Breaking News

Everything Devi Sridhar “forgot” to tell YOUR children in BBC Newsround film shown across Schools on Covid-19 Vaccines

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine was given emergency use authorisation on Friday 4th June stating it was “safe and effective” for use in children over the age of 12. This is criminal considering the overall Covid-19 fatality rate according to official statistics is less than 0.2%, and none of these fatalities are children, instead their average age is 85.

But what’s even more criminal than that is the propaganda that has been broadcast to your children in schools this week in the form of a BBC Newsround video featuring Devi Sridhar, who appears to tell children how safe and effective the Pfizer vaccine is and how important it is that they have the vaccine.

We felt it was best to take the transcript of the BBC’s video featuring the self-appointed expert on all things Covid-19, who is actually just a qualified nutritionist, and add in all the relevant information that she and the BBC chose to leave out, so that you as a parent can make a properly informed decision on whether or not to allow your child to have the Pfizer Covid vaccine, as well as make you aware of how the BBC and Schools are attempting to indoctrinate and condition your children.

We have added the relevant information that the BBC and Devi Sridhar left out in italics

Buy us a coffee!

The Pfizer coronavirus vaccine has been approved for 12 to 15 year-olds in Britain.

– this isn’t true. It has been given emergency use authorisation which is quite different from being approvedIn October the government made changes to the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 to allow the MHRA to grant temporary authorisation of a Covid-19 vaccine in an emergency without needing to wait for the EMA.

A temporary use authorisation is valid for one year only and requires the pharmaceutical companies to complete specific obligations, such as ongoing or new studies. Once comprehensive data on the product have been obtained, standard marketing authorisation can be granted. This means that the manufacturer of the vaccine cannot be held liable for any injury or death that occurs due to their vaccine, unless it was due to a quality control issue.

The UK’s medicine regulator, the MHRA, says the injections are “safe and effective” for children in that age group and that the “benefits far outweigh any risk”.

Another lieThe benefits do not outweigh the risks for anybody who is under the age of 85.

The above graph is a heat map showing deaths within 28 days of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 by date of death and age of the person. This data can be seen at the UK Gov’s. coronavirus dashboard here. Whats pretty clear from this data is that the most alleged Covid deaths have occurred in people aged 90+. The next age group with the most deaths being 85 – 89, then 80 – 84 and so on and so on. There’s a general decrease in the number of deaths up to about the 65-69 age group but then we see a dramatic fall to pretty much zero in anyone aged under about the age of 60.

Now lockdown fanatics will argue that 60 years old is too young to die. And they’re right it is. But this heat map shows that there have generally been no more than 9 deaths in a single day of anyone aged between 60 – 64. In the 65-69 year old group there have been no more than 20 deaths a day. In the 70-74 year old group no more than 27 deaths in a day. In the 75-79 group no more than than 48 deaths in a day, at it’s highest. It isn’t until we get to the 85-89 year old group that we start to see a large increase in the number of alleged Covid deaths. 179 deaths in a day at its highest. Then we have the 90+ age group which has seen no more than 379 deaths in a single day at it’s highest.

So what we’re seeing here is that is a negligible amount of “Covid” deaths in anyone under the age of 60. But we’re really not seeing very many “Covid” deaths in anybody aged between 60 and 80. What we are seeing is a much higher amount of “Covid” deaths in people aged over 85. But what’s so strange about that?

The average life expectancy in the UK is 81 years. Yet the UK has enforced dictatorial tyranny, destroyed the economy, decimated businesses and people’s livelihoods and created a flood of mental health issues because people who have lived longer than the average life expectancy of 81 are dying. So considering the fact that the Covid vaccines are experimental, how on earth can authorities state that the benefits outweigh the risk for anybody under the age of 85?

The rolling rate of deaths for anyone under the age of 29 has been 0.1 at its highest, but mostly zero. The rolling rate of deaths for anyone under the age of 20 has been precisely zero throughout.

However, a final decision on whether children will or won’t receive the jab hasn’t been made yet.

More than half of all adults in the UK have now had both doses of a coronavirus vaccine, the final decision on whether kids will also be vaccinated is now up to the UK’s vaccines committee.

