Australian’s have currently got it hard. Swathes of the country are living under strict lockdown conditions in response to an insanely low number of alleged Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths.
But it would seem those who have decided to get the Covid-19 vaccine either through their own free will or because of the coercive tactics of the authorities have had it the hardest, as official Government data shows 39% of Australians were left unable to perform daily activities after having the Covid-19 vaccine.
The National Centre for Immunisation and Research (NCIRS) in Australia are currently leading a collaboration with the Australia’s Government known as AusVaxSafety. The group has been conducting active vaccine surveillance of the Covid-19 vaccines in use in Australia to “ensure their ongoing safety”.
Up to the 16th August 2021 over 1.4 million Austalians had partipated in the surveillance completing more than 2.4 million safety surveys, outlining their experience following the Covid-19 vaccination and the published results show the following –
Pfizer Vaccine – 1st Dose
Following the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine 1,007,479 people responded to an SMS/email about their health in the three days after having the jab. The results show that 37.2% reported having an adverse reaction, with 374,832 reporting at least one adverse event.
0.5% of participants also reported seeing a doctor or attending hospital in the three days following vaccination due to an adverse reaction. This equates to 5,037 people.
Whilst 6.7% of participants reported missing work, study or routine duties for a short period – meaning 67,501 people were left unable to perform daily activities following their first dose of the Pfizer mRNA Covid-19 injection.
Pfizer Vaccine – 2nd Dose
Following the 2nd dose of the Pfizer vaccine 770,864 people responded to an SMS/email about their health in the three days after having the jab. The results show that 56.4% reported having an adverse reaction, a significant increase on the percentage of people who reported having an adverse reaction after having their first dose of the Pfizer jab.
1.3% of participants also reported seeing a doctor or attending hospital in the three days following vaccination due to an adverse reaction. This equates to 10,021 people – double the number of people who reported seeking medical attention after having the first dose despite there being 237,000 less particants in the 2nd dose survey.
However, a huge 21.2% of participants were left unable to perform daily activities, that’s 163,423 people who reported missing work, study or routine duties.
AstraZeneca Vaccine – 1st Dose
Following the first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine 429,723 people responded to an SMS/email about their health in the three days after having the jab. The results show that another huge 55.6% reported having an adverse reaction, with 238,715 reporting at least one adverse event.
1% of participants also reported seeing a doctor or attending hospital in the three days following vaccination due to an adverse reaction. This equates to 4,297 people.
Whilst 17.6% of participants reported missing work, study or routine duties for a short period – meaning 75,631 people were left unable to perform daily activities following their first dose of the AstraZeneca viral vector Covid-19 injection.
AstraZeneca 2nd Dose
Following the 2nd dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine 199,174 people responded to an SMS/email about their health in the three days after having the jab. The results show that 26.4% reported having an adverse reaction, a significant decrease on the percentage of people who reported having an adverse reaction after having their first dose of the AstraZeneca jab.
0.5% of participants also reported seeing a doctor or attending hospital in the three days following vaccination due to an adverse reaction.
Whilst 5.3% of participants reported missing work, study or routine duties for a short period – meaning 10,556 people were left unable to perform daily activities following their first dose
What’s interesting to note here is that the AstraZeneca vaccine seems to be much more lethal following the first dose whereas the Pfizer vaccine seems to be much more lethal following the second dose.
How do these figures compare to the harm caused by Covid-19?
The state of Victoria has a population of around 6.7 million peoples who are currently living under what can only be described as dictatorial tyranny.
Permits are required to leave home to work, people are not allowed to venture more than 5km from their homes, the military have set up check points to ensure people don’t venture further than they are permitted to, curfews are in force, and a QR code system has been put in place just so children can play in the park with one adult present who is not allowed to remove their mask at all, not even to drink water.
The Victorian Governments Covid-19 dashboard shows that up to the 14th September 2021 there were 445 new positive test results (0.006% of the population) for the Covid-19 virus in the previous 24 hours bringing the total to just 3,799 active cases (0.056% of the population).
