Breaking News

World War III is now a certainty

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Please share our story!


Dr. Vernon Coleman believes that World War III is now a certainty, driven by conspirators who want to destroy Christianity, decency and humanity.  He says that Ukraine’s president, Zelensky, is being supported by these conspirators, who aim for global depopulation and profit from war.

The UK, led by Keir Starmer, is being drawn into the war, with billions spent on arms, which will lead to devastating consequences, including a deepening depression and potential nuclear war.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


By Dr. Vernon Coleman

I’m no fan of Trump or Putin but I am no fan of Zelensky either and when the entire world media, all politicians and most of the internet defend him and say what a fine fellow he is then you know he is a really, really bad egg.

Real history (as opposed to corporate media history) shows that Ukraine got itself into this war. It could have been sorted years ago.

But I believe Zelensky is being supported by the conspirators who want to destroy Christianity, decency and humanity and start World War Three. His backers are the insane conspirators who want global depopulation with the world population cut to 500 million and the UK’s population cut by nearly two-thirds.

Britain is in a dire state. The Labour Party has already pushed us onto the edge of the worst depression since the 1930s. Europe is almost as bad.

We should be spending what little money our countries have on better health care and not on bombs. Starmer’s cuddling up to Zelensky shows that he is determined to be one of the driving forces taking us into World War Three. Who’d have thought it – Starmer won’t be remembered for all those free suits. He’ll be remembered as a warmonger.

It is well acknowledged by historians that World War II was deliberately created by bankers – it was a war fought for profit.

When Poland invaded Germany (not the other way round) Britain used it as an excuse to start a war with Germany. Remember, it was Poland which invaded Germany and Britain that declared war on Germany and not the other way around.

Now we’re heading into World War Three. And the banker conspirators are using exactly the same trick as before. I warned it would happen in a video called `Nuclear War is Coming’ two years ago.

Once again Britain (this time with the rest of Europe) has effectively declared war.

The consequences are going to be appalling.

Starmer has committed Britain to spending billions more on buying bombs and bullets. His is the Government which said it couldn’t afford the winter fuel allowance for pensioners. He is taking us into a war which will kill many Britons and which will push us deeper into a depression that will last for decades. One thing I can guarantee: Starmer, Reeves, Macron, etc., will not be up to their chests in blood and mud – fighting and dying in Ukraine.

The US and the UK have already paid billions on sending bombs and bullets to Ukraine (some of the arms were illegal uranium enriched stuff, of course). Now, as it was always planned, it seems clear that the US will get access to Ukraine’s rich mineral supplies. The UK will get no commodities but a lot of Ukrainian immigrants. Our creaking infrastructure will collapse.

The American bankers will, as I predicted, make money out of their “investment” in Ukraine. (The American technique is described in my book `Their Terrifying Plan’ which you should read if you want to know what is going on. To buy a copy CLICK HERE )

Corporate media claims that the majority of the British people will do anything to help Ukraine and regard Zelensky as a hero. Naturally, this is untrue. The majority of British people have no interest in defending Ukraine (which history shows was the father of its own misfortune) and I suspect many dislike Zelensky (officially addressed as “His Excellency”!) as much as they dislike Starmer.

Last week, the British people were worried about immigration, money and health care – in that order.

This week they can start worrying about World War Three.

If we are all nuked (which is now likely) then we won’t have to worry about immigration, money and health care.

The world population will fall dramatically. And the bankers will become even richer.

Starmer’s War isn’t about saving Ukraine – it’s about making money for billionaires.

About the Author

Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc practised medicine for ten years. He has been a full-time professional author for over 30 years. He is a novelist and campaigning writer and has written many non-fiction books.  He has written over 100 books which have been translated into 22 languages. On his website, HERE, there are hundreds of articles which are free to read.

There are no ads, no fees and no requests for donations on Dr. Coleman’s website or videos. He pays for everything through book sales. If you want to help finance his work, please just buy a book – there are over 100 books by Vernon Coleman in print on Amazon.

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Please share our story!
author avatar
Rhoda Wilson
While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.

Categories: Breaking News, Opinion Pages

Tagged as:

4.2 5 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
73 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bedunker
Bedunker
5 months ago

The second Churchill quote is most unlikely to be true; it would be helpful if the author of this piece had attributed it to a published work or speech as it does not form part of any of the many well known words of Churchill, nor does it conform to what we understand of his thinking.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Bedunker
5 months ago

You are quite wrong. It fits perfectly with what we do know about Churchill – the real Churchill.

Are you aware of his speeches and his letters to The Times from 1919 to the mid thirties? They are on record.

Germany is too strong. We must destroy her.” (Winston Churchill, November 1936 to US General Wood.)

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

I forgot to mention that in 1919 Churchill was calling for war with Germany. WW1 had only just ended in 1918, the British people were sick of war but he wanted to inflict it on them again.

Throughout the 1920s and early 1930, he carried on his campaign of trying to stir up war with Germany, all documented in his speeches and letters to The Times.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Bedunker
5 months ago

Here is a fact-packed article that has the truth that you won’t find in the biographies of Churchill. Read of how Churchill was plotting with foreign governments, conspiring against the interests of the British people. Read about the overthrow of Chamberlain, they got rid of him just as they got rid of Liz Truss.

“Champions of Judea: On the Supplanting of British Foreign Policy”.

https://www.unz.com/article/champions-of-judea-on-the-supplanting-of-british-foreign-policy/

About Hitler – “not until early 1938 did he order that Germany must consider after all the contingency of war with Britain—a contingency which, it must be said, Mr Churchill had himself largely created by his speeches.”

jsinton
jsinton
Reply to  Rhoda Wilson
5 months ago

Putin’s speech today:

“Dear colleagues, media, journalists, and guests.

Good afternoon

Today, again, in the European Union and NATO member states, there are calls for a “war against Russia.”.

Today, unfortunately or not, we can say again that history always repeats itself. Always!

The views of our colleagues from Europe and NATO on Russia never change; they are always ready to destroy Russia, everything Russian, and ready to occupy Russia; their goal never changes.

Hatred against Russia has always remained in the veins of some of our colleagues and countries ruling the EU and NATO.

Dear colleagues, Today we hear again that Russia is an aggressor, and the truth is that Russia has never been an aggressor and has always defended itself throughout history.

That’s a fact!

Dear colleagues from Europe and NATO, Russia never starts a war; Russia always stops wars. You start wars, and the goal is always to destroy Russia.

Russia has never threatened countries, has never threatened the security of the world, but we like to say, “The snake bites the most when it dies.”

You created fascism, always everywhere, and in Ukraine, wars are your work, and Russia will always defend its country and its people. No matter what it costs, no matter how many losses we suffer, we have always defended our country and its people; we will always continue to do so.

As you know, we have proven ourselves many times in our history as a country with spirit.

And today you are shouting again, “Victory over Russia.”

Dear colleagues, I assure you that Russia will not fall; it may be torn apart, but never destroyed.

If a NATO EU country declares war on Russia, everyone must know that our reaction will be lightning fast, and if we feel a threat to us, our reaction will be destructive.

Today, Russia has all kinds of weapons in the current history of the world, I emphasize. (I add: you have no idea.)

You have not seen anything from Russia and its possibilities in Ukraine because Ukraine is our historical country, and there are Russians in Ukraine, and we are saving them, and this is not a war but a military operation. (True)

On the other hand, it will not be like in Ukraine; that is what you need to know.

As for whether we are ready to negotiate for peace, we have always been ready to negotiate, but no one wanted to negotiate with us.

Of course, Russia has no friends among NATO and European leaders, because Russia is a strong, huge country, which is exactly what your NATO and European colleagues do not want.

But accept it!

No matter how much you repeat that one day Russia will be defeated… I believe in God, and God is with us. The world may end earlier, but Russia will not fall.

We do not need a world without Russia.

Unlike you, I know very well what a country and people are, and therefore I will always fight for my country and people.

Are you ready to accept this, as you wish? Are you ready to start a war against Russia again? But we are also ready.

And today’s war against Russia would be an absolute apocalypse.

I advise our colleagues from Europe and NATO to work for the good of the world, not for the destruction of the world.

Thank you! “

Garth
Garth
5 months ago

“I believe Zelensky is being supported by the conspirators who want to destroy Christianity, decency and humanity and start World War Three” – Zelensky was installed with one job to to do – start WW3.

“When Poland invaded Germany (not the other way round) Britain used it as an excuse to start a war with Germany. Remember, it was Poland which invaded Germany and Britain that declared war on Germany and not the other way around.” – thank you Dr. Coleman.

The British people are brainwashed to believe that Hitler started WW2. They don’t know about the Danzig situation.

The anti-Hitler propaganda is everywhere, from the politicians, the media and in entertainment.

On example is in the notable WW2 British propaganda film, “In Which We Serve”, made by Noel Coward and he starred in it as the captain of HMS Torrin.

In a scene when the crew are gathered and he gives a rousing speech, he says, “We can tell Hilter, the Torrin’s ready, you can start your war.” – YOUR war.

Even today, the propaganda to maintain the myth of Hilter is pumped out relentlessly by the newspapers and in dramas.

jsinton
jsinton
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

Makes great TV. I still watch it.

Chris
Chris
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

I’ve never heard about Poland invading Germany to kick off WW2. Yes, Britain declared war against Germany as an ally of Poland responding to Germany attacking Poland, and Germany was ruled by National Socialists who were brutally evil to many in that country, including Jews, Christians, Gypsies, and any dissenters – which reminds of the current socialist extremists governing the UK now.
And yes, corruption is part of mankind and authority across this fallen world – always has been.
Can anyone give me any sourced link to anything different to my understanding, especially re: Poland & Germany at start of WW2? Thank you.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Chris
5 months ago

You never heard of it? Have you heard of the UN’s “R2P” protocol, which, if the UN had acted on it, the Ukraine war would have been avoided? That never gets mentioned in our media.

The reason why you don’t know about how WW2 really started was because the media keep it hushed up and they push the fake news version.

When I was at school my history teacher told the class, “History is written by the victors”. I didn’t understand what he meant. I thought history was just facts about what happened. Now I understand it.

