“If successful, we anticipate we will have saved the health and lives of many children and the heartbreak of their families.” – Covid19Assembly
On 2 August 2021, the first step in legal action was taken to challenge the temporary authorisation of Covid-19 injections for children. A letter before action was sent to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”) and to Sajid Javid, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care.
“We will force the MHRA to reveal why, given the number of children who suffered harm in Pfizer’s trials, they believe your children should risk taking these drugs,” furthermore, “previous vaccines bear no resemblance to the completely new technology being used in the Covid drugs. We cannot know what the long-term effects will be on our developing children’s bodies – on their neurology, fertility or involution to any chronic conditions,” says Beth Turner, journalist and mum of three.
If you want to find out more about Covid19Assembly’s legal challenge and how you can help, follow this LINK.
By Rhoda Wilson
Although their challenge relates specifically to children it raises important questions that we should all, as a matter of urgency, be asking ourselves before anyone, of any age, takes a Covid injection or encourages others to do so. Here we ask just two of those questions.
Is there an emergency we need saving from?
As of 19 March 2020, Covid was no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (“HCID”) in the UK. A HCID is defined as an acute infectious disease which: typically has a high case-fatality rate; may not have effective prophylaxis or treatment; is often difficult to recognise and detect rapidly; has the ability to spread in the community and within healthcare settings; and, requires an enhanced individual, population and system response to ensure it is managed effectively, efficiently and safely.
Despite the Government recognising Covid was not a HCID, the Coronavirus Act 2020 (“Act”) was introduced to Parliament on 19 March, passed the House of Commons without a vote on 23 March and the House of Lords on 25 March. The Act subsequently received Royal Assent on 25 March 2020. The first national “lockdown” started on 23 March 2020 and restrictions have continued in some form or other ever since.
In August 2020, a legal research and campaign group established that the Act was ‘null and void’ as Covid (the disease) or SARS-CoV-2 (the virus) had not been not legally, medically or scientifically recognised as a disease or virus so it could not be legislated against. Further, there were a multitude of procedural and legal errors made when the Government enacted this legislation. Including enforcing the Act with the “lockdown” before it actually became law with Royal Assent. The case was denied judicial review and an appeal has been filed.
In February 2021, we reported that an analysis of NHS and ONS data proved the Covid death toll, as officially reported and publicised, is a lie. In March a mainstream journalist threw more evidence into the ring confirming that the Covid death statistics are enormously exaggerated and false. You can to some extent prove this for yourself by assessing what risk Covid poses to you using an online risk assessment: QCovid, and compare it to what you’ve been led to believe.
QCovid is a mobile app developed by the University of Oxford. It is an evidence-based model that uses a range of factors such as age, sex, ethnicity and existing medical conditions to predict risk of death or hospitalisation from Covid. You can take a quick test to gauge what your personal risk is by answering a few questions about yourself HERE. It calculates, for example, a 50+ year old with no underlying health conditions has a 1 in 34,483, or 0.0029%, chance of dying from Covid. To put this into context, the same person would have had a 1 in 434, or 0,23%, chance of being injured in a road accident during 2019 in the UK. The risk of being a road user – whether as a pedestrian, cyclist or in a vehicle – is one we personally assess and mitigate, and often multiple times, daily. It would be ludicrous to “lockdown” a nation, consequentially destroying millions of lives and livelihoods, to protect certain individuals from being potentially harmed in a road accident. The measures would be disproportionate to the risk.
In July, evidence packs showing proof of several crimes committed by Members of Parliament were given to numerous police officers. Evidence included proof that UK overall mortality rate had only fractionally increased from 2019 to 2020, by 11 in 10,000. Responses to numerous freedom of information (“FOI”) requests confirm this, for example: a response from Birmingham City Council showed total cremations and burials were lower in 2020 than the previous five years. Other causes of death do not suddenly disappear so we would expect to see all cause deaths noticeably and dramatically rise, in plain sight, if there were a pandemic.
Recently, a funeral director has been speaking out about what he has witnessed. He stated last year, except for a brief period of around ten days in April 2020, “the death rate was totally normal.” He explained that the deaths during April were mostly in care homes where, he said, “I believe thousands of the most vulnerable people in society were killed using large doses of a drug called Midazolam.”
