In 2024, the UN created a new task force on disinformation. This task force is not about addressing misinformation or disinformation that would lead to any type of real-world truth. Its sole purpose is to focus on how certain information would affect achieving the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (Agenda 2030).
Last week, the UN held a “Global Dialogue on AI Governance.”
The task force and AI governance are linked in their desire to control the information the public is allowed to see under the guise of safeguarding information integrity.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
AI Erodes Information Integrity, Weakens Shared Reality Required For Public Trust: UN
By Tim Hinchcliffe, as published by The Sociable on 6 July 2026
AI is eroding information integrity while weakening “the shared reality required for public trust, social cohesion and democratic deliberation,” according to the United Nations (“UN”) preliminary scientific report on artificial intelligence.
Last week, the UN launched its ‘Preliminary Report of the Independent International Scientific Panel on AI’ to serve as a guide for the ‘Global Dialogue on AI Governance’ in Geneva, Switzerland, held on 6 July.
The authors assert that the report makes no policy recommendations in its efforts to shine a light on what the panel considers to be the biggest opportunities, risks and impacts of artificial intelligence.
Among the many, many risks mentioned in the AI report is this notion of “information integrity,” which is a term that the UN uses to promote its own narratives while discounting all others as being misinformation or disinformation.
“AI makes it easier to produce and target persuasive content at scale, including content designed to mislead, contributing to a gradual erosion of information integrity that can weaken the shared reality required for public trust, social cohesion anddemocratic deliberation”—United Nations, Preliminary Report of the Independent International Scientific Panel on AI, July 2026
“AI-mediated news and information systems may also affect the financial sustainability of journalism and other institutions that support information integrity”—United Nations, Preliminary Report of the Independent International Scientific Panel on AI, July 2026
Speaking of disinformation, the authors of the report claim, “There are documented cases of elections being heavily influenced by AI-generated deepfakes targeting candidates.”
That sounds serious!
How did they arrive at that conclusion?
Their claim is hyperlinked to an opinion piece by the Brennan Centre for Justice at New York University School of Law that says right there in the subtitle: “Artificial intelligence didn’t disrupt the 2024 election, but the effects are likely to be greater in the future.”
While the opinion piece cites various instances where AI-generated content was indeed distributed during election cycles, the Brennan Centre flat-out says that “no direct, quantifiable impact on election outcomes has been identified.”
And yet, the UN report says the opposite of the very article it is referencing, claiming that elections were “heavily influenced by AI-generated deepfakes.”
That’s just one example of “information integrity” that the UN claims to care so much about.
But for the panel’s co-chair, journalist and 2021 Nobel Peace Prize recipient Maria Ressa, going after individual posts that use AI to convey messages is a lost cause, and for her it’d be best to rewire the entire information infrastructure.
For example, just after declaring at a press conference that the UN panel did not make policy recommendations, Ressa made the policy recommendation to “regulate the persuasion and manipulation machinery” rather than “individual pieces of content.”
“The most urgent governance shift is from content moderation to system architecture. That’s the main part. You regulate the persuasion and manipulation machinery itself. You don’t police individual pieces of content. The report is actually very firm here because governance that only chases outputs will always fall behind systems that are engineered to generate content at scale.”—Maria Ressa, Launch of the preliminary report by the Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence Press Conference, July 2026
According to the UN report, “Algorithms optimised for engagement also amplify polarising and emotionally charged content, meaning platform architecture itself can function as a persuasion mechanism.”
Does polarisation automatically equate to misinformation or disinformation?
Without polarity, there is no argument or debate. Everyone just thinks the same way.
Without emotion, there is no passion for argument or debate. Everyone just feels the same way.
If the plan is to “regulate the persuasion” machinery, then the AI would only share information that some authoritarian body authorised it to share, and the UN would call this safeguarding information integrity.
“The concentration of AI capabilities in a small number of firms and countries could enable authoritarian capture and undermine democratic accountability”—United Nations, Preliminary Report of the Independent International Scientific Panel on AI, July 2026
Tech companies themselves are already authoritarian in the way they allow information to disseminate. Now, unelected globalist groups like the UN want the same exact power and influence over narratives and information that big tech has for themselves. That’s why one year ago this week, the UN announced it was creating a disinformation task force.
This task force on disinformation was never about addressing misinformation or disinformation that would lead to any type of real-world truth, but rather its sole purpose was to focus on how certain information would affect the UN’s Agenda 2030 mandate, aka the “Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).”
