|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
If someone had said to you in 2019, that in the near future the mainstream headlines will be dominated for days on end with news that the UK Government held a Christmas party, then you would have most likely thought they were rather odd. But here we are.
However, whilst the mainstream media has got you talking about who got what in the ‘Secret Santa’ that took place in 10 Downing Street in December 2020, they’ve managed to distract you from the fact that the UK Government is slowly boiling the nation once again by drip feeding restrictions back into play, week by week, in response to an alleged new variant that is yet to claim a single soul. The United Kingdom will end up back in lockdown without anyone even realising it has happened.
But what they’ve also managed to distract you from is the latest data Public Health Data which shows that over the past four months the double / triple jabbed population have accounted for 6 in every 10 Covid-19 cases, 7 in every 10 Covid-19 hospitalisations, and 9 in every 10 Covid-19 Deaths.
Public Health Scotland (PHS) publish a weekly report containing statistics on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths by vaccination status, the latest of which was published on Wednesday 8th December, containing data on cases and hospitalisations between 6th Nov. 21 and 3rd Dec. 21, and data on deaths between 30th Oct. 21 and 26th Nov. 21.
The latest report confirms that in the most recent four weeks there were 76,677 Covid-19 cases, 1,735 Covid-19 hospitalisations, and 435 Covid-19 deaths.
Of these the vaccinated population accounted for 47,835 cases (62%), 1,226 hospitalisations (71%), and 371 deaths (85%), and this can be confirmed by reading the latest report found here, page 44 for cases, page 50 for hospitalisations, and page 56 for deaths.
But this isn’t a new phenomena that is suddenly occurring because of the overhyped Omicron variant. Dr Hilary may tell you that 90% of the people in hospital with Covid-19 are unvaccinated whilst he admires his own reflection in the camera lens on the Lorraine Kelly show on ITV. But Dr Hilary is liar, because the official data shows that the fully vaccinated have accounted for the vast majority of cases, hospitalisations, and deaths for months on end, and we can prove it to you…
We’ve compiled the following analysis using official data contained within Public Health Scotland Covid-19 Statistical Reports from the latest release published December 8th, all the way back to the edition published August 18th, and they can all be found here (click on the required report and then scroll down to ‘Full Report’).
Covid-19 Cases
Table 13 of the latest report shows the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status in Scotland. The table may have been attributed a different number in previous reports published by PHS, but the following chart shows cases by vaccination status over a period of 16 weeks from 14 Aug 21 to 03 Dec 21.
The chart shows that in August and early September, the unvaccinated population accounted for the majority of Covid-19 cases. However, when couple the partly vaccinated and 2/3 dose vaccinated population together we find that the vaccinated population have in fact accounted for the majority of cases since the 14th August.
This data alone puts an end to the myth that it is selfish to not be vaccinated, because it’s quite clear the jabs do not prevent infection or transmission. Which begs the question as to why Scotland has introduced Vaccine Passports, and why Boris Johnson is about to introduce them in England.
The above chart shows the cumulative number of cases by vaccination status between 14 Aug 21 and 03 Dec 21, and illustrates quite clearly that the fully vaccinated have accounted for the majority of cases since August.
What we can see from the above is that up to the week beginning 9th Oct, the unvaccinated had accounted for the majority of cases, however since this week there has been a switch with the fully vaccinated taking the lead and hitting 181,580 confirmed cases by Dec 3rd.
When including the 37,383 confirmed cases among the partly vaccinated during this period, the total cases among the vaccinated population rises to 218,963. Whilst the number of cases among the unvaccinated population during this period of 16 weeks has amounted to 156,282, despite this group containing children who are ineligible for vaccination and have accounted for a huge chunk of cases since the start of the alleged pandemic.
Covid-19 Hospitalisations
Table 14 of the latest report shows the number of Covid-19 hospitalisations by vaccination status in Scotland. The table may have been attributed a different number in previous reports published by PHS, but the following chart shows hospitalisations by vaccination status over a period of 16 weeks from 14 Aug 21 to 03 Dec 21.
