Breaking News

Linoleic acid: A key contributing factor in rising cancer rates

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Global cancer incidence is increasing, particularly among those under 50, with a notable rise in breast, uterine, prostate, lung, colorectal, pancreatic, and stomach cancers, with early-onset breast cancer incidence climbing by 3.8% annually between 2016 and 2019.

The global death toll from early-onset cancers has surged by nearly 28% from 1990 to 2019, with predictions indicating a potential rise in mortality rates. The World Health Organisation predicts more than 35 million new cancer cases in 2050 – a 77% increase from the estimated 20 million cancer cases that occurred in 2022.

A significant factor in the increase in cancer cases is likely the covid injection. However, Dr. Mercola is convinced that excessive intake of linoleic acid (“LA”) was already a key issue contributing to rising cancer rates before the covid era.

Dietary changes, particularly the increase in obesity and consumption of processed foods rich in LA, a polyunsaturated fat found in seed oils, have been identified as major contributors to the rising cancer rates.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Why Are so Many Young People Getting Cancer?

By Dr. Joseph Mercola

According to the latest statistics, global cancer incidence is on the rise, especially among younger people. Between 1990 and 2019, incidence of 29 cancers rose worldwide in those younger than 50, with rates rising faster among women. Cancers on the rise include breast, uterine, prostate, lung, colorectal, pancreatic and stomach cancers.

Between 2016 and 2019, early-onset breast cancer incidence rose by 3.8% annually.1 As reported by the journal Nature in mid-March 2024,2 even teens are now being diagnosed with “improbable” cancers previously only seen in seniors, such as advanced gastrointestinal cancers. And it’s not just happening in the US. Oncologists in China and India have also noted this trend.3 According to Nature:4

Likely Culprits

The conventional medical model is beyond clueless when they believe the solution for this dilemma is better screening. This is unadulterated nonsense and fails to address the cause, which is a disruption in the microbiome that obliterates the healthy obligate anaerobes in the large intestine.

When your body fails to make enough cellular energy because the mitochondria are dysfunctional as a result of being regularly poisoned by LA and oestrogen, they simply are unable to maintain an environment that allows the healthy beneficial bacteria to grow.

When the beneficial bacteria disappear, they are replaced by facultative anaerobes that tolerate oxygen, as a result of the lack of competitive inhibition by the beneficial bacteria. It is these bacteria that are increasing GI cancers, not a lack of screening.

Excessive LA Intake Promotes Cancer

The Nature article7 does, however, point to there being a dietary culprit, stating “The prominence of gastrointestinal cancers and the coincidence with dietary changes in many countries point to the rising rates of obesity and diets rich in processed foods as likely culprits in contributing to rising case rates.”

While the Nature article does not go into specifics about what it might be about our modern diets that contribute to cancer, my own research has singled out linoleic acid (“LA”) – an omega-6 fat found in seed oils (and hence most processed foods) – as a key contributor.

Like other experts in bioenergetic medicine, I’m convinced that chronic diseases such as Type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer’s and cancer are bioenergetic diseases rooted in dysfunctional metabolism resulting in poor energy production, and polyunsaturated fats (“PUFAs”) appear to be a primary contributing factor in this chain of events. As reported by bioenergetic researcher Georgi Dinkov in an October 2022 blog post:8

The study10 published in Antioxidants & Redox Signalling highlights the increased risk diabetic patients face in developing several types of cancer, including hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer and breast cancer.

This elevated risk is attributed to several factors that promote cancer growth in diabetic individuals. These factors include insulin resistance, hyperglycaemia, dyslipidemia, chronic inflammation, and elevated levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). These conditions contribute to reductive stress that disrupts the body’s redox balance. As explained by the authors:11

4-HNE Linked to Obesity and Cancer

In her book, ‘Deep Nutrition: Why Your Genes Need Traditional Food’,12 Dr. Cate Shanahan details the hazards of 4-HNE, which forms during the processing of most vegetable oils. 4-HNE is highly toxic to gut bacteria and consumption of 4-HNE has been correlated with having an obesogenic balance of gut flora.

4-HNE is also cytotoxic (toxic to cells), causes DNA damage, and instigates free radical cascades that damage the mitochondrial membrane. As noted by Shanahan in a 2017 interview:

Importantly, 4-HNE occurs even if the oil is obtained from organic crops. It’s an intrinsic byproduct of the refining and processing of the oil, no matter how healthy the oil initially was.

