually admonished until they couldn’t bear it any more and had to kill him – “If Abraham had been your father, you would understand what I’m teaching; but your father is the Father of Lies”. And these people are the ones that have come down to the present time in the form of Jewish (and Christian) Zionists, and have been committing atrocities in Palestine since the Nakba – and are actually an illegal occupation anyway, and always have been, and have no legal, lawful or moral right to even be there (as you would’ve heard from the lawyer representing Sth Africa at the ICJ a bit over a year ago in his very lengthy summing up) – and are now hell bent on wiping out the Palestinians (“They are Amalek” – Netanyahu). Up to you what you believe but what I’ve said here is the result of over two years of intensive research (added to over fifteen years of research prior to October 7th) and listening to all kinds of people on the subject, a significant number of whom are Jewish academics, reporters and Rabbis. So this is why people say they’re a legal fiction state.

Islanderthat which He has spoken.
Islanderthat which He has spoken.
Reply to  Chris
21 days ago

God’s covenant to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob is 100% unconditional.

Unto thy seed will I GIVE this land. Genesis 12:7. (my emphasis).

It is recorded in various places, see Genesis 12:1-3, 7; 13:15-17; 15:5-7; 17:4-8; 24:7.

When these passages are studied together, it is abundantly apparent that the promise concerned (1) the land, (2) the people, and (3) the Messiah (in whom all the nations of the earth would be blessed). As Jehovah is a faithful God, He will keep all three parts of the covenant, and the fact that persons from nations other than the Jewish people are blessed in the Messiah is no proof that God will not keep His promises concerning the land and the nation. In fact it is a strong indication that He will perform all that which He has spoken.

The theology you advocate is known as replacement theology, and therefore people (more so Christians that follow this unbiblical theology) wonder why the Jews are back in their God given land-hence the term “legal fiction state”.

But the worst thing is with this abhorrent theology is that it promotes anti-Semitism.

Having said this, it is true that the covenant at Sinai was conditional, nevertheless, the Abrahamic covenant stands forever AMEN.

Islander
Islander

On my icon “That which He has spoken” put there by mistake!

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
21 days ago

Rhoda, as I believe in the doctrine of biblical predestination/election-I’m sure you’re right!

But, I think it would make me look a tad sanctimonious, especially with the capital H!

I must have had my hand over the icon box under the comment box when I was typing!

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Islander
21 days ago

I had just assumed you were employing some technique to get past the habitual “waiting for approval” message 🙂.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  A Person
21 days ago

If only I were that bright!!!

Off to bed now-of course its the morning where you are!

Every blessing in the Lord.

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Islander
21 days ago

Haha, too bright for me. I tried to go over some lengthy comments Rhoda referred to below (in a reply to Chris) from a previous article between you and her about Nephilim and had to conclude, ‘Wow, this is all too in depth for little me’.

And I mean I thought that conclusion literally when I read that you are six foot five, haha 🙂!

Reverend Scott
Reverend Scott
Reply to  :Stuart-James.
21 days ago

October 7th. Israel was attacked. They don’t muck about when attacked. Remember the Munich Olympics? Israel got revenge. I don’t blame them.

Sam
Sam
Reply to  Reverend Scott
21 days ago

Frame by frame analysis of much of the footage of the supposed attacks reveals glitches consistent with AI generated imagery. The most secure hi tech border in the world inexplicably failed on that day in multiple locations.

The IDF were inexplicably redeployed away from Gaza immediately prior to the attacks and they were stood down as the attacks took place. 

The music festival was inexplicably moved closer to Gaza immediately prior to the attacks. Most of the devastation was caused by tanks and helicopters that Hamas do not have. 

Cui bono? Certainly not the Palestinians who are being wiped out as a result of the false flag attack.

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
Reply to  Sam
21 days ago

Hi Sam,
Benjamin Mileikowsky used Operation Hannibal to kill all the Israeli’s at the music gathering.
27 helicopter gunships reloaded twice to kill all the Israeli people.

Sam
Sam
Reply to  Dave Owen
21 days ago

The Israeli people were in open revolt against the Bibi regime as they went full on totalitarian during the covid scam and thereafter. Many were refusing to do their national service in the IDF. Bibi punished them and then began enacting the long standing plan for a “Greater Israel”. The Israeli regime are truly evil and so are those that support or defend them.

Nina
Nina
Reply to  Sam
19 days ago

Absolutely.

Nina
Nina
Reply to  Sam
19 days ago

Exactly so, the IDF stood down and allowed it to happen as a reason to flatten Gaza.

:Stuart-James.
:Stuart-James.
Reply to  Reverend Scott
21 days ago

Newton’s third law !

Nina
Nina
Reply to  Reverend Scott
19 days ago

No Palestine was attacked and invaded in 1948, the indigenous people have been fighting back ever since . A recent study revealed none of the invaders were Semitic people but converted European Jews. The indigenous people are however Semitic.

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
22 days ago

Hi Rhoda,
This attack reminded me of the False Flag attack on a school in Scotland UK.
This attack was to get all the pistols in the UK out of private ownership.
Only the criminals have pistols now, not the honest public.
Tony blair was the PM at that time, another con man.
The same will happen in Australia now.

Reverend Scott
Reverend Scott
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
21 days ago

I like your thinking.

Chris
Chris
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
21 days ago

That’s great. I hadn’t seen it quite like that but it’s a good viewpoint and I take lessons from it. I’d just add that there’s another group in there who didn’t get a mention and who keep themselves pretty well-hidden; and they are quietly aiming for top slot and have been for centuries, if not millennia …..

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Dave Owen
22 days ago

Guns don’t kill-people do.

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
Reply to  Islander
22 days ago

Hi Islander,
You are correct.
However in the UK, the criminals have the handguns.
There was an 100 year ‘D’ notice on the school shooting.
Why would they not want the incident investigating ?

Reverend Scott
Reverend Scott
Reply to  Dave Owen
21 days ago

It might reveal the fact that police and certain elites were involved in procuring little boys…allegedly…

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Dave Owen
22 days ago

Well, yeah, they already did a major removal of guns from the public in Australia after the 1996 gun massacre in Port Arthur, Tasmania, which may very well have been a false flag from the point that, although c. 35 people did appear to die, it may have all been a deliberate setup.

Sure, they can remove even more guns with stricter gun laws now as they may do but is there a real long game being played? I mean, they are claiming an attack against Jews in Australia – is that for real? In Australia, they follow the same script as USA a lot of the time e.g. ‘COVID’ scamdemic waves at the same times of year USA had them. Except, while it was winter in USA and seemed somewhat plausible, it was the middle of summer in Australia. But it still worked from the point of view that people in Australia generally believed in a virus running rampant and they went and got injections. Similarly to the scamdemic, a Jewish attack in USA sounds more plausible because there’s a fair population of Jews there but in Australia, it’s a very small proportion of the population who would identify as Jewish. Combined with other things in the latest story (e.g. some guy with a head covered in blood that appears to have dried but he’s not in hospital, he’s just mooching around) and it looks like a possible false flag to me 🙂.

To have a guess at the long game, I’ll predict this (not my predictions – just stolen from a ‘why tee’ video):

1) in maybe a year’s time, the Gvt says, “Everybody needs to be scanned for metals to go into the Bondi Junction Shopping Centre, due to recent attacks” (do you remember the supposed Bondi Junction claimed ‘stabb1ngs’ of 2024 that hit international news?)

2) after that the Gvt says, “Now we’ll do the same metal detection scanning for everyone in all shopping centres nationwide”

3) a bit later the Gvt says, “Actually, people are complaining about the scanning being inconvenient but we’ll introduce a way around it. If you get digital ID, you don’t have to line up in long lines to be screened”.

Same playbook as the scamdemic: if you get an injection, you don’t need to wear a mask so it will be more convenient for you.

Chris
Chris
Reply to  A Person
21 days ago

They pulled the same stunt in New Zealand with the mosque shooting. The guy was a radicalised Aussie who came over here, joined a gun club, bought the rifles he wanted, tried to indoctrinate the other guys at the gun club and was snapped by a police officer – who did nothing – and a few days later went on a killing spree and killed a number of Moslems ……. but the end result was all semi-auto weapons were taken off honest New Zealanders – but the gangs kept theirs. Later conspiracy theories say that nobody died, it was all staged, but I’m not so sure about that. Seems to be all of a piece with other shootings around the Western world ….

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Chris
21 days ago

Yes well, even though I’m a Christian, I’ve gone right off the theory of M0slems causing a lot of these well known events in western countries (despite the fact that verses in their holy book do mention doing things to Jews and Christians I think).

A lot just seem to me to be false flags and the M0slems being blamed unjustly. I didn’t investigate the Christchurch sh00t1ng much but I did find some interesting four minute footage on it called “I don’t recall this footage from Christchurch being released, but there it is” by a bloke who calls himself ‘the Prisoner’, on br1ghte0n.

The footage suggests to me it was a false flag staged event – although who knows?

All my comments are getting stopped so I’ll try to include the l1nk in a second comment, if this one goes straight through without being blocked for approval.

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
21 days ago

Thanks, Rhoda. I wasn’t aware of a difference.

The Christchurch footage is at brighteon dot com/f6375447-786d-4d37-b119-653c89e6ead5 .

Of course, I guess I’ll get ‘waiting for approval’ again like I’m getting virtually every time I make a comment, no matter how I write. It’s so exhausting.

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
21 days ago

Thanks, Rhoda. And lol, I was pleasantly surprised that my last one with the brighteon footage went straight through 🙂.

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
Reply to  A Person
20 days ago

Hi A Person,
Now I remember, the young lad who killed the 35 people could not remember any of the killings.
So was he under mind control ?

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Dave Owen
20 days ago

To be honest, I haven’t looked into it all too diligently so I’m not too sure exactly how it could have been done 🙂. They say the CIA (or in Australia, ASIO is their national ‘equivalent’) mind controls people, so maybe.

Certainly it’s been claimed that the accused, Martin Bryant, wasn’t too bright, that the shoe ting required brilliant marksmanship that a none-too-bright non-gun-user shouldn’t be capable of and other reasons as well. So the prevailing conspy theory, I think, is that Martin didn’t actually do the shoe ting.

I got into it a bit when Why Tee suggested a vibeo by this guy “The Wasp Files” on it. That guy has looked into the thing in huge detail and has many hours of footage on it and he’s suggesting it was all a setup.

I thought there was an interesting line in an article I only saw a day or so ago, on a site suggested by the insightful ‘Nicole’ on here.

The line is: “This is the same lawyer that convinced Martin Bryant’s mother to tell him she would not visit him unless he entered a guilty plea, a questionable move that would seal his fate in court” from the article ’13 Questions Surrounding the 1996 Port Arthur Massacre’ from tottnews dot c . So I’m guessing that if you’re not too bright, maybe it doesn’t take a whole lot of brainwashing to convince you to take the blame for a mass shoe ting.

Nicole
Nicole
Reply to  Dave Owen
22 days ago

Hi Dave,
It already happened here with the Port Arthur shootings…to get our guns off us. Then-PM was John Howard.
An excellent, in-depth, evidence-based analysis was written about it by Ethan Nash of TOTTNews.com here in Australia.

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Nicole
22 days ago

That site looks interesting, thanks Nicole.

Nicole
Nicole
Reply to  Dave Owen
22 days ago

*Port Arthur massacre – April 1996, Tasmania.
35 dead, 23 injured.
Martin Bryant was accused and jailed.
It worked…they got our guns.

Reverend Scott
Reverend Scott
Reply to  Dave Owen
21 days ago

You make a good point. First thing they are thinking about is more gun control! Criminals don’t care. Less gun control would create a very polite society. You never know if that speccy need is quick on the draw….

J Guti
J Guti
22 days ago

Wahhabism/ISIS is a creation of British Empire (Rothschild’s) & House of Saud. Just like Al Qaeda was created by the Carter admin (w/ Zbigniew Brezezinski) to attack the Soviet satellites.

Both are creations of western (CIA, MI6 & Mossad) intelligence agencies.

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
22 days ago

Genocide can make people do crazy things…
Poor Charkie Kirk still waiting an Expose article on the truth of his assassination.
On the payroll like so many…

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Paul Watson
22 days ago

Dunno about ‘poor’ Charlie Kirk – but maybe! There was a trapdoor that seemed to be right about where Chuck went down and they are good with holograms these days, as referenced in the vibeo ‘CHARLIE KIRK: its WORSE than you THINK (BANNED DOCUMENTARY)‘ by ‘REVELATIONS OF JESUS CHRIST‘ (a whopping 4 hour doco but the trapdoor is referenced around about 1 hour 15 mins in, I see).

Hopefully for his sake, he’s been taken somewhere and is doing fine 🙂.

Like with Bondi Beach, if people really dyed, then that’s sad but I don’t trust the telly a whole lot…

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
Reply to  A Person
21 days ago

Suggest you watch Jimmy Dore, Baron Coleman and Candace Owens on You tube.

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Paul Watson
21 days ago

I’ve seen Jimmy a number of times but his swearing exhausts me. Candace can be okay. Certain things they say put me off. Never heard of Baron. I might give him a crack.

Personally, I subscribe a fair bit to the theory that if someone is majorly pushed on mainstream TV (or even really high up in ‘alternative’ channels, like Candace, Alex Jones or Tucker Carlson), there is a reason that they are allowed to continually broadcast and are not shut down.

I’m also not a super big fan of the “right”. I’m more of a total TV sceptic of all major players and merely see politics, generally speaking as “Well, the people on the right I prefer over the people on the left but I’m not sure that I confidently trust a single one of them!”

