|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Public Health England has now been axed in favour of the new disturbingly named UK Health Security Agency, and one of the first reports published by the UKHSA shows that the Covid-19 vaccines do not work and have a negative effectiveness as low as minus-sixty-six-percent.
Pfizer claim that there Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of the following –
During the ongoing clinical trial, 43,661 subjects were split evenly between the placebo and vaccine groups (about 21,830 subjects per group).
In the placebo group — the group that got didn’t have the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine — 162 became infected with the coronavirus and showed symptoms.
Whilst in the vaccine group — the group that got the real vaccine — that number was only 8.
Therefore the percentage of placebo group who became infected equated to 0.74% (162 / 21830 x 100 = 0.74).
Whilst 0.04% of the vaccinate group became infected (8 / 21830 x 100 = 0.04)
In order to calculate the efficacy of their Covid-19 mRNA injection, Pfizer then performed the following calculation –
They first subtracted the percentage of infections in the vaccinated group from the percentage of infections in the placebo group.
0.74% – 0.04% = 0.7%
Then they divided that total by the percentage of infections in the placebo group, which equated to 95%.
0.7 / 0.74 = 95%.
Therefore, Pfizer were able to claim that their Covid-19 mRNA injection is 95% effective.
We don’t need to go into the fact that this calculation was extremely misleading and only measured relative effectiveness rather than absolute effectiveness. Neither do we need to go into the fact that Pfizer chose to ignore thousands of other suspected infections during the ongoing trial and not perform a PCR test to confirm the infection because it would have thrown efficacy below the required minimum of 50% to gain regulatory approval.
The reason we don’t need to go into it is because the general public are being told that the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is 95% effective due to the calculation performed above. The same calculation was also used based on individual results to claim a vaccine efficacy of around 70% for AstraZeneca, and around 98% for Moderna.
Now, thanks to a wealth of data published by the new UK Health Security Agency we are able to use the same calculation used to calculate 95% effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine, to calculate the real world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines.
Table 2 of the UK Health Security Agency Vaccine Surveillance report, published September 30th 2021, shows the number of recorded infections by vaccination status between week 35 and week 38 of 2021. It also shows the confirmed case rate among persons fully vaccinated, and rates among persons not vaccinated per 100,000 people.
Pfizer had an equal amount of people who had been vaccinated, and had not been vaccinated in the ongoing clinical trial in order to calculate the effectiveness of their vaccine, so in order to calculate the real-world effectiveness all we have to do is perform the same calculation using the rates per 100,000 numbers supplied by the UK Health Security Agency, which are as follows –
The efficacy of all available vaccines combined is as low as – 65.72% within the 40-49 age group, and as high as – 7.8% in the 80+ age group. This shows that the Covid-19 vaccines are making people more susceptible to catching Covid-19, rather than preventing cases of Covid-19 by up to 95%.
By combining the numbers provided for all age groups over the age of 40, we have been able to calculate an average vaccine effectiveness of – 50.58%, and we’re definitely seeing this in the number of confirmed cases by vaccination status.
Between week 35 and week 38 of 2021 there were 21,667 confirmed Covid-19 cases in the unvaccinated over 40’s, 7,106 confirmed cases in the partly vaccinated over 40’s, and a frightening 202,343 confirmed cases in the fully vaccinated over 40’s.
The new UK Health Security Agency proves without a shadow of a doubt that the Covid-19 vaccines do not work, and actually make the recipients worse.
Read and Share – ‘47% rise in deaths among teenagers since they started getting the Covid-19 vaccine according to ONS data’
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
We are being heavily censored. Please share this article…
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, The Expose Blog, World News
Excellent report.
Dr. Jessica Rose recently testified before the FDA’s Vaccine Advisory committee that all VAERS numbers need to be multiplied by a factor of 41x. That puts the current death-by-vaccine toll in the US at 615,000 – more than have “officially” died from covid.
https://secularheretic.substack.com/p/death-by-covid-jabs-update-12
The death figure can’t be that high but certainly other effects of the clot shots are severely under-reported. If 150 million people have been injected in the US then your 615,000 figure would mean that roughly 1 in 244 people would die after taking the clot shots and that simply isn’t happening.
How you know?
Last year and this year, no more people have died from covid then were expected to die from all causes. To get the death count as high as it was reported to be no one could have died from anything else. Influenza totally disappeared because of a virus that has never been isolated. The “vaccine” was a computer construct based upon a man made virus patented in the US around 2006. A paper published by Ralph Baric and ShingLi (China) described their construction of a coronavirus that would infect humans.
It took all of 24 hours to produce the mRNA thing that has been used as a vaccine, but it is not a vaccine. Look up the accepted definition of a vaccine and you will see that the injection is not a vaccine. Generally speaking a vaccine protects people from death due to a disease. This thing has killed thousands world wide.
The death rate will go up end of this year and next year because the jab destroys peoples immunity systems
Because of the corruption of reporting of Covid deaths it is difficult to rely on anything. The only figures we can trust are the total deaths. I have looked at the UK Office of National Statistics mortality rates up to 2020 and there is little sign of any pandemic in the figures. It will be interesting to see the 2021 data when they are available.
Your alternative update on #COVID19 for 2021-10-01. J&J: children don’t need jab. Jab Spike Protein Hurts Heart. Liberty before safety, now and always
https://paulthepaperbear.wordpress.com/2021/10/01/your-alternative-update-on-covid19-for-2021-10-01-jj-children-dont-need-jab-jab-spike-protein-hurts-heart-liberty-before-safety-now-and-always/
Two children in the US were accidentally injected with the Pfizer shot when they were supposed to be getting an influenza shot at a Walgreens Pharmacy. The children are 4 and 5 years of age. Both began to have adverse reactions before they got home. You should be able to find a great deal of information on this now.
So who’s going to stop these crooks? What’s the next step?
They are trying to stop us from communicating. This week since they found out what’s in the jab and how much more harmful they really are all social media platforms are censoring us.
Everyone should look up “The power of the Fed’s” fast forward to 29 mins. Listen to what Jeremy Grantham says. He says if we get in their way of making $ that they will collapse the world economy. That’s a direct threat. He should be in prison.
Mercola believes that 200,000 American’s have died from the vaccines, so far – but why would anyone take a vaccine when there is a free alternative which works 100%:
The assumption is that the only way to deal with Covid, is after it arrives as Covid in your body, after the initial cold infection, in your head, some 20 days earlier
.
Why is that?
Kill the Flu or Coronavirus in the head, soon after getting the virus in the nasal passages inside the head, with my free salt water cure, which flushes out the nasal passages (so no Long Covid) and kills off the Coronavirus infection, immediately, or during the 10 to 14 days of self isolation.
No infection in the head, no Covid – it is as simple as that.
Then the purpose and functions of the vaccines, ceases to be a problem and you simply can’t get sick and won’t ever get Covid.
Mix one heaped teaspoon of “iodine” table or sea salt in a mug of warm or cold “clean” water, cup a hand and pour some of the solution in, then sniff or snort that mugful up into your nose, spitting out everything which comes down into your mouth, from the back of your throat, by so doing, you flush out your nasal cavity, where Coronavirus lives.
If you get a burning sensation (which lasts for 2-3 minutes) then you have a Coronavirus infection.
When the soreness goes away, blow out your head with toilet paper and flush away, washing your hands afterwards and continue doing my salt clean water nasal cavity flush cure, morning, noon and night, or more often, if you want, until, when you do my free salt water cure, you don’t experience any soreness at all in your nasal cavity inside your head.
While you are at it, swallow a couple of mouthfuls and if you get a burning sensation in your chest, then you are killing the Covid/Pneumonia there too, so keep it up, each time you do a salt water sniffle, until the soreness in your head and lungs goes away – job done.
When you flush your head with the salt water remedy, it should feel like you are flushing your head with water – no reaction felt at all.
I have been doing this for 27 years and I am never ill from viruses and there is no reason for anyone else to be either.
You don’t need to be tested to see if you have a head infection, you will know instantly if you have or not, with my free salt water cure
We will need a cure for Coronavirus or the Flu, which everyone will get sooner or later and this is it – my Covid Crusher.
