Breaking News

Net Zero is a scam, built on the myth of climate change

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Please share our story!


Climate change and the Net Zero initiative is a scam. In an excerpt from Dr. Jack King’s book, `Net Zero will destroy you and everything you care about’, Dr. King highlights that the push towards Net Zero is based on misinformation and propaganda. 

Television stations, such as the BBC, promote the myth of the impact on climate change from, for example, the use of fossil fuels.  And they won’t allow a public debate even though policies related to climate change will destroy society, as they are designed to do.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


By Dr. Vernon Coleman

The following article is taken from Jack King’s No 1 bestselling book `Net Zero will destroy you and everything you care about’.

Net Zero is a scam, built on the myth of climate change. It is the door through which the conspirators plan to drag us into the Great Reset.

The drive towards Net Zero is fuelled entirely by the man-made scaremongering threats which have been devised around the climate change myth; it is based on a delicately balanced raft of pseudoscientific evidence and fake news material which are used by professional propagandists and skilled conspirators to sustain the notion that the use of fossil fuels is threatening our world and our very existence.

The theory is that man-made climate change is caused by our use of fossil fuels and that it threatens the survival of the Earth and of mankind. The principle behind Net Zero is that we can stop the alleged climate change process by dramatically reducing or halting our use of fossil fuels.

The flaw in this neat, fashionable, fraudulent and surprisingly popular theory is that there isn’t a shred of evidence to show that climate change is real, or that any fluctuations in our weather are a result of the burning fossil fuels rather than the sort of natural changes which have always occurred.

The myth the conspirators have created has been propagated and distributed with absurd enthusiasm by small but vocal teams of compliant and easily led enthusiasts, most of whom almost certainly believe that the lies they have been told are the truth and that if we do not make substantive changes to our way of life then we have no future. They’ve been taught that the seas will boil and rise up to engulf the land, that life as we have known it will become impossible and the human race will be doomed. They have been taught, and have believed, that the threat is existential, though quite what they mean by this is something of a puzzle and, at best, simply nonsense.

As a result of this nonsensical belief, governments around the world now argue that they have no choice but to take drastic action to save us from doom. Aided and abetted by gullible, easily led, virtue signalling leaders of charities, lobby groups, banks and investment groups, action is being taken to halt the use of all fossil fuels and to change every aspect of the way we live.

Without ever putting the facts before the public, without ever asking for public approval and without ever allowing public debate, government departments, lobby groups and propaganda groups purporting to represent investors have forced through a smorgasbord of oppressive, expensive, damaging, restrictive and critical proposals.

The Supreme Court in the UK has ruled that a local council should have considered the climate impact of burning oil before allowing new wells to be drilled. This will put all future oil and gas projects in doubt both in the UK and in the EU. A Swiss woman won a victory at the European Court of Human Rights to force Switzerland to do more to deal with the myth of climate change. This is all insanity.

(As the lunacy continues in the West, China is selling solar panels and electric vehicles to their gullible and compliant customers and burning coal to create the electricity to make them.)

And as we in the West are encouraged by the lunatics to condemn fossil fuels, no one is allowed to mention that 84% of global energy comes from fossil fuels. (That is just 2% less than in 1973, by the way.) Without oil and gas, we would have to survive on 16% of the energy we use now. Oh, and you can’t make fertiliser or fly planes with solar power or ugly, energy-munching, bird-crunching windmills.

It cannot be emphasised often enough that there has been no debate on any of these issues. Propaganda groups such as the BBC in the UK arrogantly claim that the issue has been settled, that climate change is real and that the proposals included in the Net Zero paradigm are essential for our survival. The BBC, which I regard as the most sexist, ageist and racist media organisation in the world, appears to me to have little interest in discussion, debate or anything as boring as evidence or facts.

Because there is no debate, and because anyone daring to question the propaganda is silenced, demonised and ignored, the whole Net Zero edifice has, without any effective opposition, been built on a flimsy structure of lies and exaggerations. (As with the fake covid pandemic and the toxic and useless covid-19 vaccines, the refusal to debate or to discuss and the refusal to allow airtime or print space to opposition views, is all the evidence that is needed that the Net Zero industry is a scam of Brobdingnagian proportions.)

And so, as a result, everything bad that is happening to our world is happening because a surprisingly small handful of liars, cheats, fraudsters and conspirators have convinced a small but noisy and powerful clique to push forward policies which are designed to destroy you, your family and everything you love. The media has been employed to promote the myth and to create confusion and misinformation. Some of the so-called evidence is laughably absurd. So, when a British holidaymaker complained that the temperature at their Southern European resort was around 30 degrees Centigrade, the press reported this as though it were important news and evidence which could be used in support of the global warming mythology. In fact, if they’d bothered to do a little checking, they’d have seen that was pretty much the average temperature in June in that resort.

