Breaking News

UK Judge orders Government to provide evidence in court that justifies Covid-19 Vaccination of Children in legal challenge to halt roll-out of the jabs to Kids

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A Judge has ordered the UK Goverment to submit evidence that justifies Covid-19 vaccination of children, giving them a deadline of Monday 11th October.

The order from The Hon. Mr Justice Jay is most welcome after we exclusively revealed Thursday 30th September that since teens over the age of 15 had been given the Covid-19 vaccine deaths among the age group had increased by 47% compared to the same period in 2020. (See here)

We also then delved back into the Office for National Statistics data due to a suspicion we would find the majority of those deaths had been among teenage boys due to the risk of myocardtis, inflammation of the heart muscle, associated with the Pfizer vaccine and mainly occurring in younger males, as well as a correlation with a rise in emergency calls requesting an ambulance due to cardiac arrest, found in Public Health England data.

Unfortunately our fears were confirmed, as we exclusively revealed on Monday 4th October that deaths among teenage boys have increased by 63% in the UK since they started getting the Covid-19 vaccine. (See here)

To add to that we then exclusively revealed on Tuesday 5th October that Chris Whitty’s decision to overrule the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation and advise the Government to offer the Covid-19 vaccine to all healthy secondary school children, has so far led to a 400% increase in deaths among male children compared to the same period in 2020. (See here)

However, people have been fighting in court to overturn the decision of the Chief Medical Officer for England that children should be given an experimental Covid-19 injection, but unfortunately to no avail so far.

The ‘Covid-19 Assembly’ and lawyer Francis Hoar had an application for an urgent hearing to pause the Covid-19 roll-out to under 18’s denied for a second time on September 2nd.

The Claimants had asked for just half a day for the Court to listen to oral argument to consider whether to pause the roll out of injections of experimental mRNA vaccine technology, producing increasing reports of clotting and other adverse effects including death, still under emergency authorisation and never before given to humans, to the whole of the healthy population of children aged 12-17.

The Court’s view was that to delay consideration of the Claimants’ application for 14 days to allow the government to prepare its response was not in fact a refusal. However, that delay had the practical effect of denying the urgent relief sought and left the full resources and machinery of the state to be put into gear.

Then on September 1th Covid-19 Assembly applied for a third time for the Court to listen to their argument, for just half a day, before the programme of mass injection of healthy children got underway.

However on the 17th September, the Court refused to allow the Claimants into Court before 28th September.

The Covid-19 Assembly then filed a claim to the Court of Appeal to overturn the Courts refusal to not allow an urgent hearing on the unnecessary vaccination of children, which can be read here.

Despite a last ditch attempt by the Government to persuade the Court of Appeal against it, the Court listed the case for an interim hearing on Wednesday 22nd September, unfortunately the appeal was refused and the case was still to be held on September 28th.

The outcome of the hearing on September 28th was as follows according to Covid-19 Assembly:

The Court has adjourned the matter to a further hearing to allow the government further time to respond to the case as set out most recently by the Claimants. This is because the JCVI and CMOs issued statements, and the Secretary of State made his decision to administer the mass vaccination, only after this claim had been issued. In response to those statements and that decision, the Claimants have necessarily had to amend the claims.    

The government had asked for the case to be struck out but it remains before the Court.  The Hon. Mr Justice Jay accepted that the Claimants’ barrister, Mr Francis Hoar, had done enough to persuade him there was an arguable case.  The Judge also rejected the government’s argument that consideration of the case should be limited to how it affects the two claimants.  In terms he accepted they were representative and were entitled to raise the issues for consideration with reference to the effect on the wider population.

However, the Court refused to order any immediate pause of the mass vaccination programme. Having heard submissions for the parties on how the case should proceed, the government seeking a long timetable and delay, the Claimants seeking a speedy hearing, the Court has given directions that the government submits further response and evidence by 11 October with the Claimants having to 15 October to reply. The Court will then reconsider the matter promptly. 

We may post a further update when the dust has settled on today’s proceedings.

Again, thank you for your support.  Please keep sharing and encouraging others to pledge their support too.

How many more children and teenagers need to die before the court decided to pause the Covid-19 vaccine roll-out to under 18’s?

Share this page to Telegram
4.2 6 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

29 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
George
George
11 months ago

Why did they not also ask for scientific evidence of the existence of sors cov 2 in the UK

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  George
11 months ago

Wouldn’t change a thing. Sadly. The system is corrupt to the score. There was / is a case, you can find on crowdjustice.com:
The Coronavirus Act 2020 is Null and Void.
We supported and followed it, they asked the government to give proof of existence of the Sars-Cov2, they even gave them a deadline to do it. The government didn’t even bother to answer. There was never a proper trial of that case, it was delayed with every possible silly reason (like the lawyers on the government side were on holiday, the judge was not suitable) – ANYTHING but a honest trial. You can read back if you wish on Crowdjustice.com.

There was another case about 5G. Same, I followed, I supported, more than a year passed, nothing happened.

The juridical system doesn’t work anymore – unless of course if Joe Common commits something but never if big money and companies or/end government is involved.

Last edited 11 months ago by GundelP
Alan
Alan
Reply to  GundelP
11 months ago

Hello, asking evidence of to prove the existence of the SARS Covid 2 in UK does make a difference in court, as per the Canadien judgement May 4th claimant Patrick King from Canada. The Canada is a country under the Crown and therefore this judgement make s a Precedent. Please check the Patrick King s interview at the Stew Peters .tv show. Keep positif.

Alan
Alan
Reply to  George
11 months ago

Hello, asking evidence of to prove the existence of the SARS Covid 2 in UK does make a difference in court, as per the Canadien judgement May 4th claimant Patrick King from Canada. The Canada is a country under the Crown and therefore this judgement make s a Precedent. Please check the Patrick King s interview at the Stew Peters .tv show. Keep positif.

