A group of Doctors, Scientists, and Lawyers are taking the MHRA to court in an attempt to overturn the decision to give emergency authorisation for the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine to be given to children.
The Medicine & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) extended the emergency authorisation of the Pfizer / BioNTech mRNA jab in the UK to allow it to be given to children between the ages of 12 – 15 on the 4th June 2021.
At the time, the Chief Executive of the MHRA, Dr June Raine said the MHRA had “carefully reviewed clinical trial data in children aged 12 to 15 years and have concluded that the Pfizer vaccine is safe and effective in this age group and that the benefits outweigh any risk”.
We are left wondering if Dr June Raine and the MHRA have even read the results of the extremely short and small study. If they have then they would have seen that 86% of children in the study suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to extremely serious.
Just 1,127 children took part of the trial, however only 1,097 children completed the trial, with 30 of them not participating after being given the first dose of the Pfizer jab. The results do not state why the 30 children did not go on to complete the trial.
The information is publicly available and contained within an FDA fact sheet which can be viewed here (see page 25, table 5 on-wards).
There was never any doubt that the MHRA would give emergency authorisation for the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine to be used in children when you consider that a certain Mr Bill Gates owns shares in both Pfizer and BioNTech and is the primary funder of the MHRA.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation bought shares in Pfizer back in 2002, and back in September 2020 Bill Gates ensured the value of his shares went up by announcing to the mainstream media in a CNBC interview that he viewed the Pfizer jab as the leader in the Covid-19 vaccine race.
“The only vaccine that, if everything went perfectly, might seek the emergency use license by the end of October, would be Pfizer.”
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation also “coincidentally” bought $55 million worth of shares in BioNTech in September 2019, just before the alleged Covid-19 pandemic struck.

The MHRA received a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2017 to the tune of £980,000 for a “collaboration” with the foundation. However, a Freedom of Information request which the MHRA responded to in May 2021 revealed that the current level of grant funding received from the Gates Foundation amounts to $3 million and covers “a number of projects”.
Can we really trust the MHRA to remain impartial when its primary funder is the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, who also own shares in Pfizer and BioNTech? We don’t think so.
But it hasn’t just been down to the MHRA to decide whether or not children should be given the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine. That decision ultimately falls to the Government, but they rely on the advice given by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI).
The JCVI is an independent group of experts who advise the Government health departments in the four UK nations on immunisations and the prevention of infectious disease. They consider vaccine safety, efficacy and look at the impact and cost effectiveness of immunisation strategies.
Unfortunately, the JCVI decided to issue the following advice on the use of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine in children on the 19th July 2021 –
‘From today, the JCVI is advising that children at increased risk of serious COVID-19 disease are offered the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
That includes children aged 12 to 15 with severe neurodisabilities, Down’s syndrome, immunosuppression and multiple or severe learning disabilities.
The JCVI also recommends that children and young people aged 12 to 17 who live with an immunosuppressed person should be offered the vaccine. This is to indirectly protect their immunosuppressed household contacts, who are at higher risk of serious disease from COVID-19 and may not generate a full immune response to vaccination.’

But thankfully, a group of Doctors, Scientists, and Lawyers are preparing to take the MHRA to court to have the decision to give the Pfizer / BioNTech jab to children overturned.
The Covid-19 Assembly is a UK based, non-profit organisation working to end all Coronavirus related restrictions and to prevent them happening again. They have assembled a world class group of expert doctors and scientists including Dr Roger Hopkinson, Dr Robert Malone, Dr Tess Lawrie, Dr Ros Jones and many others.
On behalf of many extremely concerned parents the Covid-19 Assembly is taking legal action to challenge the MHRA’s decision to approve the Pfizer / BioNtech vaccine for use in 12-15 year olds.
The group states that they have substantial evidence that clearly established that there is no legal, moral or medical justification for children to be given a Covid-19 vaccine. Arguing that there the “vaccine” is novel and comes with associated risks.
They also state that the Pfizer vaccine has not yet completed clinical trials to demonstrate efficacy beyond a few months, therefore there is no long term safety data to justify the MHRA’s approval.
A statement released by the Covid-19 Assembly said that they “strongly believe that it is unethical and unnecessary for this treatment to be widely used by under 18’s, and there are hundreds of senior doctors and scientists who agree with us, over 60 of whom put their names to an open letter to the MHRA weeks before the authorisation”.
“There have now been several reports of serious and fatal outcomes in under 18’s suspected to have been caused by the Pfizer vaccine in the US alone.
“By challenging the authorisation for use in 12-15 year-olds, our hope is to prevent any children suffering unnecessarily. If successful, we anticipate we will have saved the health and lives of many children and the heartbreak of their families.”
Bev Turner, a mainstream TV broadcaster, has repeatedly urged caution in the mainstream media over the use of the experimental Covid-19 vaccines, and is now a spokesperson for the Covid-19 assembly. She made the following video publicising the Covid-19 Assembly’s decision to take legal action against the MHRA’s decision to give emergency authorisation for the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine to be given to children.
