Breaking News

Bovaer Bullsh*t: The British public isn’t having it

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Please share our story!


The Bovaer/burping cows scandal is bullsh*t, James Delingpole writes as he reveals that a response to one of his tweets demonstrates the public thinks it’s bullsh*t as well.

Despite what corporate media claims, the public doesn’t care if it reduces methane or not and the public doesn’t care that climate alarmists peddle methane as a powerful greenhouse gas.  All the public cares about is not feeding dairy cattle with cancer-causing, testicle-shrinking poison.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Bovaer is Bullshit

By James Delingpole

Perhaps the best thing to come out of the Bovaer/burping cows scandal was this Tweet by me.

I like the Tweet because it’s true and succinct. But I like it even more for the reaction it got: almost everyone out of 215,000 people who saw it agreed strongly with the sentiment.

Here are some sample reactions:

I could go on. 629 people commented, most of them positive. 4.6K were sufficiently inspired to share it. And 19K people liked it.

OK, so these aren’t Elon-Musk-level or Russell-Brand-level numbers. But unlike Musk, I do not own Twitter, and unlike Brand, I’m not a closet Satanist with an eerie, Svengali-like hold over my audience. Also, unlike both of them, my reach is heavily suppressed via the algorithms. So I think, all in all, the fact that well over 200,000 people got to see my message and approve of it is jolly good going.

What this tells me is something that I’ve long hoped for but which I’ve never quite dared believe could be true. It appears we have reached the stage where no one – or at least no one with half a brain – buys into the “global warming” narrative any more.

When they read a phrase as baldly unequivocal as “man-made climate change is TOTALLY made up bollocks,” they no longer sigh uncomfortably and murmur something rueful about “the polar bears” or “Greenland ice sheets” or about how they “can’t believe we can be pumping all that carbon into the atmosphere without making some sort of difference to climate.”

Instead, most sensible people now just nod furiously in agreement.

But obviously, you’re never going to get this from the corporate media which continues, relentlessly, to gaslight us with the message that climate scepticism is a minority activity and that people who don’t want carcinogenic, testicle-shrinking poison fed to dairy cattle in order to save the planet are just bonkers conspiracy theorists.

For example, the Daily Telegraph, formerly a newspaper, got its house, posh-named eco-warrior Boudicca Fox-Leonard to pen an article explaining why the Bovaer scandal was just a storm in a teacup. It was headlined ‘Why British milk is churning up scary online conspiracies’.

It quoted one “expert” as saying: “You can’t just add anything to the food chain without safety testing, although it appears you can claim what you like on social media.”

But the bulk of the “expert” opinionating was given over to one Karen Douglas, apparently “a professor of social psychology at the University of Kent.” Professor Douglas was used by Ms. Fox-Leonard to help explain away all the criticisms of Bovaer and feeding additives generally as a form of mental illness.

“Psychological research suggests that people are attracted to conspiracy theories when one or more fundamental psychological needs are frustrated”, says Douglas.

What idiots we are! There were most of us foolishly imagining that the reason we’re worried about carcinogenic, testicle-shrinking poison put in cow food is that it’s a bad idea and entirely unnecessary. Whereas, it turns out, the real reason we’re worried about it is that – according to Douglas, anyway – we “need to feel safe and have control over things that are happening around us” and we “need to maintain our self-esteem and feel positive about the groups that we belong to.” In other words, the main reason we’re against Bovaer is that we’re just funny in the head.

But the most disappointing article I read about Bovaer, also run in the Telegraph, was by Jamie Blackett and headlined ‘Let’s not get into hysterics about climate friendly milk.’

I like Blackett very much, both as a friend and as a very talented and entertaining writer on rural affairs. As a farmer, he usually knows whereof he speaks. But in this particular article, he surrenders to the enemy without a shot fired.

The subs, I’m sure, will have written that nauseatingly propagandising headline (“Climate-friendly milk.” Ugh!), and the similarly grisly standfirst (“This is an honest attempt to do what everyone wants us to do – reduce cow flatulence”). But Blackett cannot escape culpability for paragraphs like the one below.

