Breaking News

Denmark, Europe’s poster child for “renewable” energy, reverses 40-year-old ban on nuclear energy

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Please share our story!


In 1985, Denmark, the poster child for the elimination of “fossil fuels” in favour of solar and wind energy, mandated the phase out of nuclear power, which took effect in 2003. 

Last week, the Danish Parliament overwhelmingly voted for a resolution to reverse the nuclear power ban.  With this reversal comes the admission that wind and solar alone cannot guarantee grid reliability.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


The following was written by Ramon Tomey and originally published by Natural News.

Long hailed as a global leader in renewable energy, Denmark has stunned environmental advocates by considering a reversal of its 40-year ban on nuclear power.

The Folketing, Denmark’s Parliament, paved the way for this overturn of the policy first enacted in 1985 – a year before the Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine. The legislature voted 102-8 to end a nuclear phase-out law that took effect in 2003. This move signals a strategic pivot toward a more resilient energy mix and underscores the challenges of relying solely on wind and solar for a stable electricity grid.

For decades, Denmark has been the poster child for wind energy. Wind turbines generated over 50 per cent of the country’s electricity and an additional 10 per cent came from solar panels.

Its aggressive push toward renewables earned international praise, with prominent figures citing the country as a model for energy independence. Yet despite these achievements, Copenhagen now acknowledges that wind and solar alone cannot guarantee grid reliability.

According to Danish Energy Minister Lars Aagaard, the government is exploring small modular reactors (“SMRs”). He added that SMRs would complement its renewable energy infrastructure, not replace it.

“We can see that there is a development under way with new nuclear power technologies,” Aagaard told the Danish newspaper Politiken. “But it’s not enough that they have potential. We also need to know what it means for Danish society if we are to enable these technologies.”

Wind and Solar Failures, and The Case For Nuclear

Meanwhile, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen told the Financial Times in a 14 May interview that the ban on nuclear power was “ridiculous.” He argued that nuclear power is essential for a stable, low-carbon grid.

“Wind and solar are good as long as you have wind and sunshine,” said Rasmussen. “But you have to have a non-fossil baseload.”

Denmark’s dilemma reflects a broader European reckoning with energy security. It followed blackouts in Spain and Portugal in late April, which experts attribute to insufficient synchronous power generation – a weakness inherent in intermittent renewables.

Germany, which shuttered its last reactors in 2022, now faces renewed debate over nuclear power after Russia’s gas cuts exposed its reliance on fossil fuels. Italy, another historically anti-nuclear nation, is also reconsidering SMRs. Even Spain, long opposed to atomic energy, may delay shutting down reactors following its catastrophic blackout.

(Related: Germany is trying to go dark by shutting down all nuclear power plants, leaving only unreliable wind and solar)

The economic case for nuclear is equally compelling. While Denmark’s wind and solar sectors have driven up electricity prices – averaging €0.3763 per kWh – nuclear offers a cost-effective baseload solution. SMRs, with their modular design and lower upfront costs, could provide the stability Denmark’s grid lacks without sacrificing decarbonisation goals.

Copenhagen’s pivot doesn’t spell the end of renewables, but rather a pragmatic reassessment of their limitations. As the country navigates this transition, its experience serves as a cautionary tale for nations betting everything on wind and solar. The future of energy demands not just idealism but flexibility – a lesson the world would do well to heed.

Visit Nuclear.news for more similar stories.

More Related Stories:

Sources include:

Featured image: Wind Energy in Denmark, IEA Wind TCP

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Please share our story!
author avatar
Rhoda Wilson
While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest