|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The Trump Administration has halted an award worth $766 million that was intended to support Moderna in the development of a bird flu vaccine.
The decision to stop the funding is a significant setback for Moderna’s efforts to create a vaccine for the bird flu, and the company has acknowledged the termination of the award.
The award, which was valued at $766 million, was initially intended to aid Moderna in its research and development of a bird flu vaccine, but the Trump Administration has now decided to withdraw the funding, effectively ending the company’s access to these resources.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
On Wednesday, End Point News reported that the Trump Administration has terminated a contract worth $766 million with Moderna to develop a bird flu vaccine, with the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) citing that continued investment in the vaccine was not scientifically or ethically justifiable.
Moderna had received an initial award of $176 million in July 2024, which was later expanded to include an additional $590 million in January, and the company had expected to advance the programme into late-stage development with the assistance of the government.
The termination of the contract adds uncertainty to the vaccine’s future, according to Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel, who stated that the company will explore alternative paths forward for the programme.
The decision is part of a shift in the Trump Administration’s approach to vaccines, which has changed since the days of Operation Warp Speed, when the administration worked closely with drug makers, including Moderna, to speed the development of mRNA-based “vaccines” for covid.
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a long-time vaccine sceptic, has cut vaccine contracts and research, and has upset covid-specific guidance, including rescinding existing covid injection recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women.
The Administration’s reconsideration of the bird flu investment comes as two other Moderna products are under review at the FDA, including the company’s next-generation covid “vaccine” and its RSV vaccine, which is being considered for expansion to include high-risk younger adults.
Log in to read the full article for free on End Point News HERE, or read the copy attached below.
Further reading:
- ‘HHS cancels funding for Moderna’s candidate H5 avian flu and pandemic vaccines’, CIDRAP, 29 May 2025
- US cancels more than $700 million funding for Moderna bird flu vaccine, Reuters, 29 May 2025
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]
Moderna have already developed the deadly mRNA platform for “covid”. All that you need to do to modify this platform for any other fake virus is to change the sequence. The sequences for all these fake viruses are available online. I could do this in 10 minutes and they were going to pay them $766 million??
Hi Sam, you say “the deadly mRNA platform for ‘covid'” in one sentence and “fake virus” in the following sentence. The piece you’ve missed out is that the platform you’re referring to is a platform to make viruses. If they are making “any other fake virus” by modifying the sequence in the platform as you claim to be able to do, then the viruses you make/develop are no longer fake.
In other words, to avoid having to admit that viruses exist, you have described “virus” as a “platform” and a “fake.” It sounds like the “there are no viruses” PsyOp is unravelling.
Where did the “platform,” e.g. Moderna’s “platform,” to make viruses come from? By observing and then mimicking nature. Here’s a truth: Man cannot create anything – there is only one creator (God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit). Men and women can only take what God has already created and manipulate or corrupt it for their use.
The modified RNA jabs do not meet the definition of a virus. There is no inconsistency in what i say. Those that defend virology do not understand the definition of a virus and they constantly change the definition. How can you defend something that you don’t even understand? Virology is fraudulent pseudoscience and that is a verifiably true fact not a PsyOp.
Hi Sam, you say you are a biomedical scientist, I’m guessing your university course included some form of biotechnology. At university, did you conduct any protein engineering or protein design experiments?
I am a qualified and experienced biomedical scientist. I have a lot of molecular biology experience. I also did diagnostic virology for 8 years.
Hi Sam, have you ever conducted any protein engineering or protein design experiments or research?
I have worked with proteins as well as DNA and RNA. I am not familiar with the term “protein engineering”. Perhaps you can clarify exactly what you mean by that?
Hi Sam, instead of replying with a long reply, with possibly more terms you are not familiar with, have a listen to Dr. Sabine Stebel. She explains the protein engineering experiments that students have been conducting at universities since the 1990s. Perhaps you have been doing these types of experiments/research without realising it? I draw your attention to the phages which are used, which you will be familiar with if you, your friends or colleagues have conducted such experiments.
https://expose-news.com/2024/07/11/a-virus-does-not-need-to-be-isolated/
Yes i have done cloning aka recombinant DNA technology and i have also worked with phages. Any protein can be produced using cloning. We never use the term “protein engineering” although that’s what we do when we clone. What is your point?
Hi Sam, so you have worked with phages and I presume from your personal experience you know that phages exist. What is a phage?
I have repeatedly highlighted the difference between bacteriophages and supposed human pathogenic viruses. Bacteriophages are isolated and purified by scientists who work with them This is something that does not happen with supposed human viruses because they do not exist.
Hi Sam, what is a phage?
The official story is that a bacteriophage is a virus that attacks bacteria. The reality is that they are a survival stage of bacteria that are produced when nutrients run out.
Hi Sam, Your perception is interesting because one feature of a PsyOp is to change the usage or meaning of commonly used words. But let’s set that aside for the moment as I have more questions.
