Last week we told you how the Covid-19 vaccines were proving to have an average negative effectiveness in everyone over the age of 18 in the UK of minus-seventy-percent. Today we can reveal that the latest report available from the UK Health Security Agency, which has recently replaced Public Health England, shows that the Covid-19 vaccines are now proving to have an average negative effectiveness in everyone over the age of 18 in the UK of minus-seventy-three-percent, despite being weeks into a booster jab campaign.
Pfizer claim that there Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of the following –
During the ongoing clinical trial, 43,661 subjects were split evenly between the placebo and vaccine groups (about 21,830 subjects per group).
In the placebo group — the group that didn’t have the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine — 162 became infected with the coronavirus and showed symptoms.
Whilst in the vaccine group — the group that got the real vaccine — that number was only 8.
Therefore the percentage of placebo group who became infected equated to 0.74% (162 / 21830 x 100 = 0.74).
Whilst 0.04% of the vaccinate group became infected (8 / 21830 x 100 = 0.04)
In order to calculate the efficacy of their Covid-19 mRNA injection, Pfizer then performed the following calculation –
They first subtracted the percentage of infections in the vaccinated group from the percentage of infections in the placebo group.
0.74% – 0.04% = 0.7%
Then they divided that total by the percentage of infections in the placebo group, which equated to 95%.
0.7 / 0.74 = 95%.
Therefore, Pfizer were able to claim that their Covid-19 mRNA injection is 95% effective.
We don’t need to go into the fact that this calculation was extremely misleading and only measured relative effectiveness rather than absolute effectiveness. Neither do we need to go into the fact that Pfizer chose to ignore thousands of other suspected infections during the ongoing trial and not perform a PCR test to confirm the infection because it would have thrown efficacy below the required minimum of 50% to gain regulatory approval.
The reason we don’t need to go into it is because the general public are being told that the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is 95% effective due to the calculation performed above. The same calculation was also used based on individual results to claim a vaccine efficacy of around 70% for AstraZeneca, and around 98% for Moderna.
Now, thanks to a wealth of data published by the new UK Health Security Agency we are able to use the same calculation that was used to calculate 95% effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine, to calculate the real world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines.
Table 5 of the UK Health Security Agency Vaccine Surveillance report, published October 28th 2021, shows the confirmed Covid-19 case rate among persons fully vaccinated, and rates among persons not vaccinated per 100,000 people.
Pfizer had an equal amount of people who had been vaccinated, and had not been vaccinated in the ongoing clinical trial in order to calculate the effectiveness of their vaccine, so in order to calculate the real-world effectiveness all we have to do is perform the same calculation using the rates per 100,000 numbers supplied by the UK Health Security Agency, which are as follows –

The effectiveness of all available vaccines combined is as low as minus-128% within the 40-49 age group, and as high as +13% in the 18-29 age group, which has dropped from an effectiveness of +21% in the previous weeks published data. This is the only age group other than under 18’s that the vaccines are currently showing to have a positive effectiveness.
This proves that the Covid-19 vaccines are making people more susceptible to catching Covid-19, rather than preventing cases of Covid-19 by the claimed 95%, and the fact the effectiveness of the vaccines has now surpassed the minus-100% barrier in everyone between the age of 40 and 69, suggests that it has completely decimated their immune systems, at least when it comes to infection from the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus.
By combining the numbers provided for all age groups over the age of 18, we have been able to calculate an average vaccine effectiveness of minus-73%, and we’re definitely seeing this in the number of confirmed cases by vaccination status.

Between week 40 and week 43 of 2021 there were 76,219 confirmed Covid-19 cases in the unvaccinated over 18’s, 25,293 confirmed cases in the partly vaccinated over 18’s, and a frightening 438,972 confirmed cases in the fully vaccinated over 18’s.
The new UK Health Security Agency report proves without a shadow of a doubt that the Covid-19 vaccines do not work, and actually make the recipients worse… by the week.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help..
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
.
Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, The Expose Blog, World News
[…] November 5, 2021Latest UKHSA report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have an average real world effectiveness of MINUS 73… […]
I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…
Here is I started.…………>> http://Www.NETCASH1.Com
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-92400-y
Covid ia een AGENT = chemical stuf, made in Lab.
Read it under ‘introduction’.
Since it was designed for the original strain and the virus has mutated beyond this specific spike protein application you’d expect its effectiveness to wane over time. Normally we’re talking years / decades however for conventional vaccines, not in only 6 months obviously – but this decline none the less is clearly shown in the COVID-19 Weekly Surveillance Reports as DE has shown on countless occasions. Presumably that’s why you don’t vaccinate during a pandemic (whether real or manufactured by the injection or tests).
But given it appears to be working, at least to a degree for those below this 29 age-group bracket, with these being the most recent to get the jab one would be fooled into thinking it’s still working against the delta[+] variant[s]. But it’s clearly not in anyone else so this suggests there’s something else going on in this lower-age group unless it’s only the young being infected with the original strain [sarc].
Perhaps the young have a more resilient counter-reaction against the gene-therapy’s attack & nullification of the innate immune system, whether temporary or permanent? We’ll no doubt see in time if / when, in the data, they start looking like the remaining age-groups so for any new-age vaxxers this slim ray of hope will likely disappear as well.
Of course it could all be due to this nonsensical manner in which we’re deeming an “infection” or “case” to then be declared with the continuous miss-use of the PCR & lat-flow test which have sent us down the road of no return.
It’s simple: younger people have stronger immune systems so the ‘vax’ doesn’t kill as many of them straight away. They’ll continue to die slower than the old people for the same reason. Anyone mad enough to ‘vax’ a 5 year old could easily kill them though – who knows if a 5 year old’s immune system is even fully developed by then…
Ok yeah, appears we’re more or less on the same page but there must be a quantifiable reason as to why the younger generation are not seeing a similar and obvious increase in the spread of the virus like those who are older. According to the surveillance reports, above the age of 29 you’re at least twice, sometimes 3 times (in the 40-49 age group) to get cov after vaccination, compared to being unvaccinated.
According to a Dr Mike Williams (and others of course) certain changes they made to parts of the mRNA code in SARS-CoV-2 vaccines may be causal in changing the innate immune response, via toll-like receptors I believe? Which are important in defence against infection, there’s even a link to inhibiting cancer. Though you might get rare cases among the young, cancer’s regarded as something you get later in life for the most part, I hope we’re wrong but perhaps we’ll see a rise in cancer cases in the young too after they’ve risked their lives with this shot.
To ‘get’ ‘covid’ you have to be ‘tested’. A younger person is far less likely to get ‘tested’ because they’re far more likely to ignore they’ve even ‘got’ it. The older people are far more likely to run off to dr frankenstein everytime they get ‘ill’. Pretty much all the ‘cases’ amongst the young are where they collapsed and/or died, and they were the ones with weaker immune systems to begin with. Not everyone is created equal, so even amongst the young there are weak ones. Relying on ‘government’ data for ‘cases’ of ‘covid’ is (pardon me) foolish in the extreme. They count you as having ‘covid’ when you die of the vax. How many amongst those older people that ‘had’ ‘covid’ were actually vaxxed to death? Add to that the fact that the young are more ‘hesitant’ (ie. a far lower percentage are poisoned to begin with) and you can easily see why the older people are more likely to ‘have it’ and to have ‘died from it’ (really they died from the vax).
haven’t been able to share on messenger even tho I’ve downloaded messenger 3 times………..this site is not user friendly.
If the vaccines really destroy immune response over time, the vaccinated should get progressively more flu, pneumonia, and colds than the unvaccinated. So far, this has not happened.
The operative part of the phrase is “so far.”
oh please, don’t try to reason with these peole 🤣
I get the general message. But I can’t get the figures straight. For a long time now I’ve been quoting Dr Chris Martensen’s figures of 99.86% proof against the virus just as you are and 99.96% proof against it promised by Pfizer.
and now you seem to be saying that without the vaccine we’re at risk something like 0.742 without and 0.036 with.