Just as today the media keep quiet about the Ukrainian Neo-Nazis of the Azov Brigade carrying out ethnic cleansing in Donbass and Luhansk, about Putin asking the UN to send in peacekeepers to stop it (read about the UN’s “R2P” protocol), and about the UN ignoring his call so Putin had to send his own troops in, so just like that, the media won’t talk about The Danzig Situation in 1939. If you don’t know about that, then you really don’t know how WW2 started. It is hushed up now but in WW2 the British public knew about it and here is a non-political source to verify it. Watch a British WW2 propaganda film called “School For Secrets”. It is about how scientists managed to miniaturise radar equipment to get it small enough to be installed in planes and that gave the RAF a night-time advantage. It begins with a few brief shots of a plane flying in bad weather then crashing Then we see a London gentleman’s club and one of the character’s turns the wireless on for the news. The top story is about the situation in Danzig. That was to give the audiences of the day the feeling of realism, because they would have known all about it.

The problem is that the media are re-writing history, so if try to look it up you are likely to get a fictionalised version of what happened (just as we will get from the UK Covid Inquiry). A few months ago I read an article by the Polish ambassador to the UK and he called Danzig, “the free city of Danzig”. It was a German city. After the war the Poles changed the name to Gdansk. The ambassador wrote his fake account of what went on, but the photographs that illustrate it must have been chosen by the newspaper and they didn’t look at the closely at them. The people are on the streets smiling and cheering as they wave at the Germans arriving in tanks and lorries. They were pleased to see the Germans. It wasn’t an invasion, it was a peacekeeping force. The Poles were carrying out ethnic cleansing of Germans and Hitler sent troops in to stop it.

You say, “Britain declared war against Germany as an ally of Poland responding to Germany attacking Poland” – yes, Britain had signed a defence pact with Poland, but the pact was a deliberate ploy to contrive a war with Germany, just as Starmer’s “100 year agreement with Ukraine (or is it a treaty?) will cause war. See the 5th March article on this site about that agreement \ treaty.

You ask for sources of information. I am just about to dig up some for you, and they are fact-filled with references to official documents and other means of verification of things they say. I need a while, so my reply might be tomorrow.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Chris
5 months ago

I’m working on it, but I came across this by John Pilger and it backs up what I said about how the people are not told the truth about war, it is is hushed up. It was also true for WW1.

“This brainwashing by omission has a long history. The slaughter of World War I was suppressed by reporters who were knighted for their compliance and confessed in their memoirs. In 1917, the editor of the Manchester Guardian, CP Scott, confided to Prime Minister Lloyd George: “If people really knew [the truth], the war would be stopped tomorrow, but they don’t know and can’t know.” from “John Pilger Silencing the lambs:: How propaganda works”.

https://johnpilger.com/2022/09/08/silencing-the-lambs-how-propaganda-works/

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

Do you know if David Lloyd George was a freemason?

It is well documented of Churchill and others, including the “butcher” Haigh.

You have made some (what I believe) good comments on our ‘history’.

Thanks.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Chris
5 months ago

I can give you enough reading to last you for weeks, but start with this. “Why Everything You Know About World War II Is Wrong”. If you don’t fancy reading it, you can listen to the audio version.

It has this, and surely the renowned Oxford historian A.J.P. Taylor is a man to be heeded.

“With regard to Hitler and the outbreak of the war, I think an excellent starting point would be Origins of the Second World War, a classic work published in 1961 by renowned Oxford historian A.J.P. Taylor. As I described his conclusions in 2019:

   Hitler’s final demand, that 95% German Danzig be returned to Germany just as its inhabitants desired, was an absolutely reasonable one, and only a dreadful diplomatic blunder by the British had led the Poles to refuse the request, thereby provoking the war. The widespread later claim that Hitler sought to conquer the world was totally absurd, and the German leader had actually made every effort to avoid war with Britain or France. Indeed, he was generally quite friendly towards the Poles and had been hoping to enlist Poland as a German ally against the menace of Stalin’s Soviet Union.”

https://www.unz.com/runz/why-everything-you-know-about-world-war-ii-is-wrong/

Note, “a dreadful diplomatic blunder by the British had led the Poles to refuse the request, thereby provoking the war” – a blunder? That excuse is used ever so often even today. A blunder. It was deliberate. The British wanted war, just as in 2022 when there was a Ukraine peace deal on the table and Boris Johnson put an end to it. See on this site, “When is a peace deal, not a peace deal? That article tells of how Boris Johnson went to Istanbul to scupper the peace deal.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Chris
5 months ago

Newspaper headlines about Danzig from https://www.freecitysourcebook.com/1939-english-language-newspapers.html

“Wilson, Michael. “Hitler Reported Allying Poland By Danzig Deal.” Washington Post 25 Mar. 1939: 7. ProQuest.” Supporting the view that Hitler wanted Poland to be his ally.


“British Support for Poland.” Financial Times [London] 1 Apr. 1939: 7. Financial Times Historical Archive. Web. Starmer has signed an agreement with Ukraine – it is a repeat of WW2 and Poland.

International News Service. “100 Germans Flee Poland to Refuge in Danzig.” Washington Post 13 Apr. 1939: 1. ProQuest. Fleeing ethnic cleansing by Poles.

Day, Donald. “Poles threaten Nazis with war in Danzig dispute.” Chicago Tribune 15 Apr. 1939: 6. Web. The Poles threaten war.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Chris
5 months ago

Some of my postings did not appear. I think they were censored, but perhaps they will appear later after they have been vetted. I doubt that that there was anything in them that can’t be published.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Chris
5 months ago

I need to post this in two parts because it is long and I think that is why it gets stopped as needing approval.

This book is a masterpiece and is the most honest and truthful account of WW2 –

A review of “Germany’s War” by John Wear.

“Establishment historians characterize National Socialist Germany as a uniquely barbaric, vile and criminal regime that was totally responsible for starting World War II and carrying out some of the most heinous war crimes in world history. Germany’s War by John Wear refutes this characterization of Germany, bring history into accord with the facts.

Germany’s War documents that the Allied leaders of the Soviet Union, Great Britain and the United States were primarily responsible for starting and prolonging World War II—costing million of lives. Far from being the conqueror of Europe, Adolf Hitler was its savior.

The leaders of Great Britain and the United States also adopted policies designed to force war with Germany. Britain’s unconditional guarantee to Poland led to horrific acts of violence against Poland’s ethnic Germans and, thus, Germany was forced to invade Poland to end these atrocities. Franklin Roosevelt’s numerous provocations, including a shoot-on-sight policy against German shipping and leaked plans of a United States invasion of Germany, forced Germany to declare war on the United States despite Hitler’s desire for peace.

This book also reports the Allied mass murder of the German people after the end of World War II during which the Allies—led by Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower—murdered approximately 1.5 million German prisoners of war through intentional starvation and exposure to the elements. Probably a minimum 2.1 million ethnic Germans expelled from their homes also died in what was supposed to be an “orderly and humane” relocation. Finally, the Allies murdered millions of additional Germans through intentional starvation after the war ended—plus much, much more.

Table of Contents

Introduction: War Is Hell

This is not from the review: part 2 to follow.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Chris
5 months ago

Here is part 2 of my posting.

From the review – Part I: The Allied Conspiracy to Originate World War

   The Chief Culprit: Josef Stalin & the Soviet Union
   FDR & America’s Second Crusade
   The Forced War: How WWII Was Originated
   The Allied Conspiracy to Instigate & Prolong WWII

Part II: Allied Postwar Crimes Against Germans

   Allied Prisoner of War Camps
   The German Expellees
   History’s Most Terrifying Peace

Part III: Actual and Alleged German Atrocities of WWII

   The Alleged Genocide of European Je wry
   Crimes Committed in German Concentration Camps
   Crimes Committed by Germany During WWII

Epilogue: Creation of the Modern World

Bibliography

Index

Introduction

War Is Hell

My father was a pilot in 50 bombing missions for the U.S. Eighth Air Force during World War II. When I was a boy I asked him if he had killed anyone during the war. He replied, “I hope I didn’t kill anyone.” In regard to his participation in the Normandy invasion, he said: “You cannot imagine how big of an operation that was. People on the ground were being killed!” My father repeatedly stated he hated war and that “War is hell.” He also expressed his opinion that the Germans had fought extraordinarily hard during the war.

I have always wondered how wars have continuously existed throughout history when virtually everyone agrees with my father that “War is hell.” In regard to the origin of World War II, a fascinating discussion occurred during the Nuremberg trials between American psychologist Dr. Gustave Gilbert and former German Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering. On the evening of April 18, 1946, in Goering’s jail cell, Dr. Gilbert expressed his belief that the common people are not very thankful for leaders who bring them war and destruction. Goering responded:

Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back in one piece? Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.

Dr. Gilbert told Goering that there is one difference. Gilbert said: “In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare war.”

Goering responded: “Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”

Hermann Goering was speaking the truth to Dr. Gilbert. The common people of the Soviet Union, Great Britain, the United States, Germany, Japan and all other countries in the world were strongly against war. World War II was instigated only because the leaders of some countries had wanted war and brought the people to their bidding. The question is: Which countries had leaders who wanted to bring about World War II?

Dr. Gilbert stated that the leaders of Germany were the ones who had wanted war. Goering emphatically denied that he and Adolf Hitler had wanted war. Most historians would agree with Dr. Gilbert’s statement and reject Goering’s denial as self-serving, absurd, and irresponsible. However, as we will discuss in Part 1 of this book, the historical record clearly shows that Goering was right. Hitler had wanted to free Germany from the Treaty of Versailles, but had never wanted to plunge Germany into World War II.

This book discusses the origins, aftermath, and atrocities of World War II from a German perspective. It is in essence Germany’s side of the story. This book is designed to counteract the one-sided bias of establishment historians against Germany in regard to World War II. Most establishment historians, for example, state that it is self-evident that Adolf Hitler and Germany started World War II. However, an objective review of the origins of World War II reveals that the Allied leaders of the Soviet Union, the United States, and Great Britain were primarily responsible for starting and prolonging the war.