Let’s hope they make the right choice, we doubt it after their ridiculous and criminal decision to recommend the Pfizer jab as safe for use during pregnancy despite the fact there is no clinical data to support this. Also despite the fact authorities demand you avoid smoked fish, soft cheese, wet paint, coffee, herbal tea, vitamin supplements, and processed junk foods when pregnant.

To date 920 women have reported the loss of their unborn baby due to one of the Covid jabs, and we implore you to read this article if you are pregnant and considering taking one of the Covid vaccines.

Newsround’s been putting YOUR questions to Professor Devi Sridhar, who is the Chair of Global Public Health at the University of Edinburgh, even though she is not qualified to do so and is instead just a qualified nutritionist.

Professor Devi: “So far trials have shown the vaccine is 100% safe for children.

This is a lie, the extremely short and small trial found that 86% of children suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to extremely serious.

“There are some side effects like headaches and fatigues, but in at least two months there was nothing actually significant.”

Another lie.

In the incredibly short trial which is still ongoing 1,127 children were given one dose of the Pfizer jab, but only 1,097 children received the second dose. This fact in itself raises questions as to why 30 children did not receive a second dose of the Pfizer jab, and we doubt the answer is pretty.

Of the 1,127 children who received a first dose of the jab a shocking 86% experienced an adverse reaction. Of the 1,097 children who received a second dose of the jab a shocking 78.9% experienced an adverse reaction.

The FDA document detailing the trial results states that 0.04% suffered an extremely serious adverse reaction but does not go in to detail on the type of reactions that occurred. 0.04% may sound small but lets put this into perspective.

In the United Kingdom there are approximately 4 million children aged between 12 – 15-years-old. If every single one of these children were to receive just one dose of the Pfizer mRNA jab then according to the study we can expect to see 1,600 suffer an extremely serious adverse reaction which could include death.

But if this then extends to children under the age of 12 and a similar rate of extremely serious adverse reaction occurs then we can expect to see that number increase to around 5,200.

Number of Covid deaths in this age group so far? Zero.

When are children likely to get the vaccine?

Professor Devi: “The Pfizer vaccine has been approved in the UK as being safe and effective and the question now is ‘when will children get it?’.

It hasn’t been approved, as we said above it has been given emergency use authorisation because it is still in phase three trials until 2023.

“It looks likely to be once people in their 20s are done, then it will move down to younger age groups.

“So the next group to get it, after those in their 20s, will be those who are 12 and older – probably starting with vulnerable children first.”

Why won’t under 11s get it yet?

Professor Devi: “Those younger than 12 won’t get the vaccine yet because it hasn’t been trialled in children under 12.

It hasn’t really been trialled in 12 year old’s either, unless you consider a two month long trial of just over 1000 children to be a good measure of whether this vaccine is safe and effective?

“There are trials ongoing to try and change the dosage to make it more appropriate for younger age groups.

“But right now nowhere is there a vaccine that has been deemed safe for children under the age of 12.”

There isn’t a Covid vaccine that is deemed safe for anybody as they are still in trials and there is no long term safety data.

Does the vaccine work?

Professor Devi: “So when the Pfizer vaccine was trialled among children in the United States, they found absolutely no cases of illness in the group that received the vaccine.

“So it looks like the vaccine does protect against getting Covid-19.”

They’ve also found close to zero cases of Covid-19 among children who haven’t had the vaccine. Those they have found have been asymptomatic and classified as Covid due to an unreliable PCR test.

PCR tests look for genetic matter from the new coronavirus using amplification cycles. However, the number of amplification cycles that was needed to detect genetic matter from the virus, which is referred to as the cycle threshold, typically isn’t included in test results sent to doctors and patients. Many coronavirus tests have fairly high cycle thresholds, with most set at 40 and some set at 37. That means a number of patients who aren’t carrying much of the new coronavirus are still testing positive, even though they may not be contagious. You can read our full breakdown on the PCR test here.

When testing people with no symptoms, and carrying out the test at high cycles it is essentially possible to find anything you want to find according to the inventor of the test, Kary Mullis.

Will the vaccine for children be the same as the adult version?

Professor Devi: “The child and adult version of the Pfizer vaccine are actually exactly the same.

“The vaccine has already been used in millions of adults and now it has been trialled in children and rolled out already in the United States and in Israel.”

I’m scared of injections, will the vaccine be available as a spray or tablet instead?

Professor Devi: “Unfortunately, at this point, the vaccine is only available as an injection.

