|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” – Upton Sinclair
This statement holds particularly true in the field of climate science, says Tony Heller.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
On NASA’s website is a tab labelled “Facts.” Clicking on “Facts” displays various menu options alongside a quote from the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPPC”): “Scientific evidence for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.”
The term “climate system” is vague and subject to the occasional reinterpretation as required. But on another webpage, NASA is more specific. ‘Scientific Consensus: Earth’s Climate is Warming’ is the title of the webpage listing selected quotes from selected institutions, including two from the IPPC
On another webpage, NASA shows a graph titled ‘A World of Agreement: Temperatures Are Rising’. The graph depicts the latest annual temperatures from 5 different research groups, working independently.
“Collectively, the past five years are the warmest years in the modern record,” NASA states.
In a short video titled ‘‘Imaginary Heat Record’, Heller discusses the graph above.
“The [lines] show five different [research] groups which have generated nearly identical graphs from 1880 to the present,” he said.
Showing NASA’s map of the world where temperature data is collected from, Heller said: “NASA uses this map to convince people that they have very good global coverage of the temperature record but unfortunately this is propaganda, not reality.”
For temperatures in 1880, there are temperature records from only a few areas and so there is very little coverage of the Earth, Heller explained. “Almost none in Africa and very little in Asia,” he said.
Data for 1880 from the UK’s Climatic Research Unit doesn’t fare any better. “They have none from the southern hemisphere,” he said.
“This coverage [of 1880 data] is grossly inadequate to calculate a global temperature,” Heller said.
“The only plausible explanation for the close agreement in these graph [lines] is that these different [research] groups are not independent at all, [the researchers are] actually colluding to produce the same graph,” he said.
“[The] graph [above] is not evidence of global warming. Rather, it’s evidence of widespread fraud.”
Heller then turned to recent temperature records. He explained how the urban heat island effect corrupts the entire temperature record using the example of Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s (“DRC’s”) capital and one of the largest cities in the world. “[The] urban heat island at Kinshasa corrupts the entire DRC temperature record,” he said.
“These five [lines on the] graph are fake at both ends. Most academic climate science assumes the accuracy of this graph. Billions of taxpayer dollars are diverted into climate academia to produce meaningless reports based on fake data.”
If the video above is removed from YouTube, you can watch it on Odysee HERE.
Tony Heller is an American lifelong environmentalist. He has degrees in geology and electrical engineering and has worked on design teams for many of the world’s most complex designs, including some which likely power your personal computer. He has also worked as a contract software developer on climate and weather models for the US government. He publishes articles on the website Real Climate Science and uploads videos on his YouTube channel HERE.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, World News
Brilliant quote that from Upton Sinclair-so true!
Get off it! surely we can trust the organisation that put man on the moon???
Trust? no more questions and its all settled. we have a consenus, but relying on trust? Only when the data is vefified and repeatable. The experiment destroying the CO2 hypotesis has been done so change it its not CO2 after all!
NASA Is a Fraud!
The land Rover was bigger than the space capsule.
NASA engineer admits they can’t get passed the Van Allen Belts
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4O5dPsu66Kw
Here let NASA tell you themselves “right” here.
NASA Admits We Can’t Leave Low Earth Orbit” (2017) 👨🚀
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5fb0ByYHOv0
Buzz Aldrin Just Admitted We cannot go past low earth orbit
@ 7:30 minute mark Buzz Aldrin says to a little 8-year-old girl because we didn’t go there to the moon
https://youtu.be/Y4UP6nRMuGs
Operation FISHBOWL within their Operation Dominic – Fishbowl of the Lord – they tried to break the firmament with rockets and failed.
We can’t go to the space, the Earth is a closed system.
The 7th rocket experiment was the NASA’s at 10 minutes.
See the proof.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rmDj1MJyaY&t=2s
I forgot to put inverted commas on ‘trust’.
It was well said by someone, the acronym NASA stands for Never A Straight Answer!
NASA means to deceive, herbrew.
The Hebrew nasa/nasha is a word not an acronym, nevertheless, people DO pronounce it as a word, don’t they?
Is there such a thing as a coincidence? I think not!
Yea, they are deceivers-big time.
You’re “on the ball” as always!
I just sent a reply, but it went into “waiting for approval”!
It is a fact that NASA spawned from JPL (Jet Propulsion Laboratory) Look up JPL on Wikipedia. Its principal founder Jack Parsons was, you might say, a forerunner to Elon Musk.
I quote from the Wiki/JPL page:
A 1960s NASA/JPL advert seeking to recruit employees:
“When you were a kid, science fiction gave you a sense of wonder. Now you feel the same just by going to work.”
I kid you not! That is what they said! NASA are liars of the worst kind-its all fiction.
I listened to a retired Russian engineer recently who was part of the team in Russia competing with the Americans in the “Space Race” back in the day. He said that whenever Russian cosmonauts came back from any time in space, they had to be taught how to walk again as their legs had atrophied – a rehabilitation process which normally took a month or two …….. and then one day he was watching a replay of some US astronauts getting out of their returned space capsule – and walking around normally, waving at the crowd, smiling etc. He got so intrigued that he contacted NASA and asked them about it – and got blown off with some implausible reply. This only piqued his curiosity further so he persisted and, nec minnit, he had some high official from the Russian space programme come round and tell him to back off as, if he continued, he was going to create “an international incident”. So ….. go figure ……
So true but the fact remains what ever the Temperature might or not do its not CO2, so net zero will not suceed in any cure. Unless there is resonance on CO2and a photon energy is not transfrerred so it remains supposition based on junk science not radiation as claimed.
Keep your cool folks. Even before the boiling planet story was on the drawing board at Disney, NASA had another version… of everything.