From your personal experience, in the work you have done or the experiments you have conducted, what do phages do to bacteria?
Your “PsyOp” position is totally ridiculous. I have worked with phages and i know exactly what they do. I don’t believe you have any science experience or qualifications at all right?
Hi Sam, you say, “I have worked with phages and i know exactly what they do. ”
What do they do?
They inhibit the growth of mature bacterial cells.
Hi Sam, why do they do that? Is it because the phages (viruses) are infecting the bacteria (i.e. injecting viral DNA or genetic material into the bacterial cells) and in so doing use/hijack the bacteria’s resources to replicate themselves? Are the bacteria cells changed/destroyed/killed in the process?
Is the mechanism of viral infection what your personal experiments/research showed or, more importantly, relied on?
I fail to understand the relevance of bacteriophages to supposed human pathogenic viruses. As i have previously pointed out they are studied in completely different ways using completely different methods. Phages do actually exist as advertised although their function is debatable. Yes they do transfer genetic information but no they are not hostile external attackers of bacteria. In fact they ensure the survival of the bacteria.
Hi Sam, the relevance is obvious. If you know phages exist from personal experience, and I presume you know they are naturally occurring, then you know from personal experience that viruses exist.
You may not agree with fear mongering messages that viruses kill or are as contagious as is touted, but you know viruses exist. You may think that no harmful viruses exist and only beneficial or harmless viruses exist, but you know viruses exist. How harmful viruses are etc are different debates to be had. But … you have repeatedly proclaimed that viruses do not exist, despite what you have seen with your own eyes.
Saying viruses that affect bacteria exist but other viruses do not, is disingenuous. Changing the definition or description of things to suit your preferred narrative is disingenuous, if not a psychological operation. Throwing out arrogant statements such as “you’re not a scientist” or “I am a biomedical scientist” when you know there is no formal qualification called “scientist” is also disingenuous – you are simply attempting to use these mantras to lord over people and shut down anyone who challenges you, even though you are deliberately misleading people and people can see it. A word of caution – “non-scientists,” as you might call them, or ordinary people if you will, are a lot more clued up about what is going on than you give them credit for. But for those who aren’t, the preceding is why bacteriophages are relevant. And I’m calling it out again – the “no virus” ideology is a PsyOp as has been proved, again, by our exchange above.
And something we haven’t discussed above: If you have conducted protein engineering or protein design experiments/research then then you know loss/gain-of-function is real – because protein engineering is gain-of-function by another name. So if you have been engaged in these sorts of experiments you have done gain-of-function research, even though you may not have realised it because you know it by another name.
Total nonsense. I have repeatedly explained the difference between phages and supposed human pathogenic viruses and you have repeatedly ignored what i have said.
I do know that bacteriophages exist but their true function is debatable. I also know that supposed human pathogenic viruses are never purified/isolated and subjected to the same scientific rigor that phages are.
What i have seen with my own eyes is the inhibition of bacterial growth due to phages and this fits perfectly with the idea that they are a survival mechanism used by bacteria to survive nutrient depletion.
There have been numerous contagion studies that have failed to demonstrate person to person transmission of supposed viral illnesses.
It is not disingenuous to compare phage biologists with other virologists because they do not use the same methods.
I have been consistent in my definitions and descriptions. It is you that flip flops around with definitions and descriptions.
Sometimes i need to mention my scientific credentials for credibility but i am not intentionally being “arrogant” and i most definitely do not want to “lord over people”.
I don’t shut down anyone who challenges me that’s what you do. You delete and block people who challenge you. I would never do that because truth is on my side.
I am misleading nobody and people can see that which is why any story you publish on viruses gets such a low score. Your readers are much smarter than you. Let me just say at this point by the way that you do actually do a lot of good work and i do agree with a lot of what you publish but you are totally wrong about viruses. So i don’t completely hate you!
I would love to see what evidence there is for the “no virus ideology being a PsyOp”. Maybe you could post some of that evidence?
Non scientists and ordinary people are very clued up which is why your viruses BS gets so much push back.
I have done experiments using bacteria and human cells which are real. Can’t do “gain-of-function” on viruses because they not real.
Hi Sam, you say “Can’t do “gain-of-function” on viruses because they not real.”
I think you may benefit from listening to the interview I shared earlier, for which I share the link again below for ease of reference. Protein engineering or gain-of-function is not done on phages (viruses). As you will know from your own experience, they are done using phages (viruses).
