Silver was one of the most explosive commodity stories of 2025. Prices surged more than 140% over the year to an all-time high of over $83, driven by geopolitical uncertainty, rising industrial demand, and tightening supply. Then, overnight, the rally collapsed. The trigger was not a sudden discovery of new supply, or a drop in demand, but instead an active decision by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) to raise margin requirements on silver futures. This forced an enormous wave of selling that wiped out leveraged retail traders and dropped the price by over 15% in a matter of hours.
Officially, it was labelled “routine risk management”, but in practice, it formed a more familiar pattern: whenever silver runs too far, the rules are changed in favour of institutional money, and retail investors pay the price.
What Just Happened?
Silver futures allow traders to control large amounts of the precious metal with smaller amounts of capital. Essentially, they pay a “deposit” on the real value and can trade it like it’s their own – this is leverage. As we saw a few days ago, exchanges have the power to increase margin requirements – the cash traders must post to hold positions – when volatility rises. Throughout December, the CME implemented multiple margin increases, meaning investors had to raise collateral payments or sell their assets. This sequence of rule changes, rather than a one-off move, continued destabilising the market.
Each increase forces traders to reassess positions under tighter constraints, creating a rolling liquidation effect rather than a single reset. Participants who survived the first hike often found themselves unable to meet the next, amplifying downside pressure, compounded by yet another late in the month.
This stair-step approach mirrors past episodes such as 2011, where successive margin hikes accelerated declines by essentially moving liquidity from one side of the market (retail) to the other (institutions).
In short, this sell-off had nothing to do with the fundamentals of silver. Neither supply nor demand changed – it was a mechanical, deliberate move to force a crash and protect institutional money that was shorting the metal (betting on its decline).
Why Retail Always Loses
Retail investors – the everyday saver of the world – always lose out to the house, and margin hikes do not affect all market participants equally. Large institutions have deeper capital reserves and can absorb higher margin requirements, while small traders, funds, and retirement savers cannot.
When prices drop due to forced liquidation – such as the end-of-month sell-off we saw in December – it benefits the short positions. As silver pushed higher and higher in 2025, big banks and hedge funds who were betting bigger and bigger on its collapse were being badly hurt. Forcing a massive sell-off with incremental rule changes ensures the money returns to the big boys at the table, and they get chance to reset ahead of 2026.
We’ve Seen It All Before
The 2025 flash crash fits a long historical pattern. Two well-known examples of which were seen in 1980 and 2011.
In 1980, silver surged toward $50/oz as the Hunt brothers famously accumulated large positions. As prices peaked, COMEX (the Commodity Exchange under the CME) restricted new long positions and raised margins. This means anyone investing optimistically – hoping the price would go up – could no longer do so. Instead, they had to continually increase their collateral payments to stay invested. This inevitable caused force-selling of everyone’s metal, dropping the price 80% in one day to $10/oz – the day is remembered as Silver Thursday.
In October 2008, silver was $8/oz. Two and a half years later, in April 2011, it rushed toward $50. The CME once again implemented multiple margin hikes (five in nine days) which crushed the price. It dropped 30% instantly and continued a downward trend, later falling as low as $28 that same year.
The story may be different in 2025, but the warning is identical. A rapid rally caused by increased participation can be abruptly reversed by a rapid rule change protecting institutional funds.
Silver is More Than Just Another Commodity
Silver occupies a unique position in the global economy. It’s a precious metal with increasingly critical industrial importance. It’s used in a wide range of booming industries, including:
- Electronics and semi-conductors
- Solar panels and renewable energy infrastructure
- Data centres and high-performance computing
- Electric vehicles and advanced manufacturing
This changes the picture for the metal. Demand is no longer optional interest in a safe-haven finite asset – it’s suddenly an irreplaceable material that’s also totally inelastic.
The Supply Problem Most People Are Missing
Almost all silver is mined as a by-product of other metals. It’s rarely sourced on its own, and is instead produced while copper, lead, zinc, and gold are mined around the world. That means silver supply is not directly increased or decreased, but rather depends on decisions made for other metals. This structural constraint makes silver particularly vulnerable to shortages, and therefore to sharp repricing when demand rises faster than supply.
China Makes Sudden Silver Policy Change
Beginning January 1, 2026, China is implementing an export licensing regime for refined silver. Exporters for any purpose will now need government approval to ship silver from China to the rest of the world. The global effects of this policy change should not be underestimated.
China is a major processor and supplier of silver – more than half the world’s supply passes through its borders. Tightening export controls introduces massive friction into global supply chains, raises uncertainty for manufacturers, and increases the risk of regional shortages. Not only is silver embedded in clean energy, electronics, and digital infrastructure worldwide, but has now also become a political chess piece. Its tenure as just a precious metal or useful commodity is over – it’s strategic now, too.
The Real Warning
Silver being manipulated at will is a structural problem with the market. As soon as it becomes politically or economically sensitive, volatility can be controlled regardless of the supply and demand elements.
This does not mean that silver will never rise again. However, it does remind us that price spikes will continue to be interrupted, often instantly and during after-hours trading so most can’t react, without any change in underlying shortages or the metal’s fundamental value.
Final Thought
Silver’s 2025 crash was not an accident, and it was not unprecedented. The danger here is not in the metal’s volatility, but that the markets can be repeatedly suppressed at the expense of the everyday retail investor. We’re seeing a critical material increase in scarcity, while supply chains are poised to be weaponised, and price discovery is once again manipulated in favour of the big players. Where do we go from here?
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: World News