Since the pandemic struck Australia in early 2020 the state of Victoria has conducted over 10 million tests recording just 26,029 (0.38% of the population) cases in the last 18 months, of which 21,404 people have recovered and just 826 lives have been lost (0.0126% of the population).
Out of a population of 6.7 million people the state of Victoria currently has just 158 people in hospital (0.002% of the population) who have tested positive for Covid-19, with 45 of those people being in intensive care.
So as you can see ridculously low numbers of cases, hospitalisations and deaths that do not justify the current restrictions in force. They also do not justify the roll-out of an experimental Covid-19 vaccination programme which is proving to be more harmful to Australians than Covid-19 itself.
At least 39% of Australians have been left unable to perform daily activities after having the Covid-19 vaccine, whilst out of a population of over 25 million, just 1,102 people have died with Covid-19 in Australia since March 2020 up to the 14th September 2021. That’s just 0.004% of the population.
Will this madness ever end?
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
WE URGENTLY NEED YOUR HELP…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, The Expose Blog, World News
[…] https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/15/39-percent-of-australians-left-unable-to-perform-daily-activities-af… […]
I’m anti vax (because it’s been tested and continues to be tested on millions of innocent creatures, and because I don’t want to be disabled or die from it). But even I would say that the reason the figures are so low in aus is BECAUSE they are locked down. Everywhere there’s a lockdown there’s almost no cases and almost no deaths. Compared to the shit storm in the uk, aus is in paradise. The problem will come when they open up again. Then they’ll become just like the uk. And throughout all of it, the most hilarious thing is that not a single person anywhere in the world is asking for the obvious thing: a good old fashioned, non dna altering and safe vaccine. LO bloody L.
The lockdown has absolutely zilch to do with deaths or cases, (except deaths from suicide or domestic violence). I live in Queensland and only an hr & half from Brisbane and have never worn a mask, took a shot or been in house-arrest. Queensland has had 7 die from COVID over 20 months! (it’s really one of our best flu seasons ever! There is no pandemic… this world-wide scenario is about the New World Order and not about trumpted-up cases.
Australia did not start injecting its population until months after the UK therefore the UK will be well ahead of Australia with ‘covid’ purely because these injections cause covid. If you doubt this then check out the Portuguese Care Home where the twice jabbed residents generated covid which was then spread into the local community. This also happened in New Jersey. Also look to Israel to see what happens when a massive number of the population gets this injection. Israel was an early and enthusiastic adopter of the covid jab. Their covid numbers are through the roof. They are now being subjected to jab number three and the authorities there are talking about jab number four. How many jabs will it take before these stupid medics concede that the jab is creating ‘covid’ where none has ever existed before?
I wouldn’t say the nubers are low ’cause of the lockdown. Rather that the numbers are low to justify the lockdown.
[…] Read more: At least 39% of Australians were left unable to perform daily activities after having the ‘Cov… […]
Is anyone in Australia challenging their government and local health authorities? Both the Canadian and UK Governments were forced to drop covid measures following Patrick King’s subpoena (served on Deena Henshaw in early 2021 circa February). King’s case did not come to court until July 2021. The UK Government dropped covid measures in July shortly before they were forced to do so. Canada and the UK are now relying on misleading propaganda to try and make people obey. There are no prosecutions in either of these countries. I am aware that a barrister on Rebel News (who admitted to knowing nothing about King’s case) claimed that King’s subpoena had ‘failed’. The attached explains how and why King’s subpoena succeeded. All Australians need to do to take back their freedom is ignore local and national health edicts. The Australian government cannot prosecute them. If the Australian government does try and prosecute then serve them with King’s subpoena (making sure to issue it via a High Court Judge this time and not a magistrate) . Australian law follows UK law. What applies in Canada and the UK applies in Australia. The same is true of New Zealand. The UK Government is unable to provide any evidence that SARS/Covid2 exists. Without this evidence all legal actions by governments on the basis of the existence if SARS/Covd2 will not stand up in court
I did a search for “39%” in your article, and it didn’t appear anywhere in the statistics you quoted. Nor was there any explanation in your article how you came up with that number. So, please explain how you got the 39% figure from the statistics you quoted.