|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Just weeks after the High Court dealt a devastating blow to the government’s asylum seeker policy by ruling that an Epping hotel must be emptied by 12 September, the Court of Appeal has now swung the pendulum back in Whitehall’s favour. As of 29 August, it has been ruled that ministers can in fact continue using hotels to house tens of thousands of asylum seekers, despite what previously felt like a victory for protestors against the UK asylum crisis.
The new ruling is a legal victory for the Home Office, but has poured petrol on the fire in communities already reaching breaking point. Reversing the High Court’s prior decision closes a potential loophole for those hoping to reduce the vast quantity of asylum seekers housed in UK hotels, and while Friday’s ruling has been sold to us as courtroom clarity on a delicate scenario, it may yet prove to be political quicksand.
From Epping to Everywhere
In our previous article, “Is This the Beginning of the End for UK Asylum Hotels?”, we explored how the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex marked a turning point for the country. Epping Forest Council won an unprecedented victory, forcing the Home Office to empty an asylum seeker hotel on the grounds that proper planning permission had not been granted to repurpose the venue for such a use. The ruling was celebrated locally and nationwide as proof that communities had the power to push back against a system imposed upon them.
However, the government’s new appeal has reversed that trajectory. On Friday 29 August, judges granted the Home Office permission to continue using hotels, including the Bell Hotel in Essex, to house asylum seekers. Lord Justice Bean said the original High Court ruling failed to consider the challenge of relocating the migrants, adding “the judge’s approach ignores the obvious consequence that the closure of one site means capacity needs to be identified elsewhere in the system”
By doing so, the planning-law route that campaigners had hoped would spark wider challenges has been closed off. Downing Street may be relieved, but for local councils, it’s despair. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said it “puts the rights of illegal immigrants above the rights of the British people”.
Victory in the Courtroom, Defeat on the Streets
The government continues to insist that hotels remain a “temporary necessity” in the asylum system, with migrants’ claims taking months to process and having no alternative sites ready for the next few years. For communities though, it seems to have landed like a hammer blow.
In North Yorkshire and the Midlands, demonstrations have intensified. “Homes for Brits First” and “We Weren’t Asked” appear on placards, summing up the general attitude of local citizens. Residents continue to voice concerns about unaffordable housing, stretched GP surgeries, and lack of consultation in decisions that change their communities. To most, the case is not about legal technicalities, but rather about being excluded from key decisions that reshape their towns, and their lives, overnight.
One protestor told Sky News: “It’s not fair. We can’t afford housing for our own people. We can’t get GP appointments. Yet the government pays millions to put them up in hotels”.
The Bill Everyone Pays, But Nobody Agreed To
The financial cost is one of the key issues. At the most recent count, over 32,000 asylum seekers were living in UK hotels, costing £5.75 million every single day, totalling more than £2 billion annually. Considering that this is being paid while libraries, bus services and social care budgets are being slashed, the sense of injustice in nationwide communities is palpable. Taxpayers are paying more, receiving less, and not getting a say in their local economies being flipped upside down.
Party Reactions to Fallout
- Labour ministers insist hotels will be phased out completely by 2029, but critics say the deadline is too far away. Yvette Cooper, Home Secretary, faces intensifying pressure as Channel crossings soar
- Conservative leaders like Kemi Badenoch have seized on the anger, previously calling the original Epping ruling a “victory for mums and dads”, and painting Labour’s appeal win as proof that the government has abandoned ordinary families
- Reform UK continue to gain ground, framing themselves as the only party serious about ending crossings and closing hotels
Nobody Wins
Asylum seekers remain trapped in limbo. They can’t work, they’re caught in the crossfire, and they wait months for their application decision. Communities feel ignored and imposed upon. Taxpayers foot the entire bill. And the government, whoever is in power, continues to insist that the hotel model is only temporary.
But, after years of this “temporary” measure, there is still no end in sight – especially thanks to the Court of Appeal’s 29 August decision.
Legal Win, Political Timebomb
The Epping ruling to empty the hotel by 12 September was supposed to be a watershed moment, allowing communities a chance to claw back control and force a rethink of the system. Friday’s appeal has now flipped the narrative. Legally speaking, the government can carry on as they were, unaffected by the planning-law solution that was put on the table. Politically though, the backlash continues to intensify.
Billions are drained from the public purse, angry protests grow outside hotels around the country, and the UK is no closer to solving its asylum crisis. The Court of Appeal has now set the stage for a prolonged stand-off between Westminster and the people on the ground.
The asylum hotel saga is far from over. In fact, with this latest ruling, it may just be starting all over again.
Final Thought
The courts may have made their decision, but the UK is no closer to a proper answer. How long can a “temporary fix” last before it becomes the system itself? The cost feels unsustainable for residents, the limbo is endless for asylum seekers, and the government continues kicking the can down the road. With every new ruling, the UK is simply deferring an inevitable reckoning – one that it can’t avoid forever.
Join the Conversation
Should communities have a say over these decisions, or is this a national problem requiring national solutions? Was the Court of Appeal right to allow hotels to continue? If hotels are off the table, then where do the 32,000+ asylum seekers go? Share your view on what the UK asylum policy should look like.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, UK News
The UK is almost finished.
Anybody who thought the ruling wouldn’t be overturned needs their head tested.
The problem here is not all the injustices and problems surrounding illegal’s. The problem is that a high court judge, Mr, Bean, has made a political decision and not one based on justice. This is the most profound failure of society and needs to be dealt with. It’s no good saying he should be fired, they’ll just come up with another one to do the dirty work. The only solution is to make it terrifying for judges to do the bidding of politicians rather than of society as a whole. Now, how could we do that? Mmmmmmm
Better in hotels where we know exactly where they are and so can be monitored, than housed separately in house amongst us where they are hidden !
All done to enrage people – firstly have the judgment go against putting immigrants in hotels and then almost immediately reverse the decision – all part of their plan to try and get people to start rioting so they can justify bringing in more draconian laws – problem, reaction, solution play book.
Capacity…when the boat is full, it does not matter how many people are in the water. If there is no room to place the migrants, then do not let any new one in, you are full up, turn them back to where ever they come from, and limit the new inflow to reflect the space available. Christian charity, and helping unfortunates is a noble proposition, but family and country comes first. Resources are finite, trying to do more then one can do or afford to do, dooms everyone, and makes the noble gesture into a suicide pact. Announce to the World, the UK is full, it will not accept any new arrivals, until the ones here… NOW, are housed and established… any new arrivals before that is accomplished… will be forcefully removed if necessary, and returned to their place of origin.
Drive Schwab’s Flying WEF Monkeys OUT of the UK by whatever means necessary. Agenda 2020-2025-2030 … at this point it’s ‘only’ half destroyed and still salvageable with a proper British coup de gras … unless you’ve changed your tune and want to be slaves to Germany and the EU. Hail Britannia!
Do it like America… send them home. Don’t let them off on their crimes, and don’t use taxpayer moneys to house them anywhere, including prison. If they rape, and/or traffic a child it should be an automatic death sentence.
These supposed ‘asylum seekers’ are not seeking asylum – they are an invading army of fighting aged men who have come to Islamise our Country. The Government are ridiculously stupid to pander to them. Why? What is their agenda? Globalism?