Breaking News

CDC Study finds Covid-19 Vaccination increases risk of suffering Autoimmune Disease Myocarditis by 13,200%

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A study conducted by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration has shown that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the population.

This means Covid vaccination increases the risk of suffering myocarditis, an autoimmune disease causing inflammation of the heart, by 13,200%.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here


The study, conducted by researchers from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) as well as from several U.S. universities and hospitals, examined the effects of vaccination with products manufactured by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.

The study’s authors used data obtained from the CDC’s VAERS reporting system which were cross-checked to ensure they complied with CDC’s definition of myocarditis; they also noted that given the passive nature of the VAERS system, the number of reported incidents is likely to be an underestimate of the extent of the phenomenon.

1626 cases of myocarditis were studied, and the results showed that the Pfizer-BioNTech product was most associated with higher risk, with 105.9 cases per million doses after the second vaccine shot in the 16 to 17 age group for males, and 70.7 cases per million doses after the second shot in the 12 to 15 age group for males. The 18 to 24 male age group also saw significantly higher rates of myocarditis for both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s products (52.4 and 56.3 cases per million respectively).

The study found that the median time to symptom onset was two days, and that 82 percent of cases were in males, consistent with previous studies. Around 96 percent of affected people were hospitalised, with most treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; 87 percent of those hospitalised had resolution of symptoms by time of discharge.

At the time of data review, two reports of death in people younger than 30 years of age with potential myocarditis still remained under investigation and were not included in the case counts.

Among the reported symptoms were: chest pain, pressure, or discomfort (89%), shortness of breath (30%), abnormal ECG results (72%), and abnormal cardiac MRI findings (72%).

The study’s authors noted that myocarditis following vaccination appeared to resolve more swiftly than in typical viral cases; however, given that vaccination is no longer considered a reliable way in which to avoid COVID infection, it is unclear whether this has any specific relevance to the cost-benefit analysis of COVID vaccination, especially considering the low risk of complications following coronavirus infection for the age group most at risk for heart-related complications following vaccination.

Given the plethora of studies confirming a link between vaccination and myocarditis, the CDC has commenced active surveillance of adolescents and young adults to monitor their progress following heart-related incidents after vaccination. Long-term outcome data, however, are not yet available.

In the meantime, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology advise that people with myocarditis should refrain from competitive sports for three to six months, and only resume strenuous exercise after normal ECG and other test results are obtained. In addition, they advise that further mRNA vaccine doses should be deferred.

In conclusion, the study’s authors note that the risk of myocarditis after receiving mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines was increased across multiple age and sex strata and was highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males and young men, and that this risk should be considered in the context of the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination.

Share this page to Telegram
4 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

35 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dawn Gonzales
Dawn Gonzales

I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)

HERE====)> https://www.worksful.com

Last edited 5 months ago by Dawn Gonzales
MaryGalvan
MaryGalvan

I made $92/hr. It’s time to take some action and you can join it too.It is a simple, dedicated and easy way to get rich. Three weeks from now you will wish you had started today.Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site.
GOOD LUCK… http://Www.cashapp1.Com

Last edited 5 months ago by MaryGalvan
Jessica Smith
Jessica Smith
Reply to  MaryGalvan
5 months ago

I make more then $12,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 11 to 12 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried it… 🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)

HERE====)> https://www.hmjobz.com
        

Last edited 5 months ago by Jessica Smith
Randall
Randall
5 months ago

Can’t help but feel that one day, this truth WILL come out. Unfortunately there are those that would like to exaggerate the statistics, but MORE THAN most, the adverse reactions are UNDERestimated…

Just let the cards fall where they may – we just NEED to know the truth.

R

Zerro85
Zerro85
Reply to  Randall
5 months ago

Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it out it.. 🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)..

open this site .…………>> https://www.fuljobz.com

Last edited 5 months ago by Zerro85
Carol
Carol
5 months ago

An IT analysts is able to prove without doubt that the covid-19 is a complete fraud. He has a blog on MINDS that it would be nice if someone paid attention. In case you might be interested his link is https://www.minds.com/badass_the_reaper/.
He also has a booklet out that we are trying to get out there called PIERCE THE DARKNESS by Mark Gray. New to this so any help he gets is appreciated.

Sara
Sara
Reply to  Carol
5 months ago

I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on
the accompanying site…http://www.incomehd.com

Last edited 5 months ago by Sara
eatit
eatit
5 months ago

explain to me what 13,200 per cent of anything is?

