|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The Climate and Nature Bill has its second reading in Parliament on 24 January 2025. If it becomes law, it will bring in compulsory re-wilding of more than 30% of the UK and place controls on travel and consumption.
“You may think that all the bills that have gone through Parliament already in the last six months have been disastrous and have been an attack on our way of life our culture and our economy. But there’s something else coming up which is as bad or even worse as everything that has gone before. And this is something called the Climate and Nature Bill,” David Kurten said.
“It will destroy the economy, essentially, and it will give the Government powers over your private property … Because of [something to do with] the climate or … nature then the government can essentially take your property,” he warned. “Because everything that happens in the country will have to be beholden to the targets in this Climate and Nature Bill.”
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Below is a summary of David Kurten’s video. But before we get to that, a brief mention of the UK constitution.
The UK constitution is a complex system of rules and principles that govern the United Kingdom (“UK”). Unlike many other countries, the UK has no single codified constitution document. The sources of the UK constitution are Acts of the UK Parliament, conventions, common law and authoritative works such as Albert Venn Dicey.
The UK constitution puts the people in charge and limits the powers of the Government. The legislature, being the House of Parliament and the House of Lords, are permitted to make legislation but they are subject to constitutional law. As William Keyte explained to Richard Vodes in 2023, “Constitutional law … absolutely limits what [the Government] can do legitimately. They could still go outside that but then they would be acting criminally.”
Magna Carta (1215), one of the sources of the UK Constitution which Keyte views as THE constitutional document, is still binding on the UK government today. Also known as the Great Charter of Freedoms (or Liberties), it established the principle that the king and government were subject to the rule of law and limited their powers. “[Magna Carta] leaves [the people] to be self-masters, essentially, and the government to get out of the way and leave them alone,” Keyte said. “[Magna Carta] elevates the people above their own government.”
Further resources: Common Law Constitution
Magna Carta explicitly refers to the Spiritual Constitution and the Temporal Constitution. The spiritual realm refers to the Christian church. The temporal realm refers to secular or worldly matters. The Commons refers to the people.
In the context of the English Bill of Rights, “Lords Spiritual,” “Lords Temporal,” and “Commons” refer to bishops of the Church of England who sit in the House of Lords, secular members of the House of Lords and elected representatives of the people, forming the House of Commons, respectively.
Related: English Bill of Rights: You are English, not British
This is the meaning of the paragraph at the beginning of the Climate and Nature Bill.
Both King Charles and the Government are subject to the rule of law and the constitution. If they are found to be acting outside what the constitution permits, they are acting criminally.
Magna Carta “reserves to … all Persons, as well Spiritual as Temporal, all their [free Liberties] and free Customs, which they have had in time passed.
“And all these Customs and Liberties aforesaid, which We have granted to be holden within this our Realm, [as much as appertaineth to Us and our Heirs, we shall observe; and] all Men of this our Realm, as well Spiritual as Temporal, [as much as in them is, shall observe the same against all Persons, in like wise.”
In other words, neither the king nor the government, nor anyone else, can remove our liberties and customs that we have had for thousands of years.
The earliest surviving record of our liberties is King Alfred’s Doombook (c. 600 A.D). It was the foundation on which Magna Carta was built. The Ten Commandments were a particularly important model for the drafting of Anglo-Saxon law codes and formed part of the preface to King Alfred’s law book, grounding the secular laws in biblical precedents. God’s law is also specifically referenced in the longest Anglo-Saxon law code, which was issued by King Cnut.
Rather than specifying what people can do, the majority of the Ten Commandments specify what people cannot do. In short, if it is not prohibited by God then it is one of our liberties or inalienable rights.
Read more: Charles III and Keir Starmer have violated the rule of law and must step down
If, through the Climate and Nature Bill, King Charles and the Government remove any of our ancient liberties or customs then the monarch and the Government are acting unconstitutionally, and criminally.
Keep in mind what our liberties and inalienable rights are as we read a summary of David Kurten’s explanation of what hundreds of politicians are attempting to push through as legislation.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Table of Contents
The Climate and Nature Bill: An Overview
The Climate and Nature (“CAN”) Bill, first introduced by former Green Member of Parliament (“MP”) Caroline Lucas, has been reintroduced by Liberal Democrat MP Ros Savage and is set to have its second reading in the House of Commons next Friday, 24 January.