But, as for the remainder of the year, deaths were “a little bit down on 2019 and towards Christmas many of my colleagues were actually turning their fridges off because there was no-one dying. We began vaccinating on January 6 locally and the death rate went through the roof almost immediately — within the same week, and for three months. I’ve never known a death rate like it in 15 years as an undertaker,” he said. Since going public he has had around a dozen funeral directors contact him confirming they noticed similar patterns in their own businesses.
The spike in deaths immediately after the start of mass Covid vaccination programmes is a phenomenon seen the world over leading some to wonder if the “vaccine is the pandemic”. So, it leads to another important question.
Are the Covid injections safe?
A shocking 86% of children suffered an adverse reaction to the Pfizer / BioNTech injection during clinical trials. What’s more shocking is the trials were allowed to continue and governments are contemplating injecting children en masse. And this is merely the start of a long and growing list of evidence demonstrating the Covid injections are unsafe. Below are some further examples.
Preliminary findings from a study showed four out of five women who were given a Covid injection suffered a miscarriage.
By April 2021, Accident and Emergency Departments at UK hospitals were over-flowing with people who had suffered adverse reactions to the Covid injections.
According to FOIs obtained from Public Health Scotland, almost ten times the number of people have died within 28 days of receiving a vaccine in seven months than died “involving” Covid during the previous twelve months.
At the end of July, a report from Public Health Scotland revealed that 87% of the people who died from Covid were “vaccinated” and a report from Public Health England revealed 65% of those who died were “vaccinated”. It seems the situation may get worse: a document produced by the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (“SAGE”) admits the Covid injections will lead to a “variant” that will kill 35% of people who are infected with it. Remember the 50+ year old in an earlier paragraph with a 0.0029% chance of dying from Covid?
We regularly report on the adverse reactions to the Covid injections and we should take the time to look closely at what these reactions are telling us. The MHRA’s latest report shows the number of adverse reactions reported to the Yellow Card system is well over a million and the number of deaths is 1,517. It is estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported. Assuming reporting levels haven’t declined due to the current culture of gaslighting and censorship, this could mean at least 15,000 people have already died as a result of the Covid injections. Until these post-vaccination deaths are investigated the Covid injections cannot be labelled as “safe”. To the contrary, they should be assumed to be the most dangerous substance, in the history of man-kind, to be injected into human populations.
The Covid injections are experimental, they are currently undergoing Phase 3 trials, and the population at large are the trial participants. The “vaccinator” is legally obliged to inform you that you are taking part in an experiment and of the risks involved. The UK granted the Covid injections temporary authorisation and for emergency use only. Which takes us back to the first question: is there an emergency we need saving from and, now we can add, if there is a public health emergency, is it due to Covid or the “vaccines”?
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
WE URGENTLY NEED YOUR HELP…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, The Expose Blog
Very clearly put.
GO AWAY FUCK YOUR JOB. PEOPLES LIVES AT RISK
Yes ,it can only be compared to a Satanic plot to deceive the world.,with evil intentions.
More thumb twiddling whilst the cess pit burns.
You can’t beat them in their courts run by their judges and their lawyers. Wake up already.
The vaccines are safe, until you have had them:
FORMER PFIZER EMPLOYEE CONFIRMS POISON GRAPHENE OXIDE IN VAXXXINE
Karen Kingston, former Pfizer employee, confirms covid vaxxxines are poison.
Nice of her to bring some science, to the growing pile of bodies.
DEADLY SHOTS! Former Pfizer Employee Confirms Poison in COVID ‘Vaccine’ (rumble.com)
Transcript of the interview:
Stew Peters: “Well we have gone back and forth with fact-checkers – some independent researchers who have attempted to debunk the findings of Spanish researchers called La Quinta Columna, originally broken here on the Stew Peters Show by Dr. Jane Ruby. That video revealing that graphene oxide, a toxic substance – a poison! was found in the Pfizer vaccines. Those researchers later found that the same applied to Moderna and AstraZeneca, is now being tested as a result of our reporting. The truth is here.
USA Today and Lead Stories, all funded by the cabal, were all over me, all over Dr. Jane Ruby, and out and out calling us liars for reporting those findings to the world in a video that has now soared over well I think about a million views on Rumble.
We have sought the input of many medical experts, world-renowned doctors, Dr. Jane Ruby, Dr. Tenpenny, Dr. Judy Mikovitz, Dr. David Martin, they have all confirmed that report. But despite all of that confirmation, the assaults on our truth continue.
On twitter, you may have recently been following the hashtag ‘pfizerleak’ [#pfizerleak]. We want to know what’s in them. We want to know if it was pre-planned. Who’s behind all of it. We want to know what to believe, so today we’re going to get the confirmation that we need.
