Late last year, the Australian Vaccination-risks Network (“AVN”) received the legal opinion of Julian Gillespie, an opinion that was carefully reviewed by a former Justice of the Federal Court of Australia, and a world-famous Queen’s Counsel (“QC”), who both deemed the legal grounds for Judicial Review to have merit. On 6 January 2022, AVN announced that the case will be pursued in a Federal Court.
Gillespie is a retired lawyer and former barrister who has come out of retirement to fight a new legal battle, aiming to put an immediate stop to the vaccines in Australia.
It is hoped to bring an injunction this week to, at least, stop the roll-out of “vaccines” for 5- to 11-year-olds. “We are going to ask for the injunction to be held in place for a week or two weeks so in early February, when the court re-opens again, we can bring the substantive case,” Gillespie said during an interview with Zeee Media on 11 January 2022.
Gillespie explained how the Australian government is lying about the number of deaths in Australia – both from Covid and Covid injections – and an “opaque body,” the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee (“AHPPC”), is really calling the shots behind the rollout. He also discussed significant court cases in Australia and the number of Covid injection injuries that are being seen in Australia.
Mid-last year Gillespie was observing, generally, what was occurring in the legal environment and wondering when “more steam was going to be picked up” by the legal industry because there were so many obvious challenges that could be made.
Gillespie was aware that Jonathon Andrews was bringing a case to challenge the PCR tests and offered his support but Gillespie’s help was not required. Andrews, a Melbourne solicitor, initiated legal action against the Victoria State Government’s suspension of constitutional civil liberties, based on the discredited ‘Drosten RT-PCR for novel Coronavirus 2019’ testing standards for recording SARS CoV-2 transmission and infectivity rates, during the Covid crisis. It was accepted for review on 24 August 2021.
Gillespie then turned his attention to the Kassam case and followed proceedings. He feels the case had not been well structured.
Since then, Gillespie has been specifically looking at the adverse events reported post-Covid injections. Adverse events are reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (“TGA”). The National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance (“NCIRS”) extracts adverse event information from TGA data to compile their annual immunisation reports. According to NCIRS annual reports for the last ten years there have been 3,500 adverse events reported and a consistent average of 4,57 deaths per year post-vaccination. But since the Covid injection roll-out adverse events have sky rocketed.
As of 6 January 2022, the TGA acknowledged 726 deaths had been reported post-Covid injection. “The TGA, particularly Professor Skerritt who’s not a medical doctor, he likes to respond to those he says: ‘well, you know, we always have temporal deaths associated with vaccines. There’s always going to be people who die naturally after vaccines.’ We acknowledge that, we know that,” Gillespie said.
Skerritt obtained a doctorate in pharmacology and for the next 20 years his research focussed on wheat. Prior to being appointed head of the TGA in 2012, Skerritt was Deputy Secretary of Primary Industries (yes, agriculture) for Victoria. The person who is approving “vaccines” and making decisions on Covid treatments for Australians is an expert on wheat.
In prior years there would be about 10 deaths reported post-vaccination and on average four, 40% of them, are causally related to the vaccines, Gillespie explained. Autopsies performed in Germany came to the same conclusion, 30-40% of the autopsies performed were causally connected or as a result of the Covid injections. In Australia this information post-Covid injection is not available because “they’ve been trying to avoid them [autopsies] as best they can.”
Biostatisticians have been working on adverse events statistics for decades. “When you see the majority of deaths occurring within 48 hours of a vaccination … it’s the *** damned vaccines,” Gillespie said.
The other factor that has to be looked at, Gillespie said, is the under-reporting in the adverse event reporting system. “We have evidence, [doctors] are being told by their state health departments ‘don’t you *** damn well put in adverse event reports for vaccines otherwise we’re going to muck around with your certificate’.”
The TGA, and in particular the Australian Committee on Vaccines, did not independently assess the safety data from “vaccine” trials prior to the roll-out to the public. The TGA simply assessed the summary of safety data given by Pfizer without looking into the individual cases of the trial participants, for example Maddie De Garay.