The Bill has gained significant support from more than 190 politicians across the Commons, Lords and local councils, largely due to lobbying efforts by the non-governmental organisation Zero Hour. (You can see a full list of MPs supporting the CAN Bill HERE and view an interactive map of MPs supporting the Bill HERE.)
The Bill builds on the existing Committee on Climate Change, established in 2008, and would give this committee more power to dictate the country’s climate strategy and targets. It aims to require the UK to achieve climate and nature targets, giving the Secretary of State the duty to implement a strategy to achieve these targets, and establishing a climate and nature assembly to advise on the strategy.
It would also grant the government powers to take control of private property if deemed necessary for climate or nature-related reasons, potentially destroying the economy and undermining private property rights.
The ultimate goal of the bill is to achieve net zero carbon dioxide emissions by 2050, with interim targets and a binding strategy to be implemented by the Secretary of State for Climate. It requires the UK government to fulfil its obligations and commitments under the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement, which involves cutting carbon dioxide emissions and limiting global temperature increases.
The CAN Bill aims to ensure the United Kingdom reduces its overall contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions to “Net Zero” by 2030, at a rate consistent with limiting the global mean temperature increase to 1.5° C compared to pre-industrial levels.
Its objectives are based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (“IPPC’s”) definition of pre-industrial levels, which dates back to around 1750, a time after the medieval warm period and before the mini ice age.
Nature and Biodiversity Provisions
In addition to addressing climate change, the Bill also focuses on nature and biodiversity, with the government aiming to halt and reverse its overall contribution to the degradation and loss of nature in the UK and overseas.
The Government’s objectives include increasing the health, abundance, diversity and resilience of species populations, habitats and ecosystems, with the goal of putting nature on the path of recovery by 2030.
It references the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, which is a framework for meeting biodiversity targets and objectives. However, the bill’s measures may not effectively address the issues of nature and biodiversity, and may even exacerbate the problems.
For example, the implementation of the bill’s objectives may involve measures that could have unintended consequences, such as the destruction of habitats and the killing of birds due to the construction of wind turbines and solar panels.
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework considers biodiversity fundamental to human well-being and a healthy planet and economic prosperity, and is being taken seriously by politicians who are introducing legislation to meet its goals.
The framework recognises and considers diverse value systems and concepts, including the rights of nature and the rights of “Mother Earth,” which is being used as the basis for a bill in the UK that would require the country to obey this framework.
2030 Agenda and Rewilding Implications
The CAN Bill is tied to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which is a way to introduce communism and take away property rights under the guise of sustainability and a climate emergency.
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework has 23 targets, including ensuring that at least 30% of degraded terrestrial, inland water and marine and coastal ecosystems are under effective restoration by 2030. This target is about rewilding and giving the government control over land, which would be particularly destructive in densely populated countries like the UK, where over 80% of the land is used for agriculture.
The CAN Bill aims to achieve sustainability targets by 2030 and additional targets by 2050, which may be destructive to the agricultural sector. It would give the Committee on Climate Change the power to tell the Secretary of State for Climate to requisition land and rewild it, potentially stopping agriculture on certain lands. The implementation of this bill would be devastating to farmers, farms and agriculture in the UK, which is already under attack through inheritance tax and extra business taxes.
Impacts on Homes, Consumption and Personal Freedom
Homeowners may be required to demolish and rebuild their houses to meet energy efficiency standards, with the possibility of remote control over energy usage.
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework’s Target 16 aims to encourage sustainable consumption choices, reduce global consumption footprint and minimise waste by 2030, which may involve legislation and regulations to enforce lower consumption.
The World Economic Forum has expressed desires to limit meat consumption, private car ownership, air travel and clothing purchases, which could lead to a loss of individual liberty and freedom.
The implementation of 15-minute cities may restrict car travel, promoting active travel like walking and cycling, and limiting access to public transport for long-distance travel.
The proposed limits on clothing purchases are an overreach, infringing on individual freedom and the free market.
The overall goal of these measures is to reduce waste and promote sustainability, but they could, and will most likely, go too far, resembling communism and restricting personal choice.
Economic and Societal Consequences
The CAN Bill will be extremely destructive to the economy and way of life, as it will give the government power to essentially destroy private property and “decarbonise” the economy by getting rid of all carbon-based energy, including imports of gas and LNG from overseas.