The fact is that if global warming were real the death rate would plummet in Britain. At the moment between 50,000 and 100,000 people die each winter because of the cold. We should all wish that global warming was real because if it were most of those deaths would be avoided. (The number who would die from the heat would be minuscule. And most of them would simply be foolish folk who had spent too long in the sun and drunk too little fluid.)

Climate change has become a Holy War and it is as unacceptable to question the fake science upon which the myth is based as it is to question the holocaust. No hyperbole is too wild for those promoting the climate change myth. Scaremongering has become official. And, of course, those offering the truth are mocked, reviled and suppressed.

Nothing in history has been as dangerous as the hasty and absurd plot to stop using fossil fuels. The myth of climate change is being used as an excuse to change the way we live, to halt health care, to herd us into small, confined urban settlements (known as twenty-minute cities) and to create a society which will be indistinguishable from the world created by George Orwell in his novel ‘1984’. The result of this plot will be that everything we value will disappear and billions will die.

And if you are still in doubt, ask yourself again why no one who believes in climate change and Net Zero will dare debate these issues. We have become a totalitarian state, and views which do not fit in with the State’s demands and expectations are not allowed and must not be disseminated. Those who hold such views must be silenced and crushed.

Ask yourself why Vernon Coleman is banned by all mainstream media, why he is banned from even accessing YouTube (let alone uploading videos) and why he is banned from all social media sites for the crime of telling the truth. Why are politicians, editors, lobbyists and propagandists so afraid of the truth?

The above is taken from `Net Zero Will Destroy You and Everything You Care About’ by Jack King. To purchase a copy please CLICK HERE

About Dr. Coleman

Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc practised medicine for ten years. He has been a full-time professional author for over 30 years. He is a novelist and campaigning writer and has written many non-fiction books.  He has written over 100 books which have been translated into 22 languages. On his website, HERE, there are hundreds of articles which are free to read.

There are no ads, no fees and no requests for donations on Dr. Coleman’s website or videos. He pays for everything through book sales. If you want to help finance his work, please just buy a book – there are over 100 books by Vernon Coleman in print on Amazon.

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Please share our story!
author avatar
Rhoda Wilson
While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
25 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dave Owen
Dave Owen
10 months ago

Hi Rhoda,
I am pleased you have managed to keep Vernon Coleman on board.
He is so interesting and truthful and so correct.
But how are we supposed to get our opinion into mainstream.
I have tried contacting my MP and local councillors, to no avail.
We badly need younger people to lead the charge.

bluearea
bluearea
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
10 months ago

He is popular, that’s for sure

norm
norm
Reply to  Dave Owen
10 months ago

Vernon Coleman needs to be more comprehensive to support his narrative as done in the following article:

https://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/FIGU_%E2%80%93_Bulletin_118

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
Reply to  norm
10 months ago

Hi norm,
Thank you for that link, is quite long, will have to read it on the weekend.

Dave Owen
Dave Owen
Reply to  Dave Owen
10 months ago

Hi norm,
The link is more like a book.
Too complicated for me, did try and digest it.
What is the title of the book.

bluearea
bluearea
10 months ago

Yes Vernon Coleman is a true patriot in my eyes, I would listen to his not only opinion but his good extreme knowledge Who is paying BBS as the last two letters spells what their made of, maybe it’s chem trails or maybe it’s the planet’s albedo or maybe it’s the shifting all the plates or maybe the chem trails holding the heat in and depleting clouds that used to normally float in the sky and block the sun. I would ask Vernon on his opinion before believing anything from lets just say the real idiots that are corrupted to the hill and know the truth but are either gaged or part of the lies

bluearea
bluearea
Reply to  bluearea
10 months ago

I left out Harp, can’t leave them out

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
10 months ago

They won’t debate climate change the same way as they won’t debate the jabs.
The truth is an anthema to these demonic loons..

norm
norm
Reply to  Paul Watson
10 months ago

There are actors that are deliberately causing direct damage to the climate. See https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

Brin Jenkins
Brin Jenkins
Reply to  Paul Watson
10 months ago

Climate change is a trap, and I would agree it does change.

The question is does it matter? What causes this? and as it is not radiation and CO2 net zero is just an illogical fix that fails.

norm
norm
10 months ago

Any discussion on climate change must first discuss the population service capacity of the planet without which there is no chance to reconcile any claims for or against the subject of the article.

