Breaking News

Author of ‘The Limits to Growth’ promotes the genocide of 86% of the world’s population

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Dennis Meadows, one of the main authors of the Club of Rome’s The Limits to Growth, is an honorary member of the Club of Rome and a member of the World Economic Forum.  If you thought his ideology had softened and become less anti-human since the publishing of his book, you’d be wrong. 

Here’s a 2017 video of Meadows musing over his hopes that the coming inevitable genocide of 86% of the world population could be accomplished peacefully under a “benevolent” dictatorship.  He said:

“We could [ ] have eight or nine billion, probably, if we have a very strong dictatorship which is smart … and [people have] a low standard of living …  But we want to have freedom and we want to have a high standard of living so we’re going to have a billion people. And we’re now at seven, so we have to get back down.  I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow and that it can be done in a way which is relatively equal, you know, so that people share the experience.”

We Love Earth: Dennis Meadows Interview p4/4 (A ‘peaceful collapse’ & many revolutions…), 1 September 2017 (11 mins)

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


As will become apparent at the end of this article, it is no coincidence that Meadows’ words echo the words in the 1995 Global Biodiversity Assessment first presented at the United Nations climate change conference COP1 which stated:

An ‘agricultural world’ in which most human beings are peasants, should be able to support 5 to 7 billion people … In contrast, a reasonable estimate for an industrialised world society at the present North American material standard of living would be one billion.

Global Biodiversity Assessment, UNEP, 1995, pg. 773

What the advocates of this ideology seem to omit mentioning is that, according to Worldometer, the population of the world is currently over 8 billion which doesn’t stack up with their fear-mongering predictions. There’s a good reason they avoid real-world scenarios because their models are a sleight of hand, they manipulate the data.

While many are now familiar with the manipulation of predictive modelling by Neil Ferguson during the covid-19 crisis, a network of powerful Malthusians have used the same tactics for the better part of the last century to sell and impose their agenda.

Malthusians are the disciples of Thomas Malthus (1766 – 1834).  Malthus promoted the mathematical thesis that population levels will always tend towards geometric growth, while agricultural resources will tend to arithmetic growth resulting in relatively forecastable “crisis points.” Malthus believed that social engineers representing the British Empire must use these “crisis points” to scientifically manage the “human herd.” Malthus believed that nature bestowed upon the ruling class certain tools that would allow them to accomplish this important task – namely war, famine and disease.

Established in 1968, the Club of Rome quickly set up branches across the Western world with members whom all agreed that society’s best form of governance was a scientific dictatorship.

It is a globalist non-governmental organisation (“NGO”) that convenes meetings between heads of state, members of royal families, business leaders, international financiers, academic scholars, laboratory scientists, and administrators of global governance institutions, such as the United Nations (“UN”), the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (“IMF”), and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”). Modelled after the “Round Table” structure of the Bilderberg Group, the Royal Institute for International Affairs (“RIIA”), and the Council on Foreign Relations (“CFR”), the Club of Rome facilitates meetings where delegates plan the global economy through public-private stewardship of the world’s natural and human resources in accordance with the Malthusian ecology of sustainable development.

In 1972, the Club of Rome’s The Limits to Growth published the results of computer-simulated forecasts calculated by a team of statisticians recruited from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”).   It was the culmination of a two-year study undertaken by the MIT team under the nominal heading of Jay Forrester and Dennis Meadows.  The Limits to Growth is arguably the most influential book about “sustainability.”   It became the bible and blueprint of the new anti-humanist movement that birthed today’s Green New Deal agenda.

The Club of Rome’s The Limits to Growth is not only Malthusian in principle, but a survey of its bibliography reveals that it is also backed by extensive citations from an array of Malthusian-eugenicists and affiliated institutions that have been dedicated to population control.

A 2012 article celebrating the book’s 40th anniversary stated: “It is worth revisiting Limits [to Growth] today because, more than any other book, it introduced the concept of anthropocentric [human caused] climate change to a mass audience.”  It’s worth revisiting Limits to Growth for other reasons as well.

One reason is that The Limits to Growth was the first of its kind to fuse global temperature with economic variables like population growth, resource loss, and the under-defined category of “pollution.” By utilising linear equations to extrapolate trends into the future, Meadows and his co-authors, one of whom was his wife, had set the stage for two major fallacies:

  • The fabric of physical space-time shaping the discoverable universe is intrinsically non-linear and thus not expressible by any form of linear equations regardless of the computing power involved. Human creative mentation is most explicitly non-linear as it is tied to non-formalisable states of existence like inspiration, love of truth, dignity, and beauty which no binary system can approximate.  The Club of Rome programmers ignored these facts and assumed the universe was as binary as their software.
  • The data sets themselves could easily be skewed and re-framed according to the controllers of the computer programmers who aspired to shape government policy. We have already seen how this technique was used to drive fallacious results of future scenarios under the hand of Imperial College’s Neil Ferguson and the same technique has been applied in ecological modelling as well.

Another reason to revisit The Limits to Growth is to highlight the influence it had and still has on supranational organisations.  For decades, New Age guru Barbara Marx Hubbard – who called for one-fourth of the human population to be culled to usher in a New World Order – championed transhumanism and Malthusian sustainable development, which is the crux of The Great Reset and the Fourth Industrial Revolution.  Hubbard’s Malthusian overpopulation theories were partly inspired by The Limits to Growth. In fact, in Hubbard’s Book of Co-Creation, there are multiple passages which warn of Malthusian “limits to growth” that could lead to ecological catastrophes. She also met personally with Club of Rome co-founder, Aurelio Peccei who prompted the World Economic Forum to adopt the Malthusian tenets of The Limits to Growth at the World Economic Forum’s Third Annual Meeting in 1973.

Last, but not least, we have Club of Rome member and author of Limits to Growth, who manipulated his predictive modelling, hoping that a dictatorship will slowly and “peacefully” cull 86% of the world’s population. 

No one should be celebrating The Limits to Growth or the agenda it’s promoting because it’s promoting your demise.

Sources for this article include:

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

3.8 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

46 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brin Jenkins
Brin Jenkins
25 days ago

I read and believed limits to growth, I had a motor business at the time and acted on the book, can I hold him responsible for bad advice based on bad science?

Brin Jenkins
Brin Jenkins
25 days ago

Perhaps if he led by his own example we might be more persuaded?

Eddie Leong
Eddie Leong
Reply to  Brin Jenkins
25 days ago

Childish remark…you are suggesting he kills himself first? We need to listen to scientists who are not hell-bent on genocide but sees a dire future.

Islander
Islander
25 days ago

Nice man-NOT.

pierre
pierre
25 days ago

when starting to cull these billions can we start these people 1st in line to show us all (the rest of the world) they mean business 😀 i bet they will as far fro. the cue as possible hahaha

biggrump
biggrump
Reply to  pierre
25 days ago

Exactly what I was going to post.👍

trackback
25 days ago

[…] læsetips: Author of ‘The Limits to Growth’ promotes the genocide of 86% of the world’s population og Current events suggest Deagel’s Apocalyptic Depopulation Forecast for 2025 is not just an […]

pablovian
pablovian
25 days ago

This article is nonsense. If one starts with available net energy, which is declining, and divides by population, which is increasing, Meadows’ statements become truisms. In addition, Meadows never mentions genocide; and nothing he says is anti-human. .

Vita
Vita
25 days ago

These criminals are murderers. They need to be brought to justice. They have been conspiring for decades for this horrific mass depopulation. 

They have introduced nanotechnology into all these injections, tests and masks, knowing full well that it will kill and injure and act like a time bomb that will kill and injure even more people over time.

Eddie Leong
Eddie Leong
25 days ago

I support Dennis Meadows thinking. He does not have the solutions but he sees an unsustainable world with such high populations. What is there to stop world population from becoming 12 billion or higher?

Whether it is national debt or population, there are limits to sustainability. No global solutions. Perhaps Covid was launched as quick way to kill billions since the world’s governments could not unite to do it together.

Will China wants to reduce its 1.4 billion to say, 300 million? Surely not. Its population size and economic growth is vital for its growing global power.

India has just exceeded China’s 1.4 billion. Will it agree to a drastic reduction to 300 million? Definitely not. Will Africa collectively reduce its 1.3 billion plus population to 300 million? Impossible.

I step back from labels like Club of Rome, Davos Club, etc. The world faces a terrible future…a total collapse unless it can control its population growth. The UN is not able to do it. Davos Club is not able to do it.

I have no solutions either but Nature and Man will force the solutions upon us. And it will be drastic.

Eddie Leong
Eddie Leong
25 days ago

The issue: How to reduce total world population. Not easy. Depending on aging and childbirth reduction will take decades. Can the world produce enough energy and food? Not possible.