Part I of this book documents that: 1) Adolf Hitler was forced to invade the Soviet Union to preempt a Soviet takeover of Europe;

2) U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt repeatedly told the American public he was committed to peace while making every effort to involve the United States in war; and 3) Germany was forced to fight Great Britain even though Hitler had always wanted peace with Britain and regarded the two countries as natural allies. The leaders of the Soviet Union, the United States, and Great Britain were all committed to the complete destruction of Germany. The Allied leaders purposely sacrificed the lives of tens of millions of people and practiced uncivilized warfare to accomplish their goal.

The Allies also intentionally allowed the Soviet Union to gain control of Eastern Europe. Thus, a war allegedly fought for freedom and democracy turned into a totalitarian nightmare for the people of the Eastern European nations.

Part II of this book reports the Allied mass murder of the German people after the end of World War II. Although denied by almost all historians, the Western Allies murdered approximately 1 million German prisoners of war through intentional starvation and exposure to the elements. The Allies also carried out the largest forced population transfer in history by expelling approximately 16 million ethnic Germans from their homes after the end of the war. Probably a minimum 2.1 million of these German expellees died in what was supposed to be an “orderly and humane” expulsion. Finally, the Allies murdered millions of additional Germans through starvation after the end of World War II.

Allied soldiers also raped an estimated 2 million German women during and after World War II. This represents more rapes against a defeated enemy than any other war in history. The Allies conducted a brutal denazification program designed to make the German people feel guilty about their war effort. Hundreds of German scientists were also compelled to emigrate by the victors, and German patents, technological advances, and other property were confiscated by the Allies. Millions of Germans were also sent to the Soviet Union and other Allied nations to be used as slave labor. Large numbers of these German slave laborers did not survive their captivity. The Allied postwar treatment of Germany is surely one of the most criminal, murderous, and unreported atrocities in world history.

The real and alleged atrocities committed by Germany during World War II are discussed in Part III of this book. Germany engaged in vicious anti-partisan activity and conducted an extensive euthanasia program against its own people during the war. Illegal medical experimentation and executions were also committed by Germany in its concentration camps. However, National Socialist Germany did not have a policy of genocide against the Jewish people during the war. Although hundreds of thousands of Je ws died of disease and other natural causes in the German concentration camps, Germany did not murder millions of Je ws as claimed by most historians. Also, while almost never reported by establishment historians, the Allies murdered tens of thousands of Germans in former German concentration camps after the end of World War II.

This book does not pretend to be a definitive or comprehensive history of the origins, aftermath and atrocities of World War II. The subject matter is far too broad for one book. Instead, it is written to summarize in an objective manner the highly successful Allied plan to conquer, control, and mass murder the German people. This book also exposes the Allied falsification and exaggeration of German atrocities during World War II. My hope is that this book will open up a debate concerning these historical events and perhaps stimulate others to investigate more deeply into these long-suppressed subjects.”

https://barnesreview.org/product/germanys-war/

Garth
Garth
5 months ago

Dr. Coleman says, “Starmer’s War isn’t about saving Ukraine – it’s about making money for billionaires.”

The war has made Zelensky a billionaire, and on that point, this short video sends a powerful message by juxtaposing the suffering of the people against Zelensky basking in the glory.

Ukrainian Film on the Real Zelensky – The War Criminal

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/ukraine/ukrainian-film-on-the-real-zelensky-the-war-criminal/

jsinton
jsinton
5 months ago

Dr. Coleman is always clear. We lack wisdom and clarity today.

I suspect reality is going to take over on the matter of WW III. There is no money, military, nor political will. Let’s see how many troops the Latvians and Estonians cough up.

And of course, Russia is a military powerhouse right now, and could probably prevail going toe to toe with Yanks in global thermonuclear war. But Uncle Sam won’t join in this time. Russia probably wouldn’t have to go nuclear to win, but Europe would.

I’d hate to be the Satanic globalist leaders in Brussels right now. I’m sure they don’t sleep well.

My guess is Europe will be forced to back down as they have no cards to play.

raj patel
raj patel
Reply to  jsinton
5 months ago

Agreed – this is just more fear mongering – if it was to happen why would the US pull out now? This is another chapter of spreading fear and uncertainty plus is a great cover up for what is really happening behind the scenes – like convid. They are all on the same side and all owned and controlled by the cabal. The convid jab deaths are by no means over yet.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  raj patel
5 months ago

Out last week – “Vanderbilt professor: Why I’m terrified about new coronavirus strain found in China”.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14430601/doctors-react-new-coronavirus-strain-pandemic-china.html

trackback
5 months ago

[…] Lægen Vernon Coleman mener: World War III is now a certainty […]

Garth
Garth
5 months ago

I posted – “With eyes on Ukraine, could WW3 start in the Middle East?

“Leaked TOP SECRET Documents Show Israel to Attack Iran Nuclear Sites “Early March” ”

https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/news-selections/world-news/leaked-top-secret-documents-show-israel-to-attack-iran-nuclear-sites-early-march

Purportedly “Leaked” Classified: TOP SECRET Documents circulating on the website 4chan, say that Israel will conduct a large scale military “pre-emptive” attack against Iran nuclear sites “as early as” this week.”

jsinton
jsinton
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

They should. They got them cornered now. Wipe out nuclear capability of the Iranians is probably a good idea. Yep, that’s their next chess move methinks.

trackback
5 months ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
5 months ago

These satanists will burn for an eternity in a lake of fire.

Anderson
Anderson
5 months ago

If ever there was a global puppet, it is Starmer. One sad pathetic individual.

biggrump
biggrump
5 months ago

Starmer is not being drawn into war. He is actively trying to make sure it happens. As this video details. https://youtu.be/KDlZx2wB_KA?si=YbiYD03zTAcZo63r

Garth
Garth
Reply to  biggrump
5 months ago

You are right. Starmer says he wants peace. He has lied about everything and what he says is always the opposite of what he intends to do, so when he says that he is working to get peace that means he is really working to start the war.

Garth
Garth
5 months ago

Trump wants peace and is getting what he wants (he knows how to get what he wants), and so, WW3 will not begin until after they have assassinated Trump.

Jack Otherside
Jack Otherside
5 months ago

Jack Otherside
I was sad to read review dr. Vernon Coleman, that Poland invaded Germany in September 1939 and started World War II. I was also saddened to read opinion dr Coleman that Winston Churchill, one of the greatest heroes WW II, according to the dr Coleman’s opinion, he is a greedy warmonger but Hitler was an angel of peace, whose only cocern is to avoid war casualties. Dr. Coleman quotes Adolf Hitler, July 1940 – „I see no reason why his war must go on. I am grieved to think of the sacrifices which it will claim. I would like to avert tchem”. Hiller like a true eulogist of peace .
Dr. Coleman, I can’t believe that yoy can  believe what you wrote.  
Commentator Garth wrote quoting your words and expresses gratitude: “When Poland invaded Germany (not the other way round) Britain used it as an excuse to start a war with Germany. Remember, it was Poland which invaded Germany and Britain that declared war on Germany and not the other way around.” – thank you Dr. Coleman.
„The British people are brainwashed to believe that Hitler started WW2. They don’t know about the Danzig situation”.

Garth, could You tell me what You know about the Danzig situation befor the II World War, because I dont know what exactly do you mean. There may be a reason of your mistake opinion about cause for the outbreak of the War World II.

This is sad, that there’s only one commentator, Chris, had doubts as to the accusation of Poland of provoking WW II.
Chris reply to Garth: „I’ve never heard about Poland invading Germany to kick off WW2. Yes, Britain declared war against Germany as an ally of Poland responding to Germany attacking Poland, and Germany was ruled by National Socialists who were brutally evil to many in that country, (…) Can anyone give me any sourced link to anything different to my understanding, especially re: Poland & Germany at start of WW2? Thank you”.
  
Chris, thanks for your words. It’s important for historical truth.
Dr. Coleman, I am sorry, but i have losed trust to your historical opinions. So, you are losing a faithful reader until today from now.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Jack Otherside
5 months ago

Jack, someone else asked me about the topic you have asked me about, please see above for my reply there. Use “Find” to find “R2P” or “School For Secrets”.

My answer is not yet complete because I am looking for well referenced articles with good reliable sources of information.

The reason why you do not know about it because the people are not told the truth about war, it is hushed up, but in recent years the true history of WW started coming out. This below is by John Pilger and it shows that hushing up the truth was also true for WW1.

“This brainwashing by omission has a long history. The slaughter of World War I was suppressed by reporters who were knighted for their compliance and confessed in their memoirs. In 1917, the editor of the Manchester Guardian, CP Scott, confided to Prime Minister Lloyd George: “If people really knew [the truth], the war would be stopped tomorrow, but they don’t know and can’t know.” from “John Pilger Silencing the lambs:: How propaganda works”.

https://johnpilger.com/2022/09/08/silencing-the-lambs-how-propaganda-works/

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

Whoops, “the true history of WW2 started coming out”.

Jack Otherside
Jack Otherside
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

I know journalistic achievements of John Pilger. He is a fantastic fighter of truth and freedom. I love his defense of Asaange. It was wonderful job. But in the article you send the link he does not discuss the tipic of start Second WW were we differ.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Jack Otherside
5 months ago

Jack, you seem to have missed my point. I wasn’t saying that Pilger backed up my claims about WW2. I was saying that he backed up my claims of how the truth is suppressed.

“the editor of the Manchester Guardian, CP Scott, confided to Prime Minister Lloyd George: “If people really knew [the truth], the war would be stopped tomorrow, but they don’t know and can’t know.””

You see – he said “they can’t know”, i.e. they mustn’t know.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Jack Otherside
5 months ago

About – “Dr. Coleman, I am sorry, but i have losed trust to your historical opinions. So, you are losing a faithful reader until today from now.”

Jack, I was brought up to believe in the “official” history of WW”, if “official” is the right word.

Finding out that I was lied to, that our leaders lie to us wasn’t nice. We don’t like having out beliefs shattered. I didn’t and didn’t want to believe it.

From a film called “Network I think it was, “You can’t take the truth”, and there is another that has something about a blue pill and a red pill. I expect you know more about that one than I do.