The bill will restrict people’s freedom to decide what to do with their own money and use the free market, and will instead allow the government to control the economy.
It will have a devastating impact on the economy, potentially leading to its collapse, and will leave people with limited options for making a living, such as growing their own vegetables and selling them.
It’s worth noting the hypocrisy of those people who are pushing for the Bill. They will be the same people who attend climate summits and global summits and are often the most wasteful, using private jets to travel to these events four or five times a year.
We are at a crucial moment to stop the Bill from progressing through Parliament. To stop the bill, write to your MP and ask them to vote against it on 24 January.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News
[…] The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework […]
This is a clear path to national suicide. The economy, such as it is, would swirl the drain. They could never pass such a thing in the US, at least not in my lifetime.
“This is a clear path to national suicide” – haven’t they just passed a law for that too – assisted dying.
I don’t think so. US has the state governments to deal with, makes it a lot harder to try draconian measures when state governments can upend those plans. We saw that during the Scamdemic. In addition, the US Constitution is 9/10 about property rights. Such laws would be found unconstitutional very quickly. UK has a complex morass of ancient laws, easier to abuse the system.
The judiciary is as corrupted as the politicians and the police enforcers.
If ppl think the law will protect them ancient or modern, they are in for a shock.
If homeowners & farmers are forced out due to these measures, who then do you think may acquire them?
The Slavland Chronicles describes how Russian oligarchs use “military acquisition “ of properties in choice areas which they then transfer into their own possession. (trump/Sanctions 18/01/25
The CAN Bill will be a huge boost too domestic agriculture as it will encourage greater domestic production
Delusional.
Most people cannot afford the changes and that is the whole issue with a bankrupt economy.
Serfdom!
“You will own nothing and be happy” – Klaus Anal Schwab – W.E.F.
Your quote is both out of context and from a work of fiction. Go on the WEF site and read it yourself
It’s from the website! Subsequently removed.
This says, “Homeowners may be required to demolish and rebuild their houses to meet energy efficiency standards”
“May be” – ordinary people need to be worried, but we know who won’t be required to demolish and rebuild their houses – the owners of Buckingham Palace, Kensington Palace, Balmoral, those fine Regency and Georgian houses in Eaton Square, Belgrave Square – i.e the elite. They will get an exemption.
Don’t worry, it says nothing of the sort in the Bill
Looks like you’re just a Bill shill. Chill shill!
If not already, it will be soon in your country as well.
Hi Rhoda,
David Kurten gives a very good look into our future demise.
Our MP’s have already shut down Coal mines, Steel works and Power stations in the UK.
What a shower of traitors are running the country.
Most of the MP’s will be ‘Friends of Israel ‘, not bothered about us.
If we already had the CAN Bill it would have stopped a lot of those things from happening
[…] Impacts on Homes, Consumption and Personal Freedom […]
O course, it’s all about Agenda 21/2030, “you will own nothing, and be happy” (to die).
David Webb: “The Great Taking, what I mean by that is it’s not just about your IRA,
this is about everything.
This is about subjugation.
It is a geopolitical strategy.
It’s essentially a hybrid war that we’re in and
they don’t need your property,
they don’t need your money,
the objective is that you will not have your property,
you will not have your money
and then
you will have no recourse but to accept the solution that they have for you.”
Alex Newman: “And what is that solution? Central Bank digital currency and total control?”
D. W.: “I think Central Bank Digital Currency.”
A. N.: “What we’re talking about is an attempt to steal basically the entire productive capacity of the planet, from me, from you, from normal people using lies using deception using surreptitious means.”
— The Great Taking: Exposing the Largest Heist in Global History – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZGPfX-KJkw
UN AGENDA 2030 Exposed & Explained – Rosa Koire – https://rumble.com/v693t0y-un-agenda-2030-exposed-and-explained-rosa-koire.html
lol!
The misunderstanding of the CAN Bill as presented here is hysterical. I would recommend everyone read the Bill as it’s only short. The author of this piece is either maliciously lying or of very limited intelligence
First thing I’ve read that makes any sense here.
Easy to spot the two paid shills!
Sad to see the UK stoop to using such pathetic tactics.