Dr. Sabine Stebel: A virus does not need to be isolated to engineer a viral protein
https://expose-news.com/2024/07/11/a-virus-does-not-need-to-be-isolated/
As for your belief viruses are not real, I refer you to a comment I made at the beginning of this thread.
https://expose-news.com/2025/05/30/us-gov-cancels-funding-to-moderna/#comment-168219
In the thread above we were in particular speaking of gain-of-function (protein engineering) research being conducted on bacteria using phages (viruses) because this relates to your personal experience, or so it appeared. Regarding loss/gain-of-function on viruses – this has been going on for a very long time. We could argue ever since they began developing “attenuated” viruses to put into vaccines, which was circa 1885. Indeed, you yourself claimed that you could make viruses in 10 mins using Moderna’s platform because the viral sequences are available online. See your comment here: https://expose-news.com/2025/05/30/us-gov-cancels-funding-to-moderna/#comment-168217
“Was the SARS-CoV-2 Virus Isolated? Dr. Stebel doesn’t know. I would really like to know what the truth is, she said.”
Anybody with a basic grasp of logic will know that SARS-CoV-2 was never isolated. People with a basic understanding of logic know that in order to “isolate” something you need to separate it from all others things. Virologists fraudulently misuse this word. When they say they have “isolated” a virus what they mean is they have added a complex mixture of substances to another complex mixture of substance with some cells. When they see a cytopathic effect (which can be caused by many things) they fraudulently claim to have “isolated” a virus.
That is not science. No independent variable has been established so the dependent variable (cpe) is meaningless. Proper control experiments are also never done. Complete quackery!
In order to engineer a “viral” protein you must first establish that the virus exists. This has never been done. As i have previously said it is possible to engineer any protein that you want but that doesnt prove that it is “viral”.
Refering me to a comment you made previously still does not prove anything.
Phages are real and they can be used to insert genetic material into bacteria. So what?
In 1885 the modern definition of a virus did not exist. Once again you are flip flopping with the definition of a “virus”. I find it very interesting that people who defend virology often don’t even understand the definition of a virus.
I did not claim that i could make a virus what i said was that it is possible to insert any genetic sequence into the mRNA platform.
Human pathogenic viruses do not exist. That is a fact. If you want to dispute that fact then go ahead and post the evidence right here…
Hi Sam, you say: “Dr. Stebel doesn’t know. I would really like to know what the truth is, she said.”
You also say, “In order to engineer a ‘viral’ protein you must first establish that the virus exists.”
It would be wise to quote Dr. Sabine Stebel in context and not cherry pick quotes that suit your narrative. There’s a clue in the title of the article as to what you omitted to say: ‘Dr. Sabine Stebel: A virus does not need to be isolated to engineer a viral protein‘. You claim that you could engineer viruses in 10 mins using Moderna’s platform because the viral sequences are online, yet you have not seen the virus from which those sequences came. If you listen to Dr. Stele’s interview, you will know why what you claim you can do is a problem – why your virus might not function as you designed it to function.
Perhaps it would be a good tactic for you to spend time listening to what people say (e.g. Dr. Stebel) rather than push a PsyOp while pretending to be some sort of “expert.” As I said before, you know phages (viruses) exist because, as you have led me to believe, you have experimented/worked with them – you might call them something else to suit your narrative, but they are viruses. Your claims that viruses do not exist are disingenuous. Your “no virus” narrative unravelled many comments ago.
As i have previously said you can engineer any protein and you can claim that it is a “viral” protein but if you have never isolated and purified the virus to begin with then it is just pseudoscientific quackery. I asked you to post evidence for the existence of human pathogenic viruses and you haven’t. That speaks volumes.
Once again i do not claim that i could engineer a virus in 10 minutes what i claim is that any sequence can be added to the mRNA platform. You simply do not listen or learn.
I don’t pretend anything. I’m pretty sure that 35 years of working in biomedicine does actually make me an “expert”.
If the truth about virology is a PsyOp then what is the purpose of this supposed PsyOp? Obviously logic is not your strong point but i am baffled as to the strategy behind this supposed PsyOp? How does it benefit the globalist psychos in any way?
I have repeatedly highlighted the difference between bacteriophages and supposed human pathogenic viruses and the different methods that are used. You continue to ignore what i have said.
My narrative has not unravelled at all. Post evidence to support your opinions. Must be really easy to find right? So post it…
“Today it gives me great pleasure to terminate all Department of the Navy’s testing on cats and dogs, ending these inhumane practices and saving taxpayer dollars. This is long overdue. I commend @POTUS, @SecDef and @DOGE for bringing this to light.”
https://www.breitbart.com/science/2025/05/31/peta-thanks-trump-admin-for-ending-navy-testing-on-dogs-and-cats-asks-for-comprehensive-federal-ban/
Big pharma makes plenty of profits and should be funding it’s own experiments. They put out “medicines” with so many warnings that they can pay for their own poisons. Tax payers give them billions each year and they still charge us outrageous prices. We don’t need dozens of medications for each illness especially when the low cost versions have become a thing of the past.
[…] Source: https://expose-news.com/2025/05/30/us-gov-cancels-funding-to-moderna/ […]