“But it really doesn’t hurt too much, just a quick pinch into your arm for the first time.

Unless you’re one of the 878,966 people who’ve suffered an adverse reaction up to the 26th May according to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. However the MHRA states that only 1% – 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the Yellow Card scheme so that number is actually astronomically higher. The adverse reactions include blindness, deafness, paralysis, seizure, brain damage, stroke and sudden death.

“And then several weeks later, the second one and then you’re fully protected.”

Professor Devi: “The benefit of getting the vaccine is you don’t need to worry about Covid-19.

“It means you’re likely to not infect your parents, the people you live with and your teachers.

This also isn’t true. You can still spread and develop what authorities tell us is Covid-19 even after having the miraculous vaccine. It is only alleged to reduce severe symptoms. Children do not suffer symptoms at all so do not need it. Did we mention it’s also experimental?

“The downside is it’s another jab, another injection into your arm. But the benefits definitely outweigh the risks.”

Stop lying Devi, we’ve just proven otherwise above.

What are the side effects after having the Pfizer jab?

Professor Devi: “Some children experience similar side effects to adults – these include fatigue (feeling tired), having a headache, feeling generally unwell, but these cleared within a day or two.

They also include blindness, blood clots, deafness, paralysis, seizure, several differnt types of stroke, tachycardia, cardiac arrest, heart attack, sudden death, sudden visual loss, sudden hearing loss, and many other extremely serious side effects which can all be viewed within the UK Government / MHRA Yellow Card reports which can be viewed here under the analysis profile section.

“And it seems a small price to pay for actually being protected from the real disease.”

Devi Sridhar will live to regret that statement.

So there you have it, everything Devi Sridhar, a qualified Nutrionist, and the BBC chose to leave out of their propganda video shown across schools to YOUR children this week.

Share this page to Telegram
5 2 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
2 years ago

Great job filling in those critically important, but absent points. Now to get that in front of all the kids, their parents and teachers, just as the BBC did. Oopps, can’t have the truth being spread around. Especially if it questions the word of God coming from the Gates funded BBC.

Reply to  Krofter
2 years ago

Nothing that is done in secret comes from God The Bible says.

Reply to  Anonymous
2 years ago

It was tongue-in-cheek my friend.

Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
2 years ago

Did Pfizer Fail to Perform industry Standard Animal Testing Prior to Initiation of mRNA Clinical Trials?
TrialSite Staff May 28, 2021
Did Pfizer Fail to Perform industry Standard Animal Testing Prior to Initiation of mRNA Clinical Trials

TrialSite has learned of material information regarding mRNA vaccine safety revealed by a freedom of information act (FOIA) request filed by a group of Canadian physicians. These doctors have become concerned about COVID-19 mRNA vaccine safety. This new safety information involves the Pfizer mRNA-based vaccine known as BNT162b2 or “Comirnaty.” The FOIA documents reveal animal study results demonstrating that the Pfizer mRNA-based vaccine does not remain at the injection site, but rather appears to spread widely after injection. According to the documents, pre-clinical studies show that the active part of the vaccine (mRNA-lipid nanoparticles), which produce the spike protein, spreads throughout the body and is then concentrated in various organs, including the ovaries and spleen. The FOIA-produced data sets are incomplete, so the full meaning of these data cannot be determined at this time. TrialSite has also learned via regulatory documents that apparently (at least in their European Medicines Agency submission), Pfizer did not follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies during vaccines, as key studies did not meet good laboratory practice (GLP). The full panel of industry-standard reproductive toxicity and genotoxicity studies were apparently also not performed. But does this matter in light of the risk-benefit analysis associated with regulatory emergency use authorization (EUA)?

Recently, there has been speculation regarding potential safety signals associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Many different unusual, prolonged, or delayed reactions have been reported, and often these are more pronounced after the second shot. Women have reported changes in menstruation after taking mRNA vaccines. Problems with blood clotting (coagulation) – which are also common during COVID-19 disease – are also reported.

Among the most critical tests, which must be performed prior to testing any drug or vaccines in a human being, is whether it can cause mutations in the DNA (genotoxicity), or whether it could cause problems with cells or tissues of the reproductive tract – including ovaries (reproductive toxicity). In the case of the Pfizer COVID mRNA vaccine, these newly revealed documents raise additional questions about both the genotoxicity and reproductive toxicity risks of this product. Standard studies designed to assess these risks were not performed in compliance with accepted empirical research standards. Furthermore, in key studies designed to test whether the vaccine remains near the injection site or travels throughout the body, Pfizer did not even use the commercial vaccine (BNT162b2) but instead relied on a “surrogate” mRNA producing the luciferase protein.

