Breaking News

Pfizer’s Clinical Trial data strongly indicates their Covid-19 Vaccine causes the recipient to develop Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

I have discovered some extremely concerning findings in the Pfizer Phase I-II-III clinical trial data. The Sepsis death rate in the 21,926 double vaccinated group of the Pfizer Phase III Clinical trial was twenty-one times higher than normal, and the Cardiovascular death rate was two times higher than normal. 

This strongly indicates that the Pfizer Covid-19 injection does in fact cause a new form of ‘acquired immunodeficiency syndrome’, as has been suggested by a mountain of data available from the UK Health Security Agency, because sepsis is caused by failure of the immune system.


By a concerned reader



Here is the table of Pfizer trial deaths from Dose 1 (July 2020) to un-blinding after 6 months (January 2021) –  

Sepsis/Septicemia results from an immune system failure to defeat a microbial (viral yeast or bacterial) infection.

Emphysematous cholecystitis is a relatively rare variant of acute cholecystitis with infection by gas-producing organisms. Diagnosis involves the demonstration of gas within the lumen or wall of the gallbladder by ultrasound or CT scan. In contrast to acute cholecystitis, emphysematous cholecystitis occurs more commonly in elderly and diabetic patients, and is frequently associated with perforation and death. – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12768870/ 

It is the result of an immune system failure to defeat a microbial (viral yeast or bacterial) infection.

Acute Cholecystitis. The most frequent cause of acute cholecystitis is gallstones. Other causes include typhoid fever and a malignant tumour obstructing the biliary tract. The inflammation may be secondary to a systemic sepsis. https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/emphysematous+cholecystitis 

Acute Cholecystitis is a biliary sepsis, a sepsis of the Gall Bladder and bile ducts.

Here are the US deaths in 2020 by cause and the percentages for each cause.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2778234

https://wonder.cdc.gov

The first thing the jumps out of these figures is that Pfizer trial participants had a death rate of 17/19 per 21,921/6 per 6 months. Whereas the general US population has a death rate of 111.2 per 21,923 per 6 months. So Pfizer trial participants were over 6x less likely to die than the general public.

The age profile of the original selection of participants is advertised to be –

So Pfizer must have done some extremely heavy exclusions of morbidities to get such an absurdly low mortality figure. Their study protocol reveals whom they excluded – https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728 

The next thing is the incredible match between the unvaccinated Covid and cardiovascular death rates (10.5% and 26.3%) and those in the general population for 2020 (10.3% and 25.3%). So even though the numbers of deaths are small. They appear to be a very good representation of the reality in general public.

Now we turn to the double vaccinated cardiovascular and sepsis rates and we see (52.9% and 23.5% death rates) compared to the general population (and the unvaccinated) who suffer only (26.3% and 1.1% or 25.3% and 0%). 

And there is the toxicity of the Pfizer vaccination laid bare. It weakens the immune system to the point where people succumb to microbial infections and die at 21 times the normal rate in the first 6 months after vaccination.

One can argue that the numbers of deaths here are not large enough to draw any valid statistical conclusions. But against that the unvaccinated numbers are very clearly representative and the numbers of participants in both groups are large enough to draw valid statistical conclusions from.

When you combine these figures with the weekly 5% immune response degradation catalogued by the UKHSA from Weeks 35-41 – https://expose-news.com/2021/11/06/uk-gov-lying-and-hiding-the-fact-covid-19-vaccinated-are-developing-ade/ , you start to see a picture that suggests the vaccinated are developing acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

However you look at this, the numbers flag up two major concerns which these days have plenty of other statistical, mass media, clinical and anecdotal evidence to support.

These findings absolutely necessitate further investigation specific to immune system degradation and cardiovascular inflammation. But Pfizer un-blinded the placebo group and permitted them to get vaccinated at the end of the 6 month trial period. So it is difficult to see how we can get any more data from Pfizer.

