On 7 July 2021 the CDC updated their “Instructions for Use” of RT-PCR Covid tests. This was the exact date the CDC notified clinical laboratories and testing sites performing Covid testing of the withdrawal of Emergency Use Authorisation (“EUA”) from 31 December 2021 and to begin a transition to another FDA-authorised Covid test.
Page 40 of the Instructions for Use of the PCR test states (emphasis our own):
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full-length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”
After almost two years of incorrect and fraudulent use of the PCR test, there seems to be a worldwide Government campaign to stop its use. Here are some examples:
“Canadians seeking a COVID-19 PCR test in recent days may have faced long line-ups at testing centres and a shortage of appointment slots as demand has risen amid the spread of the Omicron variant.” – CTV News, 26 December 2021
“Changes made to PCR testing guidance amid record demand [in Northern Ireland]. The Public Health Agency said it had issued new protocols to help ensure ‘the continued and targeted delivery of the service’.” – Belfast Telegraph, 29 December 2021
“A widespread shortage of PCR tests across the devolved nations was due to an administrative error, the First Minister of Scotland has said.” – Belfast Telegraph, 29 December 2021
“Asymptomatic people who test positive in Wales no longer required to have PCR test.” – ITV, 5 January 2022
“From today, people in NI who get a positive lateral flow test should presume that they have Covid-19 and that they are infectious – a PCR test will no longer be required to confirm the result.” – 4NI, 5 January 2022
“Boris scraps extra Covid testing rules in drive to stop Omicron shutting down the economy … And people testing positive after a lateral flow test do not have to have a PCR confirmation.” – Daily Express, 6 January 2022
“The need for PCR tests has now changed [in Scotland] in a bid to relieve pressure in test centres and labs.” – Daily Record, 6 January 2022
“Australians are no longer required to get a PCR test to confirm their COVID-positive result.” – ABC Net, 6 January 2022
A 20-year trail of patent applications concerning the virus responsible for Covid-19 proves it is neither new nor the result of a jump from animals to humans. In July 2021, a dossier of evidence supporting these claims was presented by Dr. David Martin to the international Corona Investigative Committee. The first SARS outbreak in the latter part of 2001 “gave rise to a ‘very problematic’ April 2003 patent filing by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). It was for the entire SARS gene sequence, and for a series of derivative patents covering means of detection, including the PCR test [widely used today purportedly to diagnose cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection],” The Conservative Woman wrote.
“People should remember that all the “covid” case data is based on PCR and antigen tests which are meaningless. They give positive results for those with normal flu, which has the exact same symptomology as what they are calling Covid19. This conflation is clear as day and must be pointed out to everyone and we need to take the governments of the world to court for conducting no risk benefit analysis and perpetuating a fraud on the public and restricting basic human rights at par with the Nazi and Soviet era.,” Robin Monotti posted on Telegram on 31 December 2021.
- CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel
- 07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing
- The CDC Withdraw the Emergency Use of The PCR Test In 10 Days’ Time, Why Is It Still Being Used in the UK?
- Video: Pfizer VP “The Thing to Be Terrified of Is Your Government”, The Highwire 14 June 2021
- Video: Documentary on The PCR Test Deception, Health Impact News, 8 December 2021
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
WE URGENTLY NEED YOUR HELP…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
Categories: Breaking News, World News
Please provide the URL for the first video in this post as it is very informative!
That will get you to the video. Not sure if you can download it or not.
Why? is this so the PCR test falls away as a valid safe pass/vaccine pass in countries that still allow a test instead of the vaccine?
The ‘vaccine’ does not stop you from catching the virus or stop you from passing it on so the whole argument of a vaccine passport/pass is moot and has no logical reason to exist.
i know this, and i also know the PCR test doesn’t actually test for the cov virus which has never been isolated. I’m asking why theyre discontinuing it given it’s been the mainstay of the ‘pandemic’ and is an alternative to the vaccine on the vaccine passports. we in europe have vaccine passports, even if they havent come in in the UK yet in full force, and a negative test can serve as a covid passport. this is why I’m asking, I’m wondering if it is to remove that option and force the vaccination option for the covid passes.
Don’t worry, I’ve just checked as like to travel. For unvaxxed: Right now if you travel from the UK, other countries (some) are happy with lateral flow result if it comes / certified via a known, accepted testing company. You still need the ‘2 days before coming home’ one, which is also lateral flow BUT as they don’t want to take away their buddies’ good money you need a 2nd and 8th days which are PCR.
Ah ok, so this is somewhat premature and the PCR test is stil (even though total codswallop) still required and still used in a number of instances..
EU is beginning to insist on vaccination. perhaps test on top but more often than not they want a vaccination cert.
this is why i asked the question as i suspect the testing which is currently still in most cases allowable as a ‘pass’ for 24 or 48 hours will fall away in favour of absolute vaccination with no exceptions.
Spot on, remove the possibility of having a valid passport via a test or infection. Jabs and boosters only. So predictable
Protocols of Zion Secrets
The Capitalist does not know the definition of war. He thinks of war as attack with force performed by soldiers
and machines. He does not know that a more effective if somewhat longer war can be fought with bread or, in our
case, with drugs and the wisdom of our art. The Capitalist has never won a war in truth. The psychopolitician is having little trouble winning this one.
With “Australians are no longer required to get a PCR test to confirm their COVID-positive result.” – ABC Net, 6 January 2021
Was that 2021 or 2022?
Thank you. for pointing it out. It’s 2022. It’s a typo, I’ll correct now.
No doubt this will pave the way for new Gen 2 LFT tests from Mologic backed by none other than Bill Gates and Soros!
You couldn’t make this stuff up!
The CDC have never said the PCR test can’t differentiate between Covid and flu. They are asking that new tests can differentiate the two with one test instead of the current two separate PCR tests.
Scientists have always known the PCR test is highly accurate and specific for detecting a virus but not whether it is infectious or not.
The current PCR test has been withdrawn by the CDC but there are many other now FDA approved PCR tests that they will be using in the future as listed here ……
The U.S. of Everything is Rigged, Illegal (or pending).
We’ve known since the get-go that the PCR test cannot distinguish between SARS CoV-2 and the common flu, so having it disappear is useful in making more difficult the proof of its non-utility (read here “fraud.”) Newspaper editors all across the US are refusing to publish even a “letter to the editor” than mentions this fact.
Rob, the website for Terrain is: https://terrainthefilm.com/
Did anyone know that the CDC authorized testing of POOLED PATIENT SAMPLES, e.g. more than one patient’s specimen in one PCR TEST? WTF???
Read the first paragraph.
As much as I would love to support you I am barely managing to survive on a State Pension. Good luck to you.