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
WE URGENTLY NEED YOUR HELP…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, The Expose Blog, World News
These sickos are never going to stop injecting us and killing us ! They must be stopped by any means necessary
Yes, agree, these people are sickos. Why are they still pushing the 3 most lethal injections, Pitzer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna? Why don’t they wipe these out of the market and just supply hydrochloriquine which is proven to be 100% safe and effective even in babies? They can’t get enough adults killed off or physically disable them so now they’re coming after our children. By law, you have the right to not consent and it’s the parents responsibility to say NO! The children are our future generation, look after them by keeping them safe from these lunatic tyrants‼️GOD BLESS ALL❤️🙏🏼
Come on everybody, anyone with half a brain and love for their children – who in their right mind would allow this to occur. Please stand up, anyone decided to do this to my kids god help them. Please everybody defend and protect your children even if it means removing them from school. Seeing what they are doing to children in school presently sexualising, brainwashing, making them self isolate and wear masks it may be time to take them out of school where they are at risk of having a vaccination forced on them and are being psychologically damaged. It means giving up work but anything is better than putting up with psychological abuse and the risk of death to your own kids. Everybody needs to also get their childs birth certificate put on the data base for common law so they are protected from the state. It was on the DavidIke site under common law. Please every parent do this with your childs certificate it gives your child protection please look it up.
What about the millions who can’t give up work? And what about the people who don’t have children? And what about the people who aren’t children?
What about the little people in police uniform? LOLOompa Loompa 4ft nothing
https://www .youtube.com/watch?v=hpPkm0iIADs
Do the police in the uk carry guns. I guess they can get them whenever they want, but do they carry them around the streets with them?
Not all police carry guns in the UK. Only Police in the firearms unit.
I’m not sure how many carry tazers though.
They’ve been getting their sick kicks forcing little kids to wear masks, so if they really are dressing kids up as coppers it would just be an extension of their sick perversions.
[…] ByClifford James July 24, 2021July 24, 2021 Expert Doctors are taking the MHRA to court to put a stop to the outrageous decision to give childre… […]
https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-rna-based-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-prion-disease-1503.pdf Print Out & READ 3 Pages!!
Glad you’re still here Richard. We hadn’t seen any of your comments for a while
They’re really dreaming..Theres a alim chance they might get some sort of affirmative action .Hahaha.
Wait, aren’t all doctors experts? Surely…
By the way, I’ve never come across anyone pointing out the fact that the (whatever it was, but I think 1 in 43) figure for vaxxed people that suffer ‘side effects’ doesn’t seem to hold for the rich? There’s 1050 ‘people’ in the ‘houses of parliament’, and no doubt we’re supposed to believe they’re all vaxxed, so where are the 1050 / 43 = 24 ‘politicians’ that have ‘side effects’? Personally, I’m certain that none of the rich that are in on the scam have been vaxxed – none of the ‘politicians’, none of the ‘royals’, none of the TV ‘personatlities’, etc – because how many have been disabled or killed from the vax?
Except freeloading fraud royal Philip who suffered heart failure a few weeks after his dose of covid vax poison. But he was becoming a right fraud royal pain in the rump at that point and bumping him off saved Harry laying into him about “racism”.
He was on his last legs at age 99 anyway, so it would be hard to prove the vaccine did him in.
He went downhill rapidly after his last game of Death Race 2019 when he ploughed into a minions car with his dangerous driving skills AGAIN.
And this BBC radio presenter obviously got the real thing and not the placebo .
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-57848367
The poli-tick-ians and “celebs” won’t be getting the real shots themselves. It would ruin the plan.
We must fight to the hilt to stop the conservacommunist party using innocent children as a human wall
Here is the 67 page Lawsuit America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLD) and the 8 Attorneys filed on July 19, 2021, against Xavier Becerra, head of the HHS. The AFLD’s have their own medical researchers, that researched all this.
https://mbmchoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Plaintiffs-Motion-for-Preliminary-Injuction_7_19_21.pdf
The whistleblower, Jane Doe, is a computer programmer for 20 yrs in the Healthcare Analytics field, in the public & private sectors, doing Insurance Fraud. She has access to Medicare & Medicaid, (CMS) and the Military data maintained by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid. As of July 9, 2021, VAERS reported 9048 deaths associated with the vaccines. Jane Doe queried data from CMS medical claims and military and determined that the number of deaths occurring within 3 days of injection with the vaccines exceeds those reported by VAERS by a factor of 5, indicating that the true number of deaths caused by the vaccines is at least 45,000. The defendants have intentionally concealed from the public the true number of deaths is at least 45,000, not the approx 9,000 reported to VAERS.
Complete and utter bullshit from the keyboard of Jonathan Allen-Walker
[…] children – and employs the same legal team, Jackson Osborne, challenging the Government on the 12-15 year-old rollout. Jackson Osborne has also represented a group of NHS workers who launched a legal campaign […]
[…] children – and employs the same legal team, Jackson Osborne, challenging the Government on the 12-15 year-old rollout. Jackson Osborne has also represented a group of NHS workers who launched a legal campaign […]
[…] children – and employs the same legal team, Jackson Osborne, challenging the Government on the 12-15 year-old rollout. Jackson Osborne has also represented a group of NHS workers who launched a legal campaign […]
[…] children – and employs the same legal team, Jackson Osborne, challenging the Government on the 12-15 year-old rollout. Jackson Osborne has also represented a group of NHS workers who launched a legal campaign […]
[…] children – and employs the same legal team, Jackson Osborne, challenging the Government on the 12-15 year-old rollout. Jackson Osborne has also represented a group of NHS workers who launched a legal campaign […]