Quite a difference.
And I think 8 people instead of 162 is quite a change, too.
But no matter. In the grand scheme it doesn’t change things much.
Overall the lack of detail about CPR cycles and what constitutes a ‘case’ and what constitutes a death and details of comorbidities and prior vaccinations and/or infections just about makes the whole thing a guessing match.
I think the bottom line messages are:
. there’s no emergency beyond what the govts. are creating
. if there were this would be no way to handle it.
[…] https://twitter.com/bergerbell/status/1455775773013397505?s=20 San Francisco is set to be the first state in the …November 5, 2021Latest UKHSA report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have an average real world effectiveness of MINUS 73… […]
Learn to spell before spouting any crap…you may pick up more subscriptions if you make an effort.
[…] https://twitter.com/bergerbell/status/1455775773013397505?s=20 San Francisco is set to be the first state in the …November 5, 2021Latest UKHSA report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have an average real world effectiveness of MINUS 73… […]
[…] Injuries? Emergency Rooms Overrun With People Suffering From “Sudden Cardiac Arrest” Latest UKHSA report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have an average real world effectiveness of MINUS 73… Bill Gates warns of smallpox terror attacks and urges leaders to use ‘germ games’ to prepare […]
[…] The Biden vaccine “mandate” has no basis in law and no basis in science. A steady stream of published scientific studies has long demonstrated that vaccines do not prevent the spread of covid. In fact, the latest “VE” rating — Vaccine Effectiveness — to come out of UK data shows the VE to be a negative number of minus 73 percent. […]
[…] the latest “VE” rating — Vaccine Effectiveness — to come out of UK data shows the VE to be a negative number of minus 73 percent. This means people who take the vaccine have an increased risk of hospitalizations and deaths […]
[…] of covid. In fact, the latest “VE” rating — Vaccine Effectiveness — to come out of UK data shows the VE to be a negative number of minus 73 percent. This means people who take the vaccine have an increased risk of hospitalizations and deaths […]
[…] the latest “VE” rating — Vaccine Effectiveness — to come out of UK data shows the VE to be a negative number of minus 73 percent. This means people who take the vaccine have an increased risk of hospitalizations and deaths […]
[…] of covid. In fact, the latest “VE” rating — Vaccine Effectiveness — to come out of UK data shows the VE to be a negative number of minus 73 percent. This means people who take the vaccine have an increased risk of hospitalizations and deaths […]
[…] of covid. In fact, the latest “VE” rating — Vaccine Effectiveness — to come out of UK data shows the VE to be a negative number of minus 73 percent. This means people who take the vaccine have an increased risk of hospitalizations and deaths […]
Does anybody know what exactly the term “unlinked” means in Table 5?
[…] In fact, the latest “VE” rating — Vaccine Effectiveness — to come out of UK data shows the VE to be a negative number of minus 73 percent. This means people who take the vaccine have an increased risk of hospitalizations and […]
[…] the latest “VE” rating — Vaccine Effectiveness — to come out of UK data shows the VE to be a negative number of minus 73 percent. This means people who take the vaccine have an increased risk of hospitalizations and deaths […]
[…] of covid. In fact, the latest “VE” rating — Vaccine Effectiveness — to come out of UK data shows the VE to be a negative number of minus 73 percent. This means people who take the vaccine have an increased risk of hospitalizations and deaths […]
[…] of covid. In fact, the latest “VE” rating — Vaccine Effectiveness — to come out of UK data shows the VE to be a negative number of minus 73 percent. This means people who take the vaccine have an increased risk of hospitalizations and deaths […]
[…] of covid. In fact, the latest “VE” rating — Vaccine Effectiveness — to come out of UK data shows the VE to be a negative number of minus 73 percent. This means people who take the vaccine have an increased risk of hospitalizations and deaths […]
[…] of covid. In fact, the latest “VE” rating — Vaccine Effectiveness — to come out of UK data shows the VE to be a negative number of minus 73 percent. This means people who take the vaccine have an increased risk of hospitalizations and deaths […]
[…] In fact, the latest “VE” rating — Vaccine Effectiveness — to come out of UK data shows the VE to be a negative number of minus 73 percent. This means people who take the vaccine have an increased risk of hospitalizations and […]
[…] of covid. In fact, the latest “VE” rating — Vaccine Effectiveness — to come out of UK data shows the VE to be a negative number of minus 73 percent. This means people who take the vaccine have an increased risk of hospitalizations and deaths […]
Also, they calculate the rates of hospital admissions and deaths to 100,000 people, which, in my opinion, is also misleading. They should be calculated to the number of cases for each group, since one has to be ill with covid first in order to be admited in hospital and dying of covid. When the calculations are corrected, we get higher percentages of admissions and death from vaccinated people.
[…] News) The latest data from the U.K. Health Security Agency, which recently replaced Public Health England, shows that […]
[…] News) The latest data from the U.K. Health Security Agency, which recently replaced Public Health England, shows that […]
[…] News) The latest data from the U.K. Health Security Agency, which recently replaced Public Health England, shows that […]
First time on your site, I’ll be back for more information and to verify your claims. Looks good so far.
[…] The latest data from the U.K. Health Security Agency, which recently replaced Public Health England, shows that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” have an average effectiveness rate of -73 percent in people over the age of 18. […]
[…] The latest data from the U.K. Health Security Agency, which recently replaced Public Health England, shows that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” have an average effectiveness rate of -73 percent in people over the age of 18. […]
[…] Izvor: theexpose.uk […]
[…] The latest data from the U.K. Health Security Agency, which recently replaced Public Health England, shows that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” have an average effective rate of -73 percent in people over the age of 18. […]
[…] pharmaceutical companies in order to get their drug to market. Instead the “vaccines” have negative effectiveness and do not work. However, the effectiveness of vitamin D remains […]
[…] pharmaceutical companies in order to get their drug to market. Instead the “vaccines” have negative effectiveness and do not work. However, the effectiveness of vitamin D remains […]
[…] The latest data from the U.K. Health Security Agency, which recently replaced Public Health England, shows that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” have an average effectiveness rate of -73 percent in people over the age of 18. […]
I’m antivax and anti- COVID tyranny, but this UK govt report isn’t giving us ammunition. Here’s why:
The same Table 5 in the report also compared COVID cases that needed emergency care, and COVID deaths, between the unvaccinated group and the fully vaccinated group.
Their result is that the UNVAXXED have a much higher rate for both emergency care and deaths.
Now, this could be due to completely doctoring the data, or due to using bad treatment protocols on those who are unvaxxed, etc., but such suspicions of mine need to be substantiated, which I can’t without access.
The report (on page 14) also gave a number of explanations for why the fully vaxxed may show higher case rates due to systematic biases (i.e., not due to them being more susceptible). These are not all unreasonable.
So my bottom line is that, although I firmly believe the entire COVID scam has been intended to push injections into people, for nefarious purposes, and for the “healthpass”, this UK report isn’t actually providing with powerful evidence that this article is arguing.
I should add that the fact that the UK report did find the fully vaccinated having much higher INFECTION rate than the unvaxxed, does serve to show that vaccines don’t prevent infection or transmission, taking away the basis for any argument for mandatory vaccination (to protect others). Even if it’s true that the unvaxxed may have a more severe outcome when they’re infected (I wouldn’t trust the report on that), it would only hurt the unvaxxed person, not others, so that’s no justification to force the vaccine on anyone.
[…] Latest UKHSA report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have an average real world effectiveness of MINUS 73… […]
[…] Latest UKHSA report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have an average real world effectiveness of MINUS 73… […]
[…] their drug to market. Instead the Covid injections, within a short period of time, have negative effectiveness and do not work. However, the effectiveness of vitamin D remains unchanged at 96%. […]
[…] to get their drug to market. Instead the Covid injections, within a short period of time, have negative effectiveness and do not work. However, the effectiveness of vitamin D remains unchanged at 96%. Africa is […]
[…] 15. Tabel baseret på tal fra UKHSA viser negativ vaccine effektivitet. 22; […]