It’s hard to fact-check documents. It’s hard to fact-check publicly discoverable propriotary ingredients. It’s hard to fact-check Karen Kingston. She is a former Pfizer employee, currently an analyst for the pharmaceutical and medical device industries.
Karen, thank you so much for being here. We really appreciate your bravery. We admire your desire to expose the truth behind what appears to be, to me at least, one of the most, if not THE most, evil agenda mankind has ever been subject to.”
Karen Kingston @1:50: “Well, thank you for giving me a platform to share my findings and to spread the truth. And you’re right, it is extremely difficult to find this information and link it together. I do have a unique set of skills, this is what I do in the industry; I analyse intellectual property, the legal landscape, for both physicians, pharma and consumers, and then I’m also a scientific writer and do the clinical analysis as well. So you can’t expect everyone to have that skill set to find this information, and the truth is I’m – you know, the whole do your own research was born out of the reality that the mainstream media has been lying to us and big tech and social media have been blocking the truth. And that’s why people have had to do their own research.
And that’s – that violates our first amendment.”
SP: “Is graphene oxide in these shots?”
KK: “100% it is, and it’s irrefutable.”
Stew Peters @2:38: “So, just lay it out there. Is graphene oxide in these shots?”
Karen Kingston: “100% it is, and it’s irrefutable. And I’ll walk you through it.
So, what’s really important to know is that all of the mRNA vaccines contain what’s called a PEGylated lipid nanoparticle. And that’s what we’re going to go through. So if you take a look at the Moderna patent, it says, right there, that this contains lipid nanoparticle formulation. And as you go through the patent, which I’ll show you, they specifically talk about various ingredients and various PEGylated formulations that have alpha-numeric codes. And then you can also find them in the filings with the FDA with the IND [investigational new drug] and phase 3 trials for both Moderna and Pfizer. And you can also find them, you know, across the pond with the UK filings. I hope that’s making sense so far.
So here’s the important thing about the patent. I read the patent; it’s 193 pages plus attachments. And I read the patent to look for graphene oxide. It is not listed in the patent because it is a trade secret. So remember Bill Gates saying that there was a trade secret? Trade secrets are not, you know, privy to the public, so they cannot be in the patent. So graphene oxide is not listed in the patent, and it lists everything BUT that. But I’m still going to show you evidence that these contain graphene oxide and the patent in China that shows they contain graphene oxide.”
Stew Peters: “So let me just ask you, why would they put every other ingredient on the patent, with the exception of the standalone, graphene oxide? Why would they not put that on there?”
Karen Kingston: “I would say the number one reason is because it’s poisonous to humans and well-known that it’s poisonous to humans.
Yeah, and the other reason is because it is the main ingredient in hydrogel, which is the liquid, you know, AI template that’s used for some of Elon Musk’s, you know, research and Bill Gates, as far as that creating an interface between humans and, you know, the internet, if you will.”
Stew Peters: “So there is a legitimate theory that these shots are actually designed to create some sort of connectivity between humans, 5G – whatever this is, controlling your thoughts, your memories, all of these things, I mean, those are realistic and plausible possibilities?”
Theory: Humans as guinea pigs | Injecting people with as much graphene oxide as possible before they die.
Karen Kingston @4:56: “That’s not possible with this round. They rushed this thing out. They’re just seeing, you know, how much they can put into people before they die, I think, honestly.”
Stew Peters: “So this is a dose finding study? Basically a live dose finding study, and those that are dying or multiple sclerosis, Guillan-Barre, these tremors, the magnetism, all these things – “
Karen Kingston: “Well remember, we’re supposed to get boosters every 6 months. So we’re gonna get graphene oxide boosters every 6 months, to see how much we can build up in the system. We’ll go through this, because when you see the nations that are being injected, we’re the guinea pigs, you know, and so once they perfect this technology, I think there’s a second plan. I actually am not super comfortable talking about this stuff, because I don’t like to, you know, opinions on things, you know, and hypothesize, so I’d rather just stick to the data, if that’s okay.
So if you take a look at chemical and engineering news, there is these non peer-reviewed journals, we call them RAGS in the industry, every industry has it. And it’s basically, you know, the whales of the industry, the who’s who, and they just kind of brag about what they’re doing. So this article talks about the PEGylated lipid nanoparticles that are in all the COVID-19 vaccines. And there’s 4 lipids. And I’ll go over this.
So the first lipid is cholesterol, and that’s, our body loves cholesterol, it makes it go through the blood. Then there’s a phospholipid; the phospholipid adheres to the cell membrane, so that allows permeability to enter the cell membrane. There’s an ionizable lipid, so that gives it a positive ionic charge to help penetrate the mRNA to get into the cell. And then there’s the PEGylated lipid.
And so the reason why they created these is because mRNA is very unstable. Whether it’s synthetic or zoonic, which means it’s from an animal, you know, or a human. It’s very unstable. 80 degree weather kills it. Sunlight kills it. If you breathe on it, it dies. I mean, and researchers all say this.
It’s just – it rarely gets past the nasopharynx area of any healthy individual. It just – you know, your saliva kills it. It cannot survive on its own, so it needed this kind of biosphere that they created for it. And that’s why we have these four lipids and then they put the graphene oxide.
Now what’s interesting about the graphene oxide is that it’s 4,000 times stronger than titanium, and can withstand seventeen hundred degree fahrenheit temperature. So we took this very unstable virus, single helix virus, and we made it indestructible. Or “we”… they made it indestructible. So the PEGylated lipids, if you take a look, it’s ‘peg’: PEG, they’re made by a company called SINOPEG, which is [SINOPEG], and they’re located in China.
Now, how did I find this out? Well if you take a look at the Pfizer EUA filing, they list the 4 lipids – they have 2 lipids, each of which have 4 lipids of them in there, and so does Moderna. And Moderna’s is called – it’s called a Material Safety Data Sheet, this is what they use in industrial products. And it has a cast number, and there’s is SM102 for Moderna; and then if you go to Pfizer’s filing with the UK, the number – the 2 lipids that are in there, are called ALC0315 and ALC0159.
So, when I googled MSDS cast, don’t ask how I know all this information, and I put in some of those numbers, I found SINOPEG. I didn’t find SINOPEG by googling SINOPEG. I literally put in the MSDS number. And so if you go to the website, you’ll see the, you know, extremely long, like I don’t know, hundred alpha-numeric name of each of these lipids. And you’ll see it under a tab called COVID-19 Excipients. And it says ‘polyethylene glycol PEG 2000’, right? And then here you’ll see it’s ALC0159, and this company is located in China. And then if you pull from the patent, from the Moderna patent, it lists out all the different polyethylene glycol 200, PEG 200, PEG 2,000, and you will find those listed under the COVID-19 Excipients in SINOPEG.
So… it’s right there. It’s manufactured in China. And so, there’s other vaccines that are mRNA vaccines that are not being sold in the United States. You can find those excipients here too, by the cast number, the Material Safety Data Sheet cast number. Graphene oxide as a conductor of electricity | “positive charge annihilates anything that it comes in contact with”
Karen Kingston @9:15: And so if you want to know what is graphene, you know, what they explain here on SINOPEG, is, it is the ‘core-shell structure polyethylene glycol functionalized graphene for energy-storage polymer dielectrics: combined mechanical and dielectric performances’.
So what that means is that graphene is a conductor – it can be a conductor of electricity. If it has a positive charge, and this is in all the – some of the studies from the NIH and Moderna and stuff, if graphene gets a positive charge, it annihilates anything that it comes in contact with. Right now they’re not charged. They’re neutralized.
You know, well like, how does a positive charge get into the cell? That’s that other lipid. That ionizable lipid that gives it the positive charge for cell penetration. But these currently are not – they’re neutral, they have a neutral field. But if they are, if there’s an electrical magnetic field that activates a positive charge, potentially there’ll be damage and potentially death, depending on where these nanoparticles ended up in people’s bodies and how much of them did.”
Stew Peters: “So it’s apparent to me that they’re lying, to the world. (Karen Kingston: “Yeah.”) They’re trying to hide this; this is the secret ingredient. Lead Stories, USA Today, and all these other publications fact-checking this program, it appears to me that they are out and out lying. We’re going to get to who’s in on all of this in a minute, because I’m going to ask you, but, why are they using this graphene oxide? It’s a toxic substance, it’s poisonous. Why would – why are they using it?”
Karen Kingston: “Because it’s a great conductor of electricity and it can host magnetic field. So it can literally – it can connect you to the internet. That’s why.”
Stew Peters: “All right. I just wanted to make sure that I was clear on that. Because I know that you’re not comfortable opining opinions, things like that, but I just wanted to make sure factually that that’s what it can do, that’s what it’s capable of doing.”