Please review the following comment on the planet’s service capacity: https://www.americaoutloud.news/policies-must-shift-as-america-is-on-the-verge-of-population-collapse/#comment-14554

norm
norm
10 months ago

Correlation analysis of the global population with the global temperature in the years 1880 – 2015. can be found here (See: https://nebula.wsimg.com/ea769d52e8b36f57b78d4657db26f159?AccessKeyId=C0F879B9BB56750BC6EE&disposition=0&alloworigin=1).

Brin Jenkins
Brin Jenkins
Reply to  norm
10 months ago

Not only not a problem but incapable of being one.

We need CP2 and one day the Earth will probably fail due to a CO2 shortage all being locked up in limestone rocks

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
10 months ago

Most experts agree that 1,500 ppm is the maximum CO2 level for maximum plant growth, although any CO2 level between 1,000ppm and 1,500ppm will produce greatly improved results. Greenhouse CO2 levels are jacked up to enhance plant growth.

co2. earth/co2-ice-core-data

The average CO2 ppm level the last thousand up till 1841 years averaged approximately 280ppm. Since 1841 CO2 levels have increased to 422ppm in Jan. 2024. That helps plant growth.

Anything below 200ppm starves plant growth! Carbon dioxide is essential to the process of photosynthesis. Most plants grown indoors require a minimum CO2 concentration of 330 ppm to enable them to photosynthesise efficiently and produce energy in the form of carbohydrates. These concentrations of CO2 are enough for plants to grow and develop normally.
Millions of years ago CO2 ppm levels and temperature was much higher. Plants trived!

Concentrations of CO 2 in the atmosphere were as high as 4,000 ppm during the Cambrian period about 500 million years ago, and as low as 180 ppm during the Quaternary glaciation of the last two million years. Ice core data does not lie!

Look it up! I just did. Greta Thunberg, Al Gore and Bill Gates are lying leftist frauds!

Industrial CO2 emissions since 1841 likely staved off an Ice Age!

Brin Jenkins
Brin Jenkins
Reply to  CharlieSeattle
10 months ago

At a level of 1400ppm tomato plants are increased five fold ask any tomato grower who reads a bit. Co2 is a cyclic product into plants for O2 and materials we need.

CharlieSeattle
CharlieSeattle
10 months ago

Challenging Modern Climate Narratives: Forgotten 1937 Aerial Photos Expose Antarctic Anomaly
By UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN – FACULTY OF SCIENCE JUNE 11, 2024

 https://scitechdaily.com/challenging-modern-climate-narratives-forgotten-1937-aerial-photos-expose-antarctic-anomaly/

Researchers at the University of Copenhagen have utilized aerial photos from 1937 to analyze the stability and growth of East Antarctica’s ice, revealing that despite some signs of weakening, the ice has remained largely stable over almost a century, enhancing predictions of sea-level rise. Credit: Norwegian Polar Institute in Tromsø
More About the Study

  • Out of 2200 images photographed from seaplanes in 1937, 130 were selected for the analysis.
  • The researchers combined the historical photos with modern satellite data to create 3D reconstructions of the glaciers.
  • The Norwegian aerial images were supplemented with 165 aerial images of the same glaciers from Australian surveys conducted between 1950 and 1974. This allowed the researchers to examine the evolution of the glaciers over different periods and calculate historical ice flow speeds for selected glaciers.
  • Compared to modern data, the ice flow speeds are unchanged. While some glaciers have thinned over shorter intermediate periods of 10-20 years, they have remained stable or grown slightly in the long term, indicating a system in balance.
trackback
10 months ago

[…] Dále již úryvek z výše zmíněné knihy J. Kinga: […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] Dále již úryvek z výše zmíněné knihy J. Kinga: […]

Brin Jenkins
Brin Jenkins
10 months ago

A Scam.

Yes it is even BSC’s are indoctrinated to the extent that the only counter is one of opinion and theory, which of course is negated by verified data. I had an in depth discussion on why radiation is incapable of transferring energy causing any climate emergency. The guy in question was an NHS technician on a cat scan I had yesterday. I countered every point and it evolved to opinion and theories. Well without data any opinion is limited, and I had the calculated and experimental data in support.

Joy N.
Joy N.
10 months ago

🙏🙏
The Bible prophesied 7-year Tribulation is at humanity’s doorstep & the time to escape is very short. To read more, pls visit https://bibleprophecyinaction.blogspot.com/

trackback
10 months ago

[…] The New Exposé – By Dr. Vernon […]

trackback
9 months ago

[…] people with catastrophic evidence of climate change without any proof’. Yet another piece accused the BBC of promoting the ‘myth’ of the impact of using fossil fuels. The […]