Breaking News

Disabled? Then you’re not welcome in Morrisons…or Sainsbury’s…or Asda

Please share our story!

Morrisons and Sainsbury’s have announced they will BAN customers who refuse to wear face covering’s.

Morrisons Chief Executive David Potts said – “From today we are further strengthening our policy on masks.” Pots also added that security guards at the UK’s fourth-biggest supermarket chain will be enforcing the new rules.

He stated “Those who are offered a face covering and decline to wear one won’t be allowed to shop at Morrisons unless they are medically exempt.”

Morrisons Review - Which?

Sainsbury’s Chief Executive Simon Roberts said Sainsbury’s would be putting trained security guards at the front of its stores to “challenge shoppers” who do not comply. He continued by saying – “I’ve spent a lot of time in our stores reviewing the latest situation over the last few days and on behalf of all my colleagues, I am asking our customers to help us keep everyone safe.

“The vast majority of customers are shopping safely, but I have also seen some customers trying to shop without a mask and shopping in larger family groups.

“Please help us to keep all our colleagues and customers safe by always wearing a mask and by shopping alone. Everyone’s care and consideration matters now more than ever.”

Sainsbury's shares boosted as Asda merger gets a step closer | News | The  Grocer

Asda have also announced that they will extend their Covid Marshals hours to ensure compliance with the draconian, unscientific rules.

So that’s 3 of the UK’s major supermarkets who are essentially now saying you’re not welcome if you have any form of disability. Which equates to 1 in 6 people who are now not welcome in the large supermarket stores.

The UK seems to be moving further into what has come a fusion of fascism and communism, and we’ve a feeling it’s only going to get worse.

It’s important to remember your rights if you happen to be confronted by one of these Covid Marshals when you go out to do your weekly shop. So we’ve done the hard work for you and found everything you need to know.

The current statutory instrument in place directing the wearing of face coverings in shops is ‘The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Wearing of Face Coverings in a Relevant Place) (England) Regulations 2020’. This statutory instrument states that ‘No person may, without reasonable excuse, enter or remain within a relevant place without wearing a face covering.’ So the question is, what is a reasonable excuse? Well the statutory instrument (vaguely the law) states the following –

‘For the purposes of regulation 3(1), the circumstances in which a person (“P”) has a reasonable excuse include those where—

(a)P cannot put on, wear or remove a face covering—

(i)because of any physical or mental illness or impairment, or disability (within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010(1)), or

(ii)without severe distress;’

So here we have written in law the reasonable excuses for not wearing a face covering. Now we would argue that conforming to terrible science and wearing a face covering is enough to cause anyone severe distress, but you’re free to do as you please.

Now Morrisons and Sainsbury’s have stated they will have security guards at the door now who will “challenge” shoppers if they are not wearing a face covering. Well we are pleased to inform you that they have no legal right to “challenge” you. There is absolutely nothing written in the above statutory instrument that says anyone is allowed to challenge you for not wearing a face covering, however the Government’s own guidance on the law states this –

‘If you have an age, health or disability reason for not wearing a face covering:

  • you do not routinely need to show any written evidence of this
  • you do not need show an exemption card

This means that you do not need to seek advice or request a letter from a medical professional about your reason for not wearing a face covering.

Carrying an exemption card or badge is a personal choice and is not required by law.’

The Government’s own interpretation of their law clearly states you do not have to prove your exemption from wearing a face covering. So therefore these security guards and Covid enforcement officers have no legal right to challenge you and you do not legally have to give them any form of excuse or exemption.

There is another law that is on the “exempts” side, and that is ‘The Equality Act 2010’. The act essentially makes service providers (i.e. shops) liable in civil claims for acts of disability discrimination against members of the public. So with ‘The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Wearing of Face Coverings in a Relevant Place) (England) Regulations 2020’ stating you do not have to wear one if exempt, and the Government’s own interpretation of the law stating you do not have to prove you are exempt, a denial of entry to Morrisons or Sainsbury’s because the words “I am exempt” are not enough, for the power hungry security guards and Covid enforcement officers, could be classed as discrimination and result in a hefty fine for the supermarkets.


We need your support! – If everyone reading this donated you could keep The Daily Expose going for another year and enable us to uphold our commitment to bring you the facts that the mainstream refuse to.

Please click the red button to donate via PayPal.

The Anatomy of a Perfect Call to Action & Why they are Critical for Site Conversions - Inbound Now - November 5, 2013
Australia’s proposed “hate crime” bill is not only an attack on free speech; it opens the door to belief-based punishment
“Everybody needs to stand against this.  The Australian government is rushing through …
Green Energy Transition: Energy giants looked at the cliff’s edge and refused to jump
The “green” path prescribed by the climate industrial complex is economically destructive …
BritCard was a smokescreen; UK government has not shelved plans for compulsory digital IDs
The UK government confirmed it is scrapping the mandatory requirement for digital …
Ed Miliband, NESO and the CCC are gaslighting the nation about the costs of “renewable” energy
Wednesday’s AR7 results show that Ed Miliband, NESO and the CCC are …
Consultants diagnosed renal cancer – then I discovered I had IBS
Dr. Vernon Coleman describes how he was diagnosed with renal cancer.  Fortunately, …
Conservatives are banned from entering the UK, while extremists are welcomed
Eva Vlaardingerbroek, a Dutch conservative commentator and activist who has been outspoken …
Argentina designates Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organisation
Yesterday, the Argentine government officially declared branches of the Muslim Brotherhood in …
2026: The Year Independent News Needs You More Than Ever
The world is changing fast in 2026. AI-driven narratives, censorship battles, and …
George Orwell and the “anti-ICE Karens”
Referencing George Orwell's ‘1984’, Benjamin Bartee highlights the phenomenon of "anti-ICE Karens" …
Silver Price Tripled In A Year: What Happens If It Keeps Going?
In January 2025, silver traded as low as $30 per ounce. Yesterday …
UN uses “children’s rights” to bypass parents and target children
The UN is currently finalising changes to “children’s rights” to give them …
Proof that animal experiments are illogical, unscientific, pointless and dangerous
The UK government has unveiled a strategy to phase out animal experiments …
Ursula von der Leyen: Free speech is a virus; we need a vaccine
In the following, Ben Bartee reminds us of Ursula von der Leyen’s …
Binary brainwashing has been going on for decades
When our minds are engaged in binary choices, we avoid using our …
BBC files motion to dismiss Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit
The BBC has filed a motion to dismiss Donald Trump’s $10 billion …
Trump signs memorandum to withdraw US from the UN’s climate change treaty
On 7 January 2026, US President Donald Trump signed a presidential memorandum …

Please share our story!
author avatar
The Exposé

Categories: Breaking News

Tagged as:

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments