Breaking News

Documents from Germany’s public health agency reveal the decision to “lockdown” was political

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

On 17 March 2020, at the beginning of the covid hysteria, the Robert Koch Institute (“RKI”) changed its risk assessment from “moderate” to “high” overnight. Five days later, on 22 March, public life in Germany came to a standstill.

The RKI is Germany’s government agency public health agency responsible for disease control and prevention. Documents relating to its crisis team’s proceedings were previously regarded as confidential. However, investigative journalists from the magazine Multipolar submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to find out what information the RKI had when they made their decisions.

When the RKI failed to respond, Multipolar filed a lawsuit which compelled RKI to produce the documents.  But the documents have been heavily redacted.

The documents that have now been forcibly published by the RKI obviously have political explosive power, Deutschland Kurier reported, because a name that is critical to the decision made on 17 March is blacked out. What are they covering up?


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


As Deutschland Kurier noted, the lockdown imposed in Germany on 22 March 2020 led to restrictions on fundamental rights that were unprecedented in the history of the Federal Republic: daycare centres and schools were closed; there were bans on visiting old people’s homes and general curfews.

“Public life came to a standstill. A quarter of children and young people are still suffering psychologically from the consequences of the covid hysteria,” Deutschland Kurier said.

The RKI, which is subordinate to the German Federal Ministry of Health, was forced to make more than 1,000 pages public after a lawsuit from the online magazine ‘Multipolar’. The pages include the minutes of the covid crisis team meetings from January 2020 to April 2021, mostly led by the then president of the RKI, Lothar Wieler, and his deputy, Lars Schaade, who is now head of the authority.

Multipolar’s Freedom of Information Act request, on which the subsequent lawsuit was based, was made in May 2021. It said:

RKI failed to answer.  So, Multipolar filed a lawsuit and a long tug-of-war between Multipolar’s lawyers and the RKI’s lawyers ensued.

In February 2023, the Administrative Court of Berlin warned the RKI that it should conclude the processing of the documents as the court would “probably fully uphold” Multipolar’s claim.

In April 2023, the RKI provided heavily redacted documents, seemingly to avoid a verdict by the court.  According to Mulitpolar, it is estimated that more than a thousand passages have been blacked out.

“The redactions go so far that in some cases even the simple participation of Health Minister Jens Spahn in a crisis team meeting is concealed, even though at the time the ministry made its participation publicly known on Twitter,” Multipolar said.

In July 2023, Multipolar filed a lawsuit against the redactions.

In January 2024, the court announced a date for the oral hearing and taking of evidence. The hearing is scheduled for Monday, 6 May 2024.

Multipolar was initially going to wait for the court’s verdict before publishing the redacted documents but as they explained:

Deutschland Kurier summed up the sequence of events according to the documents that Multipolar has now made public and what can be deduced from the documents so far:

The process to force RKI to be transparent has so far cost Multipolar about 15,000 euros.

Featured image: the RKI vice president Lars Schaade and RKI president Lothar Wieler at a press conference on 27 February 2020.  Source: Multipolar

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
brinsleyjenkins
brinsleyjenkins
1 month ago

Those who took the descision for this should face consequences.

bluearea
bluearea
Reply to  brinsleyjenkins
1 month ago

I agree and not even an apology for their corruption, they need to fired and never be in leadership of humans again, discuss of them

Jim
Jim
Reply to  bluearea
30 days ago

They should be slain !

SuziAlkamyst
SuziAlkamyst
30 days ago

Well of course the decision to lockdown etc., was a political decision…When there is a pandemic, a plague, people drop dead in the streets, people around one, in ones village, town, city, die by the hundreds; the ONLY pictures of that happening was the one little video from Wuhan!!! I saw no one drop dead and know far more people died from the refusal of the NHS to admit people feeling sick, instead telling them to go home until they’re nearly dead, as did far more people die in old age homes from actions authorised by politicians!

trackback
30 days ago

[…] – Documents from Germany’s public health agency reveal the decision to “lockdown” was political […]

trackback
28 days ago

[…] Wilsonová, Expose News) Dňa 17. marca 2020, na začiatku covidovej hystérie, nemecký Inštitút Roberta Kocha cez noc […]