|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
By Dr Sam Bailey We are now over four years into the COVID-19 fraud and while many things have changed, confusion remains the dominant theme. More people are coming to the realisation that there was no pandemic but there are also plenty of people ramping up “bioweapons” and “gain of function” narratives. Amongst this we have also seen the introduction of a new side-stepping argument that, “virus existence is not important”.
In 2020, we started investigating the virus model and came to the realisation that SARS-CoV-2 did not exist. In fact, there was no scientific evidence that any viruses existed, dating back to the late 1800s literature and the so-called Tobacco Mosaic “Virus”. Those critiquing virology have pointed out that no entity that meets the description of a virus has ever been physically isolated. In order to maintain the illusion, the virologists have not performed properly controlled experiments such as those proposed in the “Settling the Virus Debate” Statement. Indeed, Dr Stefan Lanka had shown that various indirect findings claimed as evidence for viruses are produced by the experimental methodologies themselves.
In 2022, Mark published A Farewell to Virology (Expert Edition), a formal refutation of almost every aspect of the virus model. As with other works that ‘no virus‘ proponents have produced there has been no direct response to the overall thesis. Instead we have only seen attempts to change the subject, cloud the established definitions of words or introduce new unfalsifiable hypotheses. There is no ‘third way’ when it comes to virus existence and this sophistry only distracts from the fact that no ‘pathogens’ of any type have been shown to exist. The real world human and animal experiments that set out to demonstrate “contagious” entities that cause diseases such as influenza and common colds were monumental flops.
In this video we investigate why realising that viruses do not exist is a pivotal step for reducing fear and creating a better society.
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/The-Final-Pandemic:5
References
- The COVID-19 Fraud & War on Humanity, Dr Mark Bailey & Dr John Bevan-Smith, 2021
- “Dr. Peter McCullough Says He Has Seen A Picture Of A Virus Up Close”, Dr Sam Bailey, 20 Nov 2022
- “The Follies of Peter McCullough”, Dr Sam Bailey, 16 Sep 2023
- “‘VIRUSES DO NOT EXIST’ was a Psyop”, Igor Chudov, 6 Nov 2022
- The “Settling The Virus Debate” Statement, 14 Jul 2022
- HIV – A Virus Like No Other, The Perth Group, 12 Jul 2017
- A Farewell To Virology (Expert Edition), Dr Mark Bailey, 15 Sep 2022
- Gain of function videos, Dr Sam Bailey
- “Project Veritas and the ‘Virus’”, Dr Sam Bailey, 18 Feb 2023
- “The End of COVID” (90 sessions)
- Ivor Cummins and Doc Malik on YouTube
- Ivor Cummins on the missing virus: ‘Let me be honest. I’m gonna lie to you’ – Eric Coppolino
- “Lab Leak: An Elaborate Misdirection?”, Health Freedom Defense Fund, 7 Feb 2024
- The Great Taking, David Rogers Webb, 2023 (free e-book)
- “Conversations with Dr. Tom Cowan & Friends: #74: Michael O’Bernicia”, Dr Tom Cowan, 31 Jan 2024
Source Dr Sam Bailey at – https://drsambailey.com/
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News
To Drs Bailey, Cowan, Kaufmann, Lanka et al., if we rename Virus to Pathogen, will this solve the argument?? I was thinking of you when reading Dr Hazan’s findings.
Worth listening to. Very impressive 9 mins! Hazan claims to have FULLY identified the C-19 virus and says it is alive for up to 45 days; Kaufmann, Lanka and others, what do they say to this?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7v527mJaPDvq/
Contagious microscopic diseases are real, call them what you wish.
There are only toxins/poisons and parasites. Illness is the body working through its process or healing. I will protect my 1sr amendment rights by saying this is just a theory I have derived from my own research. You should do the same.
Drs Bailey, Cowan, Kauffman, Lanka et al.; If we rename ‘Virus’ to Pathogen would this settle the argument?? Personally I keep an open mind.
Worth listening to. Very impressive 9 mins! Hazan claims to have FULLY identified the C-19 virus and says it is alive for up to 45 days; Kaufmann, Lanka et al., what do they say to this?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7v527mJaPDvq/
Christine Massey mentions in the video “THE EVIDENCE THAT VIRUSES DO NOT EXIST (official data) with Christine Massey” on Bright ion (from around 22:50 on) that she’s written to 220+ actual health/science institutions, asking for a record of “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification (or sometimes just for the isolation/purification of any virus that there is vaccination on the vaccine schedule for) and says that none have provided or cited any record of any such viruses, in the manner that Christine has requested it.
Christine’s website, fluoridefreepeel dot ca shows many examples of response letters that she received.
Bailey, Cowan, Kauffman, Lanka et al.; If we rename ‘Virus’ to Pathogen would this settle the argument?? Personally I keep an open mind.
Worth listening to. Very impressive 9 mins! Hazan claims to have FULLY identified the C-19 virus and says it is alive for up to 45 days; Kaufmann, Lanka et al., what do they say to this?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7v527mJaPDvq/
Drs Bailey, Cowan, Kauffman, Lanka et al.; If we rename ‘Virus’ to Pathogen would this settle the argument?? Personally I keep an open mind.
Worth listening to. Very impressive 9 mins! Hazan claims to have FULLY identified the C-19 virus and says it is alive for up to 45 days; Kaufmann, Lanka et al., what do they say to this? com/video/7v527mJaPDvq/
add https://www.bitchute.
Drs Bailey, Cowan, Kauffman, Lanka et al.; If we rename ‘Virus’ to Pathogen would this settle the argument?? Personally I keep an open mind.
Worth listening to. Very impressive 9 mins! Hazan claims to have FULLY identified the C-19 virus and says it is alive for up to 45 days; Kaufmann, Lanka et al., what do they say to this?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/7v527mJaPDvq/
I dont watch videos but could you please elaborate on “Hazan claims to have FULLY identified the C-19 virus and says it is alive for up to 45 days”. What methods were used exactly? Even virologists dont claim that viruses are living.
Confusion and jargon is the total net zero game and that’s what it is. The Hegel Society came up with a concept of causing a panic for disruption until the public asked that it be dealt with, a useful political tool. Covid was used to control us demanding cures be found, and Global Warming so net zero might be accepted. Question and resist, its a nothing cure for a nothing problem so the greedy can control the fighting for crumbs falling off their table. We will not live in the proposed bee hive!
In 2011, I had come to the conclusion that all vaccines are a fraud and all injure the recipients. Over the next decade I became aware of the infection. /terrain debate and noted that, since 1934, doctors who opposed the medical model tended to be locked up, socially destroyed, or just plan deaded.By 2012 I was satisfied I had proof that autism was caused by vaccinations in a 7-stage process, variable. When covid came along, I headed for the hills. No PCR or jabs for me. But by then I knew who was responsible and who we had to defeat to restore freedom and prosperity once again. Because nobody will believe me, I will have to do it myself. Such is life, Thank you, Sam. You are a warrior of the first order.
You can see viruses under a very high-powered microscope.Husband has been a virologist for over 50 yrs and worked with coronavirus, which is what covid was originally called. Maybe the reason why science institutions don’t want to show the virus is because it’s been altered, did you think of that? What do you think causes contation?
I think you mean contagion? Your husband may have been a virologist for 50 years, but what does that mean? Contagion is but a theory, nothing more. People have been believing and teaching lies for millennia…
I too have worked with “coronavirus” and also looked at “viruses” using a very high-powered microscope (electron microscope). What myself and your husband have actually been looking at are extracellular vesicles, intracellular breakdown products, and artifacts of the harsh treatments used to perform EM on dead samples. These are not replication competent infectious disease causing particles.
Science institutions have in fact shown many pictures of “the virus” which range so much in size and morphology that it cannot possibly be the same thing although the authors claim that it is. These particles have not been purified in order to determine their composition and function.
