The idea of a “Palestinian nation” wasn’t invented in 1948. It didn’t really gain solid identity in the global imagination as such until after the Six-Day War in 1967, which the Arabs (especially Egypt) lost badly to Israel.
This humiliation of Muslim states changed the strategic needs of the Islamic resistance movement and fabricated a Palestinian national identity with a bogus history more or less out of thin air.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
It will have become obvious to most by now that “Palestine” is not a geographical location but a political ideology. But whose ideology? And why?
Yesterday, James Lindsay, American author, mathematician, founder of New Discourses and leading expert on Critical Race Theory, provided some answers in a post on Gettr.
What is “Palestine”?
The term “Palestine” until the 20th century referred to an administrative region without fixed or clear borders and with no national identity. The people who lived there before then were either regarded as Ottomans or as part of the Syrian region.
The term came from the final humiliation of the Jews by the Romans in AD 135, following the Bar Kokhba Revolt. The Romans put down the revolt and humiliated the Jews by renaming Judea, etc., “Syria Palaestina,” which means “Philistine Syria.” Arabs and other Arabic speakers record this by naming the “Land of Filastin” (Ard Filastin) in their fatwas and some other writings.
While some Muslims used the term that we’d render as Palestine, and many Europeans did as a hangover from the Latin name for the region, especially given the general vacancy and irrelevance of the region to most world affairs, it was never anything more than a vague regional designation. There was no state, no province, no administrative district, even, referred to by any name that would render to “Palestine” today. There was, as noted, certainly no national or even sub-national identity, and any attempt to do so would have been shut down by seeing them as incorporated within the broader Syrian identity. The name carried roughly the same kind of specific significance as a term like the “Near East” would today.
Identifying people as “Palestinians” didn’t really begin until the very end of the 19th century, and even then, it was a reaction to Zionism and Jews starting to move into the region. The term was sort of mainstreamed as a political reality after the Ottoman Empire was broken up in defeat after World War I and the region came under British control, using the old Latin terminology as “British Mandate Palestine,” meaning “the part of the Palestinian region under British control.” That was roughly thirty years before Israel would declare independence as the sovereign nation-state of Israel as we know it today. At no point in this story is there a sovereign nation-state called Palestine or anything resembling it.
That said, the beginnings of an Arab “Palestinian” identity as oppositional to Zionism and British Mandatory control developed from their previous 1890s beginnings to something more like a dedicated resistance identity when the Brits took over. Arabs didn’t believe in British sovereignty or control over what they deemed Islamic land, either, and they were adamantly opposed to the Mandate’s explicit Zionism, which was being acted upon to bring Jews into the region (even though the British were wishy-washy on this and then betrayed it during World War II, when it was arguably needed most).
The “Palestinian” identity at the time wasn’t exactly national but quasi-national and born (and borne) only in resistance. It gained some crystallisation as such in the mid and late 1930s after the failed Arab Revolt, significantly as a response (back-up plan) to the failure of Greater Syria to defend “Arab” interests in the region against British (and Jewish Zionist) control.
Still, it didn’t acquire something approaching the identity status people might recognise today for about another decade. That had to wait until after the “Nakba” in 1948-49. This contested event occurred when five of the surrounding actual Arabian nations declared and LOST a war on the newly declared Israel. These were Egypt, Syria, (Trans)jordan, Iraq and Lebanon.
Now, this war was the continuation of the same war being fought in the region before Israel’s declaration of independence (15 May 1948) following the late 1947 UN Partition of the region, which the proto-Israelis accepted and all the Arabs rejected. The Arabs started that war, too. Notice: no state of Palestine was involved because there was no state of Palestine to be involved. Something like a “Palestinian identity” as a refusal of these developments took significant shape at the time, though.
The Arabs refer to this humiliating loss as a “catastrophe,” THE catastrophe (Nakba), and rewrote history to create a “Palestinian” people who were displaced, harmed and killed by the (defensive) military actions of the Israelis, which they see as an act of colonial aggression because they cannot admit or accept that they lost the wars, including WWI, which removed the land from Muslim control (which they believe is permanent). The “Palestinian people,” whom none of these Arab states would absorb because they were more useful as a military-political weapon against Israel, came into existence as a tool to further their Islamic designs.
By the way, the UN Partition in 1947 (General Assembly Resolution 181) does not name the two states it partitioned: “Israel” and “Palestine.” It called them the “Jewish State” and the “Arab State.” The Jews took for themselves the name “Israel” for that land, as they would. As for the “Arab State,” it is not actually clear what would have been its fate. Jordan (Transjordan) viewed the Arab land by the Jordan River to naturally be part of its territory, not an independent state called “Palestine.” The Syrians opposed this not particularly because they wanted the land but because they didn’t want Jordanian expansion. As for Gaza, Egypt wanted administrative control but not to annex it. It is not clear what its fate as “Arab State” would have been.
In all, in 1948-49, and following the “Nakba,” these behaviours and conflicts reflected the broader pattern of inter-Arab rivalry more than anything else. The neighbouring states were more focused on preventing a Jewish state and on blocking one another’s gains than on creating a viable independent Palestinian Arab state under the UN plan. The very idea of “Palestine” with a unique national identity and (fabricated) national history would have to wait.
Identity during this period (1949-1967) was still largely either “Arab” or as part of one of the Arab states, like Syrian, Jordan or Egyptian, specifically, or just “Islamic.” Movements like pan-Arabism and even pan-Syrianism were more relevant to the identity of the people today treated as “Palestinians” than was anything to do with Palestine, although the word was used. The biggest change in this period from the one before is that before this, the term “Palestinian” referred also to Jews in the region (under the Mandate), which more or less ended. Arab states also kicked out all the Jews (850,000 of them) during this time, and most of them were absorbed by Israel.
Even still, the idea of a “Palestinian nation” wasn’t really invented in 1948. It didn’t really gain solid identity in the global imagination as such until after the Six-Day War in 1967, which the Arabs (especially Egypt) lost badly to Israel. This second humiliation, referred to as the Naksa (“setback” or “relapse” or “defeat”), which displaced some 400,000 people[1] as Israel pushed threats out of its immediate vicinity by taking the lands from which they operated, changed the strategic needs of the resistance movement and fabricated a Palestinian national identity with a bogus history more or less out of thin air. That’s the one defended to this day.
[1] Note: These people were in large part there as a stand of active resistance against the existence of Israel as part of the aforementioned strategic refusal of any Arab states to absorb them, etc., so focusing on their displacement alone is complicated, to say the least.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, Latest News, World News
Doesn’t really matter what they are called, or what their territory is named, the genocide of these people is an unforgivable crime against humanity committed by those who are beyond reproach.
Hi Ian cross,
Without a doubt it is a crime, called a genocide.
But nobody will be prosecuted because it has all been planned.
Now we know it was all nonesence about the WW2 concentration camps.
If there was all that Holocaust, they would not do it to others.
We have been told total lies for years.
You too,you 🤡 Genocide is an absolute lie. You just hate Jews. You disgusting mszi
A disgusting comment! Grace? Do you have any?
During Hitler’s reign of terror, we had the Mufti of Jerusalem making alliance with him. During the same decade, 900.000 Jews were ethnically cleansed from at least 5 Arab nations/lands.
In 1948, the Jews declared independent. The very first action by the Arabs, was a Genocide attempt against the Jewish state. Then repeated in 1967 & 1973.
Israel was outnumbered yet still won & managed to take bufferzone in order to prevent the Arabs from succeeding.
All these wars were an attempt to kill every Jew in the land. From the ‘River to the Sea’, is not a new concept. They’ve tried their best to destroy Israel over & over, yet people are complaining or blaming Israel? Imagine?
To this day, they are still trying to kill every Jew in the world, not just in Israel.
Ezekiel 38-39 will sort this out. Turkey & Iran, two major countries who will lead this war, including other Muslim states..
This period will be the time of Israel’s redemption.
Joel 3 specifically mention this battle & gives the exact reason for it. It specifically says that God will gather these armies from all the nations in order to judge them all, all because throughout history, they all mistreated his people & divided the land of Israel.
Example: “west bank” Gaza & all the territories west of Jordan which is part of Judeah & Samaria.
A defensive war is not a genocide – unless it could be argued to spring from a genocidal attack on the defenders, that is. The Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics states that 73,259 Gazans died during the recent war. We know that they include natural deaths in their figures, and there were 5,500 of these in Gaza in 2022, the last full year before the conflict, so we have two years at 5,500 each = 11,000 subtracted from 73,259 = 62,259. Hamas has granted military widow’s pensions to 50,000 women widowed during the war; whilst Islam permits men to have more than one wife, it does not appear to be customary in Gaza (Yahya Sinwar, who could certainly have afforded more than one wife, was monogamous). So, if we know that 50,000 married combatants died, that brings us down to 12,259 as a possible figure for civilian deaths. If we had figures for the deaths of unmarried combatants, that might whittle it down further – but, even as it is, a conflict in which the ratio of civilian to combatant deaths is 1:5 is recognised by military experts like Professor John Spencer as a remarkable achievement on Israel’s part. For comparison, the ratio during the Iraq war was 9 civilian deaths per 1 combatant. There is no genocide.
Ratio figure should read 1:4, not 1:5.
During Hitler’s reign of terror, we had the Mufti of Jerusalem making alliance with him. During the same decade, 900.000 Jews were ethnically cleansed from at least 5 Arab nations/lands.
In 1948, the Jews declared independent. The very first action by the Arabs, was a Genocide attempt against the Jewish state. Then repeated in 1967 & 1973.
Israel was outnumbered yet still won & managed to take bufferzone in order to prevent the Arabs from succeeding.
All these wars were an attempt to kill every Jew in the land. From the ‘River to the Sea’, is not a new concept. They’ve tried their best to destroy Israel over & over, yet people are complaining or blaming Israel? Imagine?
To this day, they are still trying to kill every Jew in the world, not just in Israel.
Ezekiel 38-39 will sort this out. Turkey & Iran, two major countries who will lead this war, including other Muslim states..
This period will be the time of Israel’s redemption.
Joel 3 specifically mention this battle & gives the exact reason for it. It specifically says that God will gather these armies from all the nations in order to judge them all, all because throughout history, they all mistreated his people & divided the land of Israel.
Example: “west bank” Gaza & all the territories west of Jordan which is part of Judeah & Samaria.
Hi Ian Cross, by choosing to use the word “Palestine,” they are giving us a clue as to what they are doing and why.
Understanding what they are doing begins with understanding the history of the word’s use because what has happened in past is directly tied to what will happen in the future, and for the same core reasons. This, and more, is what they are telling us by using the word “Palestine.” The article above is the beginning of insights into the historical use of the word “Palestine” and the ideology behind it.
I don’t believe it is only Islamists that are following the “Palestinian” plan. Indeed, I don’t believe “Palestine” is an Islamist plan, i.e. the people calling the shots. Islamists, as with Communists, are merely going along with it thinking there’s something in it for them and they think they have a permanent seat at the table. However, Islamists and Communists are merely the Globalists’ useful idiots and are expendable.
All they (the Globalists) and their useful idiots have to do is convince you that “Palestine” is a good idea; if you have fallen for it and are calling for “Palestine” then you too have become their useful idiot.
Rhoda, God has blessed you with the gift of writing, always use it for his glory and he will continue to bless you. Take care my spiritual sister.
Hi Isabel, Thank you. But I don’t see myself as gifted, in fact quite the opposite, I fall far short of it. But I have offered up to God whatever I am capable of to speak (write) or highlight the truth He wants us to know about. I am only human, flawed and fallible. But I pray that on balance, the work I do (writing) is God’s work and to His glory.
My dear you are very gifted, God gives us each a gift or two and yours is writing. I love your style, you are a humble daughter of the most high God and our God loves a humble son/daughter and he blesses the humble which you are definitely one. I don’t know you in the flesh, but the Holy Spirit spirit speaks to me through your writings, keep up the great work, God is using you for his glory!
Hi Isabel, thank you for your kind words.
Whenever I say the Lord’s prayer and get to the line “give us this day our daily bread,” I imagine God’s word, messages, knowledge, wisdom etc as manna falling from Heaven. I have this image in mind when I pray the Lord’s prayer for all our readers: that they will receive not my words into their hearts and minds but instead manna from Heaven. If my words can in any way facilitate that then it will bring me joy – praise be to God. May he keep you and bless you.
Such beautiful words, thank you! Hope to meet you in the air very, very soon.
During Hitler’s reign of terror, we had the Mufti of Jerusalem making alliance with him. During the same decade, 900.000 Jews were ethnically cleansed from at least 5 Arab nations/lands.
In 1948, the Jews declared independent. The very first action by the Arabs, was a Genocide attempt against the Jewish state. Then repeated in 1967 & 1973.
Israel was outnumbered yet still won & managed to take bufferzone in order to prevent the Arabs from succeeding.
All these wars were an attempt to kill every Jew in the land. From the ‘River to the Sea’, is not a new concept. They’ve tried their best to destroy Israel over & over, yet people are complaining or blaming Israel? Imagine?
To this day, they are still trying to kill every Jew in the world, not just in Israel.
Ezekiel 38-39 will sort this out. Turkey & Iran, two major countries who will lead this war, including other Muslim states..
This period will be the time of Israel’s redemption.
Joel 3 specifically mention this battle & gives the exact reason for it. It specifically says that God will gather these armies from all the nations in order to judge them all, all because throughout history, they all mistreated his people & divided the land of Israel.
Example: “west bank” Gaza & all the territories west of Jordan which is part of Judeah & Samaria.
The modern state of Israel, possibly hardly semitic at all, moved into this part of the world 70 years ago and, with great assistance from its very powerful diaspora, has been attacking what’s left of the pre-existing population ever since, and the neighbours. There is no real defensive war, it has been on the offensive the whole time.
If the thing that is the most important to you is the “ideology” and not the killing then you may need to rethink which religion you are adhered to.
Hi John Hubbard, it seems for you history only began 70 years ago. Additionally, you have a very obvious bias (perhaps fanatical) that clouds your judgement of it.
Amen 👍 🙏
During Hitler’s reign of terror, we had the Mufti of Jerusalem making alliance with him. During the same decade, 900.000 Jews were ethnically cleansed from at least 5 Arab nations/lands.
In 1948, the Jews declared independent. The very first action by the Arabs, was a Genocide attempt against the Jewish state. Then repeated in 1967 & 1973.
Israel was outnumbered yet still won & managed to take bufferzone in order to prevent the Arabs from succeeding.
All these wars were an attempt to kill every Jew in the land. From the ‘River to the Sea’, is not a new concept. They’ve tried their best to destroy Israel over & over, yet people are complaining or blaming Israel? Imagine?
To this day, they are still trying to kill every Jew in the world, not just in Israel.
Ezekiel 38-39 will sort this out. Turkey & Iran, two major countries who will lead this war, including other Muslim states..
This period will be the time of Israel’s redemption.
Joel 3 specifically mention this battle & gives the exact reason for it. It specifically says that God will gather these armies from all the nations in order to judge them all, all because throughout history, they all mistreated his people & divided the land of Israel.
Example: “west bank” Gaza & all the territories west of Jordan which is part of Judeah & Samaria.
You fell for the lie.
How stupid to call it genocide when Israel gave many warnings to move to safer areas, while Hamas blocked & booby trapped the place. The Term genocide is pushed by the enemies of Israel. UN & the media.
You’re just a Jew hater & your information comes directly from islamic papa,57 Muslim states at the UN
During Hitler’s reign of terror, we had the Mufti of Jerusalem making alliance with him. During the same decade, 900.000 Jews were ethnically cleansed from at least 5 Arab nations/lands.
In 1948, the Jews declared independent. The very first action by the Arabs, was a Genocide attempt against the Jewish state. Then repeated in 1967 & 1973.
Israel was outnumbered yet still won & managed to take bufferzone in order to prevent the Arabs from succeeding.
All these wars were an attempt to kill every Jew in the land. From the ‘River to the Sea’, is not a new concept. They’ve tried their best to destroy Israel over & over, yet people are complaining or blaming Israel? Imagine?
To this day, they are still trying to kill every Jew in the world, not just in Israel.
Ezekiel 38-39 will sort this out. Turkey & Iran, two major countries who will lead this war, including other Muslim states..
This period will be the time of Israel’s redemption.
Joel 3 specifically mention this battle & gives the exact reason for it. It specifically says that God will gather these armies from all the nations in order to judge them all, all because throughout history, they all mistreated his people & divided the land of Israel.
Example: “west bank” Gaza & all the territories west of Jordan which is part of Judeah & Samaria.
The only genocide where the population has increased.Far more deaths every day in lots of other parts of the world,eg Sudan but that is Moslems killing Moslems and of Christians in Nigeria
I think that using the term “genocide” of the Gaza war cheapens the term, and is an insult not only to Holocaust victims, but to the Armenians, Anatolians and so many others.
another interesting point of view provides Shlomo Sand’s book “The invention of jewish people”. While you claim that palestinians were “invented” , it might have a sense to check who’s is claiming that. People who themselves were invented? If those invented people claim that the land they took by force and terror belongs to them because their own god promised it to them many thousands years ago- does that also mean, that now every group of people who has their own god , who promised them something, have the right to return to 2000 year old borders? And use terror claiming that they they have right to “self defense”?
Your theory breaks down upon the Truth that there is but ONE God who will soon reign the world from “the city (Jerusalem) of the great King” Matthew 5:35.
“The earth is the Lord’s, and the fullness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein. ” Psalm 24:1.
Christians worship the God that Jesus, born among the Jews, described to them. The Jews themselves don’t. They fall back on whatever parts of the Old Testament support their greed for riches and desire for world domination. They say their god only desires that they kill off all non-Jews, and he’ll give them all the wealth the world contains.
Jesus says God expects much better than that from us and has much more to give us. Jews don’t want to hear it, so they continue to deny Jesus. They can’t claim he didn’t exist because there’s too much proof, so they dismiss him as a minor prophet and brush him off.
I doubt that God approves the direction they chose to take or appreciates their claim that He wants them to do it and is helping them. The false god Jews worship is the one they’ve made an evil deal with.
Hi Worrywort, you say, “The false god Jews worship is the one they’ve made an evil deal with.” As luciferians, satanists and other occultists do, you have turned things upside down. You have made evil appear good, and good appear evil.
Christians worship God whose name is YHWH. There is only one God but He is three Persons: God the Father (YHWH, Yahweh, Adonai, Jehovah), God the Son (Jesus, Yeshua, the Christ, the Messiah) and God the Holy Spirit.
Jews also worship YHWH. But they do not recognise that Jesus is God the Son.
Both Christians and Jews use the same text as God’s written word. In the Christian Bible, the 24 books of the Jewish Tanakh are called the Old Testament. As Jews do not recognise that Jesus is the Messiah, Jews do not recognise the Bible’s New Testament as God’s written word.
In short, the difference between Judaism and Christianity is Jesus. Christians, in effect, are Messianic Jews. It is worshipping God (YHWH) that sets Christianity and Judaism apart from all other religions/cults (excepting for some Muslims who recognise that YHWH is the one true God). And it is accepting Jesus as the Son of God, as our personal Lord and saviour that sets the Christian faith apart from ALL religions.
YHWH, the God of the Jews and the Christians, is the the one true God. It is Satan that is the false god. Those who are anti-God have made an evil deal with satan.
Rhoda, I agree with everything you say except that Jews are still worshipping YHWH.
Somewhere along the line, before Jesus came — perhaps this is why he came when he did — they turned to Satan because he encouraged their immoral tendencies while God ordered them to clean up their act. (As He said, He is Who He is whatever men call him.)
Which one of us would have cried, “Crucify him!” if we had lived when he did? Even the Roman authorities thought and wrote that he did no wrong. Even a Roman soldier and a thief showed sympathy for his plight. But the devil was in the Jews.
Hi Worrywort, you are making things up to suit a narrative. In the process you are telling falsehoods. There seems to be no point in trying to correct you as “anti-Jew” has become your religion, and I doubt any fact or logic could overcome that belief. But I will address this one thing:
You say, “Which one of us would have cried, ‘crucify him!’ if we had lived when he did?” Every single person who blindly follows a narrative. Every single one us that follows a PsyOp without questioning. Every single one of us who does not have the courage to speak against the crowd. Because the point you’re missing is it was the crowd that had gathered, it was the people who chose that Barabbas (who, it seems, was a popular freedom fighter against Rome’s rule) be freed and that Jesus be crucified. Who was in that crowd? Most likely people from all over the Roman Empire. How many people in that crowd were Jews or Israelites? We don’t know. Did the people in the crowd shouting out “crucify him” represent all people (Romans and non-Romans) living in the land of Israel at that time? No, they didn’t even represent all the people in the crowd; as with what happens today, the activists are few in number but make the loudest noise.
What is the most important thing to understand is that Jesus dying on a cross for our sins was according to God’s will. God allowed, amongst other emotions such as loyalty to Barabbas, the anger and hate in people’s hearts and minds against Jesus to boil over. In reality, it probably was some sort of mass psychosis or frenzy the activists had whipped the crowd into, and most calling for Jesus to be crucified probably didn’t even realise what they were saying, they were just joining in with the chant, without engaging their critical thinking. God allowed the braying mob to demand Jesus be crucified so His promise of salvation for all men could be fulfilled. If Jesus had not died on the cross for our sins, you, today, would not have the possibility of eternal life with God in Heaven.
Around 2,000 years ago, Jesus was crucified on a cross by the Romans (it was done under Roman law, the case was presided over/judged by a Roman governor, who tried to wash his hands of it, and carried out by Roman soldiers who mocked Jesus while he was suffering and dying on the cross). Today, people crucify Jesus in other ways. For example, if we don’t retell Jesus story truthfully, if we purposefully tell lies about Jesus, if we falsely accuse those following YHWH of following something which is evil, we are the equivalent of one of those activists in the crowd calling out “crucify him” and inciting others to do the same. I think, perhaps instead of pointing fingers at others, you may benefit from looking within yourself to make sure you are not guilty of the very thing for which you are accusing others.
This author is mixing and twisting geography and political history to convince his readers that Palestine and Palestinians don’t exist.
“Philistines: An Aegean-derived group (part of the “Sea Peoples”) who settled the southern coastal strip of Canaan (today’s Gaza area) in the 12th century BCE, giving their name (“Peleset”) to the broader geographic term Palestine later adopted by the Romans.” Google AI
This broader area may be covered in rubble, but it’s still there.
He says, because the UN didn’t let Palestine into its club of “sovereign nations,” it is and was not a nation. That’s wrong. Palestine was participating in UN doings as an official “observer state.” Not “state” as in New York, but as in Trump being the Head of State of the US. The author is playing with definitions. If the UN refuses to allow a country to become a full “nation” member, does that country cease to exist?
Why did the UN keep Palestine at arm’s length? Because if it admitted that Palestine is a nation, then it would have equal international rights with other nations. The seizure of part of Palestine and the creation of a new, separate nation for a very different population could not have been approved as an international agreement, but would have been condemned as an invasion and theft. There might still be an Israel today, but it would not be a UN “sovereign nation.” It would be “recognized” as an occupying country, which in it fact has been.
The West was abandoning colonialism after WWII. Imperialism was out of favor. Yet, the UN itself was created in part so that the West could eventually create a new country for Jews out of a section of Palestine and pretend that wasn’t flat out imperialism.
What does nation really mean? In the US and Canada, we have autonomous American Indian nations descended from ancestors who were here before our ancestors arrived. When their ancestors thought we were moving too far into their lands, several Indian nations joined together in a league called the Iroquois Nation. Some of our US states, like Oklahoma and Kansas, are named for the Indian nations that previously dominated that area. That was how our forefathers defined “nation.”
When we came to dominate the middle section of North America and declared ourselves the USA in 1776, we had not marked off official borders all the way around it. Parts of the Western US and all of Alaska were not all marked off till into the 1900’s. Were we not really a nation until then?
In the Middle East, who was a nation and who wasn’t was decided by the WWII winning occupiers who set the borders. The West, via the UN, set the border between Israel and Palestine, even though Palestinians strongly objected because a section of their land was taken away from them. But the West was more powerful than the Palestinians, and the Jews were very powerful in the West, so Israel was created.
Maybe, if it had stayed in its place, Israel would have become accepted. But its early and increasing aggression against Palestinians and its outright seizure of more of their territory became objectionable to the rest of the world. Israel’s response has been to kill off as many Palestinian men, women and children as possible and blow up everything they had there, bulldoze it all and “develop” it Donald Trump-style.
Authors like this one can put whatever spin on the facts they can dream up, but the facts remain.
Wouldn’t it be ironic if the Muslims do take over the Western world and then do unto Israel as Israel has done into them and re-create Palestine?
Hi Worrywort, the Philistines lived in what is called the Pentapolis (5 city states consisting of Gaza, Ashkelon, Ashdod, Gath and Ekron) in the northern part of the Gaza strip – and they no longer exist. The land of the Philistines (aka Palestine) does not exist. It has not existed for thousands of years, their cities were destroyed and the people killed by Nebuchadnezzar II more than 2.500 years ago.
If you have read your Bible and are familiar with the history of the region under Roman occupation, you will know who the Philistines were and why, like the Romans, they are conjuring up the image of the Philistines once again.
You seem to find the idea of “re-creating Palestine” humorous; this sentiment is borne out of ignorance. If you know your history, and you know what the Globalists plan to do, you’d realise the “Palestinian” agenda has nothing to do with Islam or Muslims as you seem to believe. Muslims will be used to further the Palestinian agenda but when their usefulness has come to an end, they will not be spared.
My last sentence was ironic, which is just this side of sarcastic, the rueful humor which is not funny.
“the “Palestinian” agenda has nothing to do with Islam or Muslims… Muslims will be used to further the Palestinian agenda…” This sounds contradictory. I’m not sure what you mean.
In WWII, the globalists supported both sides. Their behind-the-scenes support would keep them in power and genocide a lot of people for them no matter who won. That’s what they are still doing. They use everybody they can and every trick there is. They don’t care much which religion wins as long as they are maintaining or increasing their power to rule all the people. They have their own religion, Satanism.
It remains to be seen whether they will force Satanism on us all, or atheism, or keep us fighting over our traditional religions while they keep their Satanism to themselves.
They do care about Christianity winning because its principles are they opposite of how they think, feel and live.
They are determined to eliminate it ASAP. Last I read, Christian churches in the West are being burned down at the rate of 1.5 per day. Are there any Nigerian Christians still alive?
Hi Worrywort, you say, ““the “Palestinian” agenda has nothing to do with Islam or Muslims… Muslims will be used to further the Palestinian agenda…” This sounds contradictory. I’m not sure what you mean.”
That’s my fault, I worded it badly. Let me try again ..
By, ““the “Palestinian” agenda has nothing to do with Islam or Muslims” I meant that the Palestinian agenda is not an Islamic or Muslim agenda.
The Palestinian agenda dates back about 3,200 years when “the Sea Peoples” moved into the coastal plain of Canaan and established their five city-states in the Pentapolis. As you will have gathered, “the Sea Peoples” became known as the Philistines. What was the aim of the Philistines? Guided/inspired by their god, satan, they established themselves there in partnership/collaboration with the Rephaim in an attempt to stop God’s will/promises, e.g. man’s salvation, being fulfilled. This is the Palestinian agenda which they (the controligarch mafia, or the Globalists, whose god is also satan) are trying to recreate.
Israel is called the Holy Land because this is the land that God (YHWH) set aside for Himself to fulfill His will/promises to all of mankind. The land was given to the Hebrews/Israelites to keep it Holy (provided they followed and were obedient to God (YHWH), i.e. Judaism/Christianity). That is why, all through history, satan and his minions have wanted control over the land of Israel. And it is why Jerusalem is destined to be where the final act of satan’s rebellion against God is played out. It is in Jerusalem where satan will defile the most Holy of places (God’s temple) and crown the anti-Christ as World King shortly before the end of days. It is from his throne in Jerusalem that the anti-Christ will publicly insult, mock and challenge God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit in front of the entire world. Before satan is able to do all that, he needs control over Jerusalem and the Holy Land. This is the ultimate aim of Palestinian agenda. It has nothing to do with Islam or Muslims, i.e. “Palestine” is not an Islamic agenda; Muslims will simply be used as useful idiots to help satan’s minions take control of Jerusalem. When Muslims are no longer useful to them, they will be disposed of, just as the Globalists intend to dispose of Christians and Jews. In those days, there will be no tolerance for any religion/faith other than worshiping the anti-Christ. To ensure compliance, the anti-Christ will force people to carry a visible mark of allegiance either on their right hand or on their forehead. Those who do not carry the anti-Christ’s mark will be hunted down, tortured and killed – may God (YHWH) be with them and give them courage and strength.
Hello Rhoda,
When you write “…before the end of days.” Do you mean before Christ’s 1000 year reign?
Also, why don’t you use a capital S for Satan? It is his name! See Matthew 16:23 etc.
I’m hoping to get my laptop back later, as I would like to reply to worrywart.
It’s freezing cold up here, what is it like down there?
Hi Islander, you ask “why don’t you use a capital S for Satan?” Because I will give satan no honour or respect and its all I can do to constantly show my disapproval of him.