Elevated LA Destroys Mitochondrial Function

Dinkov’s blog also draws attention to another noteworthy study,13 albeit its focus is on Alzheimer’s Disease instead of cancer. The study reveals that individuals with Alzheimer’s have cells that are inefficient at producing energy.

This inefficiency stems from a deficiency in glycocholic acid and an excess of LA. Essentially, LA triggers the production of damaging reactive oxygen species (“ROS”), which then hampers the cells’ ability to generate energy.

Moreover, PUFAs, like LA, disrupt your body’s hormonal equilibrium, imitating the effects of oestrogen and cortisol while counteracting androgens and progesterone. Additionally, they alter cellular interactions with water, making cells more water-attracting. Dinkov suggests that these effects, beyond merely generating ROS, play a much more critical role in the harmful effects of PUFAs on a wide variety of chronic diseases, including cancer.

Seed Oils Undermine Your Health in Myriad Ways

In summary, seed oils in general, and LA in particular, have been shown to harm health by:14

Make your fat cells more insulin-sensitive, thereby causing insulin resistance.15
Creating high amounts of oxidation products when used in cooking (as they are very susceptible to heat), including aldehydes, which are what cause oxidised low-density lipoprotein (“LDL”) associated with heart disease. Aldehydes also crosslink tau protein and create neurofibrillary tangles, thereby contributing to the development of neurodegenerative diseases.
Damaging the endothelium (the cells lining your blood vessels) and causing an increase in penetration of LDL and very low-density lipoprotein (“VLDL”) particles into the subendothelium.16 In other words, these oils get integrated in your cell and mitochondrial membranes, and once these membranes are damaged, it sets the stage for all sorts of health problems. With a half-life of 600 to 680 days,17 it can take years to clear them out of your body. They also get incorporated into tissues such as your heart and brain.
Damaging your mitochondria and DNA by making your cell membranes more permeable, allowing things to enter that shouldn’t.
Making the cell membrane less fluid, which impacts hormone transporters in the cell membrane and slows your metabolic rate.
Inhibiting cardiolipin,18 an important component of the inner membrane of your mitochondria that needs to be saturated in DHA to perform optimally and facilitate optimal function of the electron transport chain and production of ATP. Cardiolipin can be likened to a cellular alarm system that triggers apoptosis (cell death) by signalling caspase-3 when something goes wrong with the cell. If the cardiolipin is not saturated with DHA, it cannot signal caspase-3, and hence apoptosis does not occur. As a result, dysfunctional cells are allowed to continue to grow, which can turn into a cancerous cell.
Inhibiting the removal of senescent cells, i.e., aged, damaged or crippled cells that have lost the ability to reproduce and produce inflammatory cytokines that rapidly accelerate disease and aging.
Stripping your liver of glutathione (which produces antioxidant enzymes), thereby lowering your antioxidant defences.19
Inhibiting delta-6 desaturase (delta-6), an enzyme involved in the conversion of short-chained omega-3s to longer chained omega-3s in your liver.20
Exposing you to toxic 4-HNE, which is highly toxic to gut bacteria, causes DNA damage, and instigates free radical cascades that damage your mitochondrial membranes.21
Exposing you to glyphosate residues, as most vegetable oils are made with genetically engineered crops. Glyphosate has been shown to disrupt the tight junctions in your gut and increase penetration of foreign invaders, especially heated proteins, which can cause allergies.

How to Avoid These Dangerous Fats

Considering the profoundly serious damage they cause, eliminating seed oils from your diet can go a long way toward improving your health. This includes soy, canola, sunflower, grapeseed, corn, safflower, peanut and rice bran oil.

Also, be mindful of olive oil and avocado oil, as both are commonly adulterated with cheaper seed oils. That said, even pure olive and avocado oil are loaded with LA. If, like me, you’re in the habit of eating olive oil, I would strongly encourage you to limit your intake to 1 tablespoon per day or less. In my view, olive oil is not a magic bullet and if you are already consuming 80 grams of LA per day, it will only worsen, not help, your health.

Additionally, as you can see in the video below from Brad Marshall, whose interview with me will be posted shortly, olive oil is not all it is cracked up to be.

