Breaking News

With Case-Rates and Covid Deaths highest among the Triple Vaccinated; Where did the ‘Science’ of the pandemic go wrong?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A paper published on April 5th in the New England Journal of Medicine entitled “Protection by a Fourth Dose of BNT162b2 against Omicron in Israel” is raising eyebrows in the scientific world because of its deficiencies.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here


By Guy Hatchard

Dr. Vinay Prasad is an American hematologistoncologist and health researcher. He is an associate professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the University of California, San Francisco. His work has coined the term medical reversal whereby more careful trials of a drug show that its earlier approval was flawed.

Dr Prasad, who is not an anti vaxxer by any stretch of the imagination, has aired his concerns about the latest Israeli paper on Omicron and boosters in a YouTube video.

In essence, Dr. Prasad is concerned that there is a potential for inherent bias as the group of subjects in the Israeli study who took the fourth booster was self-selected rather than randomly assigned. In other words, he was asserting that any assessment of vaccine efficacy published in a leading journal like the NEJM should use the gold standard of scientific proof, rather than inferior methods known to allow confounding effects to creep in.

Dr. Prasad pointed to the current $100 billion of annual Pfizer revenue and asked: Why isn’t Pfizer conducting randomised controlled trials to assess the efficacy and safety of boosters rather than applying political pressure to bypass scientific concerns? He said this was debasing scientific standards.

Dr. Prasad also pointed out that the actual data underpinning the results of the Israeli study were inconsistent with the known trajectory of immunity development and therefore with the study’s conclusions that the booster was helping.

So precisely how could self-selection in the Israeli study invalidate results? Dr. Prasad suggested one possible mechanism: those volunteering for fourth boosters might be more healthy individuals.

We ask: How could this happen? There are a number of ways.

For example, let us take seriously the commonly voiced proposal that the Covid-19 spike protein is essentially a toxin. A toxin capable of causing the heart and organ inflammation, neurological effects, and the potentially damaging immune system storm associated with both Covid infection and vaccination.

As with any toxin, some individuals will have greater and others lesser reactions to the toxin depending on a whole range of individual physiological circumstances. As the series of inoculations proceeds from first to fourth jab, those individuals having a greater adverse reaction to the shots will be weeded out by self-selection. Those experiencing more unpleasant reactions to the spike protein toxin will naturally decide to forgo further injections as the vaccination series unfolds.

Since both the Covid virus and the vaccine expose the physiology to the spike protein which accounts for a significant part of the Covid aetiology and symptomatology, those more tolerant of the toxic effects of the spike protein will have lesser symptoms following Covid infection.

The net effect of this on the results of the Israeli study is clear, those volunteering to receive the fourth booster will appear to be gaining benefit from the booster because they have self-selected for greater tolerance. As a result there will be a tendency to see a slightly lower rate of hospitalisation and death subsequent to receiving the booster, precisely the result of the Israeli study. As the efficacy of the booster on the viral component of Covid wanes this effect will dissipate.

Dr. Prasad’s point is clear, the only way to sort out what is actually happening is to conduct a randomised controlled study where subjects are assigned to vaccination and the matched control group receives a placebo. Pfizer has the money to do this. So why aren’t they? Possibly because a randomised controlled trial may uncover some potentially serious issues for Pfizer.

Without a carefully designed randomised controlled study, results are subject to the vagaries and inconsistencies of national data collection policies:

  • Is Covid data collection mandatory, (in most countries including NZ it is not)?
  • How carefully are records kept?
  • How are Covid hospitalisations defined (for example are pregnant mothers in hospital to give birth who coincidentally test positive for Covid recorded as a Covid patient)?
  • How are Covid deaths recorded, how long after a positive test and whether they had other health conditions?

Let’s look at the New Zealand current deaths data which illustrates these points:

Proportion of covid deaths by vax status (dark colours)

with Proportion of total population in each vax status (light shades)

Shows all deaths ASSOCIATED with covid: ie from any cause within 28 days of a + test.

(Unfortunately, the MoH does not release the vax status of CONFIRMED covid deaths)

If you read this graph at face value you must conclude as follows:

During the last month boosted individuals have become more vulnerable to death from Covid that they were at the start. Both the vaccinated (excluding the boosted) and unvaccinated groups have become less vulnerable to death through Covid. The increasing vulnerability of the boosted group over time is consistent with the Israeli study. One possible interpretation of the figures is as follows:

The level of natural immunity (due to prior infection) is rising among the unvaccinated as a greater percentage of this group catch and recover from Covid, whereas the more mRNA injections you have had appear to inhibit the acquisition of natural immunity.

However few safe scientific conclusions can be drawn from this table. The NZ Ministry of Health does not release sufficient data and the numbers are small. We do not know how many of these deaths were with Covid and how many because of Covid in the various vaccination categories. We can however segway to figures from the UKHSA. Up until the end of March the UKHSA conveniently provided the case-rates per 100,000 individuals by vaccination status in their vaccine surveillance reports, and the following table has been stitched together by online UK publication The Expose from the case-rate tables found in the Week 3, Week 7 and Week 13

As you can see from the above, the case-rates per 100k have been highest among the triple vaccinated population over these 3 months, except for the 18-29-year-olds in the week 3 report only, and the under 18’s in all 3 months. However, as in New Zealand, the trend is clear: triple vaccinated individuals are becoming more vulnerable and not exhibiting the acquisition of natural immunity in every age category.