When I wrote about the activities of the anti-Christ “before the end of days” I am referring to Revelations 13: https://biblehub.com/revelation/13.htm. How that fits in with your interpretation of Revelations I’ll leave you to decide.
What’s the weather like in England? It’s beautifully warm. The first proper summer we’ve had for years. Although there hasn’t been any rain for a few weeks so things are looking a bit dry.
Rhoda, there’s no mention of the millennium in Revelation 13, only in chapter 20, I looked up what Biblehub teach on this, and yes they believe in a literal 1000 year reign of Christ as I do, so I assume you must do too?
Hi Islander, you are right, there’s no mention of the millennium in Revelation 13. It depends how you interpret Revelations to when this fits into the end of days timeline. If you read Revelations and take that events are written chronologically, then this is before Jesus’ 1,000 year reign.
I believe in a 1,000 years when Jesus will reign, but I’m not convinced it is physical and on Earth, as some people are. By that time, after the judgements contained in the Seven Trumpets and the Seven Bowls, it seems to me that the physical Earth (what remains of it, if anything) will be desolate, incapable of supporting physical life. And I don’t believe there will be a physical recreation of the Earth either. I’m tending towards the 1,000 year reign being spiritual in nature. But to be honest, its not something I spend much time thinking about because I don’t feel its important what shape or form Jesus’ reign takes.
Does that mean I believe in a literal 1,000 year reign? Yes, I think so but it depends on what literal means … If literal equates to physical, I’m yet to be convinced about “a literal [Earthly] 1,000 year reign of Christ” because I haven’t read anything in the Bible that supports this view. I’m also concerned that some point to the Dead Sea Scrolls as evidence that early “Christians” held the belief of a physical Earthly 1,000 reign – the Dead Sea Scrolls were written by Gnostics, not Christians. Personally, I check everything Gnostics say/write to the Bible before believing it as the truth.
Evening Rhoda (if this comment reaches you).
I have tried several times today to reply on your comment, but was timed out on 502 BAD GATEWAY, I may try again tomorrow. I did manage to post a reply elsewhere to someone earlier today, but that took an a absolute age to upload.
The Expose site doesn’t work like it used to-so slow, hopefully this can be fixed sometime soon.
The Lord’s 1000 year two WILL be physical.
Hi, you keep talking about the old testament and yhwh it’s almost like your an evangelical or schofield bilble fan. After Jesus we can all be God’s chosen people. You blab on about “Peoples” at the end of the day the so called Palestinians (semites) have lived there for millennia and at least 30% of them are Christian, the israelis that’s right not Israelites are for the most part not semites and the whole system was set up by yids and zionists etc mainly from eastern europe. Christ was not of the rabbinical judaic faith as it did not exist until after His death. There is absolutely no justification for what israhell and all supporting nations are are doing, also as the not so great rabbi tinsledick said “Islam is the broom of Israel” so credit where it’s due you’re partially correct.
Hi Dondownunder, Jesus was born into a Jewish family and grew up following Jewish customs and laws (he did not come to destroy or abolish the Law but to fulfill it). His adoptive Earthly father Joseph and his mother Mary were both direct descendants of King David, who was from the tribe of Judah. Judah was one of the 12 sons of Jacob (later known as Israel and after whom the Israelites were named). You will note the obvious link between the words “Judah” and “Judaism.” While on Earth, Jesus was both a Hebrew/Israelite and a Jew (“Jew” being derived from Judaism or of/from the Tribe of Judah).
Do you recall who initially arrested Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane? It was Rabbis of the Judaic faith who, in short, claimed Jesus had broken Jewish law.
Considering the above, your comment “Christ was not of the rabbinical judaic faith as it did not exist until after His death” is not correct. Judaism existed when Jesus was on Earth, but Christianity did not.
Christianity only really became a recognised faith, with its own name, after Jesus died. The term Christianity (Greek: christianismos) was first used by Ignatius of Antioch around 100 AD in his epistles (about 70 years after Jesus died and rose again), where he employed it as a positive self-designation to distinguish the faith from Judaism.
This video exposes the plan from 1982.
Full of details:
To use ” Palestine ” as a Jihad front all over the west:
https://youtu.be/XNydoEmR4jE?is=RKZRFYXm5VDWlpC9