These new disclosures seem to indicate that the U.S. and other governments are conducting a massive vaccination program with an incompletely characterized experimental vaccine. It is certainly understandable why the vaccine was rushed into use as an experimental product under emergency use authority, but these new findings suggest that routine quality testing issues were overlooked in the rush to authorize use. People are now receiving injections with an mRNA gene therapy-based vaccine, which produces the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in their cells, and the vaccine may be also delivering the mRNA and producing spike protein in unintended organs and tissues (which may include ovaries). Unfortunately, there is no way to know if this is related to vaccine safety signals or reports of menstrual irregularities; the required studies were either not done or not done properly.
How mRNA Vaccines are Believed to Work

The current mRNA vaccines are theorized to act locally in draining lymphoid tissue. Formulated lipid nanoparticles that contain mRNA able to produce the spike protein are syringe injected into a muscle such as the deltoid (shoulder muscle). Once the injection occurs, the muscle cells near the injection site are impacted by the mRNA-based vaccine (e.g. the lipid nanoparticles), while much of the dose moves into the intracellular fluid surrounding the muscle cells and consequently drains to lymph nodes (see for example here).

According to this theory, a properly functioning mRNA-based vaccine is delivered into and drives production of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein in muscle and lymph node cells. The cells then produce the Spike protein, which is then moved to the surface of these cells where it becomes attached. The foreign virus Spike protein then triggers the immune system to recognize and attack any cell in the body that is either infected by SARS-CoV-2 or has Spike protein on its surface. The vaccine was designed so that the Spike protein is affixed via a transmembrane anchor region, so that it cannot circulate around the body via the bloodstream (see here). The same general scenario applies to all mRNA-based vaccines as well as recombinant adenoviral vectored vaccines (such as the J&J vaccine) designed to use gene-therapy technology to express Spike protein in cells and tissues. This general strategy is designed to reduce the risk that any residual vaccine dose that does somehow end up in the bloodstream (or organs and tissues) ends up not being a safety risk due to unintended biologic effects. Spike protein will remain affixed to cell surfaces, and therefore is not released into the blood where circulating Spike might cause problems by binding to its natural target, ACE-2 receptors. However, any cell that has Spike protein (or protein fragments) anchored on its membrane or displayed on MHC antigen-presenting molecules becomes a target for vaccine-activated immune cells and antibodies, which would then attack, damage or kill those cells in the same way that SARS-CoV-2 virus-infected cells would be attacked. In other words, if very active mRNA delivery particles or recombinant adenoviral-vectored vaccines spread throughout the body, the resulting production of the vaccine antigen (Spike, in this case) will both stimulate immunity and also cause those same cells to be attacked by the immune system. If this actually happens, the resulting “vaccine reactogenicity” could resemble clinical symptoms seen with autoimmune syndromes.
EMA Pfizer/BioNTech Vaccine Distribution Studies

As standard practice, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) discloses their assessment of investigational new drug (IND) submissions. In the case of the Pfizer-BioNTech “Comirnaty” vaccine, the EMA assessment can be found on the Web here. This document includes a summary of EMAs evaluation of the non-clinical vaccine distribution studies reported to EMA by Pfizer-BioNTech. These studies were carried out using two methods: 1) use of mRNA producing the luciferase protein and 2) use of radioactive label to mark the mRNA (a more sensitive approach). These studies reveal that the majority of radioactivity initially remains near the injection site. However, within hours, a subset of the stabilized mRNA-containing particles become widely distributed throughout the bodies of test animals.

Upon inspection of the EMA summary document, TrialSite found evidence suggesting that the issue of biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of the “Comirnaty” BNT162b2 vaccine was not thoroughly examined in accordance with industry norms prior to the EMA review of the BNT162b2 IND/CTD. The reviewers share an explicit admission that “No traditional pharmacokinetic or biodistribution studies have been performed with the vaccine candidate BNT162b2.” Rapporteur (Filip Josephson) and Co-Rapporteur (Jean-Michael Race) suggest, however, that Pfizer used “a qualified LC-MS/MS method to support quantitation of the two novel LNP excipients” and suggest that “the bioanalysis methods appear to be adequately characterized and validated for use in the GLP studies.” However, the studies that were performed and submitted were non-GLP. Additionally, the EMA document states “Biodistribution: Several literature reports indicate that LNP-formulated RNAs can distribute rather nonspecifically to several organs such as spleen, heart, kidney, lung and brain. In line with this, results from the newly transmitted study 185350, indicate a broader biodistribution pattern.” This EMA observation corresponds with what appears to be a growing number of adverse events and aligns with data TrialSite observed via the FOIA showing concentrations of LNP-formulated RNAs in the spleen, for example.

To obtain independent reviews of these EMA regulatory documents, TrialSite contacted both Dr. Robert W. Malone, MD, MS, and another expert that wished to remain anonymous, and provided them copies of the EMA analysis and the FOIA documents. Dr. Malone was the original inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology back in the late 1980s. He currently advises several companies in regulatory affairs and clinical development. One of TrialSite’s other sources is a senior regulatory specialist who currently serves as the President of a prestigious European association. When asked to review and comment on the EMA assessment, Dr. Malone noted that normal pharmacokinetic and pharmaco-toxicology studies had not been performed before EUA authorization for the product. “I was particularly surprised that the dossier of regulatory documents indicates allowance for use in humans based on non-GLP PK and Tox studies relying on formulations which are significantly different from the final vaccine.“ After completing a review, TrialSite’s other source noted the following:

“A quick review the Toxicology Section (2.3.3) of The European Medicines Agency (EMA) Assessment Report on Comirnaty (COVID-19 mRNA vaccine) issued on 19 February 2021, raises concerns about data applicability of preclinical study findings to clinical use:

To determine the biodistribution of the LNP-formulated modified mRNA (modRNA), the applicant did study distribution of the modRNA in two different non-GLP studies, in mice and rats, and determined the biodistribution of a surrogate luciferase modRNA.

Thus, one might question the validity and applicability of non-GLP studies conducted using a variant of the subject mRNA vaccine.

In addition, no genotoxicity data were provided to EMA.”

Based on the FOIA documents, the biodistribution results (which are not disclosed in the public EMA summary document) suggest that the delivery technology results in mRNA delivery and significant concentration of the delivery lipids in ovaries, spleen, and other tissues and organs.
Urgent Emergency?

The discovery and review of the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics data obtained by the FOIA request underscores the reservations disclosed in the public EMA assessment. Although not performed to industry GLP standards, these results seem to indicate that lipid/mRNA nanoparticles, which code for the Spike protein, circulate throughout the body and then collect in a variety of organs and tissues, including the spleen and ovaries. This means that the vaccine is not remaining localized near the injection site and draining lymph nodes, but rather is also circulating in both blood and lymph and is subsequently concentrating in important organs. If this results in Spike protein being produced in unintended places including the brain, ovaries, and spleen, it may also be causing the immune system to attack these organs and tissues.
What’s the Risk?

According to official government accounts, minimal risk is associated with this vaccine when compared to the risks of COVID-19 infection. That’s why the U.S. FDA approved the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) based on a risk-benefit analysis. TrialSite, a vaccine proponent, only raises the issue to ensure full disclosure of any material safety implications to our readership, including clinicians, clinical research safety committees, and public health professionals.

While, according to the CDC’s VAERS database, over 4,000 deaths have been entered in association with all the vaccines, the US government argues that none of these deaths are formally linked to the jabs. About 291 million people have been vaccinated to date, hence overall reported adverse event risk is low. While it is true that many people are completely unscathed, the discovery of these documents and associated information may alter the risk-benefit assessment underlying the EUA decision.

TrialSite is aware that one must be particularly cautious about publishing or communicating speculations that might raise skepticism about vaccine use. Should researchers handle findings differently when there is a chance they might frighten the public? Perhaps small, inconclusive, worrying studies should not be published because they could do more harm than good. Dr. Paul Offit, Director of the Vaccine Education Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, states: “Knowing that you’re going to scare people, I think you have to have far more data.”

