Breaking News

Whilst you’ve been distracted by Russia’s invasion, the UK Gov. published data confirming the Fully Vaccinated are now up to 3.2x more likely to die of Covid-19 than the Unvaccinated

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The latest data published by the UK Health Security Agency confirms fully vaccinated individuals in England are up to 3.2 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than unvaccinated individuals based on Covid-19 death-rates per 100,000 population.

This means, based on Pfizer’s vaccine efficacy formula, that the Covid-19 injections are now proving to have a negative real-world effectiveness against death as low as minus-222%.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


The Russian invasion is now being aired in an endless 24/7 loop via BBC News and Sky News, and the UK’s Prime Minister has described it as “the biggest military conflict since World War 2”.

But with Covid-19 now nowhere to be seen across the mainstream media after two years of non-stop propaganda and lies, it’s hard not to conclude that this intensive coverage of a war thousands of miles away is merely a distraction.

One that is deliberately manipulated and designed to distract the public from terrible news closer to home, and judging by the latest data from the UK Health Security Agency, this certainly seems to be the case.

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) publish a weekly Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report containing figures on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths by vaccination status. The latest report, ‘Week 9 – 2022’ was published on Thursday 3rd March 22.

In it, the UKHSA provide the Covid-19 death rates per 100k people for the unvaccinated population and the triple vaccinated population by age groups ranging from under 18’s to 80+. However, it was only in the Week 3 – 2022 report that they stopped publishing the death-rate per 100k figures for the double vaccinated population.

Prior to this they combined the double and triple vaccinated population figures together for the number of cases, hospitalisations, and deaths as well as for the rates per 100k.

But because the UKHSA kindly provide the number of deaths to have occurred among the double vaccinated in their week 9 report, and also kindly provide the overall population size of the double vaccinated by age group in their ‘Week 8 National Influenza and Covid-19 Statistical Report‘, we’re able to do some simple maths to work out the death rates ourselves, and we can clearly see why the UKHSA have decided to no longer publish the calculated figures.

The following table is taken from the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report – Week 9 – 2022, and can be found on page 44. In it the UKHSA reveal the total number of deaths by vaccination status in England between 31st Jan and 27th Feb 22.

Now as you can clearly see the triple vaccinated population very much account for the vast majority of Covid-19 deaths, with 3,005 among the triple vaccinated people over the age of 80 alone. But we’re not interested in the triple vaccinated population for the purposes of this report, we’re interested in the fully vaccinated two dose population.

The following chart shows the total number of Covid-19 deaths between 31st Jan and 27th Feb 22 among the unvaccinated population and fully vaccinated population by age group, taken from the data in the above table –

As you can see here, the fully vaccinated accounted for the majority of Covid-19 deaths during this period in all age groups except for 30-39-year-olds. But what does this equate to in terms of the number of deaths per 100,000 population?

Well because the UKHSA decided they do not want us to know the answer anymore, we need to know the total population size of the double vaccinated population, and they kindly provide this information on page 83 of their ‘Week 8 National Influenza and Covid-19 Statistical Report‘.

To calculate the overall population size by age group all we need to do is subtract the ‘Vaccinated with at least 3 doses’ population size from the ‘Vaccinated with at least 2 doses’ population size, and we’re left with the overall two dose population size in week 7 of 2022.

The following chart shows the overall population size of the fully vaccinated by age group in England –

Now that we know this, all we need to do is divide each population size by 100k, and then divide the number of deaths among the fully vaccinated in each group by the answer to that simple equation.

Population size / 100,000 = x
Deaths / x = Death-rate per 100,000

The following table shows the death-rates per 100,000 unvaccinated individuals in England between 31st Jan and 27th Feb 22, and it can be found on page 45 of the latest UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance report

The following chart shows how the above death rates among the unvaccinated compare to the death rates per 100,000 among the fully vaccination in England –

Would you look at that? The fully vaccinated population in England are now statistically more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated population in every age single age group, even the 30-39-year-olds who, if you recall, had more deaths among the unvaccinated between 31st Jan and 27th Feb.

This data shows that all fully vaccinated individuals over the age of 70 are at least 3 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than unvaccinated individuals over the age of 70. Whilst fully vaccinated individuals aged 60-69 are 2.4 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than unvaccinated individuals aged 60-69.

This of course means that the Covid-19 injections are now proving to have a negative effectiveness against death, and here’s how bad that negative effectiveness is currently proving to be among each age group –

The real-world vaccine effectiveness is simply calculated by using Pfizer’s vaccine efficacy formula which as as follows:

Unvaccinated Death Rate – Vaccinated Death Rate / Unvaccinated Death Rate = Vaccine Effectiveness against Death

Unfortunately for the fully vaccinated population, that vaccine effectiveness against death is now as low as minus-221.7% among the over 80’s, and even as low as minus-80.255 among 18-29-year-olds.