I think it’s the word “honest” I most take issue with here. There is nothing honest about farmers feeding their livestock carcinogenic, testicle-shrinking poison in order to appease bureaucrats. If he were looking for a more “honest” adjective, surely a more apt one might have been “cowardly,” “craven,” “pusillanimous,” “cynical” or “self-defeating”?

What I also thoroughly dispute in that paragraph is Blackett’s statement that “everyone” wants farmers to “reduce cow flatulence.” I find this excuse about as plausible as if he’d said, “Big boys made us do it and then ran away.” Not for a moment am I suggesting that there is not huge pressure from certain quarters on the farming industry to do all manner of farming-unfriendly things: put up wind turbines; ruin the landscape with solar panels; rewilding; feed your dairy herd carcinogenic, testicle shrinking poison; etc. I just think it’s a bit of a stretch to suggest that those certain quarters represent “everyone.”

It’s a bit like saying, “Everyone wants more Storm Shadow missiles shipped to Kyiv so that Zelensky can defend Ukraine’s sovereignty against Putin.” Or, “Everyone wants digital ID to prevent voting fraud and social injustice.” Or, “Everyone believes more vaccines should be ready for the next pandemic.”

Sure, in each case, it’s what the corporate media narrative might wish you to think that “everyone” believes. But that’s just the corporate media gaslighting you again.

It goes almost without saying, by the way, that all the “science” behind cow burping and methane and global warming is spurious and fabricated to suit the needs of the various vested interests pushing the climate change scam. I know this because in the several years I spent researching my book ‘Watermelons – How Environmentalists Are Killing The Planet, Destroying The Economy, And Stealing Your Children’s Future’ – never once (and I do mean never once) did I encounter a single piece of hard scientific evidence supporting Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming theory. It’s junk. All of it.

And now everyone knows it’s junk. That’s why I was so delighted by the response to that Tweet of mine I cited at the beginning. Nobody (well almost nobody) is buying this nonsense any more. They’ve had it up to the teeth.

No one, apart from a tiny minority of brainwashed activists, is following the Bovaer story and going: “Well on the one hand, I can see the dangers of contaminating the food supply with experimental additives but on the other, we really have to try what ever new measures we can to help save the planet from global warming.”

No. What people are saying is: “I don’t care whether or not this stuff reduces methane by however many per cent. And I don’t care how many times more powerful a greenhouse gas methane is than CO2. And I don’t care that it’s only an experiment. And I don’t care if the cows are otherwise well-cared for. And I don’t care whether or not farmers are being bullied into doing this by official methane-reduction directives.

“All I care about is that this whole thing is ENTIRELY unnecessary, so I don’t want even a tiny bit of this noxious crap in my milk. Got that?”

About the Author

James Delingpole describes himself as an author, blogger, podcaster, irritant and hero.  Officially, he is an English writer, journalist, and columnist who has written for a number of publications, including the Daily Mail, the Daily ExpressThe TimesThe Daily Telegraph, and The Spectator. He is a former executive editor for Breitbart London and has published several novels and four political books.

You can subscribe and follow Delingpole on his Substack page HERE, his webpage HERE and his podcast on Podbean HERE or Odysee HERE.

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Please share our story!
author avatar
Rhoda Wilson
While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.

Categories: Breaking News

Tagged as:

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ivor McTin
Ivor McTin
8 months ago

Folks check out Delingpole, yes yes he was one of them, but now he’s one of us, *( endorsements subject to change without notice)
But he is saying stuff that gets right up the nose of those sanctimonious pricks with their nose in the air.

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Ivor McTin
8 months ago

I like that!

Lets not forget even the other eleven apostles never suspected Judas to be a devil, for when He said He was about to be betrayed by one of them; they with one voice exclaimed Lord, is it I? Matt:26:22!

Alma Ravn
Alma Ravn
8 months ago

I say do not buy ANY DIARIES hereafter.
Both cheese, milk, cream, youghurt etc are manipulated.

