|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Australian investigative journalist Maryanne Damasi reflects on her work in 2024. She has been fearless in her reporting and conducted exclusive interviews and investigations that challenged the status quo, particularly in the areas of public health and vaccine safety.
Notable interviews included Dr. Joseph Ladapo, Scott Atlas, Phillip Buckhaults, Kevin McKernan, Peter Gøtzsche and Stanley Plotkin, who shared insights on regulatory failures, vaccine safety concerns and the need for transparency.
She highlights her investigations into vaccine safety, including the Infanrix Hexa vaccine and the mRNA vaccine against RSV, and her revelations of serious ethical breaches in Gardasil’s HPV vaccine trials.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Welcome to 2025
As we step into the new year, I want to reflect on the journey through 2024 – a year defined by fearless reporting, exclusive interviews and relentless investigations that challenged the status quo. Your support has made it all possible.
In 2024, I focused on uncovering critical issues that have been ignored, misrepresented or outright suppressed by the mainstream media. Through my work, I exposed regulatory failures, highlighted flaws in public health decision-making and amplified the voices of experts brave enough to question the prevailing narrative.
One of my memorable moments was my in-depth interview with Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo. He was the first public official to call for a halt to the covid-19 mRNA vaccines due to unresolved safety concerns.
I also spoke with key figures from the early days of the pandemic.
In a two–part series with Scott Atlas from the Trump administration, he offered candid insights into how decisions by Anthony Fauci, Deborah Birx and former CDC director Robert Redfield led to critical missteps that resulted in chaos and widespread distrust.
In another exclusive, I interviewed Phillip Buckhaults, whose work has been pivotal in analysing DNA contamination in covid-19 mRNA vaccines. Alongside genomics expert Kevin McKernan who was the first to expose the problem, Buckhaults is advancing crucial research into genomic integration – an area with profound implications for public health and safety.
Throughout 2024, I cast a spotlight on the deep-seated failures of regulatory agencies such as the FDA and TGA. These institutions often chose obfuscation over transparency, delaying critical Freedom of Information requests and resorting to private email accounts to evade scrutiny. Such tactics not only betray public trust but also hinder the accountability essential to their roles.
My investigations into vaccine safety led to some of the most impactful stories of the year. I exposed the tragic number of sudden infant deaths reported after infants had received the Infanrix Hexa vaccine, which regulators like Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (“TGA”) continue to ignore.
I interviewed Danish physician Peter Gøtzsche who spoke of his concerns regarding the over-crowded childhood immunisation schedules in the US and Australia, compared to his native country of Denmark.
One of my most revealing interviews was with Stanley Plotkin, often referred to as the “godfather” of vaccines. Plotkin’s candid admissions about the lack of robust vaccine safety studies underscored the immense challenges in maintaining public confidence, particularly when regulatory oversight appears compromised.
It was shocking to see Moderna halt its trials for its new mRNA vaccine against Respiratory syncytial virus (“RSV”) for children. The US Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) failed to disclose the data for months after the trial showed the vaccine not only failed to prevent severe RSV disease but appeared to worsen it.
I also revealed serious ethical breaches in Gardasil’s human papillomavirus (“HPV”) vaccine trials. Participants were misled about the nature of the placebos used and this vaccine exhibits the same troubling issue of DNA contamination as the mRNA vaccines. These stories laid bare a concerning pattern of negligence and deception in vaccine trials and approvals.
2024 was also a year for questioning power.
I reported on government inquiries into covid-19 in the United Kingdom and Australia, highlighting systemic failures in transparency and decision-making. These inquiries uncovered flaws that continue to erode public trust in health institutions.
I also took aim at the corporate/legacy media’s repeated failures. Whether it was The New York Times misleading its readers about the polio vaccine or left-leaning outlets alienating audiences with biased election coverage, 2024 underscored the growing disillusionment with traditional journalism.