I recently wrote an article which contains many examples of failure to demonstrate contagion for The Expose: The Contagion Myth: Failure to Demonstrate Transmission of “Viral” Diseases. BY PATRICIA HARRITY ON MARCH 1, 2024 .
So no mention of toxins & radiation. Which I believe (through research) cause most disease.
If viruses do not exist I offer this challenge to these people. Let an animal diagnosed with the rabies virus bite you. If viruses do not exist you can refuse the rabies vax with zero worries.
Your comment made me laugh!
Check this out by Mike Stone https://expose-news.com/2024/02/12/the-infectious-myth-busted-the-germ-duel/
In the article he says:
“Oftentimes when dealing with the defenders of the germ “theory” of disease, we are challenged to similar “germ duels” where, in order to maintain our honor and support our challenge to their positive claim (which they mistakenly believe has been satisfied due to a hundred years of pseudoscientific experimentation), we must demonstrate a willingness to “risk our lives” for it while they get to sit back on fraudulent evidence that they feel is sufficient.
We are supposed to subject ourselves to various so-called “pathogenic” agents in order to disprove “infection” and “contagion.” This is a defensive tactic that is employed once the germ “theory” defenders realize that they have no scientific evidence on their side supporting their belief in invisible “pathogenic” boogeymen.
Thus, it somehow becomes “logical” in their minds to demand that we jump through ridiculous hoops in order to satisfy their outlandish scenarios in place of their having to provide experimental evidence that validates the positive claims that they make. It’s an attempt to logically fallaciously shift the burden of proof onto us so that they do not have to defend their position with scientific evidence.
Personally, I’ve been told to get bit by a rabid dog, sleep with someone who has an STD, inject myself with HIV-positive blood, sit inside a tuberculosis ward, and take care of an Ebola patient without adequate protection.”
How about you do it and prove your point??
Cor! I’ll have to read that again! But I think it makes sense upon my first reading-an upvote from me.
The Spanish Flu (experiment) was directly transferred from sick people via spittle and nasal excretions to healthy people who did not contract the disease. It was even tried on Horses with same outcome.
Virology is junk science. Germ theory was proven false a long time ago and all they did was change the boogieman to “virus”.
All vaccines are poison and has never eradicated or
prevented anything but good health.
Germ theory has not been proven false at all – this is nonsense. Bacteria are known to exist, have been isolated and defined in great detail, and it is known full well that if certain bacteria get in the wrong places in our bodies they can make us very ill and indeed kill us. A good example is gut bacteria that helps us break down our food – a synergistic relationship, but if these bacteria escape the digestive tract (eg through perforation of the bowel) they will make us ill and likely kill us if left untreated. My wife recently suffered from this very condition and the treatments administered – founded at least in part on germ theory – saved her life.
Much less is known about “viruses” and I don’t argue that the theories surrounding them can and should be questioned.
Terrain theory has plenty of merit – but that does not mean to say that germ theory is unfounded – it is perfectly feasible that both are at least partially true.
I totally agree with everything you say except for the “viruses” bit. Please see my articles for further details about virology: “The Virus Challenge: A Guide for the Purple-Pilled” and ““Virology is a Fraudulent Pseudoscience and is a Dying Field” according to Biomedical Scientist” published in The Expose.
“Germs” are bacteria & parasites (many are beneficial). Not viruses which have never been proven to exist
Virus (Latin = Toxin)
Hi Patricia,
As I am not a doctor or scientist, I rely on other observations.
In the UK our coins are made out of steel.
People were sticking coins onto the C19 injection site.
So to me, the arm was now magnetic.
What could cause this.
The C19 fluid has Graphene Oxide in it.
The masks people were wearing had GO contamination.
The PCR test probes had GO contamination.
I was refused entry to a UK hospital, because I refused to have a PCR test.
Bioweapons, are the C19 fluid injected into peoples arms.
