Dr. Peter McCullough has an impressive list of credentials1 — he’s an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist and a full professor of medicine at Texas A&M College of Medicine in Dallas and is the editor of two medical journals and published hundreds of studies in the literature. He’s also among those brave and courageous persons speaking out about the dangers of COVID-19 jabs, and putting his medical license and future livelihood at risk by so doing.
“There’s a hunting that’s going on here that’s very disturbing,” McCullough said in an episode of Perspectives on the Pandemic.2 He was referring to state medical boards hunting down doctors and their and threatening revocation of their licenses based on the spreading of unidentified “misinformation.”
“This is absolutely astonishing that this is happening over a fair exchange of ideas,” he said. What is Dr. McCullough sharing that the powers that be don’t want you to hear? It’s about COVID-19 injections and, to sum it up in a sentence, “It’s not working and it’s causing tremendous damage.”
COVID Jab Efficacy and Safety Overstated From the Start
In the U.S., Operation Warp Speed is the federal effort that fast-tracked COVID-19 jab candidates to market. Gene transfer technology platforms emerged as the frontrunners, including adenoviral DNA platforms or messenger RNA (mRNA) platforms designed to deliver genetic material to the human body.
Once the mRNA is injected, the body then takes up the genetic material and changes in some way. These technologies have been under study for years, in most cases being designed to replace a defective gene, which could potentially be used for cancer treatment, for example. Except historically, “all failed,” McCullough said.
In November 2020, however, Pfizer, in a joint venture with Germany-based BioNTech, announced that their mRNA-based injection was “more than 90% effective” in a Phase 3 trial.3 This does not mean that 90% of people who get injected will be protected from COVID-19, though, as it’s based on relative risk reduction (RRR).
The absolute risk reduction (ARR) for the jab is less than 1%. “Although the RRR considers only participants who could benefit from the jab, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a jab, considers the whole population. ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs,” researchers wrote in The Lancet Microbe in April 2021.4
Nonetheless, the jabs received emergency use authorisation. By giving the emergency authorisation, not approval, the jab administration constituted a research trial, with the sponsors being the U.S. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration. According to McCullough:5
“We’ve never had two government bodies together be a sponsor of a major research program. Shockingly, they did not have, and to this day they’ve never put together, an external critical event committee, an external data safety monitoring board or a human ethics committee. They had these committees in the registrational trials … and these are standard.
Every large clinical investigation has these three committees … I chair many of these committees for pharmaceutical companies and the National Institutes of Health. Americans should have had at least weekly, if not monthly, reviews of safety to ensure Americans that the jabs are safe.”
By March 2021, McCullough Was Worried
Initially, McCullough said, it seemed like the experimental jabs might be safe, and about 70% of his patients had received one by December 2020. But by March 2021, he was uncomfortable with what he was seeing. From December 14, 2020, through March 8, 2021, more than 92 million doses of COVID-19 jabs were administered in the U.S.
He cited data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database, which showed that during that time, there were 1,637 reports of death in people who had received a COVID-19 jab. The CDC and FDA said none of them was related to the jab but, according to McCullough, by January 22, 2021, 186 deaths had been reported — more than enough to reach the mortality signal of concern to stop the program.
“With a program this size, anything over 150 deaths would be an alarm signal,” he said. The U.S. “hit 186 deaths with only 27 million Americans jabbed.” McCullough believes if the proper safety boards had been in place, the COVID-19 jab program would have been shut down in February based on safety and risk of death.
Such was the case in 1976, when a fast-tracked injection program against swine flu was halted after an estimated 25 to 32 deaths.6 Yet, despite a much larger death toll, COVID-19 jabs continues. As of August 6, 2021, VAERS COVID-19 data showed 12,791 deaths related to the jabs, according to McCullough, and tens of thousands of hospital and clinic visits.7
In an analysis of COVID-19 vaccine death reports from VAERS, researchers found that 86% of the time, nothing else could have caused the death, and it appears the vaccine was the cause.8
The researchers noted, “The sample contains only people jabbed early in the program, and hence is made up primarily of those who are elderly or with significant health conditions. Despite this, there were only 14% of the cases for which a COVID injection reaction could be ruled out as a contributing factor in their death.”9
Further research shows, McCullough stated, and this is a very important point that I want you to understand and remember: that 50% of the deaths occurred within 48 hours of getting the shot, while 80% occurred within a week. An informal survey on Twitter, to which 10,000 people responded, also asked whether respondents knew someone who died after a COVID-19 jab.
