Breaking News

Covid-19 Vaccine Microchips are Coming “Whether we like it or not,” warns Developer

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Are Microchip Implants Required by Obamacare?

The Director of DSruptive Subdermals, a tech company based in Sweden, has lashed out at critics who say that his company’s new implantable microchips are “invasive.”

Hannes Sjoblad said that the company’s chips here now “whether we like it or not,” and that people need to just accept them.

Sjoblad said: “This technology exists and is used whether we like it or not. I am happy that it is brought into the public conversation.

“New technologies must be broadly debated and understood,” he added. “Smart implants are a powerful health technology. That is what we are building at DSruptive and our goal is to transform healthcare on a global scale.”

The chip, which is only the size of a small grain of rice, can store not just an individual’s covid-19 vaccine passport but also private medical information and cryptocurrency.

In an earlier interview, Sjoblad explained: “Implants are a very versatile technology that can be used for many different things. Right now, it’s very convenient to have covid passports always accessible on your implant.”

Currently, the implant is designed to be implanted just beneath the skin in a person’s arm or hand, however, it can probably be inserted anywhere. It measures two millimetres by 16mm in size.

“Look, I’m as pro-vaccine as anyone around … AND I’m pro-vaccine passport (on a voluntary basis only), but this just plays into the narrative of ‘they want to track you’ conspiracy theorists,” admitted one of Sjoblad’s critics on Twitter.

It is worth questioning what other information these chips can contain and track beyond financial and medical data. When you really think about it, it is concerning how invasive this technology is and has the potential to be: It could lead to the government directly tracking the movements of a chipped citizen.

Sjoblad says that the chip’s design allows for “always accessible” information by “anyone else, really, who wants to read me.”

“For example, if I go to the movies or go to a shopping centre, then people will be able to check my status even if I don’t have my phone,” he added in the interview.

While Sjoblad insists that his company’s microchips are not tracking devices, he did admit that they are easily activated by external devices as simple as a smartphone.

“They don’t have a battery,” he says about the chips. “They cannot transmit a signal by themselves. So they are basically passive. They sit there asleep.”

Share this page to Telegram
5 3 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

35 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GundelP
GundelP
10 months ago

Smoke and mirror. The real ‘chip’ is the nanotech in the vax, what was found by La Quinta Columna / orwell city.
I guess we see more and more news now like this one to divert attention from the content of the vax, not to screw up vaxxing. That MAC address emitting thing will be such a wake up to many.

Last edited 10 months ago by GundelP
Charles B.
Charles B.
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

The MAC address emitting thing is just your or anybody’s smartphone within a radius of 50meters. Even when everything is switched off there will be a signal.

Go into an area without connectable devise within a 50 meter radius and your nano vaccine thing will miraculously also disappear.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Charles B.
10 months ago

Still better than the chips in our pets with a range of 1-2 meters only…
They are not phones. The signal came from people, the Spanish doc who tested, had no other signals around, he checked, he also asked her patients to switch off their phones. The MACs came from people.
As I wrote to Rhoda you can check MACs on the net, proper MACs refers to the manufacturer, the first half part of it. But these weird MACs can’t be identified.

Last edited 10 months ago by GundelP
GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

‘…Dr. Luis De Benito: I’m going to tell you today the findings of this summer, which go along the lines of what may be behind all this attempt to vaccinate. 

Why so much interest in jabbing? What’s the reason? I’m going to tell you. 

The international organizations that are also investigating this matter asked me for a brief report on what I had done during the summer. … . 

…I don’t care if you think I’m raving or not. But as I have a moral obligation to report what I have done, I tell you today. And whoever wants to believe it will believe it, and whoever doesn’t will judge, criticize and compare it. As I say, I’ve written it, and I have already sent it to the teams that are studying this subject in different parts of the world. 

If from the medical point of view there’s no need to administer any preventive measure for a disease with the lethality of 2 per thousand, why so much insistence that everyone should be inoculated? What’s the vaccine going to give me that I don’t already have? Well, this experiment arose from this reflection. 

Although there are many consultations, during the summer of 2021, in the afternoons, I was the only operative. There wasn’t even administrative staff in the afternoons in that building. Under my office, I occasionally parked an ambulance from SUMA, from the emergency service, because they have a base there. Those were the only “interferences” I detected. Most of the observations were carried out without that artifact. I started the consultation at 15:00 and had patients listed every 20 minutes. 

Due to COVID measures, it was recommended that they come alone and, if possible, at the appointed time. Not before or after. Before starting the consultation, I’d connect the Bluetooth application on my cell phone and invariably check that there was no device available to contact. There was no electronic device in range to connect to. When a patient appeared, often already up the stairs or at the beginning of the corridor, about 20 meters away from the practice, on my cell phone, I could see if one or two devices to connect to with Bluetooth appeared. One or two or none. 

On my phone, I could check to see if the Bluetooth was detecting something or nothing. And if it was something, it was a device with a MAC Address (Media Access Control) code. This is a unique identifier that electronic device manufacturers assign to a card or item that can be networked. 

After attending to the patient’s medical requirements, I’d ask him whether or not he had been vaccinated for COVID. If the answer was affirmative, it was usually quick and without hesitation. And if it was negative, it was often accompanied by a certain wariness, if not anger at the question. A reaction that explained to me that, in general, those who hadn’t wanted to be vaccinated had been subjected to some kind of adverse social situation. After reassuring the patient, whatever his response, I’d write down on a sheet of paper the answer he gave me. 

None of the 137 patients I asked refused to answer. If the answer was affirmative, I’d ask them what type of vaccine they had received, when, and if they had had any adverse reactions. I’d then ask them if they had any cell phones or electronic devices such as wireless headsets or tablets on them, and if so, I’d ask them to turn it off for a moment. When they turned it off, on my cell phone, usually, one of the devices that registered to Bluetooth would disappear. 

Out of hundreds… Here are the results. 

Of the 137 patients questioned, 112 said they had been vaccinated, and 25 said they hadn’t been vaccinated. None of the patients who said they hadn’t been vaccinated registered on my cell phone any device available for Bluetooth connection, having ensured the disconnection of their cell phone, if they had one. In 96 patients of the 112 who said they had been vaccinated, 96 of the 112 having switched off their electronic devices if they were carrying them, a MAC code remained on the screen of my cell phone, which I had already noted in my notes next to the patient’s medical history. 

I interpreted that it was a code that the patient himself was carrying and that, in fact, when he left the office, leaving the building, it disappeared from my cell phone. With this simple observation throughout July and August, I’ve been able to verify that 100% of the patients who say they aren’t vaccinated don’t raise any contact device with my cell phone via Bluetooth. But 86% of those who said they were vaccinated generated a MAC address on my cell phone. These are the observations made, and many doubts and questions arise from them. …’

Last edited 10 months ago by GundelP
Charles B.
Charles B.
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

The key is …. he asked to switch their phones off. They didn’t take the battery out !

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Charles B.
10 months ago

NO. Just about a 1-2 minutes ago I checked the neighbor, one people is at home. That MAC can’t be identified. As this is only one ‘hit’ I wait till photos for visiting a shop or some other place where many are around.
Now I have an old Chinese tablet with andorid 6. It wrotes MACs beautifully. It saw my Phone and identified properly and a MAC it didn’t. I checked on Macvendors, ‘NOT FOUND’.
If it would be a phone it would have been identified just mine was earlier.
On my G4 this is a ‘Misc’ connection, just as I suspected when I made that recording in a shop with the lot of ‘Misc’ connections.

MariaObrien
MariaObrien
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

I Am Earning $81,100 so Far this year working 0nline and I am a full time college student and just working for 3 to 4 hours a day I’ve made such great m0ney.I am Genuinely thankful to and my administrator, It’s’ really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about this HERE… http://www.MoneyStar1.com

Last edited 10 months ago by MariaObrien
tester
tester
Reply to  MariaObrien
10 months ago

Your link is a scam

comment number 6 from Shane is a stolen photo. https://www.flickr.com/photos/yusamoilov/

Last edited 10 months ago by tester
Martha Phillips
Martha Phillips
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

Start working at home with Google! It’s by-far the best job I’ve had. Last Wednesday I got a getting a check for $19474 this – 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $170 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail.
Open This Website……..>>  http://Www.NETCASH1.Com

Last edited 10 months ago by Martha Phillips
TameraJackson
TameraJackson
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

I get paid over $87 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. 
Visit this website………. http://Www.Self25.com

Last edited 10 months ago by TameraJackson
Karen Reyes
Karen Reyes
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

I started earning $85/hour in my free time by completing tasks with my laptop that i got from this company I stumbled upon online…Check it out, and start earning yourself . I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do…..  
For more detail visit the given link……..>>>  http://Www.NETCASH1.Com

Last edited 10 months ago by Karen Reyes
Charles B.
Charles B.
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

As said any smartphone will give a signal except if you take out the battery. Doesn’t matter if Bluetooth is on or off…. for example there is always a geo localisation system that will show positional coordinates.
There is absolutely no way vaccinated people without electronic devises on them , will give a mac id.
As for graphene and graphene oxide content that seems very unlikely as these nanoparticules would be eliminated by natural phagocytosis and oxidation respectively.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Charles B.
10 months ago

Impossible. If my phone is turned off, no other devices’ bluetooth see it. Period. What you talking about is a ‘call home’ feature.
Graphene oxide was found in every covid vaxxes so far and more, in flu vaxxes for example. (orwell.city) they have the proof.

Last edited 10 months ago by GundelP
tester
tester
Reply to  Charles B.
10 months ago

So why does the blood of vaccinated people turn black?

meister
meister
Reply to  tester
10 months ago

It doesn’t.

NancyBarnwell
NancyBarnwell
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

I get paid more than $140 to $450 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $24652 from this without having online working skills .
Simply give it
open this link HERE……. http://Www.SmartPay1.com

Last edited 10 months ago by NancyBarnwell
MariaObrien
MariaObrien
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

Hello

Ted Gunderson
Ted Gunderson
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

Do the test yourself

It is not true.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Ted Gunderson
10 months ago

I’ve done. Buy an old Huwei tablet with Andorid 6. You can have one for 20-30 pounds, switch on Bluetooth and ‘look around’. Then try to identify those MACs with a help of a website (there are many, I used macvendors com), they can’t be identified. While other devices can, whether they are a wifi card’ MAC or a bluetooth’ MAC.

Last edited 10 months ago by GundelP
NancyBarnwell
NancyBarnwell
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

I get paid more than $140 to $450 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $24652 from this without having online working skills .
Simply give it
open this link HERE……. http://Www.SmartPay1.com

Last edited 10 months ago by NancyBarnwell
Yvonne Belanger
Yvonne Belanger
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site… 
Here is I started.…………>>  http://Www.NETCASH1.Com

Last edited 10 months ago by Yvonne Belanger
Anna Wilks
Anna Wilks
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

I making more than $37k by just doing very easy and simple online job from home.Last month my friend sis received $94280 from this work by just giving only 2 to 3 hrs a day.Everybody start earning money online. visit for more details…
This is what I do ………….>> http://Www.NetCash1.Com

Last edited 10 months ago by Anna Wilks
Brittney Holden
Brittney Holden
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

I am making $92/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $21 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it. simply give it a shot on the 
accompanying site……>> http://Www.NETCASH1.Com

Last edited 10 months ago by Brittney Holden
Casey Bell
Casey Bell
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

[ JOIN US ] I get paid more than $260 USD to $1200 USD per HOUR to work online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this one I easily earned $21,000 USD without having any online working skills. Just try it on the support site … 
Here’s what I do…………>>> http://Www.NETCASH1.Com

Last edited 10 months ago by Casey Bell
juliya
juliya
Reply to  Charles B.
10 months ago

I am now making extra $19k or more every month from home by doing very simple and easy job online from home. I have received exactly $20845 last month from this home job. Join now this job and start making extra cash online by follow instruction on the given website…….. http://www.Buzzjoin.com

Last edited 10 months ago by juliya
GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

OK, SO here is the test, taken today evening.

Tool: Huwei tablet Andorid 6.

Locations: parking lot, in the shop, in front of a house, in front of another house.
Please click to the image to see the details. We went to shop very late, around 9 pm, there were hardly any people around. Another day I can try it again when more are around.
In the shop two assistants, women 50-60 yrs were vaxxed, none of the young assistants were. As shoppers, there were hardly any around, most of them were not vaxxed, they were mostly younger maybe 30-50.

Phones emit on another frequency or lower range. If they emit something measurable you have to be close and even if it is a MAC, it can be identified (including our phones, try).

tagged0108.jpg
Charles B.
Charles B.
Reply to  GundelP
10 months ago

What you could do : take your tablet, one phone. one unvxxd person and one vxxd. Make sure there are no other people and phones ( not even switched off ) around. Give the one phone to the vxxd person and do your measurements. Then give it to the unvxxd person on the same spot and do the measurements. You will see the signal is exactly the same because what you detect is the presence of the phone… nothing else.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Charles B.
10 months ago

No need for that. I wrote it why but repeat.

On the web you can find sites designed to INDENTIFY these. If any of these hexas would come from a tool (phone, tablet, printer, etc) it would identify them, like the site: macvendors (com). The first 6 characters in a hexa always refer to the manufacturer.
I tried all of the hexas we found yesterday. I even marked on the photos those which could be identified. Also marked those which could not. Those which could not, must have come from the people, I don’t know other explanation.
(You can try it, you see the hexas on the photos, type it to a MAC identifier app on the web and see the results)

The cell phone theory. In the phones wireless cards have MAC and Bluetooth cards also have MAC, but if they give a sign strong enough you either see an icon of phone or the hexa it sent can be identified, we tried, the manufacturer can be found. I suspect that phones’ bluetooth signal has a shorter range, other frequency. It make sense as in a crowd where many have phones and eg. headphones they could interfere. Happened with me when my tablet, mouse and headphone all connected via Bluetooth, the headphone lost signal frequently.
Or they are simply switched off / not in searching mode that’s why there are relatively low numbers of phones on the photos. But if they give a sign, icon or hexa – they can be identified as phones. I don’t keep bluetooth switched on on a phone, two reasons, one it makes the battery run out quickly, the other is the contact tracing.

What you suggested, French did it, they took a group of volunteers in the woods to test this, there is a short video about it, I gave the link in one of the articles of Rhoda’ comments. I think it was the technical parasitism one.

How many proof needed to believe? It looks they silently tagged people in stealthy way.

Did you heard about their nightmare, advertised openly? Internet Of Bodies? IoB for short. How would they do that if you don’t have anything in you to work with that system? A phone is not good enough as you can bin it and then the it would be over, even the chip in the article is not good enough as can be removed – it must be in you in a way you can’t remove. Remember? They want to tie everything to your ID inc. your digital money, they want to control your behavior – when people woke up, many would try to get rid of a chip or phone. This is where it makes sense. Sensors in you you can’t get rid of.

Unvaxxed:
we are unvaxxed, we don’t emit a thing, we can’t be seen eiher ‘Misc’ or with hexa. Of course we tried, I was worried they could do it in another way eg. with food, pills, etc. There were articles about covid-pills and vaccinated salads.
The French experiment showed the same, Dr. Benitos experiment (above) also showed the same. Unvaxxed are not tagged, only the vaxxed are. Not all of them. Dr. Benito wrote 86% where he found MACs, some vax either didn’t have it or more vax needed to build the system in you or something just went wrong. Why the push for the Pfizer and Moderna recently?

Also explains why they are so pushy with the vax giving it to even younger and younger children. We all must to be a part of the IoT or must disappear – or their plan fails.

Graff Frankenheim
Graff Frankenheim
10 months ago

Well Swedish schmuck, we have debated it as you suggested and have the pleasure of informing you of our unanimous decision as follows: go f**k yourself you utter d**khead. Signed: the population (and remember we outnumber you).

Charles B.
Charles B.
Reply to  Graff Frankenheim
10 months ago

Did you take into account that in Sweden you need contractual consent before having sex. This chip might definitely facilitate this procedure.

Amy Harlib
Amy Harlib
10 months ago

THY CAN STICK THEIR DAMNED TOTAL SLAVERY CHIPS WHERE THE SUN DON’T SHINE!

CourtneyLyons
CourtneyLyons
10 months ago

Work At Home For USA ]My buddy’s aunt makes $64/hr on the computer. She has been unemployed for eight months but last month her but pay check was $12716 just working on the computer for a few hours. Check The Details HERE……… http://www.cash46.com

Last edited 10 months ago by CourtneyLyons
IainW
IainW
10 months ago

Another grub that wants to make money from other peoples misery

trackback
9 months ago

[…] 9.januar 2022 The Expose: Covid-19 Vaccine Microchips are Coming “Whether we like it or not,” warns Developer […]

trackback
9 months ago

[…] Covid-19 Vaccine Microchips are Coming “Whether we like it or not,” warns Developer […]