Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Hazel Gray tragically lost both her parents, who died a month apart at the end of 2020 and the beginning of 2021. In a written statement to the UK Covid Inquiry, she described what had happened to her parents in the weeks and days leading up to their deaths.
Her Dad was killed using end-of-life drugs and her Mum was denied the rehabilitative treatment she needed because she tested positive for covid and, despite having poor kidney function, she was put on a drug that was detrimental to kidney function.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The ExposĂ© to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
Hazel Gray, a member of Northern Ireland Covid Bereaved Families for Justice (“NICBF”), submitted written evidence to Module 7 of the UK Covid Inquiry on 9 April 2025 and gave oral evidence a month later on 13 May 2025. According to the Inquiry’s website, Test, Trace and Isolate (Module 7) will “look at, and make recommendations on, the approach to testing, tracing and isolation adopted during the pandemic.”
In a Substack article, Biologyphenom, who has been closely following the Scottish Covid Inquiry, highlighted statements from both Gray’s written evidence and her oral evidence to the UK Covid Inquiry. The highlights noted from her written statement were not included in her oral evidence.
To get a full picture as to what really happened to her parents before their deaths “from covid,” it’s necessary to read her written evidence in conjunction with listening to her oral evidence, Biologyphenom said. It is “disturbing beyond belief!”
In the video below, you can hear Gray’s 23-minute oral testimony. As is usual, before giving oral evidence, Gray was asked to confirm her written statement was true to the best the best of her knowledge and belief, which she did. You can read Gray’s written statement HERE.
Gray’s oral evidence centred around increasing the testing of medical and care staff to prevent vulnerable people from catching covid and what can be improved in the future.
We know that covid PCR tests, even when done to the highest standard, are not able to test whether someone has an infection. We also know that serious questions have been raised about the false positive rate and what the “covid” tests were actually testing for. In 2020, Tanzania proved that anything can test positive for covid, including a goat and a papaya; pupils in the UK were using drops of orange juice on lateral flow tests to get covid positive results; and, some of the primer sequences in the covid PCR test are found in the human genome itself.
In December 2020, a test supplier to the NHS admitted their test could not be used to diagnose covid.  In the same month, another test supplier issued an urgent field notice stating that its tests had been erroneously testing for bacteria. In July 2021, the the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) said the PCR tests were ineffective and would be withdrawn as of 31 December.  In September 2021, Abbott admitted that since July 2021, their covid tests had been faulty and “all positive results are to be considered presumptive.” In October 2021, the UK Health Security Agency (“UKHSA”) admitted that the quality of covid tests used in the UK was poor.
We can conclude then, that Gray’s oral evidence, as guided by the questions being put to her, was more about sticking with the narrative than revealing truths.
Further reading:
- Royal Statistical Society warn majority of School pupil Covid Tests will return false positives!
- Under the cover of covid there’s a deliberate three-pronged attack on our health and our lives using test swabs, face masks and toxins
- Covid “tests” and “vaccines” are delivering a hybrid biological/technological weapon which is activated by 5G, fibre optics and light
- How the PCR test has killed millions – and is still killing!
- PCR tests do not work
However, Gray’s 26-page written statement reveals more. As highlighted by Biologyphenom, Gray’s written statement said:
UK Covid-19 Inquiry|13 May 2025: Shocking testimony evidence by Hazel Gray, Biologyphenom, 13 May 2025Mother
My Mum was in a wheelchair when she went to hospital, and I got the strong impression that, aside from her consultant, she had been written off from her admission because she was in a wheelchair, as well as because of her medical history. (Paragraph 51)
I called the hospital and asked about Mum. A deputy sister who spoke to me said “Any further treatment would be futile.” I could not believe this attitude, and found it so blunt, hurtful and fatalistic. There had never been any doctor or nurse ever mention palliative care to me prior to this. This call distressed me greatly. (Paragraph 52)
It was later suggested to me that my mother was denied rehabilitative treatment because she was continuing to test positive for covid. It is not clear to me that this was a legitimate reason to deny her treatment. (Paragraph 55)
If this is correct then it suggests my mother was improperly denied treatment. It also suggests that the hospital had been testing patients in hospital well after their contagious period had passed, for no apparent benefit. (Paragraph 56)
The disparity between what I had been told about my mother and how I found her further undermined my faith in the hospital, and gave me the impression that certain people in the hospital were trying to prevent me from going in to witness what I did. I understand my mother had been left over the Christmas holiday period (which had been extended due to being over a weekend) with just comfort treatment (fluid under the skin) as her IV access had been lost. I knew I had to get speaking to a doctor urgently but this seemed impossible as no consultants seemed to be available. I rang my own GP in extreme distress at the concerns I had. (Paragraph 60)
My mother’s already poor kidney function had deteriorated due to dehydration over the Christmas period. (Paragraph 62)
On Sunday morning, 17 January, the phone rang, and it was the hospital to tell me that Mum had passed away. The nurse was crying. The nurse said that she had been with Mum during the night and given her medication for her chest. (Paragraph 63)