Now, we couldn’t quite believe our eyes when we saw that official data shows the vaccinated population have accounted for 7 in every 10 hospitalisations since August 2021. Because Dr Hilary, who has absolutely no conflicts of interest whatsoever (despite recently releasing a book about a pandemic, and being a company director of Medtate which collaborates with a certain Mr Bill Gates), said on national television that “90% of the people in hospital with Covid-19 are unvaccinated”.
Well, looks like that’s the last time we rely on obtaining reliable information from a TV doctor who said in June 2021 that “As a doctor, I have to ask the question, is a holiday really important and essential in a global pandemic? It really isn’t. It’s a luxury. It’s something that you can do without in order to preserve life.”
But then said the following only a few days later once the media had cottoned on to the fact he would be going on a cruise later this year –
“Later this year I am joining a domestic cruise in British waters which remains at sea throughout and does not call at any UK port let alone one abroad. It leaves from Southampton and returns there without stopping.”
But hey-ho. You live and learn.
The above chart shows the cumulative number of hospitalisations by vaccination status between 14 Aug 21 and 03 Dec 21, and shows just how bad things have actually been for the vaccinated population compared to the unvaccinated.
Between Aug 14 and Dec 03, the unvaccinated population accounted for 2,737 Covid-19 hospitalisations. But the vaccinated population have accounted for more than double the amount, recording 6,612 hospitalisations. This means the vaccinated population have accounted for 71% of Covid-19 hospitalisations since August 2021.
If you wish to donate to our GoFundMe Campaign to buy Dr Hilary a calculator for Christmas then you can do so here.
Covid-19 Deaths
Table 15 of the latest report shows the number of Covid-19 deaths by vaccination status in Scotland. The table may have been attributed a different number in previous reports published by PHS, but the following chart shows deaths by vaccination status over a period of 16 weeks from 07 Aug 21 to 26 Nov 21.
The above chart proves that the vaccinated population have accounted for the majority of Covid-19 deaths every single week since the beginning of August 2021, with things really taking a turn for the worst in September 2021.
The highest number of Covid-19 deaths in single week among the vaccinated population has been 129, whereas the highest number of Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated population in a single week has been just 29. That’s a 345% difference.
The above chart shows the cumulative number of deaths by vaccination status between 07 Aug 21 and 26 Nov 21, and illustrates quite clearly that this is very much a pandemic of the fully vaccinated.
Between 07 Aug 21 and 26 Nov 21 there were 247 Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated population in Scotland, compared to 1,382 deaths among the vaccinated population during the same time frame. That is a 460% difference.
Are the Vaccines working?
The official data shows that the vaccinated population have accounted for 58% of cases, 71% of hospitalisations, and 85% of deaths over the past 16 weeks.
It’s quite clear that the jabs do not prevent infection or transmission, but they are alleged to reduce the risk of hospitalisation and death. However, if this were the case then should we not be seeing a graph that looks more like this?
So why aren’t we?
Well, the data suggests that the vaccines are actually making the recipients worse once exposed to the alleged Covid-19 virus. We only need to look at case fatality rates to see that.
The case fatality rate among the unvaccinated population over the past four months equates to 0.15% (247 Deaths / 156,282 cases x 100).
But the case fatality rate among the fully vaccinated population over the past four months equates to 0.76% (1,382 deaths / 181,580 cases x 100).
This means the fully vaccinated population have a 407% higher chance of dying once exposed to Covid-19 than the unvaccinated population, rather than the claimed 95% lower chance of dying that’s meant to be induced by the vaccines.
So now that you know that the double / triple jabbed population have accounted for 6 in every 10 cases, 7 in every 10 hospitalisations, and 9 in every 10 Deaths over the past 4 months, and that the UK Government has been laughing at you since at least Christmas 2020, are you going to allow them to take away your freedom yet again in response to alleged variant that has so far caused zero fatalities, or are you going to stand up, carry on living, and say “no” this time around?