Twelve percent said they did. “When people see others in their circle dying, you can’t stop that type of organic COVID jab hesitancy,” McCullough said. Other confirmed adverse effects of the COVID jabs include myocarditis and blood clots.10
An Incredible Violation of Human Ethics
Your body recognizes the spike protein in COVID-19 jabs as foreign, so it begins to manufacture antibodies to protect you against COVID-19, or so the theory goes. But there’s a problem. The spike protein itself is dangerous and known to circulate in your body at least for weeks and more likely months11 — perhaps much longer — after the COVID jab.
In your cells, the spike protein damages blood vessels and can lead to the development of blood clots.12,13 It can go into your brain, adrenal glands, ovaries, heart, skeletal muscles and nerves, causing inflammation, scarring and damage in organs over time.
In his practice, McCullough is seeing an array of neurologic syndromes in people who’ve been injected, with symptoms including blindness, paralysis, difficulty swallowing, headaches, ringing in the ears, myocarditis and more. Other research suggests that the heart, brain, immunologic system and hematologic system may be most at risk from the jabs.14
Children, who are at extremely low risk from COVID-19, receive no benefit from the jab, nor do those who have already had COVID and have immunity, McCullough said, calling the situation “a catastrophe in real time” that’s violating human ethics:15
“We’ve seen an incredible violation of human ethics. No one, for an investigational product, under any circumstances, should receive any pressure, coercion or threat of reprisal for not participating in the research.”
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 jab received FDA approval on August 23, 2021, but prior to this, million-dollar raffles, free tuition, bonuses and other bribes like free beer and doughnuts were offered to entice people to get injected. When that didn’t work, mandates increased, including for many health care workers, and hundreds of U.S. colleges16 are also requiring students to get jabbed in order to attend.
Vaccinated People Are Getting COVID Anyway
Media reports keep referring to the pandemic as a crisis of the unvaccinated, which is simply inaccurate, since COVID-19 continues to affect and spread among those who have been vaccinated. July 30, 2021, the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) posted online details of an outbreak of COVID-19 that occurred in Barnstable County, Massachusetts — 74% of the cases occurred in fully vaccinated people.17
So-called “breakthrough infections,” which used to be known as vaccine failures, were reported by the CDC far earlier, though, including in their May 28, 2021, MMWR, which documented 10,262 breakthrough infections reported January 1 to April 23, 2021, across 46 states.18
This, they believed, was “likely a substantial undercount,” but rather than continuing to assess the situation, they stopped monitoring most COVID-9 infections among vaccinated people:19
“Beginning May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections to investigating only those among patients who are hospitalized or die, thereby focusing on the cases of highest clinical and public health significance.”
McCullough also mentions antigenic, or immune, escape. If you put a living organism like bacteria or viruses under pressure, via antibiotics, antibodies or chemotherapeutics, for example, but don’t kill them off completely, you can inadvertently encourage their mutation into more virulent strains. Those that escape your immune system end up surviving and selecting mutations to ensure their further survival.
COVID-19 has a high capacity for mutation but, if the virus isn’t under pressure, it won’t necessarily see a need to select mutations to, for instance, become more infectious. But if you put it under pressure, as is occurring during the mass vaccination campaign, this may change. McCullough stated:20
“If we keep this up with the injections, there is going to be one variant after another … We’re playing with fire here with this mass vaccination … My interpretation as an internist and cardiologist — I’m a trained epidemiologist, I’ve literally done a year of intense COVID research and training — I’m going to tell you, I think this Delta outbreak that we have right now is the product of mass vaccination.
If we didn’t have the jab, we would have been better off. We had already treated this down to a very acceptable level.”
How to Break Through the Trance
McCullough believes many health care providers and the U.S. public are in a vaccination trance. It defies logic and commonsense how public officials and hospital executives can see the vaccines failing to work, can see the rising cases of adverse effects and deaths, and yet increasingly issue vaccine mandates or recommend the vaccine to groups for which it clearly shouldn’t be, like pregnant women. McCullough likens it to a form of psychosis or a group neurosis.