Glycopynorrium had been given on 16/17th January for the chest rattle. My daughter later looked up the drug and discovered it was detrimental to kidney function. I could tell that he (the consultant) was concerned about what had occurred. I have reservations about the administration of this drug. (Paragraph 64)
Father
My father was admitted to hospital with delirium, which may have been due to covid or to a UTI which he had also contracted around this time. After he was admitted to hospital, I never saw him again, save for a short video call to say goodbye when he was already semi-unconscious and on end-of-life drugs, approximately 36 hours prior to his death. (Paragraph 37)
I do not remember DNRs being discussed, but the hospital had advised me that Dad would not be taken to ICU. This gave me the impression that they had already given up on him, and that there was rationing of care (to his detriment). (Paragraph 38)
My father was put on end-of-life medication via a syringe driver on 14th December. It was explained to me that he was in a lot of pain and there was no prospect of recovery. I queried whether his pain had any bearing on him being found on the floor apparently having fallen on 11th but was told it was not. (Paragraph 44)
I spoke to my father’s consultant later that day and queried the fall having contributed to his death and asked if a post-mortem could be performed. I was told this was not possible due to him being covid positive. I asked if there was any way of obtaining a post-mortem and the consultant directed me to contact independent pathologist Mr Brian Herron. I spoke with him and outlined my concerns and he stated that in normal circumstances due to my concerns he would have had no issue in conducting a post-mortem but due the body being covid positive he could not risk himself or his staff. (Paragraph 44)
Additional
Around 20 March 2020, the parents of Catherine and Claire Regan developed a cough. Their father, James Reagan, was a diabetic, and they requested a house call as he deteriorated, but this was refused and they had difficulty getting help from anybody. Eventually, he was admitted to a Covid Ward in Antrim Hospital, despite the fact that he was never tested for covid. They have concerns about much of his treatment, including that he was left in the ambulance with the door open for some time despite the cold, and that when they received his dressing gown back his hearing aid was still in his pocket, suggesting it had remained there throughout his admission. He was never brought to ICU. However, they are also particularly distressed that he was never tested for covid, as this gave the impression it was not important. They therefore find it insulting that covid-19 is recorded on his death certificate despite the fact that there was no effort to test for it. (Paragraph 15)
I really struggled to get any information at all about how either of my parents were doing. There seemed to be nobody to answer the phone, and if I did get through, I was told that staff were too busy to provide an update. I got so frustrated that I called them and told them in very blunt language that I needed information about Mum and Dad. (Paragraph 41)
It also meant that I had to go through my father’s death on my own, in isolation. My mother also had to go through the fact that my father, her husband of 53 years, passed away in the next room to her and I could not be there to comfort her, or her comfort me. As I noted above, I was permitted a video call with Dad, however he was already semi-unconscious for this. (Paragraph 48)
There was a failure in the response to covid to appreciate the extremely detrimental effects of isolation. (Paragraph 69)
For those who have been following The Exposé over the years, what Gray is describing above is familiar. But for those who are not familiar with what happened and how the elderly and the disabled were murdered by the state during 2020, and then their deaths labelled as “with covid,” we provide some links below.
Further reading:
- “Syringe driver” on The Exposé
- “Midazolam” on The Exposé
- “Remdesivir” on The ExposĂ©
- “Do Not Resuscitate” on The Exposé
- The Death Protocol: whistleblower nurse says “one medical blunder cost thousands of lives”
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News
There are always the people that know the truth, and knew from the beginning. Then the event happens. Its a disaster. Its cruel. Often people die or are scarred for life. They have an expensive inquiry. Mostly the truth comes out. Nothing happens. No one gets prosecuted. At the end they state, lessons have been learnt. All that gets learnt is, that “authorities” can get away with anything, no matter now outrageous, and no matter how criminal The report gets written perhaps a year later, everyone has moved on and the report collects dust. As intended.
Unless people get held to account, it will always be this way.
I would be pleased to be told I am wrong. My observations from previous
inquiries.
[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]
My friends mum age 76 perfectly fit and active she went hill walking every week, apart from the occasional common cold she’d never had an illness in her life and wasn’t on any medication. In Jan 21 she took her 1st covid injection her 2nd in March 21 within days of the 2nd she took ill was admitted to hospital and was diagnosed with a blood clot in her leg, her leg would need to be amputated, but although she was never tested for covid, and showed no signs of it they claimed she had it, so couldn’t operate and put her on a morphine and medezalam driver, my friend never seen her mother again, she wasn’t allowed to visit her and she died the following day. Her death certificate claimed it was a blood clot but the underlying cause was covid. Not only did the vaccine cause her blood clot the hospital finished her off, my friend requested a post mortom but they refused due to her supposedly having covid. The covid lie provided them with the perfect excuse to prevent the true reasons for death coming out. Never forgive and never forget what they done to us, these enquiries were never designed to expose the real truth there just another scam.
… devastating…i offer my condolences…rip…🙏➕🙏…