Graphene Oxide takes iron out of the blood and makes blood clots.
Probably a good idea not to get a PCR test.
Like the old video by Dr. Lorraine Day (who, unfortunately, seems to have died last year) where she claims “…the test vaccinates you”
rum ble (dot) com (slash) vc13y5-doctor-lorraine-day-re-covid (dot) html
She doesn’t provide evidence strong enough to convince me but who would want to chance it? 🙂
Also, I’m not totally convinced on the magnets either but I thought it was interesting this other old video on “THE COVID VACCINE MAGNET CHALLENGE” by the Highwire where they showed trying the magnet on 15 people in the street and on 6 of the 15 people (all 15 had been ‘COVID’ shot injected, I think), the magnet stuck.
rum ble (dot) com (slash) vhelu5-the-covid-vaccine-magnet-challenge (dot) html
Again, not 100% conclusive but probably enough reason not to chance getting the poison either! 🙂
Sorry to hear of Dr. Day’s passing, my friend.
If my memory serves me rightly, very early on in her career upon qualifying, she had a problem with the whole paradigm of diseases, viruses, and contagion and what have you, so she dropped that discipline and entered into trauma. I know my wife followed her, but as she’s away for a few days I can’t speak to her at the moment, maybe on the phone later.
I think Mr. Owen is pretty much “on the ball” with his understanding of the whole shocking scenario,,,
But he still thinks we are on a spinning ball, here I digress!!!
Yes, I only just noticed Dr. Day’s unfortunate demise myself when the mention of PCR testing reminded me of her appraisal of it. Wikipedia says she died at the age of 86 which I found surprising as she looks much younger than that to me in the video I cited.
I don’t know much about her so will be interesting what your wife knows about her. I do notice that Dr. Day wrote a book with the humorous title of “Germs Don’t CAUSE Disease any more than Flies CAUSE Garbage!” 😆
I get unsure on a lot of these topics when I see contradictory information but Mr. Owen certainly seems to have a good point about staying away from the PCR tests, masks and poisons 🙂.
Hi A Person.
https://mega.nz/file/JRolQRQB#5EwNSGfKc7pazgVppL8Gi9DJUGT-NfUS1Rv4w7PsN5o
Dr Loraine Day, certainly spoke her mind.
If there are no viruses, how can you explain everyone in my house getting very sick with Covid. It was not just the flu. I have never been sick quite like that and the same with other family members. What caused us to get so sick? My friend who is also against the vaccine, said she had to go to the emergency room and get monoclonal antibodies.
Hi sheep girl, I like your name 🙂.
Mark Steele, who says he’s a weapons systems expert, in a video says something like what people call COVID is a combination of injected toxic substances like tungsten and sorbitol from the poison jabs, combined with radiation from 5G.
“…dangerous 5G network is then gonna hit that body and it’s gonna radiate so you’re then get what’s called a local radiator. So you’re gonna get somebody who’s had this vaccination who’s gonna be standing next to somebody who hasn’t had a vaccination and they’re gonna get sick…” (10:07)
bright eon (dot) com (slash) 9346ec25-8f18-4565-b551-cea242d3c46e
I don’t know if he is right but info from some other sites seem to support the theory of radiation causing flu-like symptoms and maybe contagion.
e.g. 1) “…radiation therapy uses targeted radiation to treat cancer…
Side effects
You may have flu-like symptoms, nausea and pain…” (cancercouncil dot com dot au)
2) “Radiation therapy – Radiation to the head or neck area can damage tastebuds and salivary glands. This damage can change the way you taste, smell or feel food.” (Cancer Council NSW)
3) Contagability: “radioembolization…you may have to limit contact with other people for up to one week after treatment.” (cancer d org)
could be many reasons why they were ill, Covid doesn’t exist so they had the flu, and the flu is misrepresented in its cause. I suggest going through this websites history and do some reading, stop waiting to be told why. Engage some critical thinking, a tip is 💯 stay away from mainstream information it’s either a mis truth a blurred truth or a down right lie.