The U.S. public, however, has seen so much fear, hospitalization and death during the pandemic that they may have been prepared to accept casualties associated with the vaccines. Still, a sizable number of Americans aren’t being fooled.
“We’re at this pressure point, and I think right now, in talking to American people in my circles, they’re ready to take a time out,” McCullough said. If it means taking a sabbatical from work or delaying school for a year, many Americans are willing to do it to avoid getting vaccinated. “The only way to stay healthy right now is to stay away from this vaccine. If you get COVID-19, get to one of these treatment networks and get immunity on the other side.”21
McCullough is a proponent of early treatment of COVID-19 and believes treatment options have been suppressed to allow for mass vaccination:22
“I think we’ve completely suppressed any form of treatment or help to people in order to promote the vaccine. Now the vaccine doesn’t work completely and it’s, frankly, dangerous. We’re down to almost one message: Take the jab or else … It’s the scariest time to be an American, and thank goodness half of Americans didn’t take it.
We’re going to have to see what this is going to look like. I think the next month or so is going to be incredibly interesting and it’s going to be ominous.”
McCullough believes that eventually people will break out of the jab trance and realise that the answer isn’t these injections, while the handling of the pandemic, including mass jabs, will become a course in violation of human ethics and the Nuremberg code. With fear, isolation, hospitalisations and deaths still occurring, however, it may take years before the fog is lifted.
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
WE URGENTLY NEED YOUR HELP…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
- 1 Linkedin Peter McCullough
- 2, 5, 7, 14, 15, 20, 21, 22 BitChute, Episode 20 of Perspectives on the Pandemic August 26, 2021
- 3 Pfizer November 9, 2020
- 4 The Lancet Microbe April 20, 2021
- 6 CNN April 30, 2009
- 8, 9 ResearchGate Preprint June 2021
- 10 CIDRAP August 10, 2021
- 11 Clinical Infectious Diseases, ciab465
- 12 News Rescue August 4, 2021
- 13 The BMJ March 11, 2021
- 16 University Business August 31, 2021
- 17 MMWR Weekly August 6, 2021 / 70(31);1059-1062
- 18, 19 MMWR Weekly May 28, 2021 / 70(21);792–793
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, Opinion Pages, World News
One way to keep your employer at bay would be with presenting them with this letter, however, run off a few copies and pass them around to your unvaccinated work mates so that there are a group of you and not just one person, because your employer is not protected from immunity from prosecution and if you have adverse effects from being mandated to take a vaccine, then the Compensation against your employer could be terrifying for them:
The letter originated in Australia but it is valid wherever you work:
DELETE THIS PAGE BEFORE SENDING YOUR LETTER
If an employer is forcing mandatory vaccination in your workplace, the template letter below is a possible way to handle it and put you in a stronger negotiating position. It highlights the responsibility of your employer for your safety and health as a result of a vaccine. The legality of employers forcing employees to take a vaccine is a legal grey zone.
It’s possible that your employer will not provide you with the information requested in this letter. Providing this letter does not guarantee that you will avoid having to take a vaccine. It is intended to remind your employer of their obligations to you and to request information about their decision that may assist you later if you choose to challenge the direction.
Before using the template, please note the following:
You should be fully informed before providing consent to treatment. Ask for that information.
Your valid informed consent must be voluntary and based on disclosure of clear details of risks, alternatives, need, options, side effects, any other possible harm that could be caused by the proposed vaccination and their relevance to your workplace. Ask for these to be specified.
The information the employer would need to disclose needs to be specific to you writing the letter and relevant to you in considering whether to consent or not.
A direction to take a vaccine as a requirement to work must be reasonable. Ask for the reasons.
Rather than refuse the vaccine outright, employees may be in a stronger legal position through trying something like this. Despite receiving this letter and choosing to provide or not provide you with the requested information, an employer might still direct you to get vaccinated or seek to terminate your employment. At this point you should seek independent legal advice from a suitably qualified employment or industrial relations lawyer, and/or assistance from your relevant union.
Please keep in mind that if you agreed to be vaccinated when you were first appointed to your position you may be required to be vaccinated under your contract of employment.