Pass it around to everyone and take credit for it yourself, if you want.
Now to the nitty gritty – try it with everyone with Flu like symptoms and see for yourself how effective it is and post your results here.
Make my day!!
Richard.
You don’t need an infection in your nasal passages to get a burning feeling. You can get that same feeling will the water in a lake or a swimming pool.
Go to Mecola’s site and search for the instructions for making a nasal cleaning solution using very dilute hydrogen peroxide. You breath an atomized vapor of this and it will knock off any virus or bacteria in your nasal passages. It will not cause any burning sensation in your head either.
I’ve been using coloidal silver for spraying nose, throat and mouth for the last 25 years and have had no colds or flu in that period of time. I’m prone to asthma so I always look after my airways.
[…] But the above figures also show that the vaccines do NOT just lose efficacy over time to a nule efficiency, but that they gradually degrade the immune system until a negative efficiency is reached. They currently leave everyone over 30 in a worse position than before vaccination. For more information see here. […]
By the way, nule is spelled null. If the immune response is degraded then the booster will cause the dreaded AMIR (Antibody Mediated Immune Response) where the immune system will begin attacking every cell in the body that has been producing the spike protein.
[…] DAILY EXPOSE ON OCTOBER 1, […]
[…] Pero las cifras anteriores también muestran que las vacunas NO simplemente pierden eficacia con el tiempo hasta alcanzar una eficacia cero, sino que dañan progresivamente el sistema inmunológico hasta que se obtiene una eficacia negativa. En la actualidad, dejan a cualquier persona mayor de 30 años en una situación peor que antes de la vacunación. Para más información, consulte aquí. […]
The data in this article is fraudulent, because the table 2 of the government report shows different data and with that data, there is no reason at all for these harsh conclusions.
It is a subset of the whole table. If you read the article, the writer is using the over 40 subset and that is what the data is. I checked it and it’s correct against the report.
There are other sources in four recently published reports that verify what is seen in this report but from different sources. It turns out that no one needed a vaccine and the vaccination program should be halted immediately. Start here doctor.
https://rivercitymalone.com/health/immunologist-explains-why-covid-vax-is-unnecessary/
There are four PDFs that can be downloaded for the journal papers plus a letter to all the physicains in the world, You don’t need this report form the UK to verify that this is happening all over the world.
That’s true, Dr W. What kind of people would want to misrepresent the report in this way? I struggle to think of their perverse motivation. Some of the cures proposed in this exchange remind me of the Simba Rebels (Google it) who made headlines in my youth. They firmly believed holy water made them impervious to bullets. How wrong they were too!
[…] The Exposé on October 1, 2021 • ( 9 Comments […]
[…] But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination For more see here. […]
[…] per maggiori informazioni clicca qui […]
Because it’s a biological weapon.
Please learn the their, there differences. It is hard to take you seriously otherwise.
Also your and you’re . It drives me bonkers and distracts from whatever is being read.
The article is misleading. If by making things worse we mean that more vaccinated people get infected than unvaccinated then sure, that’s bad. But at the same time in the same PHE reports it’s clear that unvaccinated people die at a greater rate than vaccinated. So if the most important thing is avoiding death, the vaccines are doing there job. This is of course is a separate issue to the fact that the vaccines are harmful in and of themselves for many people. Also, based on the above data, all vaccine passports are illogical.
But a question I have is this..when it say rate per 100K, does it mean per 100K of the population in general or per 100K of the status specific cohort, i.e. vaxxed vs unvaxxed?
The rate per 100,000 should be in the report some where or maybe in the notes under the Table.
Why it it so difficult to understand that if you are injected with something that causes your cells, endothelial cells specifically, to produce the spike protein, then you are carrying the part of the virus that created all the bad effects in the actual SARS-Cov-2 infection? So if you are tested you will get a positive result. You are also producing the spike and spreading it all over the place.
The only reason people are dying is because they aren’t getting any effective treatment. If you end up in a hospital plan to die because you will not get any effective treatment.
Medical doctors that refuse to treat people that are infected with what we know to be effective treatments should loose their medical license on the spot and be arrested for malpractice.