Do you have Wi-Fi and cellphones in your house? Where does your water come from? Keep looking for answers & avoid the easy blame on a virus (toxin).
You were sprayed with poison that reacts with the 5g radiation machines and Direct energy Weapons they are called.
What??
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3x78ip5xhOA
Looking at this it seems that what we term “viruses” actually include a multitude of different entities – some of which we know more about than others. They seem to be made of proteins and much of what we know about them is derived from DNA analysis. What they do and how and why they do it is the subject of theorisation and speculation. It therefore seems a very strident and sweeping statement to say that “viruses don’t exist”. It might be more accurate to state that viruses and their nature are not understood properly and much of the current canon of knowledge regarding them is highly suspect.
The statement that “viruses don’t exist” is a perfectly reasonable statement. It is important to be clear about the definition of a virus. The modern definition is a replication competent, pathogenic particle consisting of a genome surrounded by a protein capsid.
The genome is pieced together on a computer from a multi-species genetic soup. It does not exist in the real world at all. From this fake genome construct, proteins are then predicted which, once again, is based on guess work.
The particles that are photographed do not contain this fake genome or the predicted fake proteins. They are extracellular vesicles, exosomes, intracellular breakdown products, and artifacts of the harsh treatments used in elecron microscopy. They may contain some genetic fragments and some proteins which are claimed to be from a “virus” but they are not replication competent, they are not pathogenic, and they are not contagious so the statement that “viruses don’t exist” is correct.
This video explains a lot about the no-viris hypothesis. Well known experts like Andrew Kaufmann, Tom Cowan, Mark Bailey and Stefan Lanka participate in it: https://www.bitchute.com/video/eFIivlH5Sl87/
This video explains a lot about the no-virus hypothesis. They dive into the AIDS and Covid “pandemics”. Well known experts like Mark Bailey, Andrew Kaufmann, Tom Cowan and Stefan Lanka participate in it: https://www.bitchute.com/video/eFIivlH5Sl87/
[…] Viruses Don’t Exist and Why It Matters – by Dr Sam Bailey. […]
[…] Read More: Viruses Don’t Exist and Why It Matters – by Dr Sam Bailey. […]
[…] Read More: Viruses Don’t Exist and Why It Matters – by Dr Sam Bailey. […]
Dr. Sam,
did you notice that you mainly cite yourself in the references and a total moron like Chudov, who from very begin of the PLANdemic seeds part lies and part truths, and others NOT really proper in virology educated people?? If you do only that, you and your small team will ALWAYS be a against the real science, a total denial of it.
Your ARGUMNETS are NOT SUPPORTING many scientific FACTS which are coming from the official science. The only way to proof anything is to do an EXPERIMENT TOGETHER and STOP offending each other.
Btw. I followed many Lanka’s lecture’s and there was nothing what would convince me, a ret. scientist to go over on your site, DESPITE of completely sharing Dr. Cowan’t view on heart physiology! You need MORE FACTS, scientific facts in order to proper present your point.
ok, one more note, after reading some of the comments below. How about putting this question instead the fight:
HOW TO MAKE VIRUSES???
Official science says:
1…
2..
3…
see what you got: lipids (not directly encoded by genes..), proteins (genetic origin), DNA/RNA (genes…), ligands (IMPORTANT..).
The path from here, should be straightforward.
