|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Almost all new homes in England will be legally required to have solar panels installed by 2027, as part of the UK government’s net zero plans. At the same time, the Government is funding “experiments” to reduce the amount of sunlight that reaches the Earth’s surface, where the solar panels are.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
The UK’s Future Homes Standard aims to ensure that new homes built from 2025 produce 75-80% fewer carbon emissions compared to homes built under the current Building Regulations. It will require new homes to have very high levels of energy efficiency and low-carbon heating systems, ensuring they contribute to the UK’s net-zero carbon emissions target.
The standard includes specific performance requirements for building elements like external walls, roofs, floors, windows and doors, as well as minimum efficiencies for heating systems, ventilation and lighting. It also demands that people’s homes be adorned with solar panels.
“The so-called Future Homes Standard regulations is due to be unveiled ‘soon’, billed as ensuring that properties are ‘highly efficient’ and do not have fossil fuel boilers by 2030,” the Daily Mail reported. “The latest version of the blueprint could see four-fifths of new homes required to have solar panels covering 40 per cent of their footprint.”
A Ministry of Housing spokesman said, “Through the Future Homes Standard we plan to maximise the installation of solar panels on new homes, as part of our ambition to ensure all new homes are energy efficient, and will set out final plans in due course.”
This mandate is expected to add between £3,000 and £4,000 to the cost of building a home.
Meanwhile, war criminal and former Prime Minister Tony Blair has said that the government’s net zero targets are “unrealistic” which has caused the Labour Party to descend into bitter infighting, with some Members of Parliament and unions urging a re-evaluation of net zero policies while others are defending them.
A day after issuing his comments, Blair, who has advised Sir Keir informally, backed down and insisted he supported Labour’s plan to reach net zero by 2050.
Blair wasn’t criticising the false “climate change” premise on which net zero policies are built. He merely criticised the current net zero approach as “doomed to fail” and called for a pragmatic “reset,” arguing that people in developed countries are unwilling to make financial sacrifices and lifestyle changes when their impact on global emissions is minimal.
Perhaps there is one good thing that might come out of Blair’s moment of sanity. Downing Street failed to guarantee the UK’s net zero czar, Ed Miliband, would still be in post by the next election, sparking claims that senior figures in Number 10 are trying to oust Mad Miliband over his hardline climate change policies.
While politicians debate current net zero policies, the climate change scam continues. And it doesn’t come cheap. Solar power, for example, is at least 10 times more expensive than natural gas. And the total cost of the UK’s “net zero transition” is going to cost the taxpayer a fortune. According to the Office for Budget Responsibility’s 2021 Fiscal Risks report, the fiscal cost of achieving net zero in the UK was estimated at around £1.4 trillion over the next 30 years, which translates to approximately £50,000 per household.
Read more: What will Net Zero cost? The Critic, September 2021
To that, add the cost of the UK government’s efforts to reduce or block the sunlight reaching the Earth’s surface as a way to “combat global warming.” These experiments involve injecting aerosolised particles into the stratosphere and brightening clouds to reflect sunlight away from Earth. The “experiments” to reduce the sunlight that reaches the Earth’s surface are being conducted through the Advanced Research + Invention Agency (“ARIA”), a clandestine outfit that is sponsored by the Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology. It was created via the ARIA Act (2022) with an initial investment of £800 million from the UK Government to pursue high-risk, high-reward research projects.
A fact that may have escaped ARIA is that “sunlight is not a pollutant, it is the language of life,” as a petition to stop the UK’s Sun-dimming experiments quite rightly states.
Read more: UK government is openly funding solar geoengineering; make your voice heard
It may also have escaped ARIA’s attention that on the Earth’s surface are the solar panels that the UK government is in the process of mandating. Solar panels are designed to convert sunlight into electricity using photovoltaic cells. It is claimed that they can generate electricity without direct sunlight but they are most efficient under direct sunlight. On cloudy or overcast days, they can still capture diffuse light and convert it into energy but at a lower power output efficiency.
Current commercial solar panels only convert 15%-22% of the Sun’s energy into electricity. To achieve this, typically, an average of four to six peak sun hours per day is enough sunlight to make a solar renewable energy system worthwhile, according to Green Power Energy which is a supplier of solar panels and is likely prone to overselling its product.