This uncomfortable truth does not disrespect the people who fought. My parents both did their bit in WW2. My father’s ship was torpedoed and he was lucky to be saved. The people fought bravely, but they had been lied to, told lies about what the war was about, just as we have been lied to about the Plandemic and much more. It is the lying leaders you should be angry with, and the media for lying too.

Back then in 1938 and 1939 when it was obvious to most people that war was coming, there were truthers, people who tried to warn the masses of what was being planned and that what they were being told wasn’t true, just as today Andrew Bridgen has told the truth about Ukraine. Of course they were rounded up and jailed and the media attacked them so that the masses were kept in line, just as the media attacked vaxx truthers. Horse paste indeed.

I hope the information that I eventually post will interest you, even if after reading it you choose to dismiss it.

Jack Otherside
Jack Otherside
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

If you would like to know true story that the outbreak of the Second World War was Germany’s attack on Poland on 1 September 1939, you should to buy a book I recommended to you.
https://www.amazon.pl/Gods-playground-history-Poland-Present/dp/0199253404
Norman Davies „God’s Playground A History of Poland” Vol. 2 1975 to the Present
Oxford University Press
 
This new edition of Norman Davies’s classic study of the history of Poland has been revised and fully updated with two new chapters to bring the story to the end of the twentieth century. The writing of Polish history, like Poland itself, has frequently fallen prey to interested parties. Professor Norman Davies adopts a sceptical stance towards all existing interpretations and attempts to bring a strong dose of common sense to his theme. He presents the most comprehensive survey in English of this frequently maligned and usually misunderstood country like Poland.
 
It would be good if this book wanted to read dr. Coleman. I think he would stop promoting false story accusing Poland of starting Second WW by attacking Germany. The truth wins! 

Jack Otherside
Jack Otherside
Reply to  Jack Otherside
5 months ago

Correction to information about the book Norman Davies „God’s Playground A History of Poland”. The volume 2 covers the period from 1795 to the Present, not from 1975.
It was my mistake.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Jack Otherside
5 months ago

“Thanks for that, but may I suggest another work that has this in it about the negotiations over Danzig –

“On Beck’s return to Warsaw a meeting was convened at the royal castle. Present were Beck, Marshall Smigly-Rydz, the Polish President and the Prime minister. After the meeting Beck told his Chef de Cabinet Lubienski to find some way of compromising with Germany over Danzig. Lubienski met the German ambassador Moltke and put forward a project for agreement. Its main points were that the League of Nations mandate over the free city of Danzig would be abolished and replaced by a joint German Polish condominium. Poland’s economic rights and privileges would be guaranteed. Danzig’s inhabitants could decide whether they wanted to live under German or Polish rule.”

Then there is much more about further meetings, then this below.

“The British guarantee changed everything causing Hitler to break off negotiations. Refusing to make meaningfull concessions when Germany was militarily in a different class was possibly not the right course of action. Accepting a guarantee from Britain when it could do almost nothing to help militarily was also perhaps not a good decision. To believe that the French army would leave the Maginot Line and advance into Germany (it could not go through Belgium) after a couple of weeks of war was optimistic.”

Source: – Poland and the Western Powers 1938 – 1939 p.190/191 by A. Cienciala.

So, “The British guarantee changed everything”. The parallels with 1939 and 2022 to 2024 are astounding. In 1939 the British interfered in Poland to cause war and in 2022 Boris Johnson scuppered a peace that was close to being signed. He wanted the war to go on.

I looked into Norman Davies and found this. “He has a special interest in Central and Eastern Europe and is UNESCO Professor at the Jagiellonian University, professor emeritus at University College London, a visiting professor at the Collège d’Europe, and an honorary fellow at St Antony’s College, Oxford. He was granted Polish citizenship in 2014”.

Referring back to what I said about history is written by the victors and we are fed the “official” version of history, so, from that bit of biography, to me, Norman Davies is an establishment writer who makes money from churning out the false history of WW2 in order to propagate the myths and I suspect that he was granted Polish citizenship to thank him for pumping out Polish propaganda.

In today’s world, truth is hard to find. I suspect that Dr. Coleman is a man who is not fooled by official versions. He knew that Ivermectin was not horse paste and his powers of discerning fact from fiction extend beyond medical matters.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

How our society works.

People who churn out the establishment version of events advance in their careers, are given awards and honours and sometimes achieve fame.

Those who contradict the establishment line are shunned, “cancelled” and have their careers destroyed. Andrew Bridgen is one and so was David Irving. He was regarded as Britain’s greatest historian and his books were serialised in The Sunday Times, but look at what happened to him. Henri Bergman was an other, in his day considered to be the greatest philosopher of the Twentieth Century, but how many people have heard of him? He said the wrong things and was cancelled. The list of such people is endless.

Was it Churchill who said, “the first casualty of war is truth”?

The British people were lied to from start to finish.

You know about WW2, I have forgotten the name of this military operation, but perhaps you can tell me the name of it, British paratroopers raided a German airfield in France, destroyed lots of planes and vehicles, killed German soldiers and returned without a single British casualty … but it was a total fabrication. It never happened but it was reported in the newsreels of the day and on the BBC news.

Then there was Slapton Sands. Operation Tiger I believe, but please do correct me if I got the name wrong. That is a military secret that remained secret until well after the war had ended.

The British government tell lies even when they are apologising for telling lies. In WW1, they spread the false story that the Germans were melting down human bodies to get fat to make soap. It was not true. In 1936, they made a formal apology to Germany, but they lied even then when they said that they didn’t know how the story came about, it must have been due to an error in translation. We now now that it was dreamed up by the War Office’s propaganda department. Of course it was, “error in translation” – they are shameless,

“The first casualty of war is truth” is certainly true.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

Correction – he was Henri Bergson and not Henri Bergman.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

I always offer opinions based on evidence and today, 8th March, 2025, I got evidence that backs up my comment on how society works and how staying in line and how obeying the establishment gets career advancement and so on.

At about 07:25 this morning on Radio Four’s Today programme they were talking about some Bill going through parliament and we were told that the MP who was working on the Bill was paid a visit by a Whip or top party official, something like that. Look it up on the iPlayer if you want exact details.

This senior party official told the MP that he had a promising career ahead of him – if he did as he was told and watered down the Bill so that it was virtually meaningless and ineffective. This wasn’t said but it follows that if he went against that instruction, his career would be harmed.

I say that with confidence because we saw how they treated Andrew Bridgen. He was shunned – cancelled as it is know today.

Even those who didn’t want to shun him did so because they were told to do so, and here you can actually see it happening in the House of Commons. See how people were ordered to walk out when Mr. Bridgen got up to speak.

“Vaccine collusion in UK Parliament?”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SpGcEf2yCok

Jack Otherside
Jack Otherside
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

Thank you for your comments contynuing intersting discussion.
You wrote, I quotes in extenso: “On Beck’s return to Warsaw a meeting was convened at the royal castle. Present were Beck, Marshall Smigly-Rydz, the Polish President and the Prime minister. After the meeting Beck told his Chef de Cabinet Lubienski to find some way of compromising with Germany over Danzig. Lubienski met the German ambassador Moltke and put forward a project for agreement. Its main points were that the League of Nations mandate over the free city of Danzig would be abolished and replaced by a joint German Polish condominium. Poland’s economic rights and privileges would be guaranteed. Danzig’s inhabitants could decide whether they wanted to live under German or Polish rule.”
 
Then there is much more about further meetings, then this below.
 
“The British guarantee changed everything causing Hitler to break off negotiations. Refusing to make meaningfull concessions when Germany was militarily in a different class was possibly not the right course of action. Accepting a guarantee from Britain when it could do almost nothing to help militarily was also perhaps not a good decision. To believe that the French army would leave the Maginot Line and advance into Germany (it could not go through Belgium) after a couple of weeks of war was optimistic.”
Source: – Poland and the Western Powers 1938 – 1939 p.190/191 by A. Cienciala.

I answer. Well, you see for yourself that the Polish-German negotiations regarding Gdańsk were only a pretext by Hitler for the benefit of German public opinion. British guarantees for Poland were a propaganda pretext for Hitler to break off negotiations. An attack on Poland was being prepared. A week before the attack on Poland on August 23, 1939, Hitler concluded a pact with Stalin – the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact – which was actually a treaty aimed at Poland. The Polish-English Treaty was a response to the Molotov Ribbentrop Pact and was concluded on August 25, 1939. Its purpose was to discourage Hitler from starting the war. During Poland’s defensive battles, on September 17, 1939, the Soviet army attacked defending Poland from the east. Despite the attack from both sides, Poland, lonely, continued its hopeless fight until October 6. 1939.
 I have to remind you, that among occupied European countries, Poland was one country, who did not undertake any form of collaboration with Hitler. Maybe this is the reason, that dr. Coleman doesn’t like Poland so much.
 
It’s worth mentioning that in the UK there was strong pro-German lobby before started WW II. Many influential Britons like for example Lord Foreign Secretary Halifax, Ian Hamilton, or lord Rothermere, publisher „Daily Mail” and even dethroned Edward VIII in that time thought similarly. I think, that dr. Coleman represents the legacy of this pro-hitler thinking. I will recall fragments from article dr. Coleman suggesting that Hitler was an angel of peace: “The last thing Hitler wanted was to produce another great war.” – Sir Basil Liddell-Hart.
“The state of German armament in 1939 gives the decisive proof that Hitler was not contemplating general war, and probably not intending war at all.” – Professor A.J.P.Taylor
 
I’m trying to understand the anti-war attitude of dr. Coleman. But accusing Poland of starting the WW II takes away credibility his opinion. Poland was first country to say „STOP” German’s aggresion after annexation of Austria with the consent of the Prime Mister Chamberlain, and occupation of Czechoslovakia without a single shot.
 
I met members of a Spanish historical reenactment group „Poland First to Fight” who recreate historical battles of the WWII fighting in Polish uniforms. I asked tchem why Spaniards engage in commemoration Polish soldiers fighting during the WWII. The answers was because Polish soldiers were the first to have the courage to opose a more powerful enemy.
I suggest you think this before you join to those accusing Poland like dr. Coleman for example.
Dr. Coleman you should to know, that not only „Poland First to Fight” and I can suplement „Poland never gives up”, just like a Polish pilots continuing to fight against German pilots in the air Battle of Britain.
 