View in browser
Well, Was There A Covid-19 Virus or Not?Uncertainty Still Reigns
RICHARD ROSENTHAL
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_36,c_scale,f_png,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Ficon%2FLucideHeart%3Fv%3D4%26height%3D36%26fill%3Dnone%26stroke%3D%2523808080%26strokeWidth%3D2https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_36,c_scale,f_png,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Ficon%2FLucideComments%3Fv%3D4%26height%3D36%26fill%3Dnone%26stroke%3D%2523808080%26strokeWidth%3D2https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_36,c_scale,f_png,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Ficon%2FLucideShare2%3Fv%3D4%26height%3D36%26fill%3Dnone%26stroke%3D%2523808080%26strokeWidth%3D2https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_36,c_scale,f_png,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Ficon%2FNoteForwardIcon%3Fv%3D4%26height%3D36%26fill%3Dnone%26stroke%3D%2523808080%26strokeWidth%3D2READ IN APPhttps://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_36,c_scale,f_png,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Ficon%2FLucideArrowUpRight%3Fv%3D4%26height%3D36%26fill%3Dnone%26stroke%3D%2523808080%26strokeWidth%3D2
MAR 13
Hard to believe, but the question of whether or not there actually was a Covid virus–or a classic pandemic for that matter– remains unsettled among leading expert commentators.
The “no virus” side of the argument is clearly presented in the article and video by Dr. Sam Bailey cited below.
Thanks for reading Critical Dissidence! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_40,c_scale,f_png,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Ficon%2FLucideCheck%3Fv%3D4%26height%3D40%26fill%3Dtransparent%26stroke%3D%252325BD65%26strokeWidth%3D3.6Subscribed
Michael Yeadon agrees: “There are no respiratory viruses, we don’t know what causes the symptom’s but can’t be a virus. numerous, serious clinical research studies were set up to detect and measure symptomatic transmission (causing a well person to fall ill with similar symptoms to those of the donor person). Try as they might, that didn’t happen. Contagion in this specific scenario (acute respiratory diseases) does not happen.”
Sasha Latypova agrees, maintaining that what was/is created in the lab by gain-of-function are chemical poisons. When I asked her whether the voluminous, costly and clandestine research performed by the likes of DOD, UNC & Ralph Baric in pursuit of (if not in attaining) a formidable infectious bio-weapon has been all for show? She responded: “Pretty much. They mutated a lot of bullshit and distributed some toxic chemicals. They definitely waste billions to pay themselves lavishly and assemble huge academic departments dedicated to nothing but making poison. They do not make viruses, anything live, or any GOF. Yes most of them believe their own BS. Yes, they are comically over-confident. They have never validated a single thing they claim. All this charade is doing – 1)chemical process to glue huge-size molecules together that contain nucleic acids +2)various methods of manufacture, storage, delivery and formulation of this crap. That’s it. If you look into “biologics” – they never use microscope (that’s strictly forbidden in molecular biology), most of the time rely on 3rd party unvalidated “kits”, completely automated (likewise unvalidated) processes, like PCR. And the claims of “proteins”, “viruses” and the like are based largely on the weight of the molecules they produce, and occasionally – on length of the nucleic acid chains. So they claim that a hunk of stone that weighs approximately what Michelangelo’s David weighs, is marble and is the same size = the same thing as the sculpture of Michelangelo, David. / Bioweapons research makes chemicals and things like plasmids to transfect people with these chemicals. There is nothing more mysterious to it. Nothing “alive” is made. Weaponized Anthrax? It’s a chemical. They mutated a lot of bullshit and distributed some toxic chemicals. “
JJCouey hypothesizes: “Infectious clones were dropped “
Kevin McKernan diasagrees: “Many of the “No Pandemic crowd” are critical of any protest against GOF as they believe it plays into the pandemic prep narrative. It’s as if in their mind, transmissible diseases can never be engineered. I dont think they understand how easy this stuff is to tinker with. Most of the people with these beliefs don’t actually have any lab experience to know how quickly a modified C19 could be reconstructed today (dozens of strains in weeks). someone spent the effort to hyper-optimize C19 ACE2 binding affinity such that it would spread far and wide.”
Geert VandenBossche premises his entire argument on there being a C-19 virus that rapidly and dangerously mutates, especially when confronted by mass vaccination with an ineffective “vaccine.”
And no one so far IMO has a clear and convincing explanation of how whatever it is that seemed to make people sick (if it actually did)— got distributed— or whether indeed, it was contagious.