Because this will not end until we all say it does.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, The Expose Blog, World News
The Unvaccinated are the ones who have been vaccinated, but are waiting for the 14 days to expire, before they suddenly become vaccinated
unless they expire first…
●▬▬▬▬ ✹ 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐲 𝐀𝐭 𝐇𝐨𝐦𝐞&𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐀𝐭 𝐇𝐨𝐦𝐞 ✹ ▬▬▬▬●
[ JOIN US ] I get paid more than $120 to $95 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $24000k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…
Here is I started.…………>>
GOOD LUCK… https://Www.NETCASH1.Com
[…] Source link […]
Getting paid every month easily more than $15k just by doing simple job online. Last month i have exactly received $17529 from this online job just by giving this 2 hrs a day online. start earning more cash online just by follow instructions here.
Here’s what I do…>>> https://Www.WorkJoin1.com
I don’t get the population numbers given on page 44.. they add up to 5 million ish, and have nothing to do with the UK population. X10 would be about the population of England and Wales (55million though. Maybe they are trying to make the %s of cases look 10x higher?
Anyone have an insight or do I have to write a letter?
These are Scottish numbers.
I started earning $350/hour in my free time by completing tasks with my laptop that i got from this company I stumbled upon online…Check it out, and start earning yourself . for more info visit any tab this site Thanks a lot Here…….. https://Www.SmartPay1.com
[…] December 9, 2021Whilst you’ve been distracted by the UK Govs. Christmas Party, PHS released a report confirming th… […]
[…] 9. desember 2021 The Expose: PHS released a report confirming the Fully Vaccinated account for 9 in every 10 Covid-19 Deaths over… […]
Fabulous work
If you go back to the source it shows a very different conclusion, namely that the death rate for the unvaxxed is 6x higher than for the vaxxed. It states that very clearly but you haven’t addressed that
What you’ve done is deliberately leave out the age adjustment to mislead your readers. The point being that the unvaxxed are young and less likely to die or be hospitalised whether vaccinated or not. The vaxxed are older. If you compare within the same age cohort (which the source paper does) then the conclusion is the opposite to yours.
Please tell me that was an oversight and not deliberate manipulation of your audience
The main point I’m seeing is that people are taking a vaccine that clearly doesnt work
It works, it killed my uncle in 10 days and crippled my mother or similar with a fast developing dementia. Both were healthy, he was in hospital only once in his life, after a car accident, he didn’t eat drugs and was clear in mind. He died while making the lunch to her adult daughters, a kind of dropped dead (emboli, no autopsy).
My mother loved to show off with her lab results, while I always had 1-2 marked one (bad values) she never had any. There was nothing wrong with her mind either. I don’t need statistics, two elderly just in my family out of two.
When my uncle died (different country) my mother told me that they had to wait more than 3 weeks with the funeral as the service was overwhelmed. It was the same pattern, elderly got the vaxxes first.
That is what they are manipulating the data to show. Notice how the original report(s) they claim to source their data from has charts and tables, yet they neither use nor recreate any of them. The data shows a safe and effective vaccine. For example, they use raw tally from a table to build their bar chart rather than the per capita (per 100,000 people) that the table is providing.
No you’re not, you’re seeing deliberately misleading interpretation and presentation of the numbers.
Obviously if 90% of the population is vaccinated then the percentage of those with covid against the unvaccinated will be higher but as a percentage of the vaccinated population will be very small. The percentage of unvaccinated covid deaths as a percentage of the unvaccinated population will be very high. If you’re not vaccinated and you get covid the chances of you dying are massively increased, that’s an irrefutable fact.