The following template letter could assist you because it shows you are willing to be vaccinated providing you receive information and protection. Some employers may not be capable or willing to provide such reassurance and as a result may not insist on vaccination. Information requested at points 1, 2 and 3 of the letter is especially important and could assist you if you choose to challenge the direction from your employer in court.
Disclaimer: Vaccine mandates in employment law are currently an uncertain and grey legal area. This Information is not to be considered as specific legal advice to be relied on. It comes from various sources and is for your consideration only. If you have any concerns, questions or problems please contact an employment adviser, your relevant union or a solicitor.
DELETE THIS PAGE BEFORE SENDING YOUR LETTER
[INSERT THE DATE HERE]
INSERT COMPANY NAME HERE
ADDRESS LINE 1
SUBURB STATE POSTCODE
Dear [DELETE THIS AND INSERT YOUR EMPLOYERS NAME HERE]
I write regarding your direction for me to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Before making a decision in this matter, I wish to be fully informed and appraised of all relevant facts. In that regard, I would appreciate you providing me with the following information:-
Whether you are making this request under a specific law or public health order. If so, please specify the specific law or public health order.
The circumstances under which you believe this is a reasonable direction, specifically:
The nature of the workplace (the extent to which I need to work in public facing roles, whether social distancing is possible and whether the business is providing an essential service);
the extent of community transmission of COVID-19 in the location of the workplace, including the risk of transmission among employees, customers or other members of the community;
the effectiveness of the relevant vaccine in reducing the risk of transmission;
my individual work circumstances, including duties and risks associated with my work;
whether you are accommodating for employees who have a legitimate reason for not being vaccinated and the details of these accommodations;
Under what Work Tier (1, 2, 3 or 4) you classify my work according to the below criteria:
Tier 1: employees are required as part of their duties to interact with people with an increased risk of being infected with coronavirus (for example, employees working in hotel quarantine or border control)
Tier 2: employees are required to have close contact with people who are particularly vulnerable to the health impacts of coronavirus (for example, employees working in health care or aged care).
Tier 3: there is interaction or likely interaction between employees and other people such as customers, other employees or the public in the normal course of employment (for example, stores providing essential goods and services).
Tier 4: employees have minimal face-to-face interaction as part of their normal employment duties.
The approved legal status of the COVID-19 vaccine and if it is under experimental or “provisional” approval in Australia.
Details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those tests including its long term safety, its effect on pregnant recipients, its use for children and its future generational safety along with the data used to come to these conclusions.
The full list of contents of the vaccine that I am to receive, and if any are toxic to the body.
All adverse reactions associated with this vaccine in Australia since its introduction, including deaths and disablement supported by the latest relevant data.
The likely risks of fatality or serious side effects, should I be unfortunate enough to contract COVID-19 after being vaccinated and the likelihood of recovery and long-term side effects supported by the appropriate data.
Confirmation that I will not be under any duress or coercion from you or a representative of your company, as my employer, to force me to have this vaccination including threatened loss of employment.
Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is no threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions, namely:-
I receive written confirmation that no harm will come to me after receiving this vaccination.
Once the information is provided to me and confirmed by a qualified medical doctor, you will undertake to accept full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself as a result of receiving this vaccination.
In the event that I choose to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that:
it will not compromise my workplace position; and
I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result.
[INSERT YOUR PRINTED NAME HERE]
★My last month paycheck was for 1500 dollars… All i did was simple online work from comfort at home for 3-4 hours/day that I got from this agency I discovered over the internet and they paid me for it 95 bucks every hour.
See this site—– http://Paybuzz1.com
Remind me again. Who are all the people dying in the ICU’s in America and what do they have in common? I’ll take my chances with the jab. Health care workers are leaving the profession because of the strain of dealing with the ignorant unvaccinated fools.
An important correction to make! I think it is incorrect to write that “The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 jab received FDA approval on August 23, 2021, “. It is their product Comirnaty that got the approval because Pfizer takes liability for it. It is the same product, but legally different. Therefore they state the products can be used interchangeably. Their trick is though that they won’t be producing Comirnaty (for now) and keep injecting people with their ‘vaccin’ that has only Emergency Use Authorization and not approval!