To be frank we are lucky to have the death data they have so far provided. Let us face facts. There are no long term clinical trials ongoing into the safety of these vaccines. Quite the reverse in fact. For one can argue that the purpose of the Pfizer lobbied vaccine mandates is to eradicate any unvaccinated control group from existence in order to prevent a proper evaluation of vaccine side effects over the medium term.

To that end, here is an edited copy letter recently sent to the UK’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) –

Dear Members of SAGE

I write to inform you of an oversight in your scientific advice on Covid-19.

1. As you will all be aware, the only acceptable scientific method for determining the safety or effectiveness of a medical intervention is to compare its effect upon a randomly chosen experimental group with a control group preferably of similar size for statistical reasons.

In the phase III clinical trials for Pfizer there were 21,921 participants in the vaccinated group and 21,926 in the placebo group, the control group.

The control group, the placebo group is the yardstick with which we measure the effectiveness of the intervention. Only by comparison with a control group can a researcher determine whether an intervention has a statistically significant effect on an experimental group, and the possibility of drawing a false conclusion is mathematically and precisely defined. This A B comparison between intervention and control groups is called the Scientific Method.

So without a control group the Scientific method has been abandoned, we are no longer following any science at all, and no statistically valid conclusion can be drawn from the intervention. Instead science and its method have gone out of the window and we are back in the dark ages of Papal decrees.

2. The medium term (1-3 year) safety or efficacy of the Adenovirus-DNA vaccines and the lipid nanoparticle-mRNA vaccines is not yet known because they have not yet been examined in the general population for more than 10 months. 

In this country the intervention group for these vaccines in the age demographic over 18 years old is now over 90% of the population

Why has the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies failed to advise the UK government to follow the scientific method and formulate a commensurate control group who do not take the vaccines?

How are we to assess the effectiveness of these vaccine interventions in the absence of such a group?

How can a group of scientists fail so spectacularly to follow not only ‘the science’ but actually any science at all in what is undoubtedly the most important medical intervention in the UK in the history of science and of medical practice?

May I therefore insist in the name of Science that you put your lab coats back on and advise the Government of this country without further delay to preserve all presently unvaccinated people as members of a vastly undersized, under represented depleted and sadly less than commensurate control group in order that this entire vaccination experiment can actually reach a statistically valid and meaningful conclusion and in order to demonstrate to the government and to the British public and to the world in general – what science actually is.

Furthermore if you are going to use children as lab rats for the benefit of adults and against the advice of the JCVI, then would you please ensure that only 50% of them are vaccinated and the remaining 50% are kept free of intervention as a properly sized control group in order that we can learn something from the government’s hideous medical experimentation on them.

Yours Scientifically,

A concerned reader

As a final proof that Covid vaccines destroy the immune system, we now have the admission by the CDC in response to a Freedom of Information Request, that they have no record of a person with natural immunity becoming reinfected and transmitting the virus to anybody.

Whereas the UKHSA has 450,992 records of people with double vaccine immunity who became infected with Covid in the last 4 weeks.

Could there be a clearer demonstration that vaccines prevent people reaching full natural immunity by damaging and degrading their immune systems?

Share this page to Telegram
4.8 6 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
42 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lupe Waring
Lupe Waring

I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site… 
Here is I started.…………>>  http://Www.NETCASH1.Com

Last edited 6 months ago by Lupe Waring
Whiskey
Whiskey
6 months ago

Did they test people for antibodies before including them in the study? Clinical trials really aren’t my area, but the last time I looked at one of them, they’d tested participants using a PCR test for a current COVID infection. I didn’t see any indication that they tested people for antibodies.

This makes all the difference when trying to calculate if their immune systems were damaged by the injections, and if so, how much damage was done.

Going from full prior immunity to none is a bigger leap than going from no prior immunity to none. A similar principle applies if they end up with negative protection (greater susceptibility).

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Whiskey
6 months ago

Good question. They excluded the following…

Phase 1 only: Positive serological test for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and/or IgG antibodies at the screening visit.

Also they excluded…Phase 1 only: Individuals currently working in occupations with high risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 (eg, healthcare worker, emergency response personnel).

Also they excluded …Previous clinical (based on COVID-19 symptoms/signs alone, if a SARS-CoV-2 NAAT result was not available) or microbiological (based on COVID-19 symptoms/signs and a positive SARS-CoV-2 NAAT result) diagnosis of COVID 19

Whiskey
Whiskey
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
6 months ago

Thank you very much!

midimaniac
midimaniac
6 months ago

So you’re almost twice as likely to die of cancer, than from the fake “virus”. Very interesting and it’s right up there in the charts.

Last edited 6 months ago by midimaniac
Whiskey
Whiskey
Reply to  midimaniac
6 months ago

The PCR tests also produce a lot of false positives. So, that would make the actual death rate much, much lower. There’s a study that they did on how inaccurate they are: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/72/11/e921/5912603 Most PCR tests are somewhere between 30-45Ct in the US, based on my own research. So, in the US, they’d have somewhere between 30% and 97%+ false positives for the PCR tests.

trackback
6 months ago

[…] November 13, 2021Pfizer’s Clinical Trial data strongly indicates their Covid-19 Vaccine causes the recipient to dev… […]

BabyDogOfJustice
BabyDogOfJustice
6 months ago

Death from Vaccine relevant causes has Unvaxed deaths at 14?
How if they are unvaxxed? Shouldn’t that be zero?

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  BabyDogOfJustice
6 months ago

A vaccine relevant cause of death, is not a death caused by vaccine. It is a death that could have been caused by the vaccine. So we look at all the types of death that the vaccine could conceivably have caused both in the vaccinated group AND in the control group which we use for comparison. The lovely thing about the Pfizer control group is that the % death rates in all the death categories that are relevant to the intervention are almost precisely the same as the rates in the general public (in percentage terms although 6x lower in actual terms).

trackback
6 months ago

[…] – Pfizer’s Clinical Trial data strongly indicates their Covid-19 Vaccine causes the recipient to dev… […]

Robert
Robert
6 months ago

Great informative!
thanks

Purebloodpatriot
Purebloodpatriot
6 months ago

Our healthcare system is about to experience a tsunami! Potential side effects of jabs include chronic inflammation, because the vaccine continuously stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies. Other concerns include the possible integration of plasmid DNA into the body’s host genome, resulting in mutations, problems with DNA replication, triggering of autoimmune responses, and activation of cancer-causing genes. Alternative COVID cures exist. Ivermectin is one of them. While Ivermectin is very effective curing COVID symptoms, it has also been shown to eliminate certain cancers. Do not get the poison jab.
Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com

Last edited 6 months ago by Purebloodpatriot
dnomsed
dnomsed
6 months ago

Thank you for an excellent, very revealing, analysis.

Authorities the world over seem unwilling to act on these findings, or to investigate further. Extreme malfeasance at all levels of the medical fraternity.

Politicians remain as they always were – vacuous airheads.

trackback
6 months ago

[…] November 13, 2021Pfizer’s Clinical Trial data strongly indicates their Covid-19 Vaccine causes the recipient to dev… […]

Dr death
Dr death
6 months ago

At least we now know AIDS in the 80s was created by Fauci as well. His whole career has been spent in the business of genocide with the 80s being his test run until they couldn’t perfect the bio-weapon.

Jeff
Jeff
6 months ago

So if you have taken two doses of vaccines are you doomed or how can you mitigate your risks?
my email is pendavin@aol.com

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Jeff
6 months ago

How to Mitigate the Damaging Effects of COVID Vaccination

1, Vitamin D 4,000 IU per day
2. Aquafresh or any Cetylpyridinium Chloride mouth wash ASAP after possible exposure and continue as long as cough persists – https://www.cardiff.ac.uk/news/view/2393858-scientists-call-for-urgent-research-on-potential-for-mouthwash-to-reduce-sars-cov-2-transmission
3. High dose Vitamin C or 250 mg 4x per day (NOT 1000mg once per day – one needs to keep C levels high all day)
4. High dose Zinc (30 mg per day)
5. Quercetin (500 mg per day)
6. N-Acetylcysteine, NAC (an immune helper) – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7649937/ 
7. A small low dose course of Ivermectin
8. A lot of cardio vascular exercise (long walks) or spin biking or swimming – not too high intensity
9. Echinacea once per week.

The above protocol is designed to boost the immune system and strengthen the cardio vascular system.

Keep the spikes at bay until some bright spark discovers a way to turn the vaccine mediated spike production off.

Last edited 6 months ago by Lords Witnesses
Tony
Tony
6 months ago

This is something that has been brewing for a long time. The facts are being hidden. Fortunately, many groups, business directories and ethical social networks like https://vax3dom.com have filled the vacuum for the unvaxxed who need a voice.

trackback
6 months ago

[…] Pfizer’s Clinical Trial data strongly indicates their Covid-19 Vaccine causes the recipient to… […]

Peter Siegfried Krug
Peter Siegfried Krug
6 months ago

Despite the risk of an immune deficiency, despite the risk of an autoimmune disease, despite the risk of thrombosis, heart problems and many other side effects, politicians in Austria are putting pressure on the unvaccinated and have ordered a lockdown for the unvaccinated. It is terrible to see how politicians live out their power frenzy under the invisibility of health care. It is a crime. A crime against humanity and the politicians and doctors who go along with it must be brought to justice.

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Peter Siegfried Krug
6 months ago

Vaccines after 6 months increase the viral load in Covid cases when compared to the unvaxxed. So they increase transmission, infection hospitalisation and death. Published govt figures only show this in the case of infection – But that is good enough to invalidate vaccine Passports. Pfizer stopped their 3 year trial after 6 months. Moderna stopped their 2¼ year trial 28 days after the 2nd jab. There is no valid data from either company for all cause mortality risk vs benefits of the vaccines on anybody who has been vaccinated for more than 6 months. There is no science. There is only coercion. Believe me, if these vaccines were safe, Pfizer and Moderna wold not have stopped their trials.

david ligon
david ligon
6 months ago

These vaccines are already causing multiple deaths from various conditions. There is going to be lawsuits and jail time for all who endorse, promote, and require these death shots.

trackback
6 months ago

[…] Pfizer’s own data supports the finding that the killshots cause AIDShttps://theexpose.uk/2021/11/13/pfizer-trial-data-suggests-covid-19-vaccine-causes-aids/ […]

Irene
Irene
6 months ago

I am sick more than 2 months as my TPO and TSH are abnormal after receiving 2nd dose BNT. I have medical reports before and after receiving vaccine to prove the side effects on my health. I have sent email to BNT in non -English character, but they don’t replied me as I believe BNT is international company. Wishing you understand my writing as I am non-English native.
My case is unexpected and inflammatory case. I do not know how to mitigate the side effects. My TPO is 402 and thus affect TSH.

Last edited 6 months ago by Irene
Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Irene
6 months ago

See my reply to Jeff above…. All the best

Irene
Irene
Reply to  Lords Witnesses
6 months ago

Thank you. I am not familiar with some elements except for vitamins. Also, I try to have some cordyceps, Chinese famous herb.
My disease should be subacute thyroiditis. It is surprised of me it is an autoimmune disease. Not everyone will check the blood data before receiving vaccine, a lot of people have no evidence to prove the side effects of vaccine. My blood data indicates that vaccine harms my immune system even I know all countries exempt all pharma liabilities.
What is wrong in analyzing Israel’s data? All professionals believe they are honest to disclose the data. Is it their health are too good?
A lot of people are scared of receiving 3rd dose vaccine. However, the countries and professionals emphasize all people are suitable to receive vaccine except for allergy. I don’t think they are right because I used to have Chinese herts and it takes a long time to improve my immune system. I know our health and life is controlled my pharma which set the vaccination guideline. The most important is all countries and professionals have no other method to flight against viruses and thus rely on vaccine. Why non-technology protective mask is used if there is no vaccine and pills?