Fire in a Bottle: How Olive Oil Makes You Fat, 26 March 2023 (23 mins)

Read more: How Olive Oil Makes You Fat, Fire in a Bottle, 26 March 2023

To avoid these oils, don’t cook with them, of course, but also avoid processed foods, condiments, fast foods and restaurant foods. If you eat out, you’re undoubtedly eating unhealthy amounts of seed oils, as most restaurant foods are loaded with it.

Fried foods, dressing and sauces tend to be key culprits. Your best bet is to prepare most of your food at home, so you know what you are eating and, in the case of seed oils, what you’re not. Chicken and pork are also high in LA and are therefore best avoided. Since these animals, even healthy organically grown animals, are typically fed grains, they are loaded with omega-6 fats and may have 10 times the LA content that beef, lamb or buffalo do.

How Much Linoleic Acid Is Too Much?

Ideally, consider cutting LA down to below 5 grams per day, which is close to what our ancestors used to get before all of these chronic health conditions – including obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cancer – became widespread. If olive oil puts you over the limit, consider cooking with tallow or lard instead.

If you’re not sure how much you’re eating, enter your food intake into Cronometer – a free online nutrition tracker – and it will provide you with your total LA intake. The key to accurate entry is to carefully weigh your food with a digital kitchen scale so you can enter the weight of your food to the nearest gram.

Cronometer will tell you how much omega-6 you’re getting from your food down to the 10th of a gram, and you can assume 90% of that is LA. Anything over 10 grams is likely to cause problems. To learn more about the biological impact of LA, be sure to watch the video below and/or read through my in-depth report, ‘Linoleic Acid – The Most Destructive Ingredient in Your Diet’.

Dr. Mercola: Linoleic Acid | The Disease-Causing Toxin Lurking in Our Foods, 24 March 2024 (88 mins)

mRNA Injections and Turbo Cancer

The Highwire: Is The Covid Vaccine Causing Turbo Cancers? 22 September 2023 (35 mins)

If you are unable to watch the video above on Rumble, you can watch it on BitChute HERE.

Another significant factor in the increase in cancer cases is likely the covid injection. I’m convinced that excessive intake of LA was already a key issue contributing to rising cancer rates before the covid era. Nonetheless, the introduction of mRNA “vaccines” has compounded the problem.

Specifically, these vaccines seem to be linked to the emergence of “turbo cancers,” which are rapidly growing cancers that often prove fatal. The sheer speed of their growth leaves little opportunity for effective treatment.

Canadian oncologist and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis in The HighWire interview above,22 replacing the uracil in the RNA used in the covid injections with synthetic methylpseudouridine (to improve RNA stability) is known to be problematic.23 When substituting parts of the code in this way, the resulting protein can easily get misfolded, and this has been linked to a variety of chronic diseases.24

Importantly, the insertion of synthetic pseudouridine can suppress your innate immune surveillance by dampening the activity of toll-like receptors, and one downstream effect of that is reduced cancer surveillance.

“The more mRNA shots you take, the greater the immune system damage, the greater your risk of impaired cancer surveillance and hence, the greater your risk of turbo cancer,” Makis says.

The World Health Organisation’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (“IARC”) predicts more than 35 million new cancer cases in 2050 – a 77% increase from the estimated 20 million cancer cases that occurred in 2022.25 Not surprisingly, the same drug companies that made the mRNA injections are now in a race to be the first to come up with new cancer drugs, including Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson.26

mRNA-Based Cancer Drugs Under Development

Disturbingly, many of the cancer drugs currently under development depend on the same mRNA-based technology responsible for the turbo cancer trend in the first place. Here are a handful of notable examples:

  • Personalised cancer vaccines – Companies like BioNTech (which partnered with Pfizer for the covid-19 vaccine) and Moderna have been working on personalized mRNA vaccines for cancer. These vaccines are designed to stimulate the patient’s immune system to target tumours based on the unique mutations in their cancer cells.27
  • mRNA technology for solid tumours – Moderna is also developing an mRNA vaccine targeting solid tumours.28 This approach involves using mRNA to produce tumour-specific antigens inside the body to encourage the immune system to recognise and destroy cancer cells.
  • Combination therapies – Researchers are exploring the combination of mRNA vaccines with existing cancer treatments, such as checkpoint inhibitors, to enhance the immune system’s ability to fight cancer.
  • Neoantigen targeting – Several biotech firms are focusing on neoantigens, which are new antigens that arise due to tumour mutations.29
  • mRNA-based CAR-T cell therapy – Efforts are also being made to combine mRNA technology with CAR-T cell therapy, a type of treatment that modifies a patient’s T-cells to attack cancer cells. mRNA is used to allow CAR-T therapy to be rapidly tailored to different types of cancer.30