Here´s a glass of milk!
Is it from a cow we trust!
Why do you trust this cow?
Oh, because it delivers OUR milk!

No diaries. Look at the word: It simply means something you are expected to buy on a daily basis. Do not fulfill the order. Make them obsolete.

BY NOT BYING THIS STUFF.

You want butter? Find a natural farmer who sells natural milk, no pasterusation, no homogenization. Pour it into a bowl and stir it till it sits in your bowl like butter. This is how your granny made butter. The best butter in the whole world.

Dawn
Dawn
Reply to  Alma Ravn
8 months ago

Here’s the list of ‘proper’ UK farms with good farming practices – well worth the money especially if you factor in the cost to your health. I can vouch for the raw milk – as my friend said on trying it – ‘ this tastes like my childhood.’
So support the good guys – really consciously choosing our food is the only way forward.

https://caremore.wixsite.com/bovaer-free-farms

mcc
mcc
Reply to  Alma Ravn
4 months ago

I like my dairy foods though unfortunately. Maybe I’ll have a goat in the back garden instead. (I would have a cow but the neighbours wouldnt like it. )

daisy
daisy
8 months ago

They are trying to poison us any way they can. They dont care how.
How any farmer can think this is OK, I dont know. I wont forgive or forget ARLA. I will boycott their products and their partner products for the rest of my days. I hope others will do the same. We have to show our disapproval to stop them moving forward. This is not the first time we have fed our cattle feed they shouldn’t have and people fell seriously ill. Remember CJD!

trackback
8 months ago

[…] article (Bovaer Bullsh*t: The British public isn’t having it) was published by The Expose and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the […]

julal
julal
8 months ago

Be very aware people another way to cut down the population, there is no such thing as climate warming it’s natural progression. Don’t trust government, big pharma or scientists it’s all one big scam and NOT a conspiracy theory

drift2boat
drift2boat
8 months ago

Like the article. Two reactions to the article. One i believe milk cows do little burping methane when diet is historic one of grass and lots of burping and farming when fed unnatural sickening diet of soybeans and corn.
Two. Would like elaboration on the shrinking testicle argument against the additive. It goes along with Bill Gates’s depopulation agenda and he being one of those pushing the stuff.

jsinton
jsinton
Reply to  drift2boat
8 months ago

It’s all simple illogical bullshit because the cow does not produce the methane, the GRASS does. And if the cows don’t consume the grass, it goes to CO2 anyways.

Dawn
Dawn
Reply to  jsinton
8 months ago

Also………….

  1. delve deeply and you’ll find that the cow has to process the drug to remove it from its’ system. It does that by converting it to CO2.
  2. It is disingeuous to suggest that methane is more of a threat than CO2 because it does not persist in the atmosphere, being quickly converted to CO2.
  3. The earth NEEDS CO2 for the plant life. Please look up the ‘carbon cycle’ and ‘the water cycle’ if they haven’t been scrubbed from the internet. Both were elementary education to describe the systems in place in the natural world for dealing with fluctuations of these gases, and there are many more self adjusting systems. In the past the CO2 levels were much higher; the earth adjusted, the plant life was amazing..
  4. The greatest carbon sink on the planet is……..grass, which must be maintained by grazing animals. All these artificial interventions simply oppose the natural order.
Marty Ball
Marty Ball
8 months ago
jsinton
jsinton
8 months ago

Just what every farmer needs. Will they make it mandatory?

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
8 months ago

A few more zeros and we could make some changes…

Clayton
Clayton
8 months ago
Clayton
Clayton
8 months ago

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/TUPlMPoras0 more proof their scheme doesn’t work

SuziAlkamyst
SuziAlkamyst
7 months ago

A few thousand years ago, when there were fewer people as yet on the planet, there roamed in their billons many more farting, defecating, burping, piddling herbivores’ than there are now on earth, and life, including that of peoples, thrived! These climate alarmist need to go back to school and get some basic natural history lessons.

trackback
5 months ago

[…] article (Bovaer Bullsh*t: The British public isn’t having it) was published by The Expose and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the […]