The bar chart is deliberately misleading in that the peak number of deaths in the period shown, early September, was about 58,000 bit reduced down to about 15,000. You have to add the numbers for each of the side by side red, green and yellow bars together wheras if they’d been stacked the huge reduction in deaths would have been obvious with just a glance. The choice of chart can only have been intended to make it appear to the uncritical mind that vaccination had not greatly reduced overall deaths from covid.
Sadly too many people are either incapable of seeing how they’re being fooled or just don’t care which is the audience this kind of publication preys on.
This publication should be held accountable for misrepresenting the facts in a way that can only be intended to sway people from getting vaccinated by misinforming them. To me that’s tantamount to murder or do you have some other explanation?
Thank you! This is what I’m struggling with. There seems to be manipulation on both sides. Sites like this are only worth their while if they are not Manipulating numbers – I’d love an answer too. However, if these figures are factual, my question is…what can the public do? Marches are fine but achieve nothing in the end, likewise letters to your MP etc etc.
Mass non compliance. They run the show with the help of the useless masks. People are sheep, they will follow the herd. Take it off, show an example for start. If they realize that more and more of us are not frightened and give a sh..t to the fear-campaign, they will become more brave. In private share your experience with others including what you read.
Besides I read this, can’t tell true or not but it would be nice if the Expose can:
‘The regulations for wearing masks expired on 23 July 2021. It was only valid for 12 months. There is no statutory instrument in place, therefore no fine can be issued. If challenged, quote Coronavirus Act 2020 section 3 sub section 10.Expiry.’
Educate on WEF, K.Scwab, the goal of the h. o. a. x. and share the info. The pandemic is diversion. If they keep their own agenda the financial meltdown will happen in March. Catherine Austin Fitts, Planet Lockdown 1 part. (Youtube already deleted it.)
https://vimeo.com/499015623
These figures are factual but have been distorted to misrepresent the facts.
Obviously if 90% of the population is vaccinated then the percentage of those with covid against the unvaccinated will be higher but as a percentage of the vaccinated population will be very small. The percentage of unvaccinated covid deaths as a percentage of the unvaccinated population will be very high. If you’re not vaccinated and you get covid the chances of you dying are massively increased, that’s an irrefutable fact.
The bar chart is deliberately misleading in that the peak number of deaths in the period shown, early September, was about 58,000 bit reduced down to about 15,000. You have to add the numbers for each of the side by side red, green and yellow bars together wheras if they’d been stacked the huge reduction in deaths would have been obvious with just a glance. The choice of chart can only have been intended to make it appear to the uncritical mind that vaccination had not greatly reduced overall deaths from covid.
Sadly too many people are either incapable of seeing how they’re being fooled or just don’t care which is the audience this kind of publication preys on.
This publication should be held accountable for misrepresenting the facts in a way that can only be intended to sway people from getting vaccinated by misinforming them. To me that’s tantamount to murder or do you have some other explanation?
You’d think that the detail of the age cohort normalisation procedure would be made available in the government health reports (eg in an Appendix), but it never is. How can we take such opaquely derived figures seriously? You made the point, a valid one, that the young rarely die (vaxxed or not), then imply that that fact somehow reduces the significance of the increasing numbers of deaths in the total vaxxed in the rest of the population. Well all I can say is, your mind boggles.
Hi Kbro,
Here’s a worked example. There are 1000 people, half young and half old.
Of the 500 oldies, 90% are vaxxed (so 450) and 10% of them die (so 45) and 20% are unvaxxed (so 100) and 30% of them die (so 30)
Of the 500 young ones, 50% are vaxxed (so 250) and 1% of them die (so 2.5) and 50% are unvaxxed (so 250) and 3% of them die (so 7.5).
In total 47.5 vaxxed have died but only 37.5 unvaxxed. So by the maths of this article, more vaxxed have died. But if you look at the age groups separately, you’re 3x more likely to die if unvaxxed.
Hope that helps explain the issue.
Gerry
It doesn’t explain the issue one bit.
You also did it incorrectly let me explain.
