Earlier this month, Dr. Andrew Huff, a scientist who worked with Peter Daszak at the EcoHealth Alliance, sent a whistle-blower complaint to Senator Gary Peters, the Chairman of the Senate Whistle-blower committee, stating that he believes Daszak works with the CIA and could in fact be “a double agent working on behalf of the Chinese government.”
EcoHealth, which is led by Daszak, receives funding from a number of US government agencies including the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”), which is led by Joe Biden’s chief medical adviser, Dr. Anthony Fauci.
EcoHealth partnered with Dr. Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina as well as Dr. Shi Zhengli of the Wuhan Institute of Virology to conduct gain-of-function research on bat-borne viruses found in China before the Covid-19 pandemic initially began.
Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
According to a report detailed on Substack by an independent journalist called Kanekoa, Dr. Huff earned his PhD in environmental health with a specialty in emerging diseases before he became associate vice president of EcoHealth.
While working for the firm, he was tasked with finding “novel methods of bio-surveillance, data analytics, and visualisation for disease detection,” according to his bio. In the event it may be removed, we have attached a copy of his bio as published in EcoHealth’s Newsletter below.
In a twitter thread posted on 12 January, Dr. Huff stated that Dazsak invited him to join the CIA and on three separate occasions Daszak updated Dr. Huff on his work with the CIA.
For the Record: In 2015, Dr. Peter Daszak stopped me as we were leaving work late at night, and asked me if he should work with the CIA. I was shocked given my experience in security. Over the next 2 months he gave me updates on 3 separate occasions about his work with the CIA.
My sincere apologies for my contribution to this program. I did not know what it was at the time. I am attempting to make this right.
@RoyalFamily @KingAbdullahII @narendramodi @POEthiopia @CPofCNThese types of programs are disastrous to global public health and foreign relations. As Americans, we need to practice what we preach and do what is right. I don’t know how the United States drifted so far away from decency and honesty. #Jordan #China #Ethiopia #India
China #Laos #Vietnam #Sudan #Jordan #France #Ukraine #UnitedKingdom #Canada
CIA
CIA
CIA
Dr. Andrew Huff (@AGHuff) 12 January 2022
And in a twitter thread posted on 23 January, Dr. Huff said he believes EcoHealth is basically “a CIA front organisation.” In the thread, Huff explained that the Covid experiments were part of scientific research and development programs that started in the United States and were transferred to China. He claimed “the United States of America is primarily responsible for Covid—not China.”
I have read and listened to quite a bit of online chatter wondering why I have waited so long to come forward.
I knew in December of 2019 that COVID was likely a lab leak (it could be a few different things actually which are not mutually exclusive). As I saw the smears and…
… blatant lies from the US government, based on my professional experience in the domain, and intelligence in the region, I decided to wait in fear of being smeared as a conspiracy theorist. In private, with all my colleagues, I stated bluntly how COVID likely emerged.
I immediately fled California in January for Michigan and closed on a new house as fast I could, thinking that the disease would be much worse than it turned out to be (thank god). After arriving in Michigan, I provided information related to COVID, supply chains, and…
… pandemics to numerous journalists. I even contacted the the US Army Surgeon General (Gen. Dingle) with an ofter to assist the effort to fight COVID, and began the process of re-entering the Army via direct commission (More to that story too). As I patiently waited, I was…
.. closely watching US public perception poll data related to the origin of the virus (natural v. lab leak). When a series of polls all indicated that roughly 70% of the public believed that COVID leaked from a lab, I believed that the timing was right for the next part…
… of the story. Not only is EcoHealth Alliance a CIA front organization, but the United States of America is primarily responsible for COVID, not China. COVID was a US scientific R&D program where COVID was transferred to China, so that…
@banglanews_eng @BDMOFA
Dr. Andrew Huff (@AGHuff) 23 January 2022
On the 4 February Dr. Hoff tweeted a copy of his whistle-blower complaint.
Below are images of Dr. Huff’s complaint attached in his tweet above.
Yesterday, retweeting Lindsay Jones’ tweet (shown below), Dr. Huff tweeted: “I am proud to continue serving our country, military, and veterans. Please tag a veteran or military member in this post.”
A copy of the press release attached to Lindsay Jones’ tweet is below.