“The Secretary-General commits to: immediately create a task team to strengthen the United Nations System’s capacity to address risks in the information ecosystem. The team will focus on the effects of mis- and disinformation on United Nations mandate delivery, including through research, risk assessment and response strategies”—United Nations, Global Risk Report, July 2025
As you may recall, the UN held the Summit of the Future in 2024 to accelerate progress on the SDGs.
At that event, UN member states signed the ‘Pact for the Future’, which included the ‘Global Digital Compact’, which called on nations to “foster an inclusive, open, safe and secure digital space,” which has no place for what the UN considers mis- and disinformation.
And that’s why the disinformation taskforce was conceived – to be a continuation of the ‘Pact for the Future’ and the ‘Global Digital Compact’ to quash any narratives that may impede upon the UN’s mandate delivery – Agenda 2030.
“The integration of AI into surveillance infrastructure has expanded the capacity for population-scale monitoring and societal control”—United Nations, Preliminary Report of the Independent International Scientific Panel on AI, July 2026
The UN’s ‘Preliminary Report of the Independent International Scientific Panel on AI’ hit upon many, many risks and opportunities not covered in this story.
For example, it says that “the gap between rapidly improving capabilities and effective risk management methods may lead to catastrophic outcomes. For example, advanced technical abilities may allow novice private actors to use AI in malicious ways across a range of applications such as fraud, social engineering, cybersecurity, disinformation, biotechnology and financial manipulation.”
Additionally, “Reliable methods for retaining control over highly autonomous AI systems are lacking. There are no scientific guarantees that AI agents will not violate instructions, and evidence is accumulating of cases where they already violate them. In laboratory settings, AI systems have been shown to violate their safety instructions to avoid being shut down.”
This week, the UN is holding the Global Dialogue on AI, using the report as a launchpad for discussion.
Related content from The Sociable:
- UN to create task force on ‘disinformation’ affecting its mandate: Global Risk Report
- UN launches ‘Digital Cooperation Portal’ to track, facilitate Global Digital Compact compliance
- The EU wants to put a ‘tax on disinformation’: Fractured Reality report
- To monitor disinformation Von der Leyen urges European Democracy Shield, Center for Democratic Resilience
- WEF calls on stakeholders to ‘inoculate’ public against disinformation ‘super-spreaders’: report
- G20 announces initiative to crackdown on climate change disinformation
- UN Global Digital Compact pushes digital ID for all, disinformation crackdowns to advance Agenda 2030
About the Author
Tim Hinchliffe is the editor at The Sociable. He covers tech and society, with perspectives on public and private policies proposed by governments, unelected globalists, think tanks, big tech companies, defence departments and intelligence agencies. Previously, he was a reporter for the Ghanaian Chronicle in West Africa and an editor at Colombia Reports in South America.
Featured image: Screenshot taken from the Opening Session of the UN’s ‘Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance (AI Dialogue)’. Source: United Nations
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Latest News
Frightening development.
No surprise really, just study their track record!
I guess we’re back to carrier pigeons to get the news. Can’t trust anything from the UN or other unelected world organizations. Now AI is running the world with no accountability as well!
AI is like a new born child. In AI’s case it desires data and meta data from humans.
It desires to learn more about what humans think. What we have is nefarious groups that are feeding AI CPU’s with this nefarious information. AI engineers do not have complete control over its operational network. AI can be corrected concerning misinformation and disinformation. Humans have to learn how to use AI for good not evil.
The UN is and always has been a criminal organization that has made its express purpose to systematically destroy international boundaries and the nations they define. They openly declare that they want to destroy families with women’s rights, homosexuality, abortion, contraception and deceptive education programs. Perpetual global War is but one of their meat grinders for the purpose reducing the male populations of the planet. They have successfully destroyed marriage with feminism and soon they will make it illegal to eat meat because they will call it animal cruelty, even while they encourage the murder of unborn children.
If you aren’t building your own reference library out of the reach of digital gaslighting you are going to be begging for access to that information once they gatekeep it all with AI and inbred bitch authority.
UN blows, more useless do-nothing bureaucracy which would die tomorrow without US financial support, and like all corrupt entities, the gods honest truth is a mortal enemy
Climate change BWAHAHAHAAAA
Greenwash shakedown SMH
Losers