One could argue that even an inconclusive paper can be important, as it can spur the larger, more definitive studies that are needed. It should be “put out there for the scientific community, to look at it, see it, know about it, refine study design and go and look again,” says Gregory Poland, a renowned Mayo Clinic vaccinologist and the Editor-in-Chief of Vaccine. It is crucial, though, for researchers to carefully explain such results in their papers and regulatory filings to prevent misinterpretation or misunderstandings.
Other Relevant New Data

A recent study led by researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the Harvard Medical School measured longitudinal plasma samples collected from 13 recipients of the Moderna vaccine. The manuscript has been accepted for publication by “Clinical Infectious Diseases” and the pre-print is available here. Out of these individuals, 11 revealed detectable levels of SARS-CoV-2 protein as early as day one right after first vaccine injection. The authors considered that to be normal clearance.

Clearance of detectable SARS-CoV-2 protein correlated with production of IgG and IgA. Measured mean S1 peak levels were 68 pg/mL ±21 pg/mL, and mean spike peak level was 62 pg/mL ± 13 pg/mL. Assuming an average adult blood volume of approximately 5 liters, this corresponds to peak levels of approximately 0.3 micrograms of circulating free antigen for a vaccine designed to only express membrane-anchored antigen. For comparison purposes, most influenza vaccines administer a total of about 15 micrograms of HA antigen per influenza strain. Total levels of antigen expressed by the experimental SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines currently administered to patients are not known.
Root Cause Analysis Suggested

A root cause assessment is suggested to better understand if any of this information adjusts or modifies the EUA risk-benefit analysis. TrialSite suggests that regulators and pharma manufacturers at least review and assess the risk that foreign mRNA-based spike protein delivery and expression in tissues and organs distal to the actual injection site may be contributing to the unusual reactogenicity and adverse event profile associated with these products. The uptake in vaccination rates has slowed in the United States in part due to vaccine hesitancy. However, such a phenomenon can be overcome with acknowledgment, transparency, and continuous commitment to risk mitigation.

Reply to  Richard Noakes
2 years ago

There was no pandemic Global.dwatb rates are basically standard for 2020 as expected No increase of any pandemic The vaccines a fraud. What’s really in it What’s the Top Secret that won’t be coming out of any authorised classified lab?

Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
2 years ago

400 Covid-19 cases a day are people who have had both vaccine jabs
A former scientific advisor to the Government revealed that one in 25 people who get Covid-19 have had both their vaccines
Press Association Simon Meechan
· 10:55, 7 JUN 2021
· Updated12:54, 7 JUN 2021

One in 25 people who are diagnosed with Covid-19 have had both vaccine jabs (Image: Andy Commins / Daily Mirror)
Hundreds of people who have had both their vaccine jabs are being diagnosed with Covid-19 every day, a former chief scientific advisor to the Government revealed.
Sir David King, who is now chair of the Independent Sage Group, told Sky News: “We know that anyone vaccinated twice is relatively safe against the virus.
“But let’s not forget the one in 25 new cases are people who have been vaccinated twice – that means 400 new cases a day are people who had the vaccine twice.
“While there is an extensive amount of virus out there in the country, amongst our people, it is dangerous.”
He continued: “Dying isn’t the sole issue about that we’re trying to avoid here. The number of people who are suffering from long Covid in the country is enormous and this is not a simply a flu, once you’ve had the vaccine.”
Sir David also said the current Covid-19 figures suggest a third wave is incoming.
He said: “(There are) 5,300 new cases of the disease per day in the United Kingdom and we’re up about 2,000 on last week.
“Now we’ve been discussing whether or not we’re going into a serious third wave and I don’t think we can possibly wait any longer.
“This is the evidence of another wave appearing.”
Dr King also questioned whether the Government was pressing ahead with a “herd immunity policy” among teenagers and called for over 12’s to be vaccinated.
He told Sky News: “The Pfizer vaccine has already been given the green light in this country to over 12-year-olds. I think we should run that programme forward quickly.
“But we’re opening schools today and the Government has said 12 to 18-year-olds no longer need to wear face masks at school – I don’t think that was a wise thing to do and I do hope the Government will rethink this in the light of the current figures.”
Sir David added: “Let me ask you, if I may, to ask the Government, are they actually believing in herd immunity amongst school children?
“Is that why they’re saying, ‘take masks off it’, so that the disease spreads rapidly and they all become immune by having had the disease?
“If that is a policy, shouldn’t we be honest with the public, and tell us that is the policy?
“I believe that herd immunity was the policy from the beginning back in February, March last year, so have we returned to that now with the high vaccination level?”
Me: Coronavirus is a Flu like virus and irrespective of if you have had test vaccines or not, you will get Coronavirus again, because test vaccines are for Covid in the body and that has nothing to do with Flu like symptoms in the head and body.
400 daily = 2,800 weekly = 14,000 monthly =146,000 yearly in the UK alone.
The purpose of test vaccines, is to hopefully stop you getting Covid in the body again, but that does not work effectively, when 1 in 25 of those fully vaccinated, with both shots, get Covid again.
There is no evidence to suggest that those who don’t get Covid, are in fact protected. The test vaccine might just weaken the symptoms, so you think you are safe, when in fact you are not.
A test is not conducted after getting one or two test vaccines, to discover if your body is protected from new Covid strains, because that simply is not done, so even if you have both test vaccines, you simply don’t know if you are protected from anything, because no tests have confirmed your protection from the next dose of Covid, you might get – and why, I wonder, is that not done?
I refer to my free salt water cure, it murders Coronavirus in the head, before Coronavirus is allowed to become Covid in the head and body, as above and with a potential 100% success rate there really is no point in doing nothing for the 10 to 14 days of self isolation, while the virus rages in your body, to later become Covid – when you could have killed it dead, with my simple, free, salt water cure, over that time span, if not before.
Richard Noakes