At the time of writing we were unable to find mention of this press release on either Renz Law’s website or Tom Renz’s Gettr account.
Sources:
- Former EcoHealth Alliance Official Calls NGO a ‘CIA Front Organization,’ Calls Peter Daszak a ‘Sociopath’, The Georgia Star News, 13 February 2022
- Gain of function researcher Peter Daszak accused of being CIA asset; EcoHealth Alliance described as “front” for agency, Natural News, 25 January 2022
Featured image courtesy of The Daszak Strain
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help..
Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…
.
Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
Categories: Breaking News, Latest News, World News
If he works for the chinese then he’s more trustworthy than anyone working for the panty sniffer in the
whiteblack house.[…] BY RHODA WILSON, “BREAKING: Whistle-blower, Former VP of EcoHealth Partners with Attorney Tom Renz,” The Exposé, FEBRUARY 26, 2022 […]
“And in a twitter thread posted on 23 January, Dr. Huff said he believes EcoHealth is basically “a CIA front organisation.” In the thread, Huff explained that the Covid experiments were part of scientific research and development programs that started in the United States and were transferred to China. He claimed “the United States of America is primarily responsible for Covid—not China.”
It seems to me that the following is true, and it seems to offer confirmation of the above.
THE 3Ws of COVID-19(SARS-CoV-2)
Who: Ralph S. Baric, PhD(UNC-Chapel Hill Lab)[1], Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi(Wuhan China)[2]
When: 2015-03-20
Where: UNC-Chapel Hill
If you, can prove when the virus was made, how the virus was made and who made the virus then every thing down stream of its creation must be a lie. I offer the following. Its intent is to prove COVID-19 was created, period.
I believe in 2015, through the joint efforts of American(NCU) and Chinese(Wuhan) labs and Baric and Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi. COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) was made using WIV1-CoV chimeric.
In addition to the full-length clone, we also produced WIV1-CoV chimeric virus that replaced the SARS spike with the WIV1 spike within the mouse-adapted backbone.
·
Lab-Made? SARS-CoV-2 Genealogy Through the Lens of Gain-of-Function Research
By Yuri Deigin
Apr 22, 2020
Using the SARS-CoV infectious clone as a template (7), we designed and synthesized a full-length infectious clone of WIV1-CoV consisting of six plasmids that could be enzymatically cut, ligated together, and electroporated into cells to rescue replication competent progeny virions (Fig. S1A). In addition to the full-length clone, we also produced WIV1-CoV chimeric virus that replaced the SARS spike with the WIV1 spike within the mouse-adapted backbone (WIV1-MA15, Fig. S1B). … To confirm growth kinetics and replication, Vero cells were infected with SARS-CoV Urbani, WIV1-MA15, and WIV1-CoV.[6]
comment image
To me, the 2016 paper looks a lot like the 2015 one. Moreover, its rationale is not very clear to me: after all, WIV1/Rs3367 already shared 96% of their genome with SARS-CoV. So I am not sure why one would want to insert a spike protein from its closest relative back into SARS-CoV. Maybe just because they could. In this light, the title of the article acquires a certain duality: SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence.
Oh, and I am not sure how in 2015 Baric was granted a patent for the creation of “chimeric coronavirus spike proteins”, given all that he and Shi Zhengli previously disclosed in their papers long before 2015.
httpsColon//yurideigin.medium.com/lab-made-cov2-genealogy-through-the-lens-of-gain-of-function-research-f96dd7413748
I believe the patent referenced above and granted to Baric is httpsColon//patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/84/9b/ba/459d77fa1380a5/WO2015143335A1.pdf
Publication of WO2015143335A1
Change of events
Application PCT/US2015/021773
2014-03-20 Priority to US201461968279P
2014-03-20 Priority to US61/968,279
2015-03-20 Application filed by The University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill<————————–<<<<
2015-09-24 Publication of WO2015143335A1
SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence[3]
Synthetic construction of chimeric mutant and full-length WIV1-CoV were approved by the UNC Institutional Biosafety Committee and the Dual Use Research of Concern Committee.[4]
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. We thank Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology for access to bat CoV sequences and plasmid of WIV1-CoV spike protein. Research was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and the National Institute of Aging of the NIH under Awards U19AI109761 and U19AI107810 (to R.S.B.), AI1085524 (to W.A.M.), and F32AI102561 and K99AG049092 (to V.D.M.). Human airway epithelial cell cultures were supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Di-gestive and Kidney Disease under Award NIH DK065988 (to S.H.R.). Support for the generation of the mice expressing human ACE2 was provided by NIH Grants AI076159 and AI079521 (to A.C.S.) [3].
