Breaking News

FACT CHECK: Dear Andrew Neil & BBC News… UK Gov. reports prove 30% of England’s population are NOT Vaccinated, equating to 19 million people, & 30 million (50%) have refused the Booster jab… Stop lying to the public!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Official figures published by the UK Government prove that the British public is being lied to about the effectiveness of the Covid-19 injections, and the true number of people who have refused them.

If you rewind to December 2021, you may remember an infamous headline published by Andrew Neil for the Daily Mail that read – ‘It’s time to punish Britain’s five million vaccine refuseniks: They put us all at risk of more restrictions’.

The BBC has also been peddling a similar narrative. In July 2022, they announced the release of an “eye-opening” documentary that allegedly sought to find out why “8% of the population remain unvaccinated against Covid-19”.

Andrew Neil’s headline and the BBC’s #Unvaccinated documentary are both beautiful examples of how you have been lied to since the very beginning of the alleged Covid-19 pandemic.

Because according to the UK Government, 18.9 million people in England who are eligible for vaccination still remain unvaccinated. That equates to 30% of the eligible population, and 50% of the country has refused the third dose.

Yet despite this, another UK Government report confirms 94% of Covid-19 deaths have been among the vaccinated since the beginning of April 2022, and a shocking 90% of those deaths were among the triple/quadruple jabbed.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here


The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) replaced Public Health England in the second half of 2021, and is sponsored by the Department for Health and Social Care and headed by Dr Jenny Harries.

The agency has been quietly publishing a weekly report titled ‘Weekly national Influenza and COVID-19 surveillance report’ that contains mountains of monotonous data. However, hidden deep within that report are the figures for Covid-19 vaccination uptake in England by dose.

The following table is taken from page 65 of the week 27 report, and shows vaccine uptake in England by age –

We’ve created the following chart based on the figures provided by UKHSA above, showing the total vaccination uptake vs the total vaccination refusal in England per dose –

According to the UKHA, 44.48 million people have had a single dose, 41.8 million people have had two doses, and 32.9 million people have had three doses as of July 3rd 2022.

According to the UKHSA’s own figures, 63.4 million people were eligible for vaccination at this point. Therefore, 18.9 million people have refused the Covid-19 vaccine in England and remain completely unvaccinated.

But on top of this, a further 2.6 million have refused a second dose, meaning 21.5 million people are not double vaccinated, and 8.9 million people have refused a third dose, meaning 30.4 million people are not triple vaccinated.

Here’s how those figures equate in terms of percentages –

Thirty percent of the population of England remains completely unvaccinated. 34% of the population of England are not double vaccinated. And 50% of the population are not triple vaccinated. This means England now has 30.4 million “Vaccine Refuseniks”. A figure that is 500% higher than the 5 million claimed by Andrew Neil in December 2021.

However, whilst these figures may be a cause for celebration for those who felt isolated and thought they were only one of a few who had refused the Covid-19 injection, it is terrible news for those who have succumbed to the lies and propaganda and had three or even four doses of the experimental jab.

This is because further UK Government data, quietly published just hours before Boris Johnson announced he was resigning as Prime Minister of the UK, reveals 94% of Covid-19 deaths since April have been among the vaccinated, and a shocking 90% of those deaths were among the triple/quadruple jabbed.

A UK Government agency, known as the Office for National Statistics (ONS), has just published data on deaths by vaccination status.

The latest dataset from the ONS is titled ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status, England, 1 January 2021 to 31 May 2022‘, and it can be accessed on the ONS site here, and downloaded here.

Table 1 of the latest dataet contains figures on the mortality rates by vaccination status for all cause deaths, deaths involving Covid-19, and deaths not involving Covid-19. And it is here that we are able to ascertain the vaccination status of everyone who has died of Covid-19 since the beginning of April 2022.

We’ve taken the figures provided by the ONS for both April and May 2022, and produced the following chart showing Covid-19 deaths by vaccination status in England between 1st April and 31st May 2022 –

In all, according to the ONS, there were 4,935 Covid-19 deaths over these two months, and the vaccinated population accounted for a shocking 4,647 of those deaths. But what’s even more shocking is that the triple vaccinated accounted for 4,216 of those deaths, with just 288 deaths recorded among the unvaccinated population.

The following chart shows the percentage of Covid-19 deaths by vaccination status in England between 1st April and 31st May 2022, according to the latest ONS dataset published just hours before Boris Johnson’s resignation –

The quietly published figures reveal that the vaccinated population as a whole accounted for a shocking 94% of all Covid-19 deaths in April and May 2022, with the unvaccinated accounting for just 6% of all Covid-19 deaths.

But the most horrific statistic here is that 90% of the deaths among the vaccinated were among people who had been given at least three doses of a Covid-19 injection, despite the fact just 50% of the population of England has had three doses of the Covid-19 injection.

You have been fed lie, after lie, after lie. There are now up to 30.4 million vaccine refusniks in England alone; not 5 million as was wrongly claimed by Andrew Neil, or 8% of the population as falsely claimed by the BBC. And the official data proves that if you are one of them, you most definitely made the right decision.

Share this page to Telegram
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

23 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Islander
Islander
28 days ago

What damnable liars; words fail me, this is pure evil, yet they will carry on deceiving, and being deceived, twisting and turning, covering up…

The old mantra from various bodies in the establishment was “Covid vaccines are safe and effective.” If you thought that was bad enough, it is now “Covid vaccines are safe and highly effective.” And this for pregnant women!!!!!

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-62739554

KarlM Alias
KarlM Alias
Reply to  Islander
28 days ago

Actually, UKHSA has cunningly changed at least one website to state:
 In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time: however, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination.
The weaselly blurb is easily recognised now.
link

Mark Deacon
Mark Deacon
Reply to  Islander
28 days ago

The BBC once it lies is proven too no longer serve the best interest of the people.