You wrote: <So, “The British guarantee changed everything”. The parallels with 1939 and 2022 to 2024 are astounding. In 1939 the British interfered in Poland to cause war and in 2022 Boris Johnson scuppered a peace that was close to being signed. He wanted the war to go on>.
 
My answer. The parallels The British guarantee for Poland with 1939 and for Ukraine with 2022 is not comparable. The British guarantee for Poland with 1939 it was intended to serve peace, but Johnson’s guarantees for Ukraine with 2022 serve for war.
 
Yoy wrote: <Referring back to what I said about history is written by the victors and we are fed the “official” version of history, so, from that bit of biography, to me, Norman Davies is an establishment writer who makes money from churning out the false history of WW2 in order to propagate the myths The British guarantee and I suspect that he was granted Polish citizenship to thank him for pumping out Polish propaganda.
 
My opinion about scientific credibility of prof. Norman Davies has the basics in reviwes of his scientific works, so your opinion that he is „an establishment writer who makes money from churning out the false history of WW2 in order to propagate the myths” is unfounded offensive.
 
I hope, that our disscusion will encourage you to deepen your historical knowledge. Nobody can never have too much knowledge. Really. So I am passionate about history.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Jack Otherside
5 months ago

Thanks for that Jack. Just a few comments.

“in the UK there was strong pro-German lobby” – true, and of course there were the Mitford sisters and the Duke of Windsor.

You say “The parallels The British guarantee for Poland with 1939 and for Ukraine with 2022 is not comparable. The British guarantee for Poland with 1939 it was intended to serve peace, but Johnson’s guarantees for Ukraine with 2022 serve for war” – it was Starmer who recently made a defence past with Ukraine.

As for “The British guarantee for Poland with 1939 it was intended to serve peace” – I’ll bet that Norman Davies didn’t tell you that that pact had an appendix which said that the pact applied only to Germany invading Poland. So any other country could have invaded Poland and the British wouldn’t have raised a finger. It was a contrivance to cause a war with Germany.

As for my views on the establishment version of history \ the official version, I posted above about how that works and I have just added a reply to my comment with more evidence. You might find the video of it actually happening in the Commons interesting. Please find on this page “today, 8th March, 2025, I got evidence that backs up my comment on how society works” – about a BBC news item.

Thank you for you responses. I am finding it difficult to find the time to reply. I will try to come back here again but I apologise for any delay.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

About the official version of history. I have recalled quite a few examples of the sort of bluff versions of events to cover up up the truth.

When I was child, everyone knew the story of Nurse Edith Cavell. (“Nurse”?) In WW1 she was just a nice lady who wanted to look after wounded soldiers and in 1915 those nasty Germans shot her after falsely accusing her of being a spy. That was the official version.

The truth should have come out in 1945 under the thirty year rule, but in 1945 the country was once again at war with Germany. They couldn’t let the public know that their government had lied to them and their account of history was false or the people might think, “Hmm, what are they lying about now in WW2? So they made the papers subject to the one hundred year rule.

That meant that the truth came out in 2015. She was a spy and not just a spy, she was the ring leader who set up a spy ring and led it. The people who died before 2015 died believing the official version of history – a false version.

Do you remember the Skripals?

They expected us to believe that these casually dressed Russians planted the Novichok, a substance so deadly that the British authorities searching for the bottle had to wear these hazmat suits, see below.

I thought of many more, and they are examples that prove me right about “official” versions of war.

See this, they take us for fools, but sadly there are those who do not want to see.

comment image

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Jack Otherside
5 months ago

In the 1990s, a man wrote his memoirs of his time as a senior British army officer in Cyprus in the 1950s. Many people would have read that book and thought they were well-informed about the army in Cyprus.

They were not well-informed because the author had been forced, by the MOD, to remove a chapter from his book.

Years later, after the torture had been officially admitted, that author told of when he submitted the manuscript for his work to the MOD, which he was obliged to do, they told him to remove the chapter about how the British were torturing prisoners in Cyprus. If he didn’t, then they would not allow the book to be published.

See how they control what we are told. It’s “tell the official version of history or else”.

I tried to find that news article by that ex-army officer. I couldn’t find it, but the torture is widely reported. Widely reported now, but back then people who said that the British were torturing prisoners in Cyprus were called liars – today they would be called conspiracy theorists. For many years, the British government denied it, but it was true.

“Britain’s secret ‘torture camp’ and the stench of a cover-up: How the brave men who protested about prisoners being abused at a UK base in Cyprus were shunned… until now”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5669387/Britains-secret-torture-camp-stench-cover-up.html

UK government pays £1m to Cyprus ‘torture victims’

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46978271

ACTS OF TORTURE AS AN INSTRUMENT OF GOVERNMENT POLICY IN THE COLONY OF CYPRUS IN THE 1950S

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly/article/abs/acts-of-torture-as-an-instrument-of-government-policy-in-the-colony-of-cyprus-in-the-1950s-and-choice-of-law/1041098C6652C38113DA78156F60D234

Lying to cover up torture by the British Army still goes on today, this time about Afghanistan.

“Forced to lie for the MoD: Tormented spin doctor blows whistle on the deceptions fed to loved ones of fallen heroes”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1204222/Forced-lie-MoD-Tormented-spin-doctor-blows-whistle-deceptions-fed-loved-ones-fallen-heroes.html

My point is that when you read the sort of book you showed me, you get the official version \ the establishment version of events. If you want to be really well-informed then you need excellent sites like Unz – top quality writers who have done their research and reveal the secret history.

Here is a fact-packed article that has the truth that you won’t find in the biographies of Churchill. Read of how Churchill was plotting with foreign governments, conspiring against the interests of the British people. Read about the overthrow of Chamberlain, they got rid of him just as they got rid of Liz Truss.

“Champions of Judea: On the Supplanting of British Foreign Policy”.

https://www.unz.com/article/champions-of-judea-on-the-supplanting-of-british-foreign-policy/

In it, “not until early 1938 did he [Hitler] order that Germany must consider after all the contingency of war with Britain—a contingency which, it must be said, Mr Churchill had himself largely created by his speeches.”

“The first casualty of war is truth” is certainly true.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Jack Otherside
5 months ago

I need to post this in two parts because it is long and I think that is why it gets stopped as needing approval.

This book is a masterpiece and is the most honest and truthful account of WW2 –

A review of “Germany’s War” by John Wear.

“Establishment historians characterize National Socialist Germany as a uniquely barbaric, vile and criminal regime that was totally responsible for starting World War II and carrying out some of the most heinous war crimes in world history. Germany’s War by John Wear refutes this characterization of Germany, bring history into accord with the facts.

Germany’s War documents that the Allied leaders of the Soviet Union, Great Britain and the United States were primarily responsible for starting and prolonging World War II—costing million of lives. Far from being the conqueror of Europe, Adolf Hitler was its savior.

The leaders of Great Britain and the United States also adopted policies designed to force war with Germany. Britain’s unconditional guarantee to Poland led to horrific acts of violence against Poland’s ethnic Germans and, thus, Germany was forced to invade Poland to end these atrocities. Franklin Roosevelt’s numerous provocations, including a shoot-on-sight policy against German shipping and leaked plans of a United States invasion of Germany, forced Germany to declare war on the United States despite Hitler’s desire for peace.

This book also reports the Allied mass murder of the German people after the end of World War II during which the Allies—led by Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower—murdered approximately 1.5 million German prisoners of war through intentional starvation and exposure to the elements. Probably a minimum 2.1 million ethnic Germans expelled from their homes also died in what was supposed to be an “orderly and humane” relocation. Finally, the Allies murdered millions of additional Germans through intentional starvation after the war ended—plus much, much more.

Table of Contents

Introduction: War Is Hell

This is not from the review: part 2 to follow.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Jack Otherside
5 months ago

Here is part 2 of my posting.

From the review – Part I: The Allied Conspiracy to Originate World War

   The Chief Culprit: Josef Stalin & the Soviet Union
   FDR & America’s Second Crusade
   The Forced War: How WWII Was Originated
   The Allied Conspiracy to Instigate & Prolong WWII

Part II: Allied Postwar Crimes Against Germans

   Allied Prisoner of War Camps
   The German Expellees
   History’s Most Terrifying Peace

Part III: Actual and Alleged German Atrocities of WWII

   The Alleged Genocide of European Je wry
   Crimes Committed in German Concentration Camps
   Crimes Committed by Germany During WWII

Epilogue: Creation of the Modern World

Bibliography

Index

Introduction

War Is Hell

My father was a pilot in 50 bombing missions for the U.S. Eighth Air Force during World War II. When I was a boy I asked him if he had killed anyone during the war. He replied, “I hope I didn’t kill anyone.” In regard to his participation in the Normandy invasion, he said: “You cannot imagine how big of an operation that was. People on the ground were being killed!” My father repeatedly stated he hated war and that “War is hell.” He also expressed his opinion that the Germans had fought extraordinarily hard during the war.

I have always wondered how wars have continuously existed throughout history when virtually everyone agrees with my father that “War is hell.” In regard to the origin of World War II, a fascinating discussion occurred during the Nuremberg trials between American psychologist Dr. Gustave Gilbert and former German Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering. On the evening of April 18, 1946, in Goering’s jail cell, Dr. Gilbert expressed his belief that the common people are not very thankful for leaders who bring them war and destruction. Goering responded:

Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back in one piece? Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.

Dr. Gilbert told Goering that there is one difference. Gilbert said: “In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare war.”

Goering responded: “Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”

Hermann Goering was speaking the truth to Dr. Gilbert. The common people of the Soviet Union, Great Britain, the United States, Germany, Japan and all other countries in the world were strongly against war. World War II was instigated only because the leaders of some countries had wanted war and brought the people to their bidding. The question is: Which countries had leaders who wanted to bring about World War II?

Dr. Gilbert stated that the leaders of Germany were the ones who had wanted war. Goering emphatically denied that he and Adolf Hitler had wanted war. Most historians would agree with Dr. Gilbert’s statement and reject Goering’s denial as self-serving, absurd, and irresponsible. However, as we will discuss in Part 1 of this book, the historical record clearly shows that Goering was right. Hitler had wanted to free Germany from the Treaty of Versailles, but had never wanted to plunge Germany into World War II.