[…] Pfizer je prvotno govoril o 95% učinkovitosti njihovega “cepiva”. Ta podatek je preračunan v zadnjem stolpcu v zgornjih tabelah. Zgornje številke v tabelah nakazujejo na to, da so Pfizerjeve navedbe resnične samo takoj po cepljenju (mlajše starostne skupine imajo v telesu vbrizgano cepivo najmanj časa). A zgornje številke prav tako kažejo na to, da Covid-19 cepiva ne samo, da izgubijo sčasoma učinkovitost vse do stopnje 0, ampak tudi progresivno poškodujejo imunski sistem dokler se ne začne negativna učinkovitost. Trenutno cepiva vse, ki so starejši od 30 let pozicionirajo v slabši položaj, kot pa pred cepljenjem. Več o tem si lahko preberete na tej povezavi. […]
No more people died in 2020 than were expected to die when compared to previous years. There was no spike in life insurance claims in 2020. If many more people died than were expected we would see an increase in life insurance claims and nothing of the sort happened.
If you are willing to do a little crumb following start here.
https://rivercitymalone.com/health/immunologist-explains-why-covid-vax-is-unnecessary/
Here you can find four relatively recent scientific papers explaining how immune memory cells were found in people that had never been exposed to SARS-Cov-2. The papers also support the notion that the booster will cause an Antibody Mediated Immune Response. This is the response that attacks the spike protein producing cells throughout the entire body. In some people that has occurred with the second injection. You will also find a letter written to the physicians of the world giving a synopsis of the four papers and pleading with physicians to stop the vaccine.
The entire message here is that you do not need the vaccine unless you want to significantly shorten your life.
The manufacturers of the statin drugs used the same slight of hand to make it appear that statins were wonderful.
For example, you can expect that if you look at 100 people 2 out of the 100 will have some heart related problem. If all 100 people take a statin, like Lipitor, then you can expect that only 1 out of the 100 will have some heart related problem leading to death. The absolute Risk Reduction is 1 out of 100, but the Relative Risk Reduction is 1/2 or 50% and this is what was claimed. That seems wonderful. Its not so wonderful when you consider that you have to treat 100, with all of the side effects, to reduce the deaths by 1. If this were an antibiotic it would never be used.
In medical training it is known as NNTT, number needed to treat to receive a benefit. It is a recognized problem/fallacy. The statins are harmful for all sorts of reasons and are known to cause almost immediate symptoms of dementia and muscle atrophy in many people. The pathway they block to lower cholesterol also lowers Coq10/ubiquinol which the brain and muscles need to utilize energy. Not to mention that the “high cholesterol” threshold is way too low. Numerous studies (Framingham etc.) show that people with the highest cholesterol have the lowest incidence of dementia and best overall health. It is only a problem if your arteries are getting clogged to start with, and the cholesterol is not the cause of that. It is caused by inflammation and statins won’t cure it.
I refused statins advised by three doctors and then later had a CAT scan where the doctor remarked randomly “oh look, there is not buildup at all in any of the arteries in your chest or abdomen”. As I knew, I never needed a statin.
Hey folks how about supporting this online news source by sending them a few pound or dollars?
There must be something wrong with the formula Pfizer used to calculate efficacy.
If one were to turn the results around in the formula, to perhaps calculate the efficacy of not vaccinating, say using the same 162 vs 8 cases (unvaccinated vs vaccinated) from the preliminary trial results, the formula would yield (8-162)/8*100% =-14900%). Shouldn’t the total of the two percentages only equal 100%.
Normally, given a set (a, b), the percentage of a = a/(a+b) *100%, and the percentage of b = b/(a+b)*100%. This way, when the percentages are totalled, it never is more or less than 100%.
Is the medical science wrong on a fundamental elementary mathematical basis?
Just to clarify my earlier comment, all of the mathematical gymnastics, claimed to have been done by Pfizer, in this article reduces to (162-8)/162*100% since the groups are the same size. i.e. the 21830 appears in both the numerator and denominator, so they can be cancelled out to 1. In fact the NEJM in their article “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine” published Dec 31, 2020, https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577, says in the statistical analysis section:”Vaccine efficacy was estimated by 100×(1−IRR), where IRR is the calculated ratio of confirmed cases of Covid-19 illness per 1000 person-years of follow-up in the active vaccine group to the corresponding illness rate in the placebo group.” This confirms that the mathematical formula that I question is the one being used by medical science, probably not just in this instance.
[…] But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination For more see here. […]
[…] Voor meer zie hier. […]
I’ve just checked the UKHSA website and can’t find any of the above. What I did find is that it is VERY pro-vaccine.
Before anyone slates me, I’m dead against the narrative and vaccine but one thing I do is my own research. If I’m sent anything like this, I’ll check it against their website… Putting articles like this out is counter productive as it is wrong information.
Look at the UK Yellow Card reports from the government’s own website… It’s safe to say that 1 in 10 people with the vaccine have an adverse drug reaction (ADR) I work out the percentages and it’s 17% for the UK… That is absolutely shocking, yet they are still pushing the vaccine 🤬
And just to put the world death toll from covid related deaths (they even say on the WHO website that the figure isn’t exact due to deaths within 28 days of a positive test not necessarily dying of covid) the actual percentage is 0.03% of the worlds population died of covid which, let’s be honest, is nothing. But then they wouldn’t risk spreading a deadly virus if they themselves could catch it hence they said at the start that 99.5% would be OK. Roll out project Fear to get the sheep to comply and you can lead them willingly to slaughter.
The relative risk reduction calculation you show here must be continually reported. It is utterly disgraceful and a well known trick used by big pharma to make it appear that their drugs are more effective than they really are. The other Covid treatment manufacturers did exactly the same. The absolute risk reduction is around 1% and might even be lower since the trials were too short to produce meaningful results. Pfizer made other results available to the FDA which appeared to show no difference between the placebo and trial groups.
[…] But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination For more see here. […]
Hi, I believe the vaccines are harmful. However, u cannot leave information out in the article. When you look at the actual table 2 in the report, u didnt show the younger age groups…where it is showing the unvaccinated have a higher rate than vaccinated. Please fix this in article, and explain that but do not omit info – that is exactly what media is doing to fit their narrative. Thanks
[…] But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination For more see here. […]
[…] But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT only lose efficiency over time down to zero percent efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realized. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a much worse position than they were before vaccination For more, see here. […]
[…] But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination For more see here. […]
[…] https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/01/uk-health-security-agency-report-proves-covid-vaccines-dont-work/ […]
[…] https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/01/uk-health-security-agency-report-proves-covid-vaccines-dont-work/ […]
[…] Source […]
[…] Daily Sceptic, the Exposé began to publish flawed “effectiveness” estimates based on the data from 1 October, and soon added its own interpretation of the […]
[…] the Exposé began to publish flawed “effectiveness” estimates based on the data from 1 October, and soon added its own interpretation of the […]
[…] Majority of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients at Hospital in Israel Are Fully Vaccinated: Doctor https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/10/01/uk-health-security-agency-report-proves-covid-vaccines-dont-work/ […]
[…] official data published by the UK Government, more specifically the UK Health Security Agency, proves that Government institutions have known […]
[…] official data published by the UK Government, more specifically the UK Health Security Agency, proves that Government institutions have known […]
[…] Because official data published by the UK Government, more specifically the UK Health Security Agency, proves that Government institutions have known since at least the beginning of October 2021 that the Covid-19 injections have a real-world negative effectiveness. […]
[…] But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination. For more see here. […]
[…] But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination. For more see here. […]
[…] But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination. For more see here. […]
[…] But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination. For more see here. […]
[…] But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than before vaccination For more see here. […]
[…] Dar cifrele de mai sus arată, de asemenea, că vaccinurile NU își pierd pur și simplu eficiența în timp până la eficiență zero, ci dăunează progresiv sistemul imunitar până când se realizează o eficiență negativă. În prezent, ei lasă pe oricine de peste 30 de ani într-o poziție mai proastă decât înainte de vaccinare. Pentru mai multe vezi Aici. […]