E.g. I preferred Trumpy to Biden in regards to the injections because Trumpy didn’t push the mandates and Joey did – but they both recommended getting the shots so I don’t really trust either a terrific amount…

“Revelations of Jesus Christ” ministries, on the other hand, were always vehemently against the shots and, naturally, cop problems from Why Tee and can do some really interesting stuff.

Just my opinion, thanks.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  A Person
20 days ago

‘Alternative’ gone mainstream! The ‘alternative’ lot will have to rebrand themselves!

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Islander
20 days ago

Yes! I first was told the concept of ‘controlled opposition’ around 2022.

But it makes sense to me now. Like if you have these major players like Alex Jones or Tucker, for example, and they do major shows on how the injection is bad but never, ever entertain the idea for one second that there may be no ‘COVID’ virus, that screams ‘controlled opposition’ to me now. Sure, someone can disagree with that and believe there is such a virus, but to never mention the idea at all screams dodginess.

Also, so many of these people on the right like Alex Jones talk as though they follow God and are Christian, yet are swearing and blaspheming so much. Even if you’re a Christian who believes swearing is okay, would you do it on air a lot when your followers are largely Christian? That’s another thing that screams ‘controlled oppositon’ to me. Oh well, that’s my theories, I talk too much…

Islander
Islander
Reply to  A Person
20 days ago

No!!! You don’t talk enough!!!

Goodnight.

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Islander
20 days ago

Haha, thanks a lot, you too.

Have a good sleep, may God bless you 🙂.

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
22 days ago

Get the real news on YT Jake GTV

Petra
Petra
22 days ago

The cause in westen countries is always the same: import of Muslims.

Only when we accept that plain fact, we will be able to do something about these acts of violence.

Paul
Paul
21 days ago

Australia’s PM Anthony Albanese and his Home Affairs minister Tony Burke are willing to see our babies (10 years old girl) get slaughtered simply to win the Islamic vote in south west Sydney suburbs. Neither Albanese or Burke have uttered any comment on the anti semitic culture in Australia even since October 7th.. We Australians have had enough of this pro Palestine policy from the Australian Labor Party (whatever Palestine is)?

Oliver J
Oliver J
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
21 days ago

The ship is sinking. freedomarticles.com video 264.

:Stuart-James.
:Stuart-James.
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
21 days ago

There are several sources, plus crises actors are now exposed.

:Stuart-James.
:Stuart-James.
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
20 days ago

They are in your face! If you choose to ignore, that is up to you. Plus only by your own actions can you validate the source. No one can do that for you.

:Stuart-James.
:Stuart-James.
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
20 days ago

Yes, stop making excuses and do your research.

P T
P T
21 days ago

“Gas the Jews” was not said, as stated by NSW police.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9FQCjq9kF4

This was reported in Australian Jewish News

https://www.australianjewishnews.com/no-evidence-antisemitic-phrase-was-chanted-at-opera-house/

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
20 days ago

“The Exposé relies solely on your support to allow us to report the facts the mainstream refuses”
Really?
Hundreds of articles in the MSM about Bondi Beach.
Not one about the Charlie Kirk assassination.
Fact that the crime scence was paved over 2 days after the event should raise red flags to anyone with a functioning brain.
Stop hiding behind scripture and confront the evil that exists…

Frank
Frank
20 days ago

FAKE

Cabra
Cabra
20 days ago

Rhoda Wilson:
 
You censored my comment because it doesn’t fit your narrative (the Bondi Beach shooting is due to Muslim immigration and not due to:
1/the genocide in Palestine,
2/ a false flag perpetrated by Israeli agents and/or the current Australian totalitarian regime.

I am not trying to undermine the Muslim immigration problem in the west, far from it, we are flooded by Muslims but we can thank Jews for that in the first place.
 
Tell me Rhoda, what is the difference between your website and the mainstream media?
 
None, since you censor like the MSM does and you do not tolerate other opinions than you own narrative.
 
Here are the statements I read on your site:
 
‘’ The Exposé is run by extremely ordinary, hardworking people who are sick and tired of the fear-mongering, lies and propaganda perpetuated by the mainstream media.’’
 
The Exposé is run by you and you are peddling fear mongering but the kind of fear mongering that suits your agenda.
 
‘’ Unlike many outlets that publish unverified claims or push biased narratives, we focus on evidence, transparency, and truth.’’
 
Really, what are your evidences that the shooting wasn’t perpetrated by some intel agency like Mossad using two useful idiots to do so?
What is your evidence (unless you were there that day), that evry thing which the mainstream media showed us is really what happened?
 
None. You rely on news agencies that are part of the lying media system.
 
So, keep censoring real debate and push your little narrative as much as you want, you discredited yourself and lost a regular reader.
 
And as you don’t want my comments, you won’t have my money either.

Nina
Nina
19 days ago

It was yet another ridiculous psyop.