This book discusses the origins, aftermath, and atrocities of World War II from a German perspective. It is in essence Germany’s side of the story. This book is designed to counteract the one-sided bias of establishment historians against Germany in regard to World War II. Most establishment historians, for example, state that it is self-evident that Adolf Hitler and Germany started World War II. However, an objective review of the origins of World War II reveals that the Allied leaders of the Soviet Union, the United States, and Great Britain were primarily responsible for starting and prolonging the war.

Part I of this book documents that: 1) Adolf Hitler was forced to invade the Soviet Union to preempt a Soviet takeover of Europe;

2) U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt repeatedly told the American public he was committed to peace while making every effort to involve the United States in war; and 3) Germany was forced to fight Great Britain even though Hitler had always wanted peace with Britain and regarded the two countries as natural allies. The leaders of the Soviet Union, the United States, and Great Britain were all committed to the complete destruction of Germany. The Allied leaders purposely sacrificed the lives of tens of millions of people and practiced uncivilized warfare to accomplish their goal.

The Allies also intentionally allowed the Soviet Union to gain control of Eastern Europe. Thus, a war allegedly fought for freedom and democracy turned into a totalitarian nightmare for the people of the Eastern European nations.

Part II of this book reports the Allied mass murder of the German people after the end of World War II. Although denied by almost all historians, the Western Allies murdered approximately 1 million German prisoners of war through intentional starvation and exposure to the elements. The Allies also carried out the largest forced population transfer in history by expelling approximately 16 million ethnic Germans from their homes after the end of the war. Probably a minimum 2.1 million of these German expellees died in what was supposed to be an “orderly and humane” expulsion. Finally, the Allies murdered millions of additional Germans through starvation after the end of World War II.

Allied soldiers also raped an estimated 2 million German women during and after World War II. This represents more rapes against a defeated enemy than any other war in history. The Allies conducted a brutal denazification program designed to make the German people feel guilty about their war effort. Hundreds of German scientists were also compelled to emigrate by the victors, and German patents, technological advances, and other property were confiscated by the Allies. Millions of Germans were also sent to the Soviet Union and other Allied nations to be used as slave labor. Large numbers of these German slave laborers did not survive their captivity. The Allied postwar treatment of Germany is surely one of the most criminal, murderous, and unreported atrocities in world history.

The real and alleged atrocities committed by Germany during World War II are discussed in Part III of this book. Germany engaged in vicious anti-partisan activity and conducted an extensive euthanasia program against its own people during the war. Illegal medical experimentation and executions were also committed by Germany in its concentration camps. However, National Socialist Germany did not have a policy of genocide against the Jewish people during the war. Although hundreds of thousands of Je ws died of disease and other natural causes in the German concentration camps, Germany did not murder millions of Je ws as claimed by most historians. Also, while almost never reported by establishment historians, the Allies murdered tens of thousands of Germans in former German concentration camps after the end of World War II.

This book does not pretend to be a definitive or comprehensive history of the origins, aftermath and atrocities of World War II. The subject matter is far too broad for one book. Instead, it is written to summarize in an objective manner the highly successful Allied plan to conquer, control, and mass murder the German people. This book also exposes the Allied falsification and exaggeration of German atrocities during World War II. My hope is that this book will open up a debate concerning these historical events and perhaps stimulate others to investigate more deeply into these long-suppressed subjects.”

https://barnesreview.org/product/germanys-war/

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Jack Otherside
5 months ago

You say – “It would be good if this book wanted to read dr. Coleman. I think he would stop promoting false story accusing Poland of starting Second WW by attacking Germany. The truth wins! ”

This is the book to read, a masterpiece that is the msot honest and truthful account of WW2, written with the benefit of new research that has unearthed information that was not available to earlier authors.

“A review of “Germany’s War” by John Wear.

“Establishment historians characterize National Socialist Germany as a uniquely barbaric, vile and criminal regime that was totally responsible for starting World War II and carrying out some of the most heinous war crimes in world history. Germany’s War by John Wear refutes this characterization of Germany, bring history into accord with the facts.

Germany’s War documents that the Allied leaders of the Soviet Union, Great Britain and the United States were primarily responsible for starting and prolonging World War II—costing million of lives. Far from being the conqueror of Europe, Adolf Hitler was its savior.

The leaders of Great Britain and the United States also adopted policies designed to force war with Germany. Britain’s unconditional guarantee to Poland led to horrific acts of violence against Poland’s ethnic Germans and, thus, Germany was forced to invade Poland to end these atrocities. Franklin Roosevelt’s numerous provocations, including a shoot-on-sight policy against German shipping and leaked plans of a United States invasion of Germany, forced Germany to declare war on the United States despite Hitler’s desire for peace.

This book also reports the Allied mass murder of the German people after the end of World War II during which the Allies—led by Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower—murdered approximately 1.5 million German prisoners of war through intentional starvation and exposure to the elements. Probably a minimum 2.1 million ethnic Germans expelled from their homes also died in what was supposed to be an “orderly and humane” relocation. Finally, the Allies murdered millions of additional Germans through intentional starvation after the war ended—plus much, much more.

Table of Contents

Introduction: War Is Hell

…” please see another post of mine with the full review.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

Some of my postings did not appear. I think they were censored, but perhaps they will appear later after they have been vetted. I doubt that that there was anything in them that can’t be published.

Ben Fridge
Ben Fridge
5 months ago

The 3rd WW will come enabled by a pathetic orange moron and started by his Nazi puppet master in Moscow! Both aim to destroy Europe and that must be prevented by collapsing the Russian Nazi empire once and for all!!!

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Ben Fridge
5 months ago

Cutting off the supply of weapons will end the war. The EU wants to send more weapons to have the war continue and turn into WW3.

Look at this bluff that Cleverly gave us in February, 2023. Sadly, too many British people fall for this sort of thing.

“James Cleverly says arming Kyiv is the only path to peace as he urges allies to send jets to war-torn region”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11716585/James-Cleverly-says-arming-Kyiv-path-peace.html

He said that sending more weapons would bring peace, and he even said it would happen “swiftly”. How did that work out?

Trump has now shown that stopping the supply of weapons brings peace. More weapons means more war, but Cleverly knew that.

This was In the article, “The Kremlin has said western countries’ supply of increasingly sophisticated and more weapons will only prolong the conflict”. As usual, we got truth from the Russians but we got bluff and lies from our leaders.

Also in the article was this, “The defence minister also pledged not to use longer-range weapons pledged by the US to hit Russian territory, saying they would only target Russian forces in occupied Ukrainian territory” – and as we know, Storm Shadow missiles and US ATACMS and HIMARS were used to attack Russian territory. Another broken promise by a British minister – James Cleverly and by Biden.

Jack Otherside
Jack Otherside
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

Garth, we lead a discussion about Poland’s role in the WWII. There was no compliance. But your answer to Ben Fridge deserves support. You’re absolutely right.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Jack Otherside
5 months ago

Thanks Jack. I have replied to one of your postings above but I am finding it difficult to find the time to reply. I will try to come back here again but I apologise for any delay.

Garth
Garth
5 months ago

This book is a masterpiece and is the most honest and truthful account of WW2 –

A review of “Germany’s War” by John Wear.

“Establishment historians characterize National Socialist Germany as a uniquely barbaric, vile and criminal regime that was totally responsible for starting World War II and carrying out some of the most heinous war crimes in world history. Germany’s War by John Wear refutes this characterization of Germany, bring history into accord with the facts.

Germany’s War documents that the Allied leaders of the Soviet Union, Great Britain and the United States were primarily responsible for starting and prolonging World War II—costing million of lives. Far from being the conqueror of Europe, Adolf Hitler was its savior.

The leaders of Great Britain and the United States also adopted policies designed to force war with Germany. Britain’s unconditional guarantee to Poland led to horrific acts of violence against Poland’s ethnic Germans and, thus, Germany was forced to invade Poland to end these atrocities. Franklin Roosevelt’s numerous provocations, including a shoot-on-sight policy against German shipping and leaked plans of a United States invasion of Germany, forced Germany to declare war on the United States despite Hitler’s desire for peace.

This book also reports the Allied mass murder of the German people after the end of World War II during which the Allies—led by Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower—murdered approximately 1.5 million German prisoners of war through intentional starvation and exposure to the elements. Probably a minimum 2.1 million ethnic Germans expelled from their homes also died in what was supposed to be an “orderly and humane” relocation. Finally, the Allies murdered millions of additional Germans through intentional starvation after the war ended—plus much, much more.

Table of Contents

Introduction: War Is Hell

Part I: The Allied Conspiracy to Originate World War

   The Chief Culprit: Josef Stalin & the Soviet Union
   FDR & America’s Second Crusade
   The Forced War: How WWII Was Originated
   The Allied Conspiracy to Instigate & Prolong WWII

Part II: Allied Postwar Crimes Against Germans

   Allied Prisoner of War Camps
   The German Expellees
   History’s Most Terrifying Peace

Part III: Actual and Alleged German Atrocities of WWII

   The Alleged Genocide of European Je wry
   Crimes Committed in German Concentration Camps
   Crimes Committed by Germany During WWII

Epilogue: Creation of the Modern World

Bibliography

Index

Introduction

War Is Hell

My father was a pilot in 50 bombing missions for the U.S. Eighth Air Force during World War II. When I was a boy I asked him if he had killed anyone during the war. He replied, “I hope I didn’t kill anyone.” In regard to his participation in the Normandy invasion, he said: “You cannot imagine how big of an operation that was. People on the ground were being killed!” My father repeatedly stated he hated war and that “War is hell.” He also expressed his opinion that the Germans had fought extraordinarily hard during the war.

I have always wondered how wars have continuously existed throughout history when virtually everyone agrees with my father that “War is hell.” In regard to the origin of World War II, a fascinating discussion occurred during the Nuremberg trials between American psychologist Dr. Gustave Gilbert and former German Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering. On the evening of April 18, 1946, in Goering’s jail cell, Dr. Gilbert expressed his belief that the common people are not very thankful for leaders who bring them war and destruction. Goering responded:

Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back in one piece? Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.

