According to reports, a life insurance company based in France refused to pay multiple millions of pounds for a Covid-19 vaccine death, because the man knew about the risk of death and “voluntarily” took part in the medical experiment.
Around the world, the number of insurance claims, especially covering young people, skyrocketed in 2021. Rates in the US alone of prime-age mortality were 40 percent higher in 2021 compared to 2019. These claims are putting pressure on life insurance companies. In America, to compensate for the excess in prime-age mortality, employers are beginning to deny life insurance policies for those who are not fully vaccinated. In contrast, fully vaccinated people are paid full insurance benefits when they pass away.
With deaths in the fully vaccinated increasing rapidly, life insurance companies will soon have to recognise the safety issues surrounding the jab.
According to media reports from France, an entrepreneur from Paris died post-covid-19 vaccination. The deceased man had previously taken out a multi-million-pound life insurance policy to benefit his children and grandchildren. However, the insurance company is refusing to payout. They argue that the man took part in a medical experiment at his own risk and that the side effects of the jab are well known and are available online. The same company has stated that covid-19 is not classified as a “critical illness,” but that the adverse events of the vaccine do include death.
The French insurance company claimed that the deceased individual violated the insurance contract by partaking in a medical experiment with known risks. Whilst the family have sued the company, they have been largely unsuccessful. As the man took a life-threatening risk that can be legally recognised as suicide, the life insurance does not have to pay out and also refuses to pay for deaths caused directly by the vaccines.
The case was shared online by the family’s lawyer Carlo Alberto Brusa, who revealed that the court ruled in favour of the insurance company. This was because the court recognised the insurer’s classification of the man’s death and that the man knew the risks of the vaccine, including death.
Tragically, the family’s appeal was rejected because the contract of the life insurance is clear: A fatal risk that is publicly known is “not covered by the contract” and is “legally considered as suicide.” In conclusion, the court ruled that the man voluntarily took part in a medical experiment.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help..
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
.
Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, World News
Surely this reasoning would apply to anyone who has taken the vaccine.
MAGA 2022 !!
I get paid more than $140 to $450 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $24652 from this without having online working skills .
Simply give it
open this link HERE……. http://Www.NETCASH1.Com
They’ve got us every which way. Hang in there, folks.
Wow, this tops off the money grab nicely, can’t 8magine the anger that family feel
Actual name of insurer and insured who was denied would make this story more credible. In the current form, it does not sound credible. BTW, I checked with my insurer in the US and they informed me (with some delay) by email that it was covered.
Insurance company: “Sir, is this a hypothetical situation?”
Person: “Yes”.
Insurance company: “In that case, yes, we are very willing to pay”.
the actual ‘court transcripts’ would be even better…..
doubtless: there was some pretty ‘hefty’ evidence presented abt the Vâ‚“â‚“ ;
might, even, be of some use in the case currently pending in the AUssie courts ….
I can’t imagine life insurance companies surviving very long if the death rate stays elevated.
Is another bail out on the way?
If so, this will be a big one. Nations will lose a lot of sovereignty. Citizens will be plugged into the matrix for good. They’ll love their cattle tag and the banker that feeds them. After 2 years of lockdown, now is the time to do it.
This is the video that the Insurance company used in court:
https://drtrozzi.org/2022/01/11/schizer-because-we-care-about-our-profits/
The guy knew that he was committing suicide when he accepted the kill shot.
“A fatal risk that is publicly known is “not covered by the contract” and is “legally considered as suicide.” In conclusion, the court ruled that the man voluntarily took part in a medical experiment”
k
i’m ‘good’ with that;
how-ever: would like to see the evidence that was presented in court by the Insurance Co.
and: of course: in a court of law: you are under pretty severe penalties of perjury for not telling the truth;
unlike, say, being in-front of a TV camera, eh?
[…] 20. Januar 2022 The Expose: French Life Insurance Company Allegedly Denied Payment to Man Who Died From Covid-19 Vaccine […]