Karen Kingston: “Yeah, and I mean, I haven’t had the chance, but I could probably go into some tech publications and AI publications, and we can find more information on how graphene oxide is a great electromagnetic – “ Graphene oxide is poisonous/toxic – Who’s responsible for it being in the vaccines?
Stew Peters @11:24: “Well the bottom line is that it’s poisonous. It’s poisonous
(Karen Kingston: “It is poisonous.”)
– it annihilates if it has a positive charge; it annihilates anything that it comes into contact with. It’s toxic for humans, it should not be in there and it is. That is what I needed to know. Who’s behind this? That’s what I’d like to know. Who’s behind all of this?”
Karen Kingston: “Well, I don’t… so, hold on, I didn’t put this in here but, there’s a company called Shanghai Nanotech, and they filed a patent, and you can – for graphene oxide for the use in COVID-19 excipients, and this is a meeting of them at their headquarters and that looks like, I think his name is Tal Zaks, the chief technology officer for Moderna, and if you go to the World Health Organization website, there is a page where they talk about how the global world needs to work together on these COVID-19 vaccines.
It’s from some time last year. And you’ll see the usual suspects there. You’ll see like Peter Daszak and the names from Moderna and several names from the NIH and NIAID, so… there is a large group of billionaires and millionaires, many many times over that have coordinated for the development and execution of these products.”
Stew Peters: “So you knowing this, you bringing this confirmation, why would the – I guess, I mean this is opinion, so you can just tell me if you’re not comfortable answering this, but I gotta ask, why would people like President Trump, Ron DeSantis, Sean Hannity, what do they have in – what stake in the game do they have? How do they not know this stuff? They have – I mean…”
Attempts to expose these vaccines as bioweapons are silenced/censored.
Karen Kingston @13:05: “No, there’s no way they can know this stuff. I want to be…[long pause], when I – sorry, when I found out, when I read this information, I didn’t know a woman could cry as hard as I cried. So I sent an email out on May 26th, to about 30 outlets with this information; I sent an email summarizing that these are bioweapons. I even spoke to – and I don’t mean to be disparaging to anybody, I even spoke to American Frontline Doctors and stuff and after I spoke to them, you know, some of the doctors still went on saying, “Oh, as long as you’re – if you’re under 30 you shouldn’t get the vaccine.”
And I called them up and I’m like, “What the hell are you doing? These are bioweapons.” They’re like, “We can’t say that.“ So the cognitive dissonance of the depravity and the evil of these “vacc” – injections, is very difficult for anyone to understand. And you have to also understand that for the whole year and a half these were being developed, anyone that came out and said, “Hey, this virus isn’t that bad”, they were mocked, they were ridiculed, they were ostracized, doctors were threatened to have their license taken away. So the truth couldn’t get out there. And then when people, anyone that was questioning about the speed for any of these vaccines to market, the need for them, even the FDA documents, they talk about “Hey, we don’t think someone under 18 should get these things. We’re worried about viral shedding.” If you show this like here – the manufacturing section of the application is redacted!
No one in good conscience should have approved this. But there is such brainwashing going on, such control of what basically the big tech wanted us to know as “the truth”, which was a bunch of lies, that it’s very difficult then for when someone says to you, “this is what’s going on”, to believe it.
I would compare it to anyone that’s been in a marriage where they had a spouse that was cheating on them. Your friends can tell you they’re cheating, there’s tons of evidence, but you are not going to believe it. You’re not going to believe all your trusted – all your trusted advisors have been telling you this stuff is safe, everything on the media says it’s safe, and then someone says “No. It’s actually lethal, and this is a planned, you know, planned genocide.” It’s impossible to believe.
Stew Peters: “Wow.”
Karen Kingston: “Does that make sense?”
Questioning people’s complicity with these agendas
Stew Peters @15:25: “Yeah, and, you know, I’m just, I’m having a hard time. I mean, honestly, I mean, I’m a human. You know. And so just knowing people that have subjected themselves to this inoculation; knowing how hard, how difficult it is to have a conversation with somebody, doing what I do, downloading to my brain, terabytes of information, every single day. Trying to determine what’s real, what’s not, what’s mis- and what’s dis-information? Who’s deep state, who’s trying to throw me off, who’s controlled opposition?