Dr. Gilbert told Goering that there is one difference. Gilbert said: “In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare war.”

Goering responded: “Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”

Hermann Goering was speaking the truth to Dr. Gilbert. The common people of the Soviet Union, Great Britain, the United States, Germany, Japan and all other countries in the world were strongly against war. World War II was instigated only because the leaders of some countries had wanted war and brought the people to their bidding. The question is: Which countries had leaders who wanted to bring about World War II?

Dr. Gilbert stated that the leaders of Germany were the ones who had wanted war. Goering emphatically denied that he and Adolf Hitler had wanted war. Most historians would agree with Dr. Gilbert’s statement and reject Goering’s denial as self-serving, absurd, and irresponsible. However, as we will discuss in Part 1 of this book, the historical record clearly shows that Goering was right. Hitler had wanted to free Germany from the Treaty of Versailles, but had never wanted to plunge Germany into World War II.

This book discusses the origins, aftermath, and atrocities of World War II from a German perspective. It is in essence Germany’s side of the story. This book is designed to counteract the one-sided bias of establishment historians against Germany in regard to World War II. Most establishment historians, for example, state that it is self-evident that Adolf Hitler and Germany started World War II. However, an objective review of the origins of World War II reveals that the Allied leaders of the Soviet Union, the United States, and Great Britain were primarily responsible for starting and prolonging the war.

Part I of this book documents that: 1) Adolf Hitler was forced to invade the Soviet Union to preempt a Soviet takeover of Europe;

2) U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt repeatedly told the American public he was committed to peace while making every effort to involve the United States in war; and 3) Germany was forced to fight Great Britain even though Hitler had always wanted peace with Britain and regarded the two countries as natural allies. The leaders of the Soviet Union, the United States, and Great Britain were all committed to the complete destruction of Germany. The Allied leaders purposely sacrificed the lives of tens of millions of people and practiced uncivilized warfare to accomplish their goal.

The Allies also intentionally allowed the Soviet Union to gain control of Eastern Europe. Thus, a war allegedly fought for freedom and democracy turned into a totalitarian nightmare for the people of the Eastern European nations.

Part II of this book reports the Allied mass murder of the German people after the end of World War II. Although denied by almost all historians, the Western Allies murdered approximately 1 million German prisoners of war through intentional starvation and exposure to the elements. The Allies also carried out the largest forced population transfer in history by expelling approximately 16 million ethnic Germans from their homes after the end of the war. Probably a minimum 2.1 million of these German expellees died in what was supposed to be an “orderly and humane” expulsion. Finally, the Allies murdered millions of additional Germans through starvation after the end of World War II.

Allied soldiers also raped an estimated 2 million German women during and after World War II. This represents more rapes against a defeated enemy than any other war in history. The Allies conducted a brutal denazification program designed to make the German people feel guilty about their war effort. Hundreds of German scientists were also compelled to emigrate by the victors, and German patents, technological advances, and other property were confiscated by the Allies. Millions of Germans were also sent to the Soviet Union and other Allied nations to be used as slave labor. Large numbers of these German slave laborers did not survive their captivity. The Allied postwar treatment of Germany is surely one of the most criminal, murderous, and unreported atrocities in world history.

The real and alleged atrocities committed by Germany during World War II are discussed in Part III of this book. Germany engaged in vicious anti-partisan activity and conducted an extensive euthanasia program against its own people during the war. Illegal medical experimentation and executions were also committed by Germany in its concentration camps. However, National Socialist Germany did not have a policy of genocide against the Jewish people during the war. Although hundreds of thousands of Je ws died of disease and other natural causes in the German concentration camps, Germany did not murder millions of Je ws as claimed by most historians. Also, while almost never reported by establishment historians, the Allies murdered tens of thousands of Germans in former German concentration camps after the end of World War II.

This book does not pretend to be a definitive or comprehensive history of the origins, aftermath and atrocities of World War II. The subject matter is far too broad for one book. Instead, it is written to summarize in an objective manner the highly successful Allied plan to conquer, control, and mass murder the German people. This book also exposes the Allied falsification and exaggeration of German atrocities during World War II. My hope is that this book will open up a debate concerning these historical events and perhaps stimulate others to investigate more deeply into these long-suppressed subjects.”

https://barnesreview.org/product/germanys-war/

Jack Otherside
Jack Otherside
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

Garth, you are trying to support your theory that Hitler did not want the war, and Poland caused it by attacking Germany on September 1, 1939, citing John Wear’s book “The German War”. I’m sorry, but this is one of the worst arguments you could use in apologetics for Hitler.
Prof. Norman Davies, a world-class scholarly authority in the field of history, whose book “God’s Playground: A History of Poland” I referred to in our discussion, is for you „an establishment writer who makes money by creating a false history of World War II in order to propagate myths”. I don’t know of a single scientific opinion accusing Prof. Davies is falsifying history, so you should consider the basis for making such an accusation of scientific dishonesty of Prof. Davies.
However, John Wear, who for you is a scientific authority, is in fact a historical liar, which I personally experience when reading fragments of his book, which I have certain knowledge, even from the accounts of family members and friends, participants of World War II and prisoners of KL Auschwitz, that in John Wear’s message they are a mixture of truth and lies. An old method of psychological operations to make lies credible.
I do not intend to enter into a polemic against John Wear’s lies, because that would mean that his lies deserve discussion.
I agree with your views regarding the current war in Ukraine being fueled by both the British and Polish governments and other European governments except the Hungarian and Slovak governments. There is no consensus on views on Nazism. During World War II, six members of my immediate family lost their lives at the hands of Germans serving Hitler.
They were not Jews. During the German occupation of Poland in 1939-1945, according to estimates, approximately 6 million Polish citizens lost their lives, including approximately 3 million Polish Jews and approximately 3 million Poles. Jews died mainly as a result of planned extermination, Poles as a result of resisting the German occupation. This applies to members of my family who died in combat, in the Auschwitz and Buchenwald concentration camps, and during cruel investigations after arrest on charges of participation in the anti-occupation conspiracy. This is the truth.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Jack Otherside
5 months ago

Who started World War I and World War II?

Here’s another man who says that the history books don’t tell the truth, and let me tell you about this man’s credentials.

He is a military man who knows about war and military history. In fact he made military history himself. He was the youngest USAF pilot in the Vietnam War and he he holds the record for the most flying missions of that war. After his flying days we went into military intelligence. His Wikipedia page fails to mention all of that. Don’t expect the whole truth from Wikipedia.

He also made world headlines in the 1980s when he pulled off a daredevil stunt by flying under the arches of the Eiffel Tower, it’s in Paris. 🙂 (watch it here, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_txdqnVP3-c)

See this article for these quotes.

“I think it goes back to the same thing that caused World War I and World War II. World War I was, to a large degree, a function of the UK being bankrupt as a result of getting involved in stupid wars they couldn’t afford. So certainly, the British had a lot more to do with starting World War I than the history books tell us.

I just came across something yesterday. It was marvelous. The question was, who was responsible for starting World War II?

The author made a very convincing argument that it had far more to do with Roosevelt than anybody realized.”

“To the extent that I think there was a lot of truth to that, what has happened with NATO, Trump, the Germans, the Brits, terrifies me because it convinces me we will go into World War III. I think there’s no other possible alternative. Strangely enough, a lot of that is going to have to do with the fact that both the EU and the United States and the debt-based system of the West are bankrupt, and they need a war to get the economy restarted.”

“So we’ve got the Germans and French trying to start World War III in Ukraine, and we’ve got the United States and Israel trying to start World War III in Iran. And somebody’s bound to succeed sooner or later”

Here is that interview.

https://robertsinn.substack.com/p/bob-moriarty-the-us-will-withdraw

Bob Moriarty flies under the Eiffel Tower. If he did it today he might have been shot down.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_txdqnVP3-c

Jack Otherside
Jack Otherside
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago
Garth, I tried to reply to your post above, but my reply was not allowed.
Garth
Garth
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

“Russia blames ‘treacherous’ Britain for ‘instigating’ both world wars in scathing verbal attack after expelling two UK diplomats for ‘spying”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14481971/Russia-blames-treacherous-Britain-instigating-world-wars-scathing-verbal-attack-expelling-two-UK-diplomats-spying.html

As we can see, London today, just as it did on the eve of both world wars of the last century, acts as the main “instigator” of the global conflict,’ the agency said.

Garth
Garth
5 months ago

About the official version of history. I have recalled quite a few examples of the sort of bluff versions of events to cover up up the truth.

When I was child, everyone knew the story of Nurse Edith Cavell. (“Nurse”?) In WW1 she was just a nice lady who wanted to look after wounded soldiers and in 1915 those nasty Germans shot her after falsely accusing her of being a spy. That was the official version.

The truth should have come out in 1945 under the thirty year rule, but in 1945 the country was once again at war with Germany. They couldn’t let the public know that their government had lied to them and their account of history was false or the people might think, “Hmm, what are they lying about now in WW2? So they made the papers subject to the one hundred year rule.

That meant that the truth came out in 2015. She was a spy and not just a spy, she was the ring leader who set up a spy ring and led it. The people who died before 2015 died believing the official version of history – a false version.

Do you remember the Skripals?

They expected us to believe that these casually dressed Russians planted the Novichok, a substance so deadly that the British authorities searching for the bottle had to wear these hazmat suits, see below.

I thought of many more, and they are examples that prove me right about “official” versions of war.

See this, they take us for fools, but sadly there are those who do not want to see.

comment image

Garth
Garth
5 months ago

This writer agrees with Dr. Coleman, the signs are that WW3 is imminent.

“European Leaders Warn That Conscription Will Be Necessary As The EU Launches An $840 Billion Program To Prepare For War With Russia”.

https://citizenwatchreport.com/european-leaders-warn-that-conscription-will-be-necessary-as-the-eu-launches-an-840-billion-program-to-prepare-for-war-with-russia/

“On Tuesday, Ursula von der Leyen unveiled a brand new $840 billion program that will be known as “Rearm Europe”…”

“Of course money won’t be enough to accomplish what European leaders have planned.