A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence[4]
Construction of Chimeric SARS-Like Viruses. Both wild-type and chimeric WIV-CoV infectious clones were designed using published sequences and based on the SARS-CoV infectious clone (10). Synthetic construction of chimeric mutant and full-length WIV1-CoV were approved by the UNC Institutional Biosafety Committee and the Dual Use Research of Concern Committee.[3]
ONLINE METHODS:
Construction of SARS-like chimeric viruses. Both wild-type and chimeric viruses were derived from either SARS-CoV Urbani or the correspond-ing mouse-adapted (SARS-CoV MA15) infectious clone (ic) as previously described27. Plasmids containing spike sequences for SHC014 were extracted by restriction digest and ligated into the E and F plasmid of the MA15 infec-tious clone. The clone was designed and purchased from Bio Basic as six contiguous cDNAs using published sequences flanked by unique class II restriction endonuclease sites (BglI). Thereafter, plasmids containing wild-type, chimeric SARS-CoV and SHC014-CoV genome fragments were ampli-fied, excised, ligated and purified. In vitro transcription reactions were then preformed to synthesize full-length genomic RNA, which was transfected into Vero E6 cells as previously described2. The medium from transfected cells was harvested and served as seed stocks for subsequent experiments. Chimeric and full-length viruses were confirmed by sequence analysis before use in these studies. Synthetic construction of chimeric mutant and full-length SHC014-CoV was approved by the University of North Carolina Institutional Biosafety Committee and the Dual Use Research of Concern committee.[4]
The virus is known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The disease it causes is called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).[5]
Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in over 150 million people (Organization 2020).[5]
1 https[Colon]//sph.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/112/2021/10/Ralph_Baric_2021_Jon_Gardiner_738x714-738×714.jpg
2 https[Colon]//www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/shi-zhengli-2–360×188.jpg
3 https[Colon]//www.pnas.org/content/pnas/113/11/3048.full.pdf
4 https[Colon]//www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985.pdf
5 https[Colon]//www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/symptoms-causes/syc-20479963
5 https[Colon//link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11481-021-10012-9
6 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4801244/
I found the following write-up interesting and related to the general topic.
Moderna Patented CANCER GENE is in Sars-Cov-2 “Spike Protein”
CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG may do just what it was designed to do
Igor Chudov
Feb 22
I did a little bit more digging into the topic of my article about genes from 2018 Moderna patent. I wrote about it yesterday, but kept reading and digging and found much more disturbing stuff than I expected.
First, a recap: Sars-Cov-2 virus has a genetic insert that exists ONLY in Moderna patent 9,587,003 from 2018. Obviously, bats could not copy the patented insert into their viruses by themselves, right?
Igor’s Newsletter
How did Moderna’s Patented Sequence End up in Sars-Cov-2?
Here’s a continuation of the CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG story. It was discussed much online and Naked Emperor posted a great substack article that prompted me to post a follow up. A peer reviewed article came out today: The short of this (and you NEED to read the long version) is that Sars-Cov2 has a genetic sequence CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG, that is the mirror image…
So, then, since cave bats cannot copy genes from a Moderna patent into their coronaviruses, obviously a question arises how did this happen. The explanation from @JikkyKjj is as follows:
Rephrasing his explanation: Sars-Cov-2 was passed through human cells, which were specifically of the line developed by Moderna, which contained mutated MSH3 genes. Due to such passage, Sars-Cov-2 cells acquired the Moderna mutation. In other words, they say, the CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG sequence was randomly picked off human cells, that happened to be Moderna patented human cells. It is just a sign of what kind of lab work was performed.
