In response to a request made under the Freedom of Information Act (FOI) the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (“CDC”) admitted it does not have any documented cases of unvaccinated people being re-infected or transmitting Covid to another person after acquiring natural immunity.
In September a New York attorney, Elizabeth Brehm, had requested “documents reflecting any documented case of an individual who: (1) never received a COVID-19 vaccine; (2) was infected with COVID-19 once, recovered, and then later became infected again; and (3) transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to another person when reinfected.”
The CDC responded in a letter dated 5 November. “A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request,” a spokesperson for the CDC replied. “The CDC Emergency Operations Center (EOC) conveyed that this information is not collected.”
While the answer on its own does not establish that no such cases exist, it could be taken as an indicator of health authorities’ disinterest in information that could undermine their chosen policies.
“Studies have found that vaccine-induced Covid protection wanes around six months (or potentially sooner),” Life Site News reported, “by contrast, a recent Yale study projected that natural immunity lasts three times longer.”
Dr. Sebastian Rushworth, a physician in Stockholm, discussed in an article a recent Swedish study to determine how effective the Covid injections are at protecting against Covid after more than a few months.
In total, 1,684,958 individuals were included in the study. The authors of the study identified who was “vaccinated” in late May 2021. The vaccinated people were then matched individually against people of the same age and gender, and living in the same municipality, who hadn’t been “vaccinated.” They followed them until October to see if they developed Covid-19.
After the first two months from “vaccination,” there was a rapid decline in efficacy. At four to six months, the injections, over all types, were only reducing the relative risk of infection by 48%.
“Governments had initially set the bar for approving the vaccines at a 50% relative risk reduction. So, if the trials had been required to run for six months before presenting results instead of only running for two months, then the vaccines would have been considered too ineffective to be worth bothering with, and would never have been approved,” Dr. Rushworth wrote, four to six months after the injection “AstraZeneca was at that point not doing anything whatsoever to lower risk …[and] by the nine-month mark, the Pfizer vaccine is no longer offering any protection.”
Dr. Robert Malone posted on Telegram: “Natural Immunity is broad, protective, and durable. Unlike vaccine-induced immunity. I am so tired of USG lies.”
Dr. Malone should know, he is the inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA as a drug.
Further resources:

The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help..
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
.
Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support belowV support
Categories: Breaking News, World News
[…] Source link […]
[…] November 13, 2021CDC Confirms They Have No Recorded Case of Someone Who Has Natural Immunity Being Re-Infected or Tra… […]
THIS sentence should of been the CENTRAL POINT of Expose’s article. “While the answer on its own does not establish that no such cases exist, it could be taken as an indicator of health authorities’ disinterest in information that could undermine their chosen policies.”
Otherwise, the reader is given a DECEPTIVE understanding UNTIL (many paragraphs later) that sentence is positioned.
The Expose must present facts in a clear (not deceptive way). Otherwise your CREDIBILITY is gone!
The world is made up of people with diverse opinions which is healthy and good for society. However, your opinion alone does not determine whether The Expose is credible or not.
Perhaps I shoul dhave been more assertive and written “While the answer on its own does not establish that no such cases exist, **it does indicate** health authorities’ disinterest in information that could undermine their chosen policies.”
Personally, I was thinking the most important takeaway from this article is those who have natural immujnity do not need a Covid injection. so why are people’s livelihoods, and possibly their lives, being threatened by the CDC, governments and corporate media “pushing” the Covid injection on entire populations?
[…] November 13, 2021CDC Confirms They Have No Recorded Case of Someone Who Has Natural Immunity Being Re-Infected or Tra… […]
[…] As a final proof that Covid vaccines destroy the immune system, we now have the admission by the CDC in response to a Freedom of Information Request, that they have no record of a person with natural immunity becoming reinfected and transmitting the virus to anybod… […]
[…] source: https://theexpose.uk/2021/11/13/cdc-confirms-they-have-no-recorded-case-of-someone-who-has-natural-i… […]
[…] As a final proof that Covid vaccines destroy the immune system, we now have the admission by the CDC in response to a Freedom of Information Request, that they have no record of a person with natural immunity becoming reinfected and transmitting the virus to anybod… […]
[…] – CDC Confirms They Have No Recorded Case of Someone Who Has Natural Immunity Being Re-Infected or Tra… […]
They test for the flu since they’ve never isolated Covid-19. Which makes me wonder how they can tell there is a delta variant. They never isolated the virus but they use a test to show the damage of a solution does on monkey kidney cells then show the cellular debris as proof of the virus. So, they can use this method to claim an UNENDING! amount of variants. A lot of cancers and “viruses” are probably just different forms of parasites. Since the tests can’t differentiate between cold and flu and covid then doesn’t that mean ivermectin cures both the cold and the flu? Welcome to “they’ve been lying to us our entire lives about everything”. Get Ivermectin while you still can https://ivmpharmacy.com
If this is true (and I say that because I don’t put much trust in the CDC), then what people I know have gotten sick from is not COVID, because many of them got sick more than once. (This includes both people who got the injections and people who didn’t.) The progression also didn’t work like a virus. They seemed more poisoned than anything. I knew someone who got chemotherapy/radiation for cancer and the way the life was sucked out of these people was very similar. There were also similarities in confusion, disorientation, etc. The inflammation was also sort of misplaced — pain on just the top of the head, pain in just the jaw, pain in the forehead and ears, no trouble breathing, little or no cough, etc. It didn’t seem at all like a respiratory illness. These also weren’t clusters of symptoms these people remembered getting in the past.
[…] Como prueba final de que las vacunas Covid destruyen el sistema inmunológico, ahora tenemos la admisión por parte de los CDC en respuesta a una Solicitud de Libertad de Información, que no tienen registro de una persona con inmunidad natural que se haya reinfectado y transmitido el virus a nadie… […]
[…] 🔎 | TheExpose […]
[…] As a final proof that Covid vaccines destroy the immune system, we now have the admission by the CDC in response to a Freedom of Information Request, that they have no record of a person with natural immunity becoming reinfected and transmitting the virus to anybod… […]
[…] [23] https://expose-news.com/2021/11/13/cdc-confirms-they-have-no-recorded-case-of-someone-who-has-natur… […]
[…] The credibility of this statement is dubious as, if the patient had previously had a SARS-CoV-2 “asymptomatic infection,” naturally acquired immunity is the “gold standard” and durable. A 2008 study demonstrated that immunity to the 1918 H1N1 flu strain, the Spanish flu, lasted a lifetime. And in September 2021, in response to a request made under the Freedom of Information Act, the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) confirmed it had no documented case of Covid re-infection. […]
[…] The credibility of this statement is dubious as, if the patient had previously had a SARS-CoV-2 “asymptomatic infection,” naturally acquired immunity is the “gold standard” and durable. A 2008 study demonstrated that immunity to the 1918 H1N1 flu strain, the Spanish flu, lasted a lifetime. And in September 2021, in response to a request made under the Freedom of Information Act, the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) confirmed it had no documented case of Covid re-infection. […]
[…] The credibility of this statement is dubious as, if the patient had previously had a SARS-CoV-2 “asymptomatic infection,” naturally acquired immunity is the “gold standard” and durable. A 2008 study demonstrated that immunity to the 1918 H1N1 flu strain, the Spanish flu, lasted a lifetime. And in September 2021, in response to a request made under the Freedom of Information Act, the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) confirmed it had no documented case of Covid re-infection. […]
[…] Die CDC gibt an, dass es keine Aufzeichnungen darüber gibt, dass eine Person mit natürlicher Immunität sich erneut infizie…. […]