trackback
5 months ago

[…] information below refers to the following articles:“Pfizer’s Clinical Trial data strongly indicates their Covid-19 Vaccine causes the recipient to…” […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] The Pfizer Phase I-II-III trails founds twice as high a cardiovascular death rate in the vaccinated group as in the unvaccinated group – in the period 6 months after the 2nd Jab – https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/13/pfizer-trial-data-suggests-covid-19-vaccine-causes-aids/  […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] Les essais de phase I-II-III de Pfizerrévèlent un taux de mortalité cardiovasculaire deux fois plus élevé dans le groupe vacciné que dans le groupe non vacciné – au cours de la période de 6 mois après la 2ème injection – https://dailyexpose .uk/2021/11/13 /pfizer-trial-data-suggests-covid-19-vaccine-causes-aids/  […]

greg A
greg A
5 months ago

are you accounting for the fact that “Multiple causes of death could be listed for each participant”

greg A
greg A
5 months ago

This article is jumping to a rather aggressive conclusion: “vaccines cause AIDS” from just a tiny number of deaths that may very well be misinterpretation of the data. For example just 4 Sepsis deaths are used to make the sensational claim that the Sepsis death rate is 23X normal. Well does the author know for sure that these were 4 different people? Multiple causes of death could be listed for the same person. So for example there may have been 1 person that died but multiple Sepsis boxes checked as a cause. To make matters worse the same person could have also had cardiac arrest which throws off that analysis as well.

Also why did the author cut off the crucial footnote below the deaths data table where it says “Multiple causes of death could be reported for each participant”. I’ve attached the table below.

Screen Shot 2021-12-24 at 10.53.27.png
David Post
David Post
3 months ago

The evidence of the “vaccine’s” role in the Great Reset must be a comfort the designers, engineers and distributors of this multi-platform
agenda. Mankind again shows how good it is at wiping out unwanted plants, animals and humans. Whatever is left will breathe a sigh of relief to see the end of homo sapiens.

trackback
2 months ago

[…] The Pfizer Phase I-II-III trails also found the cardiovascular death rate in the vaccinated group was twice as high as the rate in the unvaccinated group – […]

trackback
2 months ago

[…] The Pfizer Phase I-II-III trails also found the cardiovascular death rate in the vaccinated group was twice as high as the rate in the unvaccinated group – […]

trackback
2 months ago

[…] The Pfizer Phase I-II-III trails also found the cardiovascular death rate in the vaccinated group was twice as high as the rate in the unvaccinated group – […]

trackback
2 months ago

[…] Lo studio su 566 pazienti che hanno ricevuto i vaccini Pfizer o Moderna ha rilevato che i segni di danno cardiovascolare sono aumentati vertiginosamente dopo la seconda iniezione. Il rischio di attacchi cardiaci o altri gravi problemi coronarici è più che raddoppiato mesi dopo la somministrazione dei vaccini, sulla base dei cambiamenti nei marker di infiammazione e di danno cellulare. I pazienti avevano un rischio di 1 su 4 per problemi gravi dopo i vaccini, rispetto a 1 su 9 prima. Il loro rischio di infarto a 5 anni è passato dall’11% al 25% grazie ai vaccini (ovvero un aumento del 227%). Le tracce Pfizer Fase I-II-III hanno anche rilevato che il tasso di mortalità cardiovascolare nel gruppo vaccinato era due volte più alto del tasso nel gruppo non vaccinato  – […]

trackback
2 months ago

[…] Pfizer’s Clinical Trial data strongly indicates their Covid-19 Vaccine causes the recipient to… […]