You know, I mean it really – it happens. It sounds like some kind of a sci-fi movie, but you’re living in it, so you understand. I’m just trying to process all of this as you’re saying it. And I’m imagining, you know, people in the media. You know, I’m imagining, you know, people that they don’t understand that there are billions of lives at stake, or maybe they do, which makes it even worse. Because they’re complicit in this. They’re part of this – the carrying on of this.
And then, I think about everybody who’s going to be mandated; these shots. Um, listen, I’ve – Karen, I got an email this morning. I got an email this morning from a very concerned mother, of a young woman, who is going to be attending a Christian college in South Carolina. And they’re going to mandate this thing for her. 18 year old young woman with her entire life ahead of her. And she’s just one of millions of stories like this that are happening here in this country. What we’re doing to our young people. Poisoning them.
And so, then you got healthcare workers. I mean, I have a dozen emails in the last 48 hours from nurses, healthcare workers, doctors, people who are working at these facilities, in these clinics at these hospitals that are going to be mandated this. They don’t want to do it, they need help! And, you know, the DOJ is telling everybody that they can do this. The governors can mandate this, that businesses can mandate this. And so…” “There’s no benefit to your health when you get injected;
the only thing it can do is poison, harm and kill.”
Karen Kingston @17:15: “Well, the DOJ – just because someone says something, especially in this current administration, doesn’t make it true. Okay? The DOJ can say, “We recommend this is mandated. We’re saying that this is – we mandate these vaccines.” But I, you know, it’s a memo, I read the memo, okay? It’s a memo that was written by Dawn Johnsen. She’s the acting assistant attorney general to the president, saying that, under title code 21, section 564, you can – private companies and local governments can mandate the vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization.
Her interpretation is reckless, and it has no merit. So it’s just an opinion. It is not enforceable.
Period. You know. And on top of that, what’s happened with these vaccines, or these injections, these EUA injections, not only is all the campaign and the propaganda a bunch of lies to terrify people into getting injected, which is a violation of human rights in and of itself, on top of that, she doesn’t mention title code 21 in her memo, which is what this falls under, because they violated 4 other sections of that title code under drug safety: drug and vaccine safety.
They have, under section 502, it’s false and misleading labelling, because this thing is NOT a vaccine, there’s no benefit to your health when you get injected; the only thing it can do is poison, harm and kill. So there’s false and misleading l. It doesn’t tell you that it contains graphene oxide. Adulterated drugs and devices, it also violates section 501, which again, adulterated drugs and devices is if it includes a toxin, which is the graphene oxide.
It also violates section 312.23 under initial new drug application. So if you go through an IND, you have to prove safety in animals before you move on to humans. They signed a letter of intent for pregnant rats. If that doesn’t make you furious, and we’re injecting pregnant women? And under the IND it says that if there is shedding, if there is risk to people of child-bearing age, then you need to stop the trial.
We KNOW there is shedding. We KNOW there is risk to child-bearing age. And the FDA even talks about it in their protein therapy and oncolytic virus that treatments that shedding is a real thing and you need to do animal studies first, then you need to do phase 1 human studies, and if there is, you know, if there is shedding, then you need to come up with controlled measures so that you don’t infect the un-injected. Which is what’s going on right now. They also violate section 312.42, which is clinical research holds and request for modifications. So that says if any of these things, I said, there’s at least 3 dozen, you need to stop the trials.”
Difference between trials of the past, and the COVID injections
Stew Peters @20:08: “Trials have been stopped when 25 people die; when 6 beagle dogs die.”
Karen Kingston: “They were supposed to have stopped the trials when they did the mice study, and all the mice – 80% died in 24 hours, and the rest died by the end of the week. […] They should’ve stopped the trials – “
Stew Peters: “But there is no threshold here. Is there? I mean – that’s the bottom line. There is no threshold. It doesn’t matter how many people die, they will continue this incessant push, won’t they?”
Karen Kingston: “Until American people speak up, and say ‘Enough is enough. Stop it!’ They will keep pushing us until, you know, they basically wipe out America. And they’re going after the children. Which is what is so disheartening. There is a – there will be no posterity. There will be no America. You know, if people of child-bearing age become infertile, and then children are at most risk for having serious adverse events and death from these injections. I mean, just look at the myocarditis numbers. They’re 1 to 25,000 reported, we know that’s at least 10%, which would be 1 in 2500, and it’s probably more like 1 in 250, which would be 4% of children are getting – having decades taken off their life or dying.
By Derek Knauss August 6, 2021
What no salt water sniffing this time?