To the distress of the ungodly, sociopathic perps of both C-19 and the unsafe, ineffective, and indisputably dangerous “vax,” the quest for the truth continues.
Viruses Don’t Exist and Why It Matters – by Dr Sam Bailey.BY PATRICIA HARRITY ON MARCH 13, 2024 • ( 14 COMMENTS )
By Dr Sam Bailey We are now over four years into the COVID-19 fraud and while many things have changed, confusion remains the dominant theme. More people are coming to the realisation that there was no pandemic but there are also plenty of people ramping up “bioweapons” and “gain of function” narratives. Amongst this we have also seen the introduction of a new side-stepping argument that, “virus existence is not important”.
In 2020, we started investigating the virus model and came to the realisation that SARS-CoV-2 did not exist. In fact, there was no scientific evidence that any viruses existed, dating back to the late 1800s literature and the so-called Tobacco Mosaic “Virus”. Those critiquing virology have pointed out that no entity that meets the description of a virus has ever been physically isolated. In order to maintain the illusion, the virologists have not performed properly controlled experiments such as those proposed in the “Settling the Virus Debate” Statement. Indeed, Dr Stefan Lanka had shown that various indirect findings claimed as evidence for viruses are produced by the experimental methodologies themselves.
In 2022, Mark published A Farewell to Virology (Expert Edition), a formal refutation of almost every aspect of the virus model. As with other works that ‘no virus‘ proponents have produced there has been no direct response to the overall thesis. Instead we have only seen attempts to change the subject, cloud the established definitions of words or introduce new unfalsifiable hypotheses. There is no ‘third way’ when it comes to virus existence and this sophistry only distracts from the fact that no ‘pathogens’ of any type have been shown to exist. The real world human and animal experiments that set out to demonstrate “contagious” entities that cause diseases such as influenza and common colds were monumental flops.
In this video we investigate why realising that viruses do not exist is a pivotal step for reducing fear and creating a better society.
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/The-Final-Pandemic:5
References
Source Dr Sam Bailey at –
https://drsambailey.com/
Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI)
Isolation: The action of isolating; the fact or condition of being isolated or standing alone; separation from other things or persons; solitariness.
– Oxford English Dictionary
The controversy over whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus has ever been isolated or purified continues. However, using the above definition, common sense, the laws of logic and the dictates of science, any unbiased person must come to the conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated or purified. As a result, no confirmation of the virus’ existence can be found. The logical, common sense, and scientific consequences of this fact are:
the structure and composition of something not shown to exist can’t be known, including the presence, structure, and function of any hypothetical spike or other proteins;
the genetic sequence of something that has never been found can’t be known;
“variants” of something that hasn’t been shown to exist can’t be known;
it’s impossible to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called Covid-19.
In as concise terms as possible, here’s the proper way to isolate, characterize and demonstrate a new virus. First, one takes samples (blood, sputum, secretions) from many people (e.g. 500) with symptoms which are unique and specific enough to characterize an illness. Without mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain genetic material, the virologist macerates, filters and ultracentrifuges i.e. purifies the specimen. This common virology technique, done for decades to isolate bacteriophages1 and so-called giant viruses in every virology lab, then allows the virologist to demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of identically sized and shaped particles. These particles are the isolated and purified virus.
These identical particles are then checked for uniformity by physical and/or microscopic techniques. Once the purity is determined, the particles may be further characterized. This would include examining the structure, morphology, and chemical composition of the particles. Next, their genetic makeup is characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from the purified particles and using genetic-sequencing techniques, such as Sanger sequencing, that have also been around for decades. Then one does an analysis to confirm that these uniform particles are exogenous (outside) in origin as a virus is conceptualized to be, and not the normal breakdown products of dead and dying tissues.2 (As of May 2020, we know that virologists have no way to determine whether the particles they’re seeing are viruses or just normal break-down products of dead and dying tissues.)3
1 Isolation, characterization and analysis of bacteriophages from the haloalkaline lake Elmenteita, KenyaJuliah Khayeli Akhwale et al, PLOS One, Published: April 25, 2019. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0215734 — accessed 2/15/21
2 “Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Apoptotic Cells: An Essential Link Between Death and Regeneration,” Maojiao Li1 et al, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2020 October 2. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2020.573511/full — accessed 2/15/21
3 “The Role of Extracellular Vesicles as Allies of HIV, HCV and SARS Viruses,” Flavia Giannessi, et al, Viruses, 2020 May
If we have come this far then we have fully isolated, characterized, and genetically sequenced an exogenous virus particle. However, we still have to show it is causally related to a disease. This is carried out by exposing a group of healthy subjects (animals are usually used) to this isolated, purified virus in the manner in which the disease is thought to be transmitted. If the animals get sick with the same disease, as confirmed by clinical and autopsy findings, one has now shown that the virus actually causes a disease. This demonstrates infectivity and transmission of an infectious agent.
None of these steps has even been attempted with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, nor have all these steps been successfully performed for any so-called pathogenic virus. Our research indicates that a single study showing these steps does not exist in the medical literature.
Instead, since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then minimally process this sample and inoculate this unpurified sample onto tissue culture containing usually four to six other types of material — all of which contain identical genetic material as to what is called a “virus.” The tissue culture is starved and poisoned and naturally disintegrates into many types of particles, some of which contain genetic material. Against all common sense, logic, use of the English language and scientific integrity, this process is called “virus isolation.” This brew containing fragments of genetic material from many sources is then subjected to genetic analysis, which then creates in a computer-simulation process the alleged sequence of the alleged virus, a so called in silico genome. At no time is an actual virus confirmed by electron microscopy. At no time is a genome extracted and sequenced from an actual virus. This is scientific fraud.
The observation that the unpurified specimen — inoculated onto tissue culture along with toxic antibiotics, bovine fetal tissue, amniotic fluid and other tissues — destroys the kidney tissue onto which it is inoculated is given as evidence of the virus’ existence and pathogenicity. This is scientific fraud.
From now on, when anyone gives you a paper that suggests the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated, please check the methods sections. If the researchers used Vero cells or any other culture method, you know that their process was not isolation. You will hear the following excuses for why actual isolation isn’t done:
There were not enough virus particles found in samples from patients to analyze.
Viruses are intracellular parasites; they can’t be found outside the cell in this manner.
If No. 1 is correct, and we can’t find the virus in the sputum of sick people, then on what evidence do we think the virus is dangerous or even lethal? If No. 2 is correct, then how is the virus spread from person to person? We are told it emerges from the cell to infect others. Then why isn’t it possible to find it?
Finally, questioning these virology techniques and conclusions is not some distraction or divisive issue. Shining the light on this truth is essential to stop this terrible fraud that humanity is confronting. For, as we now know, if the virus has never been isolated, sequenced or shown to cause illness, if the virus is imaginary, then why are we wearing masks, social distancing and putting the whole world into prison?
Finally, if pathogenic viruses don’t exist, then what is going into those injectable devices erroneously called “vaccines,” and what is their purpose? This scientific question is the most urgent and relevant one of our time.
We are correct. The SARS-CoV2 virus does not exist.
Sally Fallon Morell
Sally Fallon Morell, MA
Thomas Cowan
Dr. Thomas Cowan, MD
Andy Kaufman
Though I couldn´t watch the full video due to some “failure of network” I fully support your views and research. The article appeals to common sense. Had there been a lethal “virus” people would have collapsed in the streets on top of each other, spare me, won´t you?
It´s very simple: Fiction is for authors, fact is for scientists.
Time for many more decent doctors to speak up.
As I had commented on the website itself, there was a CCP reason for C19, namely to quell the active rebellion that was happening ~1000 km from WuHan, namely in Hong Kong from 2017 through being locked down in 2020. The rebellion was spreading to other cities, and even Shanghai had a few “events.” In Xi’s re-election speech, he made special note that Hong Kong was again under full Chinese control.