Robert Guarino
Robert Guarino
11 months ago

Giving this experimental injection to children is blatant child abuse and is clearly an example of how corrupt and evil the governments of the world are now. We need to throw them out and replace them with good people that want the best for the people and their health, especially children. I’m afraid it’s too late though since so many have had this poison and are now sterile, so the human race can’t have any children naturally and will now be grown artificially in labs which is exactly what they want.

kiwi
kiwi
11 months ago

whitty has to hang, grab him do it now before he can
kill any more kids

name
name
11 months ago

user kiwi is a idiot

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  name
11 months ago

Why? Because living far from the UK he can say freely what he thinks?
Some of you probably haven’t read it despite it is a year old article with the answer that why nothing happens to stop them:

https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/who-controls-british-government-response-covid19-part-one

Last edited 11 months ago by GundelP
trackback
11 months ago

[…] [16] UK Judge orders Government to provide evidence in court that justifies Covid-19 Vaccination of Child…[] […]

trackback
11 months ago

[…] UK Judge orders Government to provide evidence in court that justifies Covid-19 Vaccination of Child… […]

John Qosmio
John Qosmio
11 months ago

Excellent reporting, please continue

VJP
VJP
11 months ago

Is there any update on this??

Tony
Tony
Reply to  VJP
8 months ago

Of course not, it’s just more unsubstantiated bs from the expose. They wonder why 0.1% of readers actually sponsor them, it’s laughable

trackback
11 months ago

[…] However, the Judge has so far refused to halt the roll-out of the Pfizer jab to children despite instructing the UK Government to submit evidence to the court justifying the vaccination of childre… by October 11th, with ‘Covid-19 Assembly’ having until the 15th October to respond before the […]

trackback
11 months ago

[…] However, the Judge has so far refused to halt the roll-out of the Pfizer jab to children despite instructing the UK Government to submit evidence to the court justifying the vaccination of childre… by October 11th, with ‘Covid-19 Assembly’ having until the 15th October to respond before the […]

trackback
11 months ago

[…] However, the Judge has so far refused to halt the roll-out of the Pfizer jab to children despite instructing the UK Government to submit evidence to the court justifying the vaccination of childr… by October 11th, with ‘Covid-19 Assembly’ having until the 15th October to respond before the […]

trackback
11 months ago

[…] However, the Judge has so far refused to halt the roll-out of the Pfizer jab to children despite instructing the UK Government to submit evidence to the court justifying the vaccination of childre… by October 11th, with ‘Covid-19 Assembly’ having until the 15th October to respond […]

trackback
11 months ago

[…] However, the Judge has so far refused to halt the roll-out of the Pfizer jab to children despite instructing the UK Government to submit evidence to the court justifying the vaccination of childre… by October 11th, with ‘Covid-19 Assembly’ having until the 15th October to respond before the […]

trackback
11 months ago

[…] However, the Judge has so far refused to halt the roll-out of the Pfizer jab to children despite instructing the UK Government to submit evidence to the court justifying the vaccination of childre… by October 11th, with ‘Covid-19 Assembly’ having until the 15th October to respond before the […]

trackback
11 months ago

[…] However, the Judge has so far refused to halt the roll-out of the Pfizer jab to children despite instructing the UK Government to submit evidence to the court justifying the vaccination of childre… by October 11th, with ‘Covid-19 Assembly’ having until the 15th October to respond before the […]

trackback
11 months ago

[…] However, the Judge has so far refused to halt the roll-out of the Pfizer jab to children despite instructing the UK Government to submit evidence to the court justifying the vaccination of childre… by October 11th, with ‘Covid-19 Assembly’ having until the 15th October to respond before the […]

trackback
11 months ago

[…] However, the Judge has so far refused to halt the roll-out of the Pfizer jab to children despite instructing the UK Government to submit evidence to the court justifying the vaccination of ch… by October 11th, with ‘Covid-19 Assembly’ having until the 15th October to respond before […]

trackback
11 months ago

[…] However, the Judge has so far refused to halt the roll-out of the Pfizer jab to children despite instructing the UK Government to submit evidence to the court justifying the vaccination of childre… by October 11th, with ‘Covid-19 Assembly’ having until the 15th October to respond before the […]

trackback
11 months ago

[…] However, the Judge has so far refused to halt the roll-out of the Pfizer jab to children despite instructing the UK Government to submit evidence to the court justifying the vaccination of ch… by October 11th, with ‘Covid-19 Assembly’ having until the 15th October to respond before […]

Krissytina
Krissytina
11 months ago

Blatantly lying to parents in the Vax letters too!! “Waiting for guidance from the JCVI on timings of the second dose” when the JCVI didn’t even approve the first!! At no point in the letter does it state that your child should have this Vax for the sole purpose of their OWN health and safety.. Using children as shields just like they do with the flu vax.. Beyond disturbing..

trackback
10 months ago

[…] However, the Judge has so far refused to halt the roll-out of the Pfizer jab to children despite instructing the UK Government to submit evidence to the court justifying the vaccination of childre… by October 11th, with ‘Covid-19 Assembly’ having until the 15th October to respond before the […]

trackback
10 months ago

[…] the American left emulates most) have suspended the COVID “vaccines” in children. A judge in the UK ordered the government to provide evidence in court to justify theses jabs on children because of […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] However, the Judge has so far refused to halt the roll-out of the Pfizer jab to children despite instructing the UK Government to submit evidence to the court justifying the vaccination of ch… by October 11th, with ‘Covid-19 Assembly’ having until the 15th October to respond before […]