But go back to the patent where CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG appears: This is a Moderna patent (by Bancel et al) that is ONCOLOGY (Cancer) related and is about making cancer-causing proteins. The patent
Thus, I would like to present an alternative that is much more sinister. The specific sequence of the MSH3 mutation that we are discussing, is not a random mutation, it is a cancer gene added on purpose. It’s point is, duh, to ensure PRODUCTION OF ONCOLOGY RELATED PROTEINS, just like in the patent — the proteins that end up in the spike of the Sars-Cov-2 virus.
It possibly was purposely edited into the Sars-Cov-2 genome, just as HIV genes were edited in, and was not an artifact of accidental and sloppy lab work. Furthermore, CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG is a key part of the spike protein and is present in in the key location of the spike protein of the Sars-Cov-2 virus. Is it really an “accident”?
Let’s take a look.
History
The gene MSH3 has been long known for its mutations that cause cancer. Here’s the NIH article from 1996:
Here’s a good explanation of how MSH3 encoded proteins are related to cellular repair and prevention of cancer:
MutS homolog 3 (MSH3) is a gene that encodes a protein that is a component of MutS beta – a post-replicative DNA mismatch repair system. The protein functions in DNA mismatch repair. Missense mutations, nonsense mutations, silent mutations, frameshift deletions and insertions, and in-frame deletions are observed in cancers such as intestinal cancer, skin cancer, and stomach cancer.
MSH3 is altered in 2.28% of all cancers with colon adenocarcinoma, endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, prostate adenocarcinoma, and conventional glioblastoma multiforme having the greatest prevalence of alterations [3].
Oddly Enough, Spike Protein does the same
The article explains that free-floating spike protein penetrates cell nuclei (where DNA is) and inhibits normal DNA repair, leading to cancers. Just like the Moderna cancer patent’s MSH3 mutations do!
As Sars-Cov-2 appears to be genetically edited, with HIV sequences embedded in it, can we ask: is it possible that CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG was intentionally added to Covid-19 spike, for the specific purpose to do the same things as it does in MSH3 mutations?
That is, with the purpose to suppress DNA repair and cause cancers?
In other words, there are two possibilities:
CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG was accidentally picked up by Sars-Cov-2 virus as it was passaged through Moderna’s patented MSH3-mutated cell lines, developed for Moderna’s cancer experiments
CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG was intentionally added to Sars-Cov-2 spike protein code to inhibit V(D)J recombination and p53 repair, and cause cancers in anyone who receives spike protein (from Covid or otherwise).
The tip to our answer is that CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG does not appear in some random place in the Sars-Cov-2 genome, but instead it appears IN THE SPIKE, and near the furin cleavage site — the centrally important part of the spike!
We do not yet know which of these possibilities is right. What we DO know is that everything else about Sars-Cov-2 was extremely thoughtfully and professionally done, such as HIV fragments added to it. Why should we assume that a cancer-causing mutation code from a cancer-related Moderna patent, was inserted into just the perfect location on the spike, purely by chance?
Giving credit where it’s due, I asked @JikkyKjj prior to publishing. He answered in a manner that indicates that itis worth thinking about. If he gives me permission, I will post his brief answer. EDIT: He did and ALSO made some generous suggestions regarding the content.
It’s too convenient to be accidental, when combined with the gp120 sequences. Read Pradhan’s paper again
My last question is: CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG is patented. Was the author of Sars-Cov-2 adding it with the permission of patent holder? What do you think?
Also: if you disagree with something, please say so and rebut me! I am not a molecular biologist and I am just asking questions.
For details how to find CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG in the Moderna patent, click here:
Igor’s Newsletter
Where is CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG in the Moderna Patent
Yesterday, I wrote an article that made rounds on Twitter and substack and generated a tremendous amount of comments. Two astute readers asked me a very reasonable question: where in the Moderna patent 9,587,003, exactly, is something that matches the Sars-Cov-2 sequence CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG? I am trying to explain here…
Read more
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/moderna-patented-cancer-gene-is-in?utm_source=url
After extensive reviews, I found HIV connected to many medical problems. Now in the news.
I found the following write-up interesting and related to the general topic.
Faust Hold Patents on a Key HIV Component Used to Create COVID-19
By Dr. Jerome Corsi| April 28th, 2020
Why does Dr. Anthony Fauci’s name appear on 4 U.S. patents for a key glycoprotein that appears to have been inserted into a SARS virus chassis to create the current COVID-19 epidemic?