Can the world find enough jobs? Impossible.

So, what solutions are there? It is not Climate Change. It has to be Population reduction and fast or Nature will impose its will…mass starvation

I will listen to Dennis Meadows closely and see if I can derive any wisdom. I share the same concerns..the world is over-populated but has no solutions on what to do.

Eddie Leong
Eddie Leong
25 days ago

Dennis is a calm scientist. He is not promoting mass murders. He has no viable solutions. He sees a world in great danger of food and energy shortage. He sees possible disasters from Nature.

Let’s not demonise those who talks about unsustainable world population. His views of reducing to 1 billion may be too drastic. He cannot dictate to the world. Look at the total reasoning not pick on a sentence.

fighting gnome
fighting gnome
Reply to  Eddie Leong
24 days ago

Dennis is a “Calm scientist” he is not promoting mass murders…well what exact terminology would a person use to describe a man who sees a solution of getting rid of 7 Billion people….”in a civilized and fair way” anything other than a Cull which means Killing people ? isnt that what we do to Animals in slaughter houses ?

Are You OK with this letting your loved ones be killed because the so called “Elites” who have been so called “Stewards of the Planet” have suddenly decided we all have to “take one for the Team”.

They have been so busy exploiting the ever expanding population for generations…. they ignored the fact that there are too many people,.because they were making so much money from us all, now they have run out of Runway they are busy asset stripping the planets wealth from people before they execute them …by the way if you took the Jab you are one of the people they are “reducing” in a “Civilized fair way” (according to these psychopaths)
The Elites have always tried to kill the people off , the world wars were no coincidence, neither was the Spanish flu…history has a habit of repeating itself…you can dress Murder up with as much Tinsel as you like ….but its still Murder, currently via the Jabs.

Robbi
Robbi
25 days ago

He’s a liar…As, even with a population of 1,00,000,000,000; THERE WILL HAVE TO BE THOSE TRANSHUMANISTICALLY ALTERED SLAVES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SOCIAL LADDER PROVIDING FOR SERVICE AT COMMANDS UPON DEMAND, YESTERDAY.
It isn’t about his Earth, Climate Change or Energy Gods…It’s about the TERROR; the HORROR resulting from inagining the ‘dirty, unwashed, starving masses RISING-UP TO TAKE DOWN the ‘Royal Institution’s International Foreign Affairs Committee’ with all their TREASONOUS BENEDICT ARNOLDS ON THE TAKE AROUND THE WORLD; ONCE AND FOR ALL FOLLOWING 1000 YEARS OF PERPETRATED SATANIC EVIL UPON EVEN THEIR OWN FAMILY MEMBERS WHILE MAKING THEIR CHILDREN WATCH THE HORROR from the time they were the ‘Venetian BLACK Nobility’ with NOTHING NOBLE ABOUT THEM IN ANY WAY AT ALL.

Psycho-Sociopathic Predators will ALWAYS DEMAND THEIR VICTIMS; ‘THEIR HUMAN HERD’ TO DO AS THEY WILL…As, forcing diets of insects, metals and Graphene Oxide to provide the self-assembly of Blue Tooth Electronics within human beings activated with radiation and frequencies as they once used to promote healing from disease and injury.

EXACTLY WHO DO THESE SATANIC DEMONS WEARING HUMAN BEING SUITS THINK THEY’RE TRYING TO DECEIVE WITH THIS BOVINE FECAL MATTER?

Wellsy
Wellsy
25 days ago

There is no population crisis now or any where in the near future. The entire population of the earth could stand together in an area the size of Los Angeles( verify this yourself). There is enough land to grow plenty of crops but not the will to distribute it. Nuclear power can provide masses of electricity cleanly we can have as much as we want but again we don’t have the will to do it.
I am surprised so many comments here go along with this doomsday scenario.