“How many other Maddie De Garays are buried in that data which our guys in the TGA and the Australian Committee on Vaccines didn’t look at and independently assess?” Gillespie asked. It is a fundamental primary obligation to independently assess safety data.
“Then we found out that the UK equivalent authority, the MHRA and Public Health England, did the same trippy thing. They didn’t actually read the data … The TGA wrote up in the introduction to its provisional approval ‘Oh, but this has already been passed by the English and the US, everything’s okay’. But if the English and the US didn’t read the safety data then who the *** damn hell has been responsible for the lives and health of the Australian community?”
Click on the image below to watch Gillespie’s interview on Rumble.
Further resources:
- Australian Vaccine-risks Network Inc. (“AVN”) website
- A Court Case Note Concerning Covid Mandates, Orders & Restrictions Across Australia, by Julian Gillespie, 30 September 2021
- The AVN Takes Legal Action to Protect All Our Rights
- Julian Gillespie – AVN Judicial Review to Stop Vaccines in Australia
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance (“NCIRS”)
- ‘Lymphocytes Amok’ Post-Covid Injection Is Very Alarming, Says Pathologist
- Mom details 12-year-old daughter’s extreme reactions to COVID vaccine, says she’s now in wheelchair (Maddie De Garay)

The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help..
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
.
Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support belowV support
Categories: Breaking News, World News
Off,
Sorry Rhoda I think I own you an apology. A bigger one. I think you were right, MACs changing like a dynamic IP, we need time to read after it if we can but these days short with time because of work. I am not sure yet as can test it only on poor neighbours sharing wall.
However it makes no real difference as NONE can be identified, none belongs to a phone or other tool and surprisingly strong (range). Probably one more security layers to cover what they did with people via the vax. Surely no one gave consent for running an opsystem inside their body with bluetooth properties.
Dr Marin sadly also look fake, first comment with links to proofs here:
https://www.fromrome.info/2022/01/16/dr-david-martin-proposes-prosecuting-globalist-agents-letting-globalists-off/
About Malone I wrote it, his twitter message.
No need to apologise. We’re still experimenting, trial and error, discovering what could be happening. My experiments will continue as and when I can. there are more addresses than devices with the people I’m “monitoring” so something is definitely up, regardless if the addresses keep changing …
We know the government is corrupt, it will be interesting to see if the judiciary are the same. Won’t hold my breath.
Of course they are – but Gillespie is one of them and knows their tricks (unless this just a false flag to shut us up!)
Great to see that sanity may be returning to the world BUT what must be done is to sue the media for tort. By promoting Project Fear and not telling all the facts, it is making people panic and thereby make bad decisions. It is also fuelling prejudices.
I’m certain if all the media outlets said that we were under alien invasion and we’d all better buy a gas mask and live underground, and it turned out they were lying, there’d be hell to pay!
People shouldn’t be mislabelling anti-authoritarians as anti-vaxxers.
Your alternative update on #COVID19 for 2022-01-17. Denying fundamental immunology, grossly exaggerating the threat, prisoner of war, nixing telegram (blog, gab, tweet).
There’s a bunch of issues with this article.
1. Gillespie is neither a scientist or a doctor. He has no medical training or medical qualifications at all. He’s a retired lawyer. Why is he being treated like an expert on this topic? His comments hold little weight. Gillespie claims to have evidence of some things he claims, yet has never shared it.
2. What you conveniently don’t mention is that the Department of Primary Industries covers much more. It also includes biosecurity. Bisosecurity is preventing the introduction and/or spread of harmful organisms (e.g. viruses, bacteria, etc.) to animals and plants in order to minimise the risk of transmission of infectious disease. So you’ll find that Dr Skerritt is actually well qualified for his job.