The legal portal Justia.com lists the following “patents by inventor Anthony S. Fauci” involving a glycoprotein found in the HIV-1, a disease that attacks the human immune system, leading to the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, more commonly known as AIDS. In 1990, Fauci held the same position at the NIH that he holds today. Fauci made his mark around the anti-viral medications that were developed by Big Pharma to combat the AIDS epidemic raging at that time.
This same glycoprotein, identified as Glycoprotein 120, or simply as GP120, has also been found to be a key component of the current COVID-19, a disease that appears to combine a HIV-1 attack on the human immune system, with SARS CoV-1, the pathogen from the original SARS (“Severe Acute Respiratory System”) that created an international pandemic in 2002-2003. The pathogen in COVID-19 is named SARS CoV-2 in medical scientific literature.
The four patents on which Fauci is named as an inventor are the following:
Patent Number: 9896509, patent granted August 3, 2016. “Use of antagonists of the interaction between HIV120 and ?4?7 integrin.
Publication Number: 20160333309, patent application filed August 3, 2016. “Use of Antagonists of the Interaction Between HIV GP120 and A4B7 Integrin.
Patent Number: 9441041, patent granted September 13, 2016. “Use of antagonists between HIV GP120 and ?4?7 integrin.”
Publication Number 2016007586, patent application filed September 21, 2015. “Use of antagonists of the Interaction Between HIV GP120 and A4B7 Integrin.”
An article published by a group of medical scientists in India in the medical science journal BioRXiv in January 2020 was entitled “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCov spike protein to HIV-1 and Gag.”
In a highly controversial finding, the medical scientists in India reported: “We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-Gag, all of which have identity/similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature.”
The article almost immediately was withdrawn after disinformation experts recognized the medical scientists in India were suggesting that COVID-19 was created by inserting the particular glycoprotein from the HIV-1 disease that involve patents held by or applied for by Fauci. Even more upsetting to disinformation operatives was the suggestion that the insertion of these 4 inserts into a SARS virus is not likely to occur in nature.
The clear suggestion was that COVID-19 was laboratory-created, possibly as a bioweapon, and that the creator of the virus used GP120 to do so, a glycoprotein from the HIV-1 1990s era that tied back to Fauci.
https:[Colon]corsination.com/fauci-patents-on-hiv-covid-19-components/
https://sicem365.com/forums/7/topics/66481
[…] BREAKING: Whistle-blower, Former VP of EcoHealth Partners with Attorney Tom Renz BY RHODA […]
[…] – BREAKING: Whistle-blower, Former VP of EcoHealth Partners with Attorney Tom Renz […]
[…] READ MORE […]
can’t tell if your site is real or fake with all of what’s going on everywhere. SIMPLIFY and you’ll be more respected.
[…] believes Daszak works with the CIA and could in fact be “a double agent working on behalf of the Chinese government.” He […]
[…] believes Daszak works with the CIA and could in fact be “a double agent working on behalf of the Chinese government.” He […]
[…] believes Daszak works with the CIA and could in fact be “a double agent working on behalf of the Chinese government.” […]
[…] Whistle-blower, Former VP of EcoHealth Partners with Attorney Tom Renz […]
[…] Whistle-blower, Former VP of EcoHealth Partners with Attorney Tom Renz […]
[…] Whistle-blower, Former VP of EcoHealth Partners with Attorney Tom Renz […]
[…] Whistleblower, ehemaliger Vizepräsident von EcoHealth kooperiert mit Rechtsanwalt Tom Renz […]
[…] Whistleblower, ehemaliger Vizepräsident von EcoHealth kooperiert mit Rechtsanwalt Tom Renz […]
[…] Whistleblower, ehemaliger Vizepräsident von EcoHealth kooperiert mit Rechtsanwalt Tom Renz […]
[…] Whistle-blower, Former VP of EcoHealth Partners with Attorney Tom Renz […]
[…] Whistle-blower, Former VP of EcoHealth Partners with Attorney Tom Renz […]
[…] Whistle-blower, Former VP of EcoHealth Partners with Attorney Tom Renz […]