Yeppers
Yeppers
Reply to  eatit
5 months ago

If you eat 1 bananas a day, then suddenly you decide to eat 132 bananas a day, you have increased your banana eating by 13,200%

Last edited 5 months ago by Yeppers
Bro Ken Knows
Bro Ken Knows
5 months ago

BIG TECH lefties will label this study Russian disinformation and flag, ban, censor, deplatform or delete it is 3,…2,…1…

Michigan J Frogg
Michigan J Frogg
Reply to  Bro Ken Knows
5 months ago

It’ll be the first item on the new ‘Ministry of Truth’ agency agenda. Smdh, we are regressing into the 1984 novel.

trackback
5 months ago

[…] – CDC Study finds Covid-19 Vaccination increases risk of suffering Autoimmune Disease Myocarditis by 1… […]

RAND ARISTOTLE
RAND ARISTOTLE
5 months ago

SCARE TACTIC NONSENSE! Read the report, not the spin on the report!

READ IT CAREFULLY. The HIGHEST, not median or lowest cases, were 70 per million. That computes to 70 / 1000000 = 0.00007

7/10,000th of a percent! That is the highest stat reported to the narrow band of the young. For the general population over 20, there is no myocarditis.

IN OTHER WORDS IT IS A NUMBER THAT IS INSIGNIFICANT!

What the article proved was that the mRNA vaccines are totally safe.
And a medical miracle designed for the 1st variant that still works for the 9th!

Other vaccines have greater side effects, making mRNA the safest vaccines ever created.

Most importantly, myocarditis is set off by any bacteria, any virus including the cold virus, any fungi, and any chemical reaction and even allergies. REFERENCES:

https://tinyurl.com/y2b423jl

https://tinyurl.com/yyeyzk44

https://tinyurl.com/y6tcd6uu

Critical thinker
Critical thinker
Reply to  RAND ARISTOTLE
5 months ago

It’s never insignificant if it happens to you or your loved one. The study states that the median age of those affected after vaccination is 21. That age group is not at major risk for Covid compared to those over 60. Without comparing the risk of the heart conditions after vaccination compared to after viral infection, taking into account the age factor, the small number which you call insignificant is still not an assurance that the vaccine reduces risk rather than increases risk. The study clearly says that while vaccination is important for public health, nevertheless, it comes with risk. Regardless of the rarity of that incidence occurring, the recommendation to vaccinate should ONLY be made if it decreases one’s risk rather than increases it. Because of the age factor, it is clear that it is more risky to be vaccinated in this age group than to be infected with the virus.

Ant
Ant
Reply to  RAND ARISTOTLE
1 month ago

Brain dead r back u r vaxxed I wood think and will suffer the consequences if not just another hypocrite

The mRNA needs a protective envelope to enter the cells. This protective envelope consists of nano lipids. The nano lipids are stabilised by layers of polyethylene glycol (“PEG”). The PEG is formed from chains of different lengths. The structure of a nano lipid particle protecting the mRNA is shown schematically below:

blob:https://expose-news.com/8943e5f6-8792-436b-9b72-b05e190590c5

BKMart
BKMart
5 months ago

“If we save even one life’ is the lunatic left’s gun control mantra. Appling the same leftist ‘logic’ to the manmade virus and their genetic experiment response it would be “if we kill millions to save a few”…

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration actually found that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration actually found that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration actually found that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration actually found that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration actually found that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] pro kontrolu nemocí a Úřadem pro kontrolu potravin a léčiv ve skutečnosti zjistila, že riziko myokarditidy po očkování mRNA COVID je přibližně 133x vyšší než základní riziko v […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration actually found that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration actually found that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration actually found that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration actually found that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration actually found that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] 美国疾控中心和食品与药品管理局悄悄发表的研究结果表明,接种mRNA新冠病毒疫苗引发心肌炎的风险比普通未接种人群高约133倍。 […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration actually found that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the […]

trackback
21 days ago

[…] Eine in aller Stille veröffentlichte Studie der US-amerikanischen Centers for Disease Control und der Food and Drug Administration hat ergeben, dass das Risiko einer Myokarditis nach einer mRNA-COVID-Impfung etwa 133 Mal höher ist als das Hintergru… […]

trackback
18 days ago

[…] for Disease Control et la Food and Drug Administration des États-Unis a en fait révélé que le risque de myocardite après la vaccination par ARNm COVID est environ 133 fois plus élevé que le r… dans la […]

trackback
2 days ago

[…] by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration actually found that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the […]

trackback
1 day ago

[…] by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration actually found that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the […]

trackback
22 hours ago

[…] by the US Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration actually found that the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID vaccination is around 133x greater than the background risk in the […]