Reply to  Richard Noakes
2 years ago

Didn’t need too It only was a threat to basically dying people anyway Almost all of the dead were over 80 with an average of 2.3 serious pre existing medical conditions They mostly would have died soon after anyway. And the rest would have acquired herd immunity to something that was less dangerous to 95%of the population than the regular flu. And you don’t need a jab for that either. If anything this jabs going to create a pa demic of secret design that will be camouflaged by their spin doctors and the marketing arm of propaganda from government frauds.

Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
2 years ago

Coronavirus Achilles Heel: A Coronavirus is a virus that causes an infection in your nose, sinuses, or upper throat. It can lead to pneumonia (4)(5). Most Coronaviruses are not dangerous. Some types of them are serious, such as MERS and SARS (6). The name comes from the crown-like appearance the virus displays. Mercola
1 heaped teaspoon of salt in a mug of warm water, (can be cold) cup a hand and sniff or snort the whole lot up, spitting anything which comes down into your mouth – no reaction fine, blow out your nose, flush away, washing your hands afterwards, you don’t have a virus .
A reaction, you have a virus – retain the salt water in your head for as long as the soreness lasts (2-3 minutes) then blow out your nose, flush away, washing hands afterwards and do this treatment 3 times a day, morning, noon, night, or more often, until the soreness goes away, when you have killed off the virus in your head and you won’t get the disease it will become, as I have done these past 26.5 years and to this (I am never ill), I add those virus related diseases which remain unknown to us, but are delivered by a virus, as in (unspecified) air pollution. Simple.
Try it, if you are satisfied with the results, pass the cure along, if results are not excellent, there are still the untested, trial vaccines to fall back on.
I never have Flu shots, or this vaccine either. No point doing the above salt water cure and then having vaccine shots too – like Duh!!
About 26 years ago, I read the report from a posh Research Center in America, where the author suggested, in his research paper, that his experiments with Salt Water cured flu type colds and he in turn referred to the Swedish or Norwegian Army (I think), who had barrels filled with Salt Water, attached to a hose, out of the bottom, which soldiers used to flush out their heads, when they thought they were getting a cold – and their troops never got colds.
I have been doing it ever since and neither do I, from any virus related “thing”.
There are weak salt water spray preparations you can buy from your local chemist, to clear your head. To my way of thinking, (as above) you need a stronger salt water solution to wash out your inner head and no spray is ever going to be enough to do that, which is proof of safety concerns, regarding salt, as above.
If you are allergic to salt – don’t do as I suggest!!