3. You mention that 726 post-vax deaths have been reported to the TGA. Yes, reported is the key word here. The same document that you took that number from also mentions that after reviewing all of those reports, only 11 of those deaths has been confirmed to be directly linked to the vaccines by the TGA.
get the ‘jab’, you jerk…
and… thereby relieve us of the tedium of yr presence…
Thank you for your hard work Julian and others concerned with the charge. Most people don’t realise the mandates are not legal and so many lives/ businesses have been destroyed and / or died from these experimental nano tech jabs. People need to be free and fully informed about any medical decision for their own bodies and one size does not fit all.if people took the time to investigate the ingredients in these human culling experiments they would not touch them.So many lies surround these experimental jabs and it’s now mostly nurses who are coming forth to tell the truth.How can any medical professionals deny their hypoctratic oath as they mostly are to keep their jobs. I do not know as right now they are doing the opposite.
Retired nurse.
Yes, one size does not fit all. Exemptions exist for a reason. There is information available about the vaccines, and people have looked into their ingredients. You call it a culling experiment, based on what? There is no “nanotech”. Don’t buy into all this fearmongering by anti-vaccine people. This website is full of that.
There is nanotech in them, it was found. Just now even the Argentina government has admitted that there was graphene oxide (the base of nanotech) in it. Result of a court case. But it’s not listed ingredient because it can’t be, too poisonous, never was accepted to use.
Here is the article:
https://www.orwell.city/2022/01/ANMAT.html
Even if that was true, graphene is not nanotech. Graphene is a material.
“Graphene is a material”
no…
its much more than ‘a material’ ;
it, actually, behaves like nano-tech;
the evidence for that is, pretty much, OVERWHELMING…
there have been papers published on it in peer-reviewed scientific journals….
LOOK it UP…
It’s been pointed out by others that mandates are not a legal instrument, which is apparently why they cant be legally challenged.
But if not legal then what are they ? Elected parties can claim a mandate to govern, but the way the term is used suggests governments believe they have power to order things to be done without the requirement of any legal basis for the order..
Interesting that governments grant mandates.to business to carry out government ‘health’ policy, yet dont claim mandates for themselves to implement such policies.
Is it all smoke and mirrors ?
mandates are not a legal instrument
then: they cannot be ‘enforced’ by any gov’mt authority;
usually: the cops;
and: you cannot be taken to ‘court’ for violating (any)
[…] 17. Januar 2022 The Expose: Australia: AVN Pursues Federal Court Case to Halt the Use of Experimental Covid Injections […]
[…] accurate information around Covid deaths, and deaths from the Covid injections. During an interview with Zeee Media at the beginning of this year he explained that he was hoping to bring a substantive case regarding […]
[…] given accurate information around Covid deaths, and deaths from the Covid injections. During an interview with Zeee Media at the beginning of this year he explained that he was hoping to bring a substantive case regarding […]
[…] given accurate information around Covid deaths, and deaths from the Covid injections. During an interview with Zeee Media at the beginning of this year he explained that he was hoping to bring a substantive case regarding […]
[…] given accurate information about Covid deaths and deaths from the Covid injections. During an interview with Zeee Media at the beginning of this year, he explained that he was hoping to bring a substantive case […]
[…] given accurate information around Covid deaths, and deaths from the Covid injections. During an interview with Zeee Media at the beginning of this year he explained that he was hoping to bring a substantive case regarding […]
[…] given accurate information around Covid deaths, and deaths from the Covid injections. During an interview with Zeee Media at the beginning of this year he explained that he was hoping to bring a substantive case regarding […]
[…] given accurate information around Covid deaths, and deaths from the Covid injections. During an interview with Zeee Media at the beginning of this year he explained that he was hoping to bring a substantive case regarding […]
[…] una entrevista con Zeee Media a principios de este año, explicó que esperaba presentar un caso sustancial sobre las […]
[…] precisa sobre las muertes por Covid y las muertes por las inyecciones de Covid. Durante una entrevista con Zeee Media a principios de este año, explicó que esperaba presentar un caso sustantivo sobre las […]