Peak sun hours refer to the duration of sunlight that is strong enough to generate the maximum power output of the solar panels. For example, if a solar panel has a power output of 250 watts and it receives four hours of peak sun, it would generate 1 kilowatt-hour of electricity.
Conditions that affect the efficiency of solar panels include the angle and orientation of the panels, the time of year (sunlight hours and solar intensity), the weather (e.g. clouds, rain and snow) and whether the panels are installed in full Sun exposure or shade conditions.
Adding to the reliability and efficiency problems of solar panels is the geographical location.
The effect of seasonal changes on photovoltaic solar panel efficiency is also heavily influenced by geographical location … regions closer to the equator experience less variation in day length and sunlight intensity throughout the year, making solar energy more reliable in those areas. For instance, solar panels installed in tropical or subtropical regions like parts of Africa, South Asia, or South America can generate power more consistently across seasons.
In contrast, regions farther from the equator, particularly in higher latitudes, experience much more pronounced seasonal variations in sunlight. In places like Scandinavia, Alaska or northern Canada, solar energy production may drop dramatically during the winter months due to limited sunlight.
Does Seasonal Changes Affect the Efficiency of Solar Panel? Invertor, 2 April 2024
Because of its geographic location, the UK has among the lowest theoretical photovoltaic power potential in the world, according to the World Bank. The theoretical potential of solar power is determined by the long-term distribution of solar resource from global horizontal irradiation (direct and indirect sunlight).
And for practical photovoltaic potential, the World Bank ranks the UK as Level 0, the lowest maximum potential.
Read more: World Bank report states that solar power has minimal potential to produce electricity in the UK
So, let’s put this all together. The UK government wants to enforce that all new homes in England are equipped with solar panels to produce electricity, at the buyer’s expense. The UK government also wants to reduce the amount of sunlight that will reach those solar panels by using chemtrails and other solar geoengineering methods, at the taxpayers’ expense. This obvious contradiction of seeking to harness sunlight while reducing sunlight is not due to stupidity or lack of common sense – it is an agenda. What agenda?
The goal of the “green economy” is wealth redistribution that benefits multinational corporations and private banks, while stripping away individual freedom, wealth and property. A government that is implementing or supporting plans to strip away our liberties is acting unconstitutionally.
As stated in Magna Carta (1215), the government cannot remove the liberties and customs that we have had for thousands of years. With its net zero agenda and solar geoengineering projects, the UK government is acting outside what the constitution permits. The UK government is, therefore, acting criminally.
Read more:
- The decades-long “climate change” plan to strip away personal freedom, wealth and property
- The Climate and Nature Bill will destroy the UK economy and end private property
- David Kurten: Net Zero Zealots will use the Energy Bill to take your home away from you
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News
The most dangerous thing that climate change zealots can do is to mess around with the earth’s climate system, and we allow them to do so at our peril. These zealots base their projections on barely 60 years of accurate data, maybe 200 years of imprecise data. The Earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old, so even 200 years is mere seconds in the Earth’s life and a group of human egotists are convinced that their activities have the power to impact the complex system that is Earth and cause the climate to change. That said their mechanical tinkering with systems and processes that they do not truly understand could easily cause the extinction of Homo sapiens and much animal and plant life on this planet.
4.5 thousand
And that’s not “years old”.
That’s just since the last cycle.
Push us into using Solar Energy and make us pay for it, then block the Sun that produces the Solar Energy and make us pay for it, whilst the absolutely massive Global aeroplane movements continue every day in order to spray the skies, which, supposedly, caused the initial problem in the first place, which they make us pay for. Yep…that makes perfect sense!
Here’s the kicker…we are then forced to pay for these psychopaths to come up with this absolute shite science in the first place.
Please if you can go to http://www.NaturalNews.com. Its creator Mike Adams has a new video out about some quite scary news of things incubating in the chemtrails. I have not seen it yet. He and Dr. Jane Ruby have investigating the trails.
agriculturedefensecoalition.org rosalin peterson has a web site also .. be careful with mike and Jane !