We have ‘X’ oldies, ‘Y’ are jabbed, ‘Z’ are not. We also have ‘A’ youngsters ‘B’ are jabbed, ‘C’ are not.
When these figures get put through my mysterious and secret criteria the answer is: Get your Jab/Booster, They are safe and effective.
Clear?
“Of the 500 oldies, 90% are vaxxed (so 450) and 10% of them die (so 45) and 20% are unvaxxed (so 100) and 30% of them die (so 30)”
90% + 20% = 110% ?
It appears that the criteria for being jabbed is dependent upon a time frame and is not binary
Of the 500 oldies, 90% are vaxxed (so 450) and 10% of them die (so 45) and 10% are unvaxxed (so 50) and 30% of them die (so 15)
90% + 20% = ?
Also, if all the 500 oldies were unvaxxed 10% of them might die from the virus (so 50)
If all the young were unvaxxed 0.001% might die from the virus (so 0.005).
Why should we mandate vaccines for everyone and not just target the vulnerable cohort?
Why target the vulnerable? Euthanasia shot?
Again: Many were placebos, we don’t know how many because reports from different countries differ.
The range is 30-80% – huge.
If only the half were placebos, the full picture will be different, isn’t it?
As proof: Nadim Zwadhi – slip of tongue in the house? He told that those who got placebos also get covid passes.
Died to WHAT?
First: where is the proof that anyone died to covid? No working test, the PCR gave positive to a papaya, goat among others. Autopsies were not required.
What is the proof for even one covid death then? Can you tell the difference between this or that pneumonia by look? I doubt.
Second: they already killed many elderly during the ‘first wave’, the ‘midazolam wave’. They cannot die again because of the vax or pneumonia named as covid or lack of usual treatments but with a positive PCR named as covid.
Third: O’Looney (the funeral director) told that people died in clusters, age-clusters, after the vax. There were more death among that age group who were recently vaxxed.
Fourth: We don’t know the number of placebos. It can be different in different countries, what we know for sure, many were placebos. How do you count them then?
Even Nadim Zwadhi told that those people who got placebos get vax passports (recorded on video). They know how many – we don’t.
Their numbers are totally useless. The only thing which matters the all death compared to previous years.
I regularly travel(led) to abroad, I have 2-3 favorite places I visited in every years, same hotels, same people who also tend to travel there at that period of the year. What I saw this year that the elderly disappeared. There were no elderly on the planes from UK or in the hotels or anywhere on holiday. I used to travelled with many who looked 65-80. Not anymore. The oldest are 60 max but rather younger. What happened with them? Where are they?
The statistics show that deaths from all causes are higher in the vaccinated than the placebo group in the Pfizer trial. Once you figure the baseline deaths, the relative harm from the vaccines look to be 5x the harm from covid.
38 total deaths in both 22k arms
17 deaths in placebo, of which 2 were from covid
21 deaths in vaccine, of which 1 was from covid
baseline deaths is 17 – 2, or 15
minimum covid deaths is 1 per 22k, as we see from the vaccine arm, so we have to adjust the baseline deaths up by one to 16
Excess deaths from placebo arm are 17 – 16, or one.
Excess deaths from vaccine arm are 21 – 16, or five.
So the ratio of excess deaths is 5 from vaccines versus 1 from placebo.
Oh, are these numbers insignificant?
Lol, that means that the mortality benefit from vaccines are insignificant.
Do I recall well that the placebo group also got some kind of shots but not the covid one? Was it the meningitis one? Because that’s how they test.
While it should be strictly unvaxxed vs vaxxed.
Even their test result is fraudulent if I remember well.
Statistics show no such thing.
Long term studies have unrelated deaths that are factored in.
Unless there was an update since July, the numbers were —
Was 29 deaths in the 44,000 participants.
15 in vaccine & 14 in placebo died before Jan ’21
1 vaccinated died of covid pneumonia
2 placebo died of covid
How ever, this was not a study on rate of morbidity.