But vaccine effectiveness isn’t really a measure of a vaccine, it is a measure of a vaccine recipients immune system performance compared to the immune system performance of an unvaccinated person.

The Covid-19 vaccine is supposed to train your immune system to recognise the spike protein of the original strain of the Covid-19 virus. It does this by instructing your cells to produce the spike protein, then your immune system produces antibodies and remembers to use them later if you encounter the spike part of the Covid-19 virus again.

But the vaccine doesn’t hang around after it’s done the initial training, it leaves your immune system to take care of the rest. So when the authorities state that the effectiveness of the vaccines weaken over time, what they really mean is that the performance of your immune system weakens over time.

But because the real-world effectiveness has fallen below 0%, this means the immune systems of the fully vaccinated population haven’t simply returned to their original natural state in line with the immune systems of the unvaccinated. It means their immune systems have actually degraded, strongly suggesting the Covid-19 injections cause damage to the natural immune system over a period of time.

So it looks like the theoretical risk of Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease, that Pfizer admitted to in confidential documents authored in April 2021, is no longer theoretical, and is very much coming to fruition in the United Kingdom. Either that, or we are seeing some new form of Covid-19 vaccine induced acquired immunodeficiency sydrome.

Share this page to Telegram
4.6 7 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

62 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Novus Ordo Seclorum
Novus Ordo Seclorum
8 months ago

The sheeple scramble to get the booster death vaccine:

https://rumble.com/vtdc3w-rushing-sheeple-for-the-booster.html

ChristineSmith
ChristineSmith
Reply to  Novus Ordo Seclorum
8 months ago

I get paid more than $120 to $130 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this i have earned easily $15k from this without having online working skills. 

This is what I do…. http://Www.jobsRevenue.com

Last edited 8 months ago by ChristineSmith
MicheleBarnes
MicheleBarnes
Reply to  ChristineSmith
8 months ago

I made $92/hr. It’s time to take some action and you can join it too.It is a simple, dedicated and easy way to get rich. Three weeks from now you will wish you had started today.Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site.
GOOD LUCK… http://Www.WorkSite24.Com

Last edited 8 months ago by MicheleBarnes
Jennifer
Jennifer
Reply to  MicheleBarnes
8 months ago

I’ve made $64,000 so far this year working online and I’m a full time student. Im using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Heres what I do.
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)

HERE====)> https://www.worksful.com

Last edited 8 months ago by Jennifer
Ozella Ethridge
Ozella Ethridge
Reply to  Novus Ordo Seclorum
8 months ago

I made $92/hr. It’s time to take some action and you can join it too.It is a simple, dedicated and easy way to get rich. Three weeks from now you will wish you had started today.Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site.
GOOD LUCK… http://Www.NETCASH1.Com

Last edited 8 months ago by Ozella Ethridge
Mahi3236
Mahi3236
Reply to  Ozella Ethridge
8 months ago

I make more then $12,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 11 to 12 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried it…GOOD LUCK….
    =====))>https://www.fuljobz.com

Last edited 8 months ago by Mahi3236
GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Novus Ordo Seclorum
8 months ago

But the not so sheeple could choose so far to have the poison vax or not.
While they keep us entertained with the Russian news, diversion, this is what going in the background and it is huge:

The Pandemic Treaty Under the World Health Organization (WHO)
WORLD HELL ORGANIZATION (WHO) Seeks to End National Sovereignty in the name of “Pandemics”
Negotiations on an international agreement to prevent and combat pandemics have begun, and ratification is set for 2024.
The agreement is based on Article 19 of the United Nations’ World Health Organization (WHO) Constitution, which allows the WHO General Assembly to adopt binding agreements for all 194 Member States by a two-thirds majority.

The end of choise on vax and else.
Full news: SOTN, ‘WORLD HELL ORGANIZATION Seeks to End National Sovereignty in the name of “Pandemics”’

Eva
Eva
Reply to  GundelP
8 months ago

I’ve made so far this year working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Here’s what I do.

For more details visit……………… http://Www.Cash46.Com

Last edited 8 months ago by Eva
Novus Ordo Seclorum
Novus Ordo Seclorum
Reply to  GundelP
8 months ago

This to me means that Bill Gates is going to release the next plandemic only after 2024, very likely before the Medicare goes bankrupt in 2026.

It won’t be in 2024 because of the presidential election in the US.

Get ready for the smallpox pandemic in 2025 or 2026 from Bill Gates!

Last edited 8 months ago by Novus Ordo Seclorum
sam
sam
Reply to  Novus Ordo Seclorum
8 months ago

You think? Why would he wait that long? The idea would be to kill all those with compromised immune systems, and if he waits that long they may recover.