Sounds and Looks like the dumb following the dumbest sorry
It’s funny how they are pushing climate change right when things are published like “NASA and NOAA said this week that the sun has officially reached Solar Maximum, the peak of its 11-year cycle” (October, 2024). Although they never seem to be too phased if they say contrary things, like “if you want to ensure healthy breathing, wear a mask”.
EMF Radiation From Solar Panels (& Dirty Electricity)
Excellent info and recommendations on this site, thanks Doreen : )
[…] UK government plans to mandate new homes have solar panels and also plans to block sunlight reaching… Almost all new homes in England will be legally required to have solar panels installed by 2027, as part of the UK government’s net zero plans. At the same time, the Government is funding “experiments” to reduce the amount of sunlight that reaches the Earth’s surface, where the solar panels are. […]
Back in the more ‘normal’ pre convid age, unbelievers would often mock the Holy Bible because the Truth contained within it’s sacred pages appeared too fantastical for them to accept, yet we’re asked to believe all the excrement being constantly churned out-strewth!!!
[…] Original source: https://expose-news.com/2025/05/01/uk-government-plans-to/ […]
This is exactly what happens when the elitism and the self-importance of the ruling class takes over from the duty of full disclosure of all facts to the people pertaining to their vital interests such that their input share in the decision making process and also acts as a check to every kind of abuse you can think of.
“duty of full disclosure” ?? now where did that come from? In our so called “free” nations, or in any totalitarian nation, nor with any government I can find, is there any such a duty. In fact all of our systems protect the right of our governments to lie to us on virtually everything. In the West they protect that “right” on the basis of their alleged duty to serve the “common good”. This allows them in any FOI request to purge out any relevant information disclosing not only what is really going on but also to cover all of their graft and crimes. Covid and the “vaccines” involves massive coverups and perhaps the greatest crimes against humanity in history. Chemtrails is a close runner up and we have no right to know anything.
No one can make rational and responsible decisions on anything without full disclosure of the facts. There is no freedom without free choice regarding our interests. If we are denied access to information concerning our vital interests then we are living in a tyranny.
edit –
This is exactly what happens when the elitism and the self-importance of the ruling class takes over from their duty of full disclosure of all facts to the people pertaining to their vital interests such that the input of the people to share in the decision-making process is cancelled, and prevents them from being the primary check to every kind of abuse you can think of.
surely your comment must be a joke? they have been performing stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI)/sun dimming for decades and can be seen on a almost daily basis in the UK – please see this site for more information and evidence of SAI which is happening globally: https://geoengineeringwatch.org/
Toomuchhabitualcocaineabusedoesthat.Arrogance+toomuchmoney+self-indulgentattitude=governmentfailure.FromKingTuttothefallofthecentralandsouthAmericanempires,tothefalloftheBritishEmpireandRothschildworldbank,itstillringstrue.
[…] The average number of sunshine hours in New Zealand is above 2,000 per year. In the United Kingdom, it averages around 1,350. [For solar panels to be worthwhile, a minimum of 4-6 hours of sunshine strong enough to generate power is required per day, which translates to 1,460 – 2,190 hours of “peak sun hours” per year. Because of its geographical location, the UK is well below the minimum of sunshine required for solar panels to be an effective source of energy. Read more HERE.] […]
[…] Numărul mediu de ore de soare în Noua Zeelandă este peste 2.000 pe an. În Regatul Unit, acesta este în jur de 1.350. [For solar panels to be worthwhile, a minimum of 4-6 hours of sunshine strong enough to generate power is required per day, which translates to 1,460 – 2,190 hours of “peak sun hours” per year. Because of its geographical location, the UK is well below the minimum of sunshine required for solar panels to be an effective source of energy. Read more HERE.] […]
[…] The average number of sunshine hours in New Zealand is above 2,000 per year. In the United Kingdom, it averages around 1,350. [For solar panels to be worthwhile, a minimum of 4-6 hours of sunshine strong enough to generate power is required per day, which translates to 1,460 – 2,190 hours of “peak sun hours” per year. Because of its geographical location, the UK is well below the minimum of sunshine required for solar panels to be an effective source of energy. Read more HERE.] […]
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/GYNRr9Mf5MI rosalin peterson