Was a study on efficacy of preventing symptoms as related to antibody counts. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.28.21261159v1.full.pdf
In any case, we now have the real world data past the study that shows a reduction in symptoms, spread, and deaths that directly correlate with vaccination rates for the countries/regions.
I don’t understand why the headline says 9/10 deaths are among vaxxed either…but, if I wanna know how many people are dying in my age cohort (20-29) based off vaccination status, why is that information hidden? That would be the best and most clear source for me to base my decision off of. There’s no statistical report to show where the age-adjusted value that is supposedly lower for the vaxxed comes from; they simply say it is..
And, let’s say, okay the unvaxxed are dying at 6X the rate than the vaxxed, what happened to the stats that said the vaccines are 90%,95% effective etc. Because these stats clearly show they’re not as effective as people said (just take a look at table 13).
Indeed, both the data displayed on this page as well as shown in the source documents are somehow tricky. This page is forgetting about age groups, and the source is drawing conclusions from very low number of cases. The power of statistical tests for such low number of cases is not significant to draw sure conclusions.
But… humans and viruses are more-or-less similar on every continent. Data from US (CDC) are quite rich and can be meaningful. Try to use:
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#demographicsovertime
Use Deaths – all-ages-groups
There you will see how severe the disease is among different age groups.
And here: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#rates-by-vaccine-status
you can find vaccination influence on deaths (even you can see how each of the typical proposed vaccines are working)
All the best from Poland (project TITAN: search for anti-covid medicine, my contact: aj***@********il.com). Stay in good health!
Do you mean the same way the media NEVER includes the age or weight of the deaths happening at present?
Just curious.
If you seriously still believe the government has your best interests at heart, then i have nothing left to say to you.
Take care x
But how do account for thect the fact the jabbed are also counted as unjabbed depending upon a time frame?
They don’t give us the age data we need. Here is something I see. Total pop. vaxed is about 2.5 times unvaxed. 21 deaths unvaxed, 112 vaxed. 2.5 x 21 is 50. Overall, the per capita deaths vaxed is more than double the unvaxed.
This is somewhat skewed because there are huge numbers of cases in the unvaccinated population. The sort of people that queue up for their vax are the first to go for testing so every one of those gets counted whereas that’s not true for the other population.
It would be very useful to see these numbers per capita, along with how many people constitute the vax’d vs unvax’d populations
[…] Source: DailyExpose.uk […]
[…] – Whilst you’ve been distracted by the UK Govs. Christmas Party, PHS released a report confirming th… […]
The document has been pulled, does anyone have a copy of the PDF 21-12-08-covid19-winter_publication_report.pdf?
https://web.archive.org/web/20211208200456/https://publichealthscotland.scot/media/10741/21-12-08-covid19-winter_publication_report.pdf
I’ve tried to click on link to latest report but doesn’t take me anywhere can you put up link
Yet another fantastic article.! Thank you.!
Exactly as I said earlier – distraction tactics. All part of the Psyop!! 🤬🤬. And now, with the Omicon jabs & boosters to come any time soon, the triple jabbed will soon become the unjabbed again!! 🤡🤡
Some of those links aren’t working, i’m afraid
Hi, is it just me or the links to see the actual numbers on the PHS WEBSITE link through to a ‘PAGE NOT FOUND’ ? It would be great to see the actual 1 in 10 numbers on the PHS website
You guys are absolutely incredible. Always bang on with your analyses and the subject matter is timely, which tells me you’re constantly working at it.
would love to see you include Canada data or provide separate analyses for Canada. This country is in the dark.
pulled website here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20211208200456/https://publichealthscotland.scot/media/10741/21-12-08-covid19-winter_publication_report.pdf
[…] The Exposé on December 9, 2021 […]
[…] Read more: Whilst you’ve been distracted by the UK Government’s Christmas Party, official data confir… […]
The first two links go to pages that are not found. Please amend it.