A sufficiently well planned and executed randomised controlled trial with a long duration would reveal what is going on, but neither Pfizer or government health agencies are moving in this direction. In fact health agencies like the UKHSA are publishing less and less data, possibly because the data is suggesting alarming longer term health consequences of mRNA vaccination.

The lack of complete data at this point actually confounds the issue because it becomes increasingly difficult to sort out what adverse health effects of Covid are due to infection and which to vaccination. If the supposition that the spike protein is a toxin is right, both will have similar effects to varying degrees. The action point is clear: mRNA vaccination is not working and could be dangerous. In the absence of reliable clinical assessment, and in the presence of concerning data, the use of mRNA  vaccines should be paused.

Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID)

Share this page to Telegram
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

18 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
jennifer
jennifer

I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)

HERE====)> https://www.worksful.com

Last edited 5 months ago by jennifer
Elizabeth
Elizabeth
Reply to  jennifer
5 months ago

I make more then $12,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 11 to 12 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried it… 🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)

HERE====)> https://www.hmjobz.com

Last edited 5 months ago by Elizabeth
Sara
Sara

I get paid more than $120 to $130 every hour for working on the web. I found out about this activity 3 months prior and subsequent to joining this I have earned effectively $15k from this without having internet working abilities Copy underneath site to check it… http://Www.Cashapp1.com

Last edited 5 months ago by Sara
diseb
diseb
Reply to  Sara
5 months ago

Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://Www.Homzjob.Com

Last edited 5 months ago by diseb
TickyItIs
TickyItIs
5 months ago

Interesting piece and thanks to Expose and Mr Hatchard for bringing us this.

Two points; shame on the Expose for reporting on a trial that claims to go opposite to the “Covid vaccines bad” narrative without setting out its key finding. Well, third paragraph, obliquely mentioned. I think that the Expose does not need to be scared of presenting alternative narratives, especially if it’s felt that they can be debunked

Second point is that, controlled trials aside, the fact of a need/push for a booster and then a second, each time on the basis that the booster shows good results is debunk enough. Why ask for a booster if the original course worked? And why a second if the first booster worked? And so on. And then for any study to come along and say, “Look, the booster gives good results!” Okay. Like last time. And the time before. And so on..

Brooklyn
Brooklyn
Reply to  TickyItIs
5 months ago

*I am making $92 an hour working from home. i was greatly surprised at the same time as my neighbour advised me she changed into averaging $ninety five however I see the way it works now. I experience mass freedom now that I’m my non-public boss. 
that is what I do….. http://www.incomehd.com

Last edited 5 months ago by Brooklyn
fosoxag
fosoxag
Reply to  Brooklyn
5 months ago

  I am able to create $88/h to complete few jobs on home computer. I’ve never thought that it’s even achievable but my closest mate earning $25k only within five weeks simply working this leading project & she had convinced me to join…Discover extra details by going following link https://www.makemeboost.com

Last edited 5 months ago by fosoxag
Dan
Dan
5 months ago

How the hell do we fight this, so at least there is some form faux investigation.

Last edited 5 months ago by Dan
elsie
elsie
Reply to  Dan
5 months ago

You pick up a gun and shoot the bad guys — but that would require you to get off your fat ar*e and actually do something.

Ian
Ian
Reply to  Dan
5 months ago

Simple. Don’t comply! Do the opposite of what the people in power say!

trackback
5 months ago

[…] April 22, 2022With Case-Rates and Covid Deaths highest among the Triple Vaccinated; Where did the ‘Science’ of… […]

elsie
elsie
5 months ago

“Dr. Vinay Prasad is an American…”

No he/she/it isn’t…

Last edited 5 months ago by elsie
Saifer65
Saifer65
5 months ago

This year now its very very easy to earn more income online. start using this job and earn more than $15000 every month very easily. now its time for you to change your life. check this website for info.

🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)

HERE====)> https://www.fuljobz.com

Last edited 5 months ago by Saifer65
Kelly
Kelly
5 months ago

Vaccinated people could be releasing spike proteins by air. This is called shedding and documented in pfizer’s released files. I talked with people and read stories online that some unvaccinated people are experiencing headaches, stomachaches, itching sensation in throat, need to cough, smelling weird parfume like smells whenever they are near vaccinated people. I personally started to experience headache when I go in crowded areas. Graphene hydroxide in their body are amplifying wireless signals to terahertz level. Literally every vaccinated person becomes like walking antennas. This and spike proteins could be causing us to experience these symptoms. We need to take care of ourselves with much causion because threat is real.
You can get ivermectin to detox your body by visiting https://livingnatural.net

Last edited 5 months ago by Kelly
trackback
5 months ago

[…] 22.  !!! With Case-Rates and Covid Deaths highest among the Triple Vaccinated; Where did the ‘Science’ of… […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] April 22, 2022With Case-Rates and Covid Deaths highest among the Triple Vaccinated; Where did the ‘Science’ of… […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] The pandemic: Case rates and deaths highest among the triple vaccinated? (Report) […]