It was always important to have accurate data, but it was also important to have data that politicians and the military liked. So NASA has always run two sets of books, like every corporate accountant does.
Here is the good news. NASA’s records show the hottest year on record was 1934, and Australia’s NSW dairy farmers, who kept meticulous records from 1840 onwards, also list 1934. So there you go. We have missed the excitement and fun of global warming. It was all over and done with by 1935. Please don’t tell Mr Tedros. He does not handle disappointment well.
They are heating up the upper layers of the earth with radiation. Notice how the evenings are tend to be much warmer than the day, even on days when the sky was very cloudy and after sunset when the sun doesn’t heat us anymore.
Who is why and how? Radiation relies upon resonance to work, what is it? and where is this energy from?
This is just one, there are many:
“Sharma, A. S.; Eliasson, B.; Milikh, G. M.; Najmi, A.; Papadopoulos, K.; Shao, X.; Vartanyan, A.
2016-02-01
Ionospheric heating experiments have enabled an exploration of the ionosphere as a large-scale natural laboratory for the study of many plasma processes. These experiments inject high-frequency (HF) radio waves using high-power transmitters and an array of ground- and space-based diagnostics. This chapter discusses the excitation and propagation of low-frequency waves in HF heating of the ionosphere. …”
worldscience (org)
Then: wikipedia: Ionospheric heater
Then:
“HAARP, the most powerful ionosphere heater on Earth“(Physics today)
[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]
Milankovitch cycles, solar activity yes…carbon dioxide levels not really…twenty years now I’ve been calling this out and I am someone who “studied” it at Cambridge!!
Them. Again. And Haarp and the rest of their tech. It’s not even hidden.
Even the wikipedia knows about it. Ionospheric heaters. The only question is that it is just HAARP or 5G and satellites, too. I think Mark Steele discussed it in connection with 5G but not sure he was the one.
Not
A
Space
Agency
It’s a set; Holly wood theatre, a money laundering, pull the wool over our eyes, fraud.
It’s crashing down for them as the fiat dollar sovereign debt crises expands – no money for bribing the ‘scientists’, ‘educators’, congress’ and ‘movie industry’.
We The People will finish the job.
A ‘X’ on the backs marks the spot.
When I was a child, I was so scared of the ‘New Ice Age’ that was looming. Just the usual fear porn to keep us dumbed down and scared, it’s just the narrative that changed.. What was the quote now for the NASA acronym…oh yeah…: ‘Not A Space Agency’.
Not fully…
“HAARPThe High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program, or HAARP, is a scientific endeavour to study and experiment with radiation. Using antennas with a billion GHz per anntena. Creating lighting, earthquakes, and other natural disasters.
By radiating the ionosphere with directional precision, the radiation caused the ionosphere to heat approximately 1600 degrees. So powerful they can plume the radiation back down to earth, causing earthquakes. When geologists send waves into the ground to discover things like oil and gas, they use 30 GHz.
This technology has the potential to be weaponized for mass destruction. Global climate is being changed by weather modification tactics like the technology in the South China Sea and Alaska’s Haarp and Cloud seeding.“
I’m not an expert but I do observe things, and I’ve been observing changing weather patterns where I live over about 45 years. The climate used to be very stable and predictable with very little rain year round apart from a month in Autumn and a month in Spring. Summer temps were around 24 – 27 degrees Celcius, and you knew summer was over when that odd 30 degree day came round. But all that has changed. We had a string of summers about a decade ago where nearly every day was around the mid-30’s with occasional high-30’s and sometimes even a low-40. This was when I could observe lots of geo-engineering activity overhead (got dozens and dozens of photos). And then this all changed too. Now we’re getting very long wet winters where it stays wet all through the Spring and makes Spring planting very difficult; and the summers seem to be shorter and colder and have some real winter cold-snaps occasionally. As far as I’m concerned, if they would stop spraying all that toxic crap into the atmosphere, everything would normalise. I think people in this community are pretty aware but, generally, people need to join the dots. Geo-engineering, the CBDC’s, covid, the war in Ukraine, etc., – all these come from one belief system, believed by people who are, at bottom, all narcissists. Narcissism is a mental illness which has no cure. Here’s a great interview which ends with how to wake people up ……. https://realitycheck.radio/feargus-oconner-greenwood-on-his-book-180-unlearn-the-lies-youve-been-taught-to-believe/
Let me explain why the weather is changing. when it’s warm or not, there’s a million fires a day in the. Philippines. taking trees down is another bad thing We doing this all over the world. Then what happens? It goes to the Global warming. goes the ice cap. breaks down because the eats getting bit worse. Goes to the sea. and changes the weather. If you don’t change it, it’ll. get worse. Anything in life Where’s the problem? You have to change it or leave it as it is. And if you leave if it is, it gets worse.
since damn near everything else the national association of ’space’ actors has said since its inception has been utter hogwash and/or propaganda, it is more than likely safe to say that this is another load of straight up fraudulence.
[…] Is NASA’s ‘Temperatures Are Rising’ graph evidence of global warming or evidence of widespread… […]
[…] Read More: Is NASA’s ‘Temperatures Are Rising’ graph evidence of global warming or evidence o… […]
[…] Read More: Is NASA’s ‘Temperatures Are Rising’ graph evidence of global warming or evidence o… […]
Common sense. Wunderbar!
But what is going on with Reiner and his wife?
[…] Is NASA’s’ temperatures are rising’ graph evidence of global warming or evidence o… “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” – Upton Sinclair. This statement holds particularly true in the field of climate science. […]
[…] Is NASA’s’ temperatures are rising’ graph evidence of global warming or evidence o… “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” – Upton Sinclair. This statement holds particularly true in the field of climate science. […]