Also would be good to have the charts’ references underneath.
“The data shows no reduction in covid or death”
The last American vagabond video at 27:57 :
28:00 Those spike proteins cross the blood brain barrier. . . . They have prion disease effects. We are going to see this in about a year and a half.
https://www.flemingmethod.com/select-videos
Except that I doubt that any spike protein is involved but graphene oxide and those little razor like graphene hydroxid particles.
[facepalm] the VIRUS has spike proteins, NOT the vaccines.
The vaccines provide the antibodies to FIGTH the spike proteins.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/qsuoo6/how_the_mrna_vaccine_works_to_fight_the/
There is a wind-up for the immune system to get cracking; this is why the variants with larger viral load have more break-thru cases.
___
Reading what you gremlins talk about these topics is like double entendre, second meanings for all the words, but NONE of the sexy.
Yes, COVID with the SPIKE PROTEINS is neuroinvasive, crossing the blood-brain barrier, hence the long covid including the cognitive.
Prions DO NOT contain genetic information. mRNA vaccine… yeah no.
And for the gremlin who replied to you prior who has also been watching the psuedo-science fiction put out by anti-vaxx profiteers: there is no graphene oxide in the vaccine anymore than there are ice cube trays in your drink. Do you put the entire tray in your drinks? or do you remove the cubes? There is a stage of manufacturing where graphene oxide is used as an adjunct for proper molecular spacing, akin to ice being spaced out in a tray. The graphene oxide is not soluble and any signs of damage would render the next stages impossible. Not only would it be clearly visible, but reducing graphene oxide to the vaccines required temperatures would break stuff. Check out 3-D Graphene printing and its aerogel formations.
The links to the official reports referred to do not exist on the public health site (i.e. 404)
[…] December 9, 2021Whilst you’ve been distracted by the UK Govs. Christmas Party, PHS released a report confirming th… […]
[…] https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/09/distracted-by-christmas-party-data-shows-9-in-10-covid-deaths-vacc… […]
The same is happening in Australia and New Zealand, in Victoria 100% of the ”covid” deaths in the last 2 months have been jabbed
[…] “Natural Immunity”: This Variant is likely to be “both very mild and very transmissible.” Whilst you’ve been distracted by the UK Govs. Christmas Party, PHS released a report confirming th… Fauci: Definition of Fully Vaccinated Will Be Changed Anti-vaccine group follows California’s […]
where are these charts? i looked through the last 2 source things released and i dont see them
[…] The Exposé on December 9, 2021 […]
[…] “Public Health Scotland releases report confirming the fully vaccinated account for nine in every 10 …” – “The fully vaccinated population have a 407% higher chance of dying once exposed to Covid than the unvaccinated population, rather than the claimed 95% lower chance of dying that’s meant to be induced by the vaccines,” writes the Exposé. […]
[…] Click here to visit: Whilst you’ve been distracted by the UK Govs. Christmas Party, PHS released a report confirming th… […]
[…] Read more […]
[…] Whilst you’ve been distracted by the UK Govs. Christmas Party, PHS released a report confirming th… […]
Sorry for duplicating this, but it can be important for many…
Indeed, both the data displayed on this page as well as shown in the source documents are somehow tricky. This page is forgetting about age groups, and the source is drawing conclusions from very low number of cases. The power of statistical tests for such low number of cases is not significant to draw sure conclusions.
But… humans and viruses are more-or-less similar on every continent. Data from US (CDC) are quite rich and can be meaningful. Try to use:
https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#demographicsovertime
Use Deaths – all-ages-groups
There you will see how severe the disease is among different age groups.
And here: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#rates-by-vaccine-status
you can find vaccination influence on deaths (even you can see how each of the typical proposed vaccines are working)
All the best from Poland (project TITAN: search for anti-covid medicine, my contact: aj***@********il.com). Stay in good health!