Considering the mRNA technology itself appears to produce carcinogenic results, I’d be extremely wary about cancer drugs based on it. Time will tell if they can somehow perfect it, but why wait? As mentioned, excess LA in the diet is a major driver of cancer, with or without the mRNA injections, and that is something you have complete control over.

As discussed in previous articles, you also want to avoid excess oestrogen, which is a major driver of many cancers, especially breast cancer. For a refresher, see ‘What You Need to Know about Oestrogen and Serotonin’.

Sources and References

About the Author

Dr. Joseph Mercola is the founder and owner of Mercola.com, a Board-Certified Family Medicine Osteopathic Physician, a Fellow of the American College of Nutrition and a New York Times bestselling author.  He publishes multiple articles a day covering a wide range of topics on his website Mercola.com.

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

3.7 3 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
35 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nicole
Nicole
1 month ago

An Ancestral traditional diet is the healthiest for humans.
Our bodies have not adapted, nor are they designed to eat this modern-day crap!
We should be doing the complete OPPOSITE of everything THEY recommend!
Why are they trying to destroy farms and getting rid of meat? Because it’s literally the healthiest thing for your body and brain.
Why are they blocking the sun with Geoengineering and telling us to wear chemical-laden sunscreen? To prevent us from getting precious vitamin D and to give us skin cancers.
As Mercola has mentioned in previous articles, Linoleic Acid causes detrimental changes in the body and contributes to many cancers including skin cancer and it takes seven years to get the stuff out of your body!
Forcing us to eat insects? They’re full of cancer-causing chitin and loaded with PARASITES (their very favourite!)
The list goes on and on…
Best to stick to with 100% pasture-raised/grass-fed red meat and eggs, raw dairy if tolerated, wild-caught seafood, lard, ghee and butter from pasture-raised cows, and homegrown and/or organic veg and herbs and small amounts of fruit, nuts, seeds and honey for the most part.
It can be difficult to source these and expensive but it can be done and we can only do our best.

LemmingNo1
LemmingNo1
Reply to  Nicole
1 month ago

All true but seed oils were used 60 years ago, we still didn’t get this level of cancer cases and turbo cancers. Because of it the article is a diversion in this form. Especially that level we are experiencing in the past 4 years.

What has changed then?

  1. Antennas and satellites, smart meters by the tons
  2. The vax with a stuff which fortifies the effect of radiation coming from 1.
Nicole
Nicole
Reply to  LemmingNo1
1 month ago

I completely agree with you and you’re right – it is multi-faceted, it’s never just one thing, especially with cancer.
As you say, the increase in EMFs, etc plays a HUGE role, along with ALL vaccines, especially the ‘covid’ injections which have been proven by several reliable experts to contain terrifying things, most worryingly all of the Nanotech which is being manipulated by frequencies/5G, etc. (See the work of La Quinta Columna, Dr Ana Mihalcea, Karen Kingston, Dr David Nixon.. also Celeste Solum is all over the SynBio stuff).
It seems pretty clear to me that ‘covid’ is Radiation Poisoning/sickness. They’ve been doing it for decades, same old playbook (see Dr Lee Merritt).
I do believe that diet plays a major role in all of this though.
If seeds are organic, cold-pressed and consumed fresh then I can’t see a problem when eaten in small amounts.
I guess one of the main issues is that these toxic seed oils are so highly processed and heated at extremely high temperatures over and over and they are also usually GMO and saturated with pesticides like glyphosate – a proven carcinogen/causes cancer.
\And they are in EVERYTHING, especially all processed foods.
Zen Honeycutt from CHD is an expert in this area along with Scientist Stephanie Sennef (sp?)
I always keep in mind if it’s not Natural, don’t touch it.

A Person
A Person
1 month ago

“2024—First Year the US Expects More than 2M New Cases of CancerThe American Cancer Society reports lower overall cancer death rates, yet incidence is increasing for many common cancers, including 6 of the top 10.

Published on: January 17, 2024″

From the cancer dot org website

A Person
A Person
Reply to  A Person
1 month ago

cancer (dot) org/research/acs-research-news/facts-and-figures-2024 (dot) html#:~:text=2024%E2%80%94First%20Year%20the%20US,6%20of%20the%20top%2010

LemmingNo1
LemmingNo1
Reply to  A Person
1 month ago

If a blood clot finishes someone the one never would discover that the cancer has started, too. Animals die to strokes and heart failures just like humans, it’s very telling isn’t it?

A Person
A Person
Reply to  LemmingNo1
1 month ago

Well, yes. Arthur Firstenberg mentioned, for example, in his book “The Invisible Rainbow” about the heart failures in animals and how it could not be blamed on diet like in can in people, because the zoo’s diet remained unchanged:

Whatever environmental factor was affecting human beings in America during the 1930s and 1940s was also affecting all the animals in the Philadelphia Zoo.

The Laboratory of Comparative Pathology was a unique facility founded at the zoo in 1901. And from 1916 to 1964, laboratory director Herbert Fox and his successor, Herbert L. Ratcliffe, kept complete records of autopsies performed on over thirteen thousand animals that had died in the zoo. 

During this period, arteriosclerosis increased an astonishing ten- to twenty-fold among all species of mammals and birds. In 1923, Fox had written that such lesions were “exceedingly rare,” occurring in less than two percent of animals as a minor and incidental finding at autopsy. The incidence rose rapidly during the 1930s, and by the 1950s arteriosclerosis was not only occurring in young animals, but was often the cause of their death rather than just a finding on autopsy. By 1964, the disease occurred in one-quarter of all mammals and thirty-five percent of all birds. 

Coronary heart disease appeared even more suddenly. In fact, before 1945 the disease did not exist in the zoo. And the first heart attacks ever recorded in zoo animals occurred ten years later, in 1955. Arteriosclerosis had been occurring with some regularity since the 1930s in the aorta and other arteries, but not in the coronary arteries of the heart. But sclerosis of the coronary arteries now increased so rapidly among both mammals and birds that by 1963, over 90 percent of all mammals and 72 percent of all birds that died in the zoo had coronary disease, while 24 percent of the mammals and 10 percent of the birds had had heart attacks…

Diet had nothing to do with these changes. The increase in arteriosclerosis had begun well before 1935, the year that more nutritious diets were introduced throughout the zoo. And coronary disease did not make its appearance until ten years later, yet the animals’ diets were the same at all times between 1935 and 1964…

…The element that increased most spectacularly in the environment during the 1950s when coronary disease was exploding among humans and animals was radio frequency (RF) radiation. Before World War II, radio waves had been widely used for only two purposes: radio communication, and diathermy, which is their therapeutic use in medicine to heat parts of the body…”

Nicole
Nicole
Reply to  A Person
1 month ago

That’s fascinating information, thanks for sharing.
Unfortunately I’m not surprised.
This IS a mass depopulation agenda after all and we are all under MASSIVE attack from multiple vectors!

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Nicole
1 month ago

Thanks, Nicole. It’s a long book but has some interesting things in it.

Mary Ann Dowrick
Mary Ann Dowrick
Reply to  A Person
1 month ago

Forgive me but the ACS is probably one of the last agencies I would look to for any data or information on cancer. The last.

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Mary Ann Dowrick
1 month ago

No problem at all, Mary 🙂. I take a lot of big company claims with a grain of salt so I understand the skepticism.

Nevertheless, I found it interesting that even the society that is supposed to help us battle cancer and receives mega bucks of donations each year to do that claims that there are more cases of cancer this year than any other.

LemmingNo1
LemmingNo1
1 month ago

The no1 cancer causing stuff is wireless radiation, period. With or without a graphene oxide based vaccine. Then their vaccines and other poisons inc seed oils.

Heart cancer was unheard of in the past, never existed. Now you can cause it to labrats with a cell phone, also sarcoma with microchip.

Mercola is a gatekeeper.

Nicole
Nicole
Reply to  LemmingNo1
1 month ago

I don’t know about Mercola being a gatekeeper, he is the no.1 censored person in the U.S.
I just think that so many experts have a different take on what’s causing cancer.
I guess that the most important thing is for us to take responsibility for our own health and to keep it all as simple, healthy and as NATURAL as possible – mind, body and soul.

SAbi2
SAbi2
Reply to  Nicole
1 month ago

Have a look…

mercola.JPG
Nicole
Nicole
Reply to  SAbi2
1 month ago

Thanks SAbi. I love their work, also the Baileys and I completely agree with them on the whole ‘virus’ thing. There’s also an excellent video on it by Spacebusters that explains it very well.
I’m not saying that I agree with everything that Mercola says or believes and I certainly don’t agree with his beliefs on viruses, but he does have a thorough knowledge of a lot of things health-related, nutrition, etc. which I find interesting and helpful.
Mercola may very well change his mind in light of all of the evidence, who knows!

ZuckerRat
ZuckerRat
1 month ago

Umm… ya. I do not disagree that LA is not health promoting. I also don’t disagree with the idea that people should be eating less processed food… Much less.

But, there is scads of evidence coming to light (much of it, censored and redacted) about what is really causing these aggressive “turbo cancers” and the return of very aggressive cancers in people who have been in remission for years or decades.

Connect the dots. Anti-parasitics such as ivermectin were known to be very effective against COVID-19. It would appear that the 🥕 Is causing the onset or return of extremely aggressive cancers that oncologists have no idea what to do with because they don’t respond to treatments in the usual way. Again, there is lots of evidence coming for that yet more anti-parasitic such as ivermectin and fenbendazole are effective cancer treatments, even in late stage.Hmm. Covid. Cancer. Parasites? Is there a connection there? Dr. Lee Merritt and many others seem to think so. Do an Internet search for what she thinks about that idea. Parasitologists in many cases know that a parasite cyst and a cancer cell look almost identical. Oncologists do not appear to have caught up yet. It’s true… Maybe it is difficult to get someone to understand something when their livelihood depends on them not understanding…

Surely I can’t be the only one who sees these dots and the lines are connecting them.

Nicole
Nicole
Reply to  ZuckerRat
1 month ago

You are 100% correct, I completely agree with you and I’m seeing exactly what you are. Lee Merritt is brilliant! She’s right on target with her analysis with the whole agenda and backs it all up with ample evidence from the past.
They LOVE using parasites against us don’t they! THEY are the parasites!
I read recently that since the 1800s, doctors were calling parasites cancer. They are one and the same. Then big pharma buried it all and covered up the truth about cancer so that they could make their billions. Give everyone cancer with their toxic vaccines, food, EMFs (and the rest), keep them sick, make a fortune and kill the rest.
We are in the fight of our lives, I’m glad that God has my back.

SAbi2
SAbi2
Reply to  ZuckerRat
1 month ago

I am afraid the connection is not what you think.

It was also Merritt earlier, a year ago or so, who had a podcast where she told that these drugs changed the electrical charge of the cells. The problem are not the parasites (whether they are there or not) but the depleted or changed electrical charge – which again leads us back to the radiation and the radiation fortifying stuff in the vax.
A hundred years ago or so there was a diet – Budwig if I recall her name well – which cured allegedly successfully cancer ridden people, the base of the diet was cottage cheese mixed with a certain oil for the chemical reaction which gave back to the necessary energy to the cells to start self healing.

High dose of Vit C acts similarly, that’s why it is a good-for-everything medicine if administered IV.

You can see the effect of radiation (itself) on red-blood cells, it depletes their energy and they don’t repel each other anymore. They start to stuck together (Rouleaux formation) but normally when the exposure is over they go back normal with time. However with the graphene oxide in the body they have no chance to go back normal as the radiation (poisoning) is constant.

Some naturopath docs claimed that parasites appears and live in the body only if the body has too much heavy metals, parasites are there to help to get rid of them.

Nicole
Nicole
Reply to  SAbi2
1 month ago

Wow! That’s very interesting info.

A Person
A Person
Reply to  SAbi2
1 month ago

Oh, so parasites are the good guys? People are suggesting to take stuff to kill the internal parasites!