Amidst the challenges, there were victories too. I reported on the legal triumph of Zoe Harcombe and Malcolm Kendrick, who successfully sued a British tabloid for defamation over their work on statins. Their win was a powerful reminder of the importance of standing up to the lies of legacy media, no matter the odds.
Looking Ahead
To my loyal subscribers and founding members, thank you. Your support fuels my work, allowing me to dig deeper and ask tougher questions.
If you’re not already a paid subscriber, now is the time to join. Independent journalism depends on your support to uncover the truths others dare not touch.
As 2025 begins, I am about to release a story that will blow the lid off the DNA contamination scandal. I guarantee it’s not one you’ll want to miss.
Here’s to a transformative 2025.
About the Author
Maryanne Demasi is an Australian investigative journalist and formerly a television presenter with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) Catalyst television program. She holds a PhD in rheumatology from the University of Adelaide and has worked in various capacities, including as a speechwriter and political advisor for the South Australian Science Minister. She is also an author and writes for online media and top-tier medical journals. In 2023, she was named a Brownstone fellow.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]
Something is a miss. They are not so lethal after all, I don’t want to downplay the harmful effects, but as a whole picture, a bunch vaxxed people are visibly still well, many of them used the argument: I don’t know anyone with side effects or dead.
The purpose of the vax was very likely to ‘just’ connect people to the IoB or IoT, start a search in Google: COordinate and ROuting system for NAno networks, and notice that it stands for CORONA.
“Not SO lethal…”.
They should not be lethal at all, but they are. You don´t want to downplay the harmful effects, when there should be zero (0) of them, and numbers are going up every day.
Try to wake up.
You missed the point. The whole purpose of vaxxing with nanotech.
In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king.
This fact could not bring you to vote, right?
“In another exclusive, I interviewed Phillip Buckhaults, whose work has been pivotal in analysing DNA contamination in covid-19 mRNA vaccines. Alongside genomics expert Kevin McKernan who was the first to expose the problem, Buckhaults is advancing crucial research into genomic integration – an area with profound implications for public health and safety.”
See that? “Genomic integration”? Transhumanism. Parallel brain array structure. Nanobots harvesting blood. Humongous microplastic structures. What’s not to like?
Your blog is a shining example of excellence in content creation. I’m continually impressed by the depth of your knowledge and the clarity of your writing. Thank you for all that you do.
[…] https://expose-news.com/2025/01/01/maryanne-demasi-reflects-on-2024/ […]
“Throughout 2024, I cast a spotlight on the deep-seated failures of regulatory agencies such as the FDA and TGA.”
I haven’t seen any journalists live up to that in 4 years. The EUA requirements are short and easy. It is exceptionally plain to see that they violated item II regarding known risks and therefore assumed liability:
EUA REQUIREMENTS:
21 USC 360bbb-3: Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies
A) Required Conditions
(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed-
(I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product;
(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
(III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.
Very easy to see that the EUA was not upheld. They assumed liability because they lost the EUA. Without emergency use, the entire thing is illegal.
There are 1500 peptides listed in a single Moderna patent (they have 10). 5 of these peptides are related to ovaries. Is that a risk?
There were no ingredient lists, so it’s all possible. There are also 552 patent citations in that patent. No risks?
Let’s not leave out test packets, because those also affected non-vaccine takers. There were risks associated with the tests, and those were never conveyed. They turned people into trojan horses against their own families. Every test has Fact Sheets and they all contain this statement:
“However, in the event of a false positive result, risks to patients could include the following: a recommendation for isolation of the patient, monitoring of household or other close contacts for symptoms, patient isolation that might limit contact with family or friends and may increase contact with other individuals with COVID-19, limits in the ability to work, the delayed diagnosis and treatment for the true infection causing the symptoms, unnecessary prescription of a treatment or therapy, or other unintended adverse effects.”
How many take the test if they know?
They failed to uphold the EUA, and therefore assumed liability. Upholding emergency use was an absolute necessity due to the nature of the treatments.
1500 peptides pushed through as emergency use with zero liability? They lost the EUA.