Linus Ndonga
Linus Ndonga
Reply to  Wellsy
24 days ago

One can never put it better. Any population crisis is the figment of the imagination of the Dystopians who are creating the bioweapons such as COVID-19 and its jabs to carry out diabolical experiments with humanity and which is part of the conspiracy

Karen Bracken
Karen Bracken
25 days ago

The earth is NOT overpopulated and they know it BUT if your goal is to seal off 75% of all land to any human presence (which is the goal) then yes we are over populated because it would awfully dificult to squeeze 9 billion people in just 25% of the world surface. AND it is impossible to monitor 9 billion people. 1 billion is doable though. WAKE UP PEOPLE. Take another needle in your for ANY reason and you are assisting them in their global genocide.

trackback
25 days ago

[…] Read More: Author of ‘The Limits to Growth’ promotes the genocide of 86% of the world’s popul… […]

trackback
25 days ago

[…] Read More: Author of ‘The Limits to Growth’ promotes the genocide of 86% of the world’s popul… […]

trackback
25 days ago

[…] Author of ‘The Limits to Growth’ promotes the genocide of 86% of the world’s population Dennis Meadows, one of the main authors of the Club of Rome’s The Limits to Growth, is an honorary member of the Club of Rome and a member of the World Economic Forum.  If you thought his ideology had softened and become less anti-human since the publishing of his book, you’d be wrong. […]

trackback
24 days ago

[…] Author of ‘The Limits to Growth’ promotes the genocide of 86% of the world’s population […]

johnny
johnny
24 days ago

This is what a Megalomaniac , a Mentally disturbed person Looks like

margue
margue
Reply to  johnny
24 days ago

Unfortunately they somehow get into positions of power. Look at the British Government especially over the last three years; some would say since 1997.

trackback
24 days ago

[…] Author of ‘The Limits to Growth’ promotes the genocide of 86% of the world’s popul… […]

Rose
Rose
24 days ago

Please write an article about how much of the earth is populated, how much of the earth is explored for natural resources. We are so tired of the “over populated” expression coming out from short minded individuals who are locked in their tiny box full of propaganda and all they can do is to repeat what others tell them. Thank you.

trackback
23 days ago

[…] Jak je zřejmé, není náhoda, že se Meadowsova slova shodují se slovy globálního hodnocení biologické rozmanitosti, které bylo poprvé představeno na konferenci OSN o změně klimatu COP1 v roce 1995, které uvádí: […]

trackback
23 days ago

[…] By: Rhoda Wilson via The Expose May 4, […]

trackback
23 days ago

[…] Diposting Oleh: Rhoda Wilson melalui The Expose […]

LOREN
LOREN
23 days ago

For a definition of the word “Repugnant”– just watch and listen to this man talk; for a definition of what form of waste material needs depopulating immediately– see this man, Dennis Meadows. Shocking, how he’s willing to confess to murder: intentional, planned, genocide. He’s confessing to what’s going on, still going on — with the lethal injection, with the wars, with the food demolition events. Remarkable.

trackback
23 days ago

[…] Pôvodný zdroj tohto článku je The Expose […]

trackback
22 days ago

[…] The original source of this article is The Expose […]

trackback
20 days ago

[…] The doomsday “World Dynamics” model was the basis for the COR’s book ‘Limits to Growth’.  There are, in fact, two models: a World2 model that was developed by Forrester in 1971; and, by adding new features to the World2 model, Meadows produced the World3 model.  Both the models and COR’s book were the product of Forrester and Meadows.  The same Meadows who is an honorary member of the COR and who during an interview in 2017 promoted the genocide of 86% of the world’s population. […]

trackback
18 days ago

[…] according to the desired outcome of controllers of the computer programmers.  And as we mentioned in a previous article, it appears this is exactly what the models used to produce The Limits to Growth […]

trackback
17 days ago

[…] Author of ‘The Limits to Growth’ promotes the genocide of 86% of the world’s population […]

trackback
15 days ago

[…] El modelo apocalíptico de la “Dinámica mundial” fue la base del libro de la COR ‘ Los límites del crecimiento ‘. Hay, de hecho, dos modelos: un modelo World2 que fue desarrollado por Forrester en 1971; y, al agregar nuevas características al modelo World2, Meadows produjo el modelo World3. Tanto los modelos como el libro de COR fueron producto de Forrester and Meadows. El mismo Meadows que es miembro honorario de la COR y que durante una entrevista en 2017 promovió el genocidio del 86% de la población mundial . […]

trackback
15 days ago

[…] highlighting comments by Club of Rome co-founder Alexander King, co-author of The Limits to Growth Dennis Meadows, the Godfather of climate change Maurice Strong and founder of management cybernetics Anthony […]

trackback
14 days ago

[…] highlighting comments by Club of Rome co-founder Alexander King, co-author of The Limits to Growth Dennis Meadows, the Godfather of climate change Maurice Strong and founder of management cybernetics Anthony […]