I’ve seen Rouleaux formation in the blood of those who took the scamdemic poison shots, e.g. the German study from a couple of years ago, where they looked at the blood of 4 poisoned and 4 unpoisoned people under the microscope

brighteon (dot) com/799e4497-a2a9-49c5-91ea-ee99ee30c179

but didn’t realise that Rouleaux formation also comes from radiation exposure, although a brief internet search brings up confirmation, such as the study “Effects of mobile phone radiation on certain hematological parameters” by Bindhu Christopher, et al., which says in it “A recent report, points to degeneration of blood quality even after short-term cell phone radiation exposure, both in a passive condition in the pocket as well as in active use. The blood cells were found to have Rouleaux formation (groups of red blood cells (RBC) stacked together in a long chain) which would result in lowering oxygen transport and in reducing waste removal mechanism”sciencedirect (dot) com/science/article/abs/pii/S0969806X19305481#:~:text=The%20blood%20cells%20were%20found,in%20reducing%20waste%20removal%20mechanism.

So the Rouleaux formation effects are possible confirmation of ‘COVID’ being the effects of radiation as well as the jabs. Interesting, SAbi2.

Mary Ann Dowrick
Mary Ann Dowrick
1 month ago

Dr Mercola banned me for 24 hrs for criticising this article. When every oncologist around is pointing to the covid vaxxes as promoters of cancer, why suddenly for two days in a row is Dr Mercola’s linoleic oil info now repeated on expose? I find it worrying that despite top scientists discussing concerns cancer in young people is on the increase post covid jabs, along comes dr Mercola’s article blaming linoleic oils for the increase and today, expose’ repeating his message. I am confused.

Mania
Mania
Reply to  Mary Ann Dowrick
1 month ago

Yes it seems everything is a cause of cancer other than the Jabs. I’ve never heard of ‘turbo cancer’ until recently.

kal dani
kal dani
Reply to  Mary Ann Dowrick
1 month ago

Pointing to Linolenic acid as cancer causing doesn’t detract from the cancer shots effects.

Dr M was right to ban you for being a silly troublemaker.

Nicole
Nicole
Reply to  Mary Ann Dowrick
1 month ago

Good point Mary Ann, it IS worrying.
I think that there are several causes of cancer but obviously some MAJOR and obvious ones like the ‘covid’ shots!
I think that experts can become narrow-minded in their fields and they need to widen their focus and be open to all possibilities.

SAbi2
SAbi2
Reply to  Nicole
1 month ago

When an expert got an open challenge and fails to answer, that expert is not narrow minded but tries to hide the truth. Sorry.

mercola2.JPG
Nicole
Nicole
Reply to  SAbi2
1 month ago

I appreciate your well-researched info and references, thanks.
Yep, it’s disappointing = (

SAbi2
SAbi2
Reply to  Mary Ann Dowrick
1 month ago

He is also pushing the Sars-Cov2 exists lie, he didn’t bothered to answer when Dr Cowan and Dr Kaufmann challenged him.

Nicole
Nicole
Reply to  SAbi2
1 month ago

Out of his depth?

Michael
Michael
1 month ago

Just wondering if Conjugated linoleic acid from safflower oil is any healthier than linoleic acid

Nicole
Nicole
Reply to  Michael
1 month ago

CLA is good for you and I would get it from organic/pasture raised beef/dairy, not safflower oil.

Johnny B Good
Johnny B Good
1 month ago

Cancer is microparasites
https://www.excelwell.net/drugs

SAbi2
SAbi2
Reply to  Johnny B Good
1 month ago

Where were those microparasites 100 years ago or even earlier?
Same with their beloved viruses.
We should say a good bye at this point to the germ theory if really want a solution.
In most cases it’s more simple. Look for the poison.

I’ve just started to read a very interesting article google-translated from Dutch claiming that even the Black Death was part of / used for a previous reset. One thing is sure, in many-many years ago HBO had a series on Black Death guessing that as the spread couldn’t be explained with that level of slow travel they had, they came up with the idea that the epidemics and pandemics were different illnesses with some similarity.
In a grave having 2000 bodies who died to Plague they found the ‘culprit’ Yersinia just in 11 bodies. Yersinia couldn’t be the cause then.
Another investigation showed that during the pandemic the trees grew very slowly – trees don’t get Plague, it points to a change in the environment, people were complaining about ‘foul’ air and there was mass starvation (and who starves tend to get ill and die anyway).

It’s never a germ, it’s always something else.

Strategos
Strategos
1 month ago