Florence Freedom
Florence Freedom
Reply to  Richard Noakes
2 years ago

It is great to read that there are still people out there like @Richard who trust in their immune systems, common sense and the herbs and minerals provided (often for free) by mother nature. If I may add to the above comments that a couple of cloves of raw garlic is a powerful, natural medicine that happens to be anti-viral, antibacterial, antifungal and so much more besides. It may have a strong taste and strong smell but when used regularly, it can provide a cheap, powerful protection against illness and disease for those who are concerned about their health. Likewise, if you are obliged to maintain the social distancing laws then garlic will naturally help there too! Of course, the pharmaceutical companies don’t want you to use such simple remedies as it doesn’t line their greedy pockets. Shame on those who are promoting the un-necessary, un-licensed vaccine onto vulnerable others including children and systematically eroding our ‘hard fought for’ freedoms.

2 years ago

The leopard never changes its spots. They have never done anything except lie and deceive the people about everything Why do you think they really made “education” compulsory? Remember your teachers telling you how important it was to be well informed by reading the papers and watching the news? Remember thinking what liars.! Nothings changed They still make sure teachers are selected from the middle ranks of ordinary talentless slobbos who just want long holidays.

Last edited 2 years ago by Anonymous
2 years ago

she is an absolute psychopath of the highest order. A bill Gates, globalist puppet. totally evil and sick woman !

2 years ago

2 words.
Informed Consent.

almost impossible for the average joe, completely impossible for children.

please, can we put an end to this crime perpetuated against the human race?

are you ready to stand up? or die on your knees with a needle in your arm?

Des Gusted
Des Gusted
2 years ago

The govt are proposing free Oija boards so that all citizens can access the mint imperial Seance directly.

2 years ago

Im in no way supportive of these vaccines, for any age group really, but one thing I find hard to argue against, and if anyone can help me with out with this, is that all us “selfish unvaccinated” are the reason for the virus spreading, particularly the mutations…….all of us asymptomatics if you like. Can anyone help me out to refute this?

Florence Freedom
Florence Freedom
Reply to  louise
2 years ago

It is a common misconception that having the vaccine stops transmission of this particular ‘disease.’ If we are to believe what we have been told about the vaccine then it would potentially only protect the person receiving the jab from said ‘disease’ – having no protective impact on other members of their household etc. Unfortunately, many people do not research as thoroughly as they should but in (possible) hype and panic, misguided trust and loyalty to the ‘powers that be’ eagerly offer their arms for the ‘dodgy jab’ and then feel the need to judge the un-vaccinated who have decided to research and/or trust in their immune systems to deal with ‘disease’. It is really frustrating as at the moment, the anti group seem to be in the minority. But as the old saying goes…, “just because everyone is doing it, doesn’t mean it is right.” Furthermore, @louise I would question any statistics related to the ‘pandemic’ – ask who compiles these statistics? How are they compiled and to whose benefit? What is the real aim? Are the statistics based in absolute truth and there to help people make an informed choice or are they being doctored to frighten people into early submission?

2 years ago

Excellent, inarguable article.

2 years ago

[…] UK Medical Freedom Alliance (UKMFA) have sent a letter of complaint to Professor Sridhar after she made claims on BBC Newsround – misleading claims including that the Covid-19 vaccines are 100% safe, that the benefits of […]

2 years ago

Just the last statement “for the real disease” she actually says “from the real disease when it comes”. Very chilling choice of words …. you should correct on your site.

2 years ago

How can we as parents tell the schools to stop spreading propaganda

2 years ago

[…] I tweeted a link to a Daily Expose article – 2021 Jun 8 Daily Expose Everything Devi Sridhar “forgot” to tell YOUR children in BBC Newsround film shown across Schools on Covid-19 Vaccines [4] […]

2 years ago

[…] also added all the relevant information that Devi and the BBC chose to leave out, so that you as a parent could make a properly informed decision on whether or not to allow your […]

2 years ago

[…] also added all the relevant information that Devi and the BBC chose to leave out, so that you as a parent could make a properly informed decision on whether or not to allow your […]

2 years ago

[…] We previously told you how propaganda had been broadcast to your children in schools, in the form of a BBC Newsround video featuring Devi Sridhar, who told children how safe and effective the Pfizer vaccine is and how important it is that they have the vaccine. We felt it was best to take the transcript of the BBC’s video featuring the self-appointed expert on all things Covid-19, who is actually just a qualified nutritionist, and add in all the relevant information that she and the BBC chose to leave out – you can read our Fact Check article here. […]

2 years ago

[…] should cause massive embarrassment to the BBC which has broadcast advice from alleged expert but non-doctor Devi Sridhar claiming that the covid jab produces only mild side effects in […]