[…] READ MORE AT THE EXPOSE […]
In the CAN bill the UK government states a 400 billion global annual tonne limit for CO2 emissions. So if they can put that number into context then I should be allowed as a person on this planet through rationing to produce 44 tonnes per year without penalty.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/268753/co2-emissions-per-capita-worldwide-since-1990/?__sso_cookie_checker=failed
Being an average Joe I only product 5-6 tonnes a year at most.
We need rationing at this needs to be implemented on all – making people stick to the 5-6 tonne limit or jailed makes it really easy.
Stop Starmer flying around the world save loads of CO2 emissions.
[…] Agenda 2030 et Implications de Rewilding […]
These criminals care nothing for nature.
It’s all about power and control…
This “bill” is transferring land from rich people to other rich people. At the end, no one, except whichever rich people end up in control of it, 99.99% of all people won’t have any land, nor even be “allowed” to set foot on it, just like now.
You have no “nature”. Look around you. Farms are prisons and torture for all “living” there, except the rich farmers. Other tham farms, what do you have? National “trust” ruins here and there, that again you have no actual right to enter. For 99.99% they can’t even afford to go there.
Hell, that’s the rest of the world, some countries worse than others.
does ending private property apply to the parasitic”royals too”?
Hi ChrisIrish67, the property belonging to the Royals is state property. By “state” I am not referring to national governments, which, in some cases, is our definition of the “state.” Their definition of “state” is the national government and its cronies as exemplified by the UN-WEF Public Private partnership (which is the One World Government).
The UN is owned and run by oligarchs and the WEF is owned and run by oligarchs. Both organisations (i.e. the oligarchs) have infiltrated public bodies and authorities and taken control of them, and national governments are openly partnering with global corporations (owned by the oligarchs). So the “state” I’m referring to is the “public private partnership” of national governments and the oligarchs.
The British Royal family is one of the oligarch families – they are part of the Black Nobility (or Venetian Nobility) which is the oldest (and the most powerful/influential) group of global oligarchs that has been planning and attempting to take over/take control of the world for centuries (ever since the fall of the Roman Empire). The Black Nobles are at the top of the pile in the global oligarchical structure. So, by their definition, property owned by the British or any of the European Royal families is not “private property” it is “state property.” That’s why the rules they make for us regarding “private property” do not apply to them – in their minds, we are the “private” and they are the “state” (i.e. the One World Government). We (“private”) will own nothing and they (the oligarchs’ state) will own everything, that is their plan and has been for centuries.
Is this the snake eating its tail? Always thought the Brits were smarter than that.
[…] Nature and Biodiversity Provisions […]
There was a time the people would take up arms and fight for their rights. Time we stopped being spineless amoebas and followed our ancestors-it’s all very well having peaceful demonstrations but they don’t change anything. As George Carlin once said ‘I don’t condone violence but historically it’s only massive bloodshed that changes anything.’ The despots are skating on thin ice now, they are panicking like f**** because they can’t stamp out the truth for much longer. Personally, I wouldn’t lose any sleep if assassinations do start happening-karma and all that.
When government has control of things, like for instance the NHS, things usually fall apart pretty soon after, as most politicians appear o be in the pocket of corporations who’s aspirations are never the good of the land or people but simply profit for themselves. Time for drastic change!
[…] of the key documents that forms part of the UK constitution is Magna Carta (1215). In 2023, William Keyte explained that he views Magna Carta as THE constitutional […]
[…] clés qui fait partie de la Constitution britannique est Magna Carta (1215). En 2023, William Keyte a expliqué qu’il considère la Magna Carta comme LE document […]
[…] of the key documents that forms part of the UK constitution is Magna Carta (1215). In 2023, William Keyte explained that he views Magna Carta as THE constitutional […]
…Rhoda, do u know if the UNFCCC has shifted to under the wing of the WHO, i’m trying to recall where I’m sure I read this?…
Hi Gerry O’C, I haven’t read or heard anywhere that it has.
At the end of the day, does it matter? The UN, the whole of the UN, is an organisation of the global oligarchs. They only split it up into “divisions” for appearances; so the the public thinks it’s a legitimate organisation involving many decision makers.
… thanks Rhoda, yes i agree…that’s how they operate… btw, the following links to doubtless one of the best substacks… escapekey.substack.com …
Hi Gerry O’C, thanks for the pointer to Escape Key. I’m aware of that Substack, I’ve even republished a couple of his/her articles. 🙂