They are going to need warm bodies as well.

As most of you know, elections were just held in Germany, and the group that won is apparently pushing for a rapid reintroduction of “compulsory military service””

“A spokesperson for the group that will be heading up the new government has publicly stated that the first new conscripts “will have to walk through the barracks gates in 2025”…”

“These developments have raised concerns about the potential outbreak of World War 3, with NATO’s former Deputy Supreme Allied Commander Europe, Sir Richard Shirreff, considering the possibility of conscription returning to the UK.”

Garth
Garth
5 months ago

This writer agrees with Dr. Coleman, the signs are that WW3 is imminent.

“European Leaders Warn That Conscription Will Be Necessary As The EU Launches An 840 Billion dollar Program To Prepare For War With Russia”.

https://citizenwatchreport.com/european-leaders-warn-that-conscription-will-be-necessary-as-the-eu-launches-an-840-billion-program-to-prepare-for-war-with-russia/

“On Tuesday, Ursula von der Leyen unveiled a brand new 840 dollar billion program that will be known as “Rearm Europe”…”

“Of course money won’t be enough to accomplish what European leaders have planned.

They are going to need warm bodies as well.

As most of you know, elections were just held in Germany, and the group that won is apparently pushing for a rapid reintroduction of “compulsory military service””

“A spokesperson for the group that will be heading up the new government has publicly stated that the first new conscripts “will have to walk through the barracks gates in 2025”…”

“These developments have raised concerns about the potential outbreak of World War 3, with NATO’s former Deputy Supreme Allied Commander Europe, Sir Richard Shirreff, considering the possibility of conscription returning to the UK.”

Garth
Garth
5 months ago

“Russia blames ‘treacherous’ Britain for ‘instigating’ both world wars in scathing verbal attack after expelling two UK diplomats for ‘spying”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14481971/Russia-blames-treacherous-Britain-instigating-world-wars-scathing-verbal-attack-expelling-two-UK-diplomats-spying.html

From the article, “As we can see, London today, just as it did on the eve of both world wars of the last century, acts as the main “instigator” of the global conflict,’ the agency said.”

History proves him right.

The parallels with 1939 and today are astounding, parallels between WW2 and WW3.

1. In the 1930s, the Poles claimed sovereignty over Danzig, but the people were mainly German and they wanted to be part of Germany. The Poles were killing them In Ukraine, the people of the Donbass and Luhansk regions were mainly Russian and wanted to be part of Russia. The Ukrainians were killing them.

2. In 1939, The League of Nations refused to act to stop the genocide of Germans by Poles, so Hitler was forced to act. After the 2014 coup in Ukraine, Ukrainian Neo-Nazis were carrying out ethnic cleansing in Donbass and Luhansk. Putin went to the UN to ask them act under the “Responsibility To Protect” protocol (look up “R2P”) The United Nations refused to act, so Putin was forced to act.

3. Hitler wanted to make a deal with Poland over Danzig and avoid war, but the British acted to stop any deal and they used Danzig to start WW2. In April, 2022, Boris Johnson scuppered a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia, he wanted the war to go on and to eventually turn into WW3.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

The Road to War: How the Ukraine War Began – A Factual Accounting With Document Proof from US National Security Archive

https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/news-selections/world-news/the-road-to-war-how-the-ukraine-war-began-a-factual-accounting-with-document-proof-from-us-national-security-archive

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

So there we have Russia did not start the war in Ukraine and official US government documents prove it.

Garth
Garth
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

“THE GENOCIDE OF THE GERMANS IN POLAND – 1939” – how WW2 started, Danzig. Hitler did not start WW2.

https://issuu.com/tjprc/docs/2-42-1652854406-12ijhrjun202212

Garth
Garth
5 months ago

They are doing it again. Falsifying history.

Vance’s speech in Munich was a warning to Europe about the dangers of its restrictions on freedom of speech and there was advice to Europe about regaining its democratic values.

This morning, 11th March, on the Radio 4 Today programme, along with other false claims, Jeremy Bowen claimed that Vance’s speech was the US virtually saying to Europe, “We’re washing our hands of you lot”.

This was a gross misrepresentation and an example of re-writing history to promote a lie. On its own it isn’t too important, but this sort of propaganda is constantly repeated and pumped out day after day to create the false view of history, and it just like the false history of WW2 when the British were told that Hitler started WW2.

Speak to people from countries that aren’t subjected to Western propaganda about WW2 and they know the truth.

Garth
Garth
5 months ago

“THE GENOCIDE OF THE GERMANS IN POLAND – 1939” – how WW2 started. Hitler did not start WW2.

https://issuu.com/tjprc/docs/2-42-1652854406-12ijhrjun202212

Jack Otherside
Jack Otherside
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

Garth you wrote:
“THE GENOCIDE OF THE GERMANS IN POLAND – 1939” – how WW2 started. Hitler did not start WW2.
https://issuu.com/tjprc/docs/2-42-1652854406-12ijhrjun202212

I will quote two sentences from the article you recommended.
„This paper shows how the genocide of the Germans in Poland such as the Danzig and Broomberg Bloody Sunday played role in causing the II World War. (…)
It debates on the reasons that pushed Hitler (of Jewish descent) in trigger the Second World War by invading Poland”

First, I recommend taking into account the last sentence, which states that it was Hitler (pushed) who started World War II by invading Poland, which contradicts Dr. Coleman’s accusatory thesis against Poland:
„When Poland invaded Germany (not the other way round) Britain used it as an excuse to start a war with Germany. Remember, it was Poland which invaded Germany and Britain that declared war on Germany and not the other way around”.
Garth, you should remember, it was Germany which invaded Poland and not the other way around.

Now I will refer to the first quoted sentence of the article:
„This paper shows how the genocide of the Germans in Poland such as the Danzig and Broomberg Bloody Sunday played role in causing the II World War.

First of all, I don’t know what the author had in mind when he wrote about the genocide of Germans in Gdańsk.
However, when it comes to Bloody Sunday in Bydgoszcz (Bromberg) on September 3 and 4, 1939, these events could not have influenced Hitler’s decision to attack Poland, because they took place after the invasion of September 1, 1939.

I recommend an article that discusses the different opinions of Polish and German historians about Bloody Sunday in Bydgoszcz (Bromberg):

https://1september39.com/39e/articles/2332,The-Myth-of-quotThe-Bloody-Sunday-of-Bydgoszcz-Dispelled.html

For over sixty years, Polish and German historians have been talking about what happened in Bydgoszcz on September 3, 1939 – called “Bloody Sunday” by the Third Reich’s propaganda – in a completely different way.
Article conclusion:
In turn, “Bydgoszcz Bloody Sunday” by Günter Schubert. “Death of a Legend”
appears as a critical analysis of both German and Polish reports,
Schubert confronts Polish and German positions, ending this confrontation with a comprehensive examination of preserved source documents. Consequently, he comes to the conclusion that on September 3 and 4, 1939, the Germans started an “uprising” in Bydgoszcz, which was deliberately omitted from the testimonies recorded by Nazi state institutions.
Günter Schubert’s book brings us closer to the truth, but because many questions remain unanswered, historians must continue to search numerous German and Russian archives. Let us hope that as a result of these investigations, further documents will appear that will allow for a more clear interpretation of the events that took place at the beginning of World War II.

Garth, I am counting on your reflection on Dr. Coleman’s assessment that it was Poland that committed genocide against Germans and invaded Germany on September 1, 1939. Truth defeats propaganda lies.
Regards!

Garth
Garth
5 months ago

Who started World War I and World War II?

Here’s another man who says that the history books don’t tell the truth, and let me tell you about this man’s credentials.

He is a military man who knows about war and military history. In fact he made military history himself. He was the youngest USAF pilot in the Vietnam War and he he holds the record for the most flying missions of that war. After his flying days we went into military intelligence. His Wikipedia page fails to mention all of that. Don’t expect the whole truth from Wikipedia.

He also made world headlines in the 1980s when he pulled off a daredevil stunt by flying under the arches of the Eiffel Tower, it’s in Paris. 🙂 (watch it here, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_txdqnVP3-c)

See this article for these quotes.

“I think it goes back to the same thing that caused World War I and World War II. World War I was, to a large degree, a function of the UK being bankrupt as a result of getting involved in stupid wars they couldn’t afford. So certainly, the British had a lot more to do with starting World War I than the history books tell us.

I just came across something yesterday. It was marvelous. The question was, who was responsible for starting World War II?

The author made a very convincing argument that it had far more to do with Roosevelt than anybody realized.”

“To the extent that I think there was a lot of truth to that, what has happened with NATO, Trump, the Germans, the Brits, terrifies me because it convinces me we will go into World War III. I think there’s no other possible alternative. Strangely enough, a lot of that is going to have to do with the fact that both the EU and the United States and the debt-based system of the West are bankrupt, and they need a war to get the economy restarted.”

“So we’ve got the Germans and French trying to start World War III in Ukraine, and we’ve got the United States and Israel trying to start World War III in Iran. And somebody’s bound to succeed sooner or later”

Here is that interview.

https://robertsinn.substack.com/p/bob-moriarty-the-us-will-withdraw

Bob Moriarty flies under the Eiffel Tower. If he did it today he might have been shot down.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_txdqnVP3-c

Jack Otherside
Jack Otherside
Reply to  Garth
5 months ago

Garth, thank you for the discussion about Poland’s role in World War II. I understood a lot thanks to your opinions and the links sent to confirm that it was Poland that carried out ethnic cleansing of Germans before the war, and some commentators even go as far as to use the concept of Polish genocide, that it was Poland that forced Hitler to go to war by not agreeing to the German dictate of depriving Gdańsk of the status of a Free City, inhabited by Poles and Germans, and replacing it with the status of a German City, that it was Poland that would trigger World War II by invading Germany, not the other way around, as emphasized by Dr. Vernon Coleman in the article.
Thank you Garth, because thanks to you I realized the shocking truth about the impact of Goebbels’ wartime propaganda. Goebbels discovered that a lie repeated a thousand times will be considered the truth. It turns out that for many people, lies do not need to be repeated a thousand times. For many, saying it once is enough.