[…] https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/09/distracted-by-christmas-party-data-shows-9-in-10-covid-deaths-vacc… […]
[…] By The Exposé , December 9, 2021 • […]
[…] By The Exposé , December 9, 2021 • […]
I cannot join nor support your essays that are clearly designed to demonize the UK government or any authorities, be it scientific, political or of any affiliation.
There is still plenty to learn from the SARS-Cov-2 virus and with the information on hand, vaccination is still the best means to combat this pandemic.
Please refrain from twisting the facts to accommodate your fanciful optic against the hard working people in many labs and pharmaceutical plants around the globe. Don’t trivialize the serious and tough work that so many do in order to save millions of lives.
NOT ‘saving millions of lives’ Acquaint yourself with FACTS.
[…] By The Exposé , December 9, 2021 • […]
[…] Whilst you’ve been distracted by the UK Govs. Christmas Party, PHS released a report confirming th… […]
[…] Egy másik megdöbbentő jelentés! Az Egyesült Királyság kormányának karácsonyi partija elterelte a figyelmet, a PHS által közzétett jelentésről, amely megerősíti, hogy az elmúlt 4 hónapban minden 10 Covid-19 halálesetből 9-et a teljesen beoltottak okoztak. Forrás […]
[…] Source […]
[…] article from the blog, The Exposé, claims that fully vaccinated people accounted for nine in 10 Covid-19 […]
[…] article from the blog, The Exposé, claims that fully vaccinated people accounted for nine in 10 […]
[…] Whilst you’ve been distracted by the UK Govs. Christmas Party, PHS released a report confirming th… […]
[…] Click here to visit: UK Government report admits there are 23.5 Million people in England who have NOT had a single dose … […]
[…] https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/09/distracted-by-christmas-party-data-shows-9-in-10-covid-deaths-vacc… https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/18/triple-vaccinated-account-4-in-5-covid-deaths/ https://off-guardian.org/2021/12/02/the-case-for-compulsory-vaccinations-is-dead-omicron-just-killed-it/ […]
That is shady as hell. Daily Expose is manipulating the data in a completely dishonest manner.
Rather telling that they don’t use the graphs, even recreations from the report and instead make their own.
Why % for first graph, data is not given in this format.
Second is a bar graph from a table of percentage of population data. (pg 45)
Third is a stacked cumulative count of cases, without population sizes or total tests context.
Fourth is a bar graph of the raw number from per capita data for hospitalizations. (pg 51)
Fifth is stacked cumulative counts of hospitalizations, without population or total tests context.
Sixth is another bar graph of raw number from per capita data for deaths. (pg 57)
When you are looking at a high rate of vaccinations in a population (with age over 40 @ 95% fully two dose vaccination and even 16 and over are l90% for first dose ) then you will see numbers like this. What you don’t see are the people who don’t have symptoms requiring testing/hospitalization, which is why the per capita numbers are important.
Put more plainly, if you look at the first week of the report that Daily Expose is citing,
For 13 Nov thru 19 Nov:
19.85 Unvaccinated out of every 100,000 were hospitalized.
17.13 Single Dose out of every 100,000 were hospitalized.
6.43 Two or more dosed out of every 100,000 were hospitalized.
Resulting in a mortality rate by covid of:
4.92 Unvaccinated out of every 100,000 died
5.63 Single Dose out of every 100,000 died* (age groups explain data anomaly, in report)
1.52 Two or more dosed out of every 100,000 died
And when you factor in the included data for ages and compared deaths between 2013-2019 very different picture emerges. As I said, shady. Daily Expose is Shady AF
gg just kill everyone on this world and the elit team will be happy
and stay in the dream and take the vaccine
[…] The red warning above appeared after the expose used PHS figures to prove that vaccines increase your chances of being infected with Covid, and they increase your chances of being hospitalised with Covid and they increase your chances of dying from Covid. – https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/09/distracted-by-christmas-party-data-shows-9-in-10-covid-deaths-vacc… […]