It certainly through these lies does not serve the interests of the injured and dying from the toxic vaccines and that should open up peoples lies.

Imagine the BBC stating how many died and wwe injured or disabled from the vaccines who because of exposure could not get treatment or help in their position.

That is what is disgusting about the BBC right now.

The BBC applied the same tactics through BREXIT but people were not dying or injured through that action … they are this time.

Rabbi Seamus
Rabbi Seamus
Reply to  Mark Deacon
28 days ago

It is serving the interest of its founder. You’re just taxed to pay for your own Brainwashing.

Same as the Bank of England and its owners/founders. Taxed to pay for your own Inflation.

Archibald Maule Ramsay warned you.

Rabbi Seamus
Rabbi Seamus
Reply to  Islander
28 days ago

Taxed to be lied at by State Pravda. When you research who founded the BBC, it becomes obvious.

trackback
28 days ago

[…] Official figures published by the UK Government prove that the British public is being lied to about the effectiveness of the Covid-19 injections, and the true number of people who have refused […] Source link […]

John Blundell
John Blundell
28 days ago

Percentages comparison of Vaxxed to Unvaxxed is meanigless unless it is done pro-rata as per 100,000 of that cohort, although I agree vaccine remorse will eventually get rid of the lethal jab fiasco.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  John Blundell
26 days ago

My guess, and it doesn’t mean racism in any way, just as many came from a different cultural background ‘vax hesitancy’ is different, too. I bet that the unvaxxed are mainly among the Arabic nations (religious hesitancy), the central European origins (ex socialist countries, where they remember that governments didn’t want any good to them ever) and similar but not the ‘we are westerns from generations’ people because they had blind faith in their govs.

The big question is that if things turn nasty (they surely will try the good old Divide and Conquer), how these different groups can and willing to work together. Fingers crossed, we badly need each other support.

Mark Deacon
Mark Deacon
28 days ago

This is what people must understand … the weaponized media tries to make you feel alone and isolated too control people. The result is too get peopel through fear, intimidation or conformity to sign up.

Right now I feel the likes of the BBC should have their tongues cut out for being political propqaganda instead of serving public interest.

Because of this position the BBC CANNOT REPORT THE TRUE NUMBER OF DEATHS AND INJURIES FROM THE VACCINES THEREBY DENYING PEOPLE HELP.

That is the BBC acting against the best interests of the dead and injured.

See what I mean … can’t have it both ways BBC so my words suggesting cut out their tongues is actually in the best interest of the people suffering and dying.

Gerald
Gerald

I thought most people stopped believing what the bbc broadcast years ago, I can’t believe that some people still watch it!

Islander
Islander
Reply to  Gerald
28 days ago

I don’t “watch it”, I only read what the the BBC (Biased Broadcasting Corporation as it truly is!) has to say on their website. One has to read what HM government’s propaganda machine is advising (commanding) us to do, would you not agree? We then can the make informed choices, that is normally doing the complete opposite of what they would have us do. Though I believe the movements of the devil’s tail will be ever harder to detect in these increasingly evil days.

Rabbi Seamus
Rabbi Seamus
28 days ago

They attempted this hoax while WMD was still in recent memory.

sticky
sticky
Reply to  Rabbi Seamus
27 days ago

And 911.

bernard kerkhof
bernard kerkhof
27 days ago

Pleased to see the numbers of anti injections is rising.
Keep an eye on the general yearly death rates and birth rates.
They can’t hide the death bodies.
SADS = “Spontaneous “Adult ( and children) Death Shot

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  bernard kerkhof
26 days ago

I hope it includes EVERY injections. With the help of ‘bots’ they still try to persuade people to go for a flu shot or any other, you have to be mad to trust in their ingredient list after this.

Guy
Guy
27 days ago

You don’t stop to think about the government’s importing of brainless mongrel refugees as surely a way to replace you all. If you continue to do nothing, soon it will be too late.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Guy
26 days ago

And how they will persuade them to be vaxxed? Ukraine had one of the lowest vax uptake, I doubt that the Albanians would be very different.
How they could control them on the long term? Would you trust in the elite if you were one of them? They betrayed us and culling but they surely won’t do them?
Those ‘refugees’ came from a hard environment, if they survived that, they are not stupid. However it’s not such good news to us, either I guess.

GundelP
GundelP
26 days ago

And where are they? Right now I have limited net, no long comments or uploaded videos. I check MACs, the bad news that I don’t think the assembled nanotech will stop, based on that many refused a 3rd, and the second was appx a year ago.
The data I share is NOT from the UK but consider that at least one of the affected country had much lower vax acceptance.
Recently I was sitting in a small touristic train where I could count and compare the numbers of people to the numbers of MACs, I found 50 MACs, from which 41 were unknown, the train could accommodate 45 people +/-4-5 (children) + 2 drivers and 3 more standing at the station. No one else were within the range.

That’s a very heavily vaccinated ratio especially that among the adults there were teenagers, too. Nationalities (based on the languages) Germans or Austrians, Croatians, Hungarians, 2-3 English couples.

Try to measure it in the UK, if you are in a place where you can count people you will see who was really vaxxed and who was not.

I can’t wait for a Mik Anderson or La Quinta Columna update on what happens with the nanotech with time, last forever? As long as it last the person can be manipulated (thoughts, feelings) and targeted. It would be vital knowledge.

Cathy
Cathy
25 days ago

I don’t know the proper term for what I’m about to say, but you will get the point. I know that your Aristocracy (spelling?) are in name only. But the world knows and loves Queen Elizabeth and Prince William and the family. Do they have no say whatsoever? I would bet a ton of money (if I had a ton of money) that if they knew what was going on, they would not agree to it. Do you English people agree?