Peace
Peace
Reply to  sam
8 months ago

Anyone who has had the vax HAS a compromised immune system.

JoanneConway
JoanneConway
Reply to  Novus Ordo Seclorum
8 months ago

I made $92/hr. It’s time to take some action and you can join it too.It is a simple, dedicated and easy way to get rich. Three weeks from now you will wish you had started today.Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site.
GOOD LUCK… http://Www.WorkSite24.Com

Last edited 8 months ago by JoanneConway
GladysSilva
GladysSilva
Reply to  Novus Ordo Seclorum
8 months ago

I made $92/hr. It’s time to take some action and you can join it too.It is a simple, dedicated and easy way to get rich. Three weeks from now you will wish you had started today.Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site.
GOOD LUCK… http://Www.WorkSite24.Com

Last edited 8 months ago by GladysSilva
Turn Around When Possible
Turn Around When Possible
8 months ago

How long do we have to wait until the vaxxed offer their apologies for the govt. sponsored insults towards us free thinkers? I won’t be holding my breath.

Rio
Rio
Reply to  Turn Around When Possible
8 months ago

I get paid over $90 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 15k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless .
Here’s what I have been doing…  http://www.cashoffer9.com

Last edited 8 months ago by Rio
CaroleStanko
CaroleStanko
Reply to  Rio
8 months ago

[JOIN NOW] I am making a real GOOD MONEY ($200 to $300 / hr.) online from my laptop. Last month I got cheek of nearly 50,000$. this online work is simple and straightforward. Don’t have to go office, Its home online job. You become independent after joining this job. I really thanks to my friend who refer me this:-
..
SITE….., http://Www.MoneyStar1.com

Last edited 8 months ago by CaroleStanko
Novus Ordo Seclorum
Novus Ordo Seclorum
Reply to  Turn Around When Possible
8 months ago

I bet you still don’t get it. You’re leaving in the NWO where Humans 1.0 coexist with the new Humans 2.0. There is nothing called apology with transhumans!!!

A Person
A Person
8 months ago

“The Fully Vaccinated are now up to 3.2x more likely to die of Covid-19 than the Unvaccinated?” I previously had thought that the rate per 100,000 took into account the individual population sizes of unpoisoned and poisoned but now I see that it doesn’t seem to. If there were 671 deaths for doubly poisoned 80+ year olds in the period and 228 deaths for unpoisoned 80+ year olds, and the rate of poisoning is 95% for 80+ year olds, then the mortality rate for 80+ year olds was 671/95 poisoned to 228/5 for unpoisoned, or 35-228 i.e 6+ times more likely to die if unpoisoned (vs doubly poisoned) for 80+ year olds.

For younger ages, it’s different. If we take an average of 80.4% poisoning rate for 40-49 year olds, then the mortality rate in the period for doubled poisoned vs unpoisoned is 44/80.4 vs 30/19.6 or i.e. 0.5 vs 1.5 i.e. about 3 times more likely to die if unpoisoned for (vs doubly poisoned) for 40-49 year olds.

So it looks like the poison might be conveying some temporary help? I’m still not lining up for it though… odds of dying from Covid are astronomically low.

Last edited 8 months ago by A Person
A Person
A Person
Reply to  A Person
8 months ago

Oh oops, totally wrong but can’t see how to delete my earlier comment. The rates did take in to account the population sizes of unpoisoned and poisoned. Now I get it, the 671 deaths for 80+ year olds are not divided by the 95% double poisoned rate, they are divided by 4% (95% for double poisoned minus 91% for boosters).

So the rate of 3.2x stands and may be an underestimate considering they twist data by having those who die within so many days of poisoning (maybe 28?) to count as unpoisoned.

Last edited 8 months ago by A Person
Kdubya
Kdubya
Reply to  A Person
8 months ago

You can delete your erroneous comment by simply clicking on the encircled word “reply” or the grey borderline to reveal an editing star icon at the right hand side of the comment frame. Thank you for acknowledging the mistake.

Last edited 8 months ago by Kdubya
A Person
A Person
Reply to  Kdubya
8 months ago

Umm, I still couldn’t get it but thanks anyway! 🙂

Gug
Gug
8 months ago

Based on this information, why are they still pushing this onto 5 yr olds. Many Medical professionals have suggested Ivermectin, an extremely safe and effective alternative, that will take you out of ICU, that happens to be pennies as opposed to pounds.

sam
sam
Reply to  Gug
8 months ago

Are you suggesting Ivermectin for 5 year olds? Because they don’t need anything. Why does everyone reach for drugs whenever the drug pushing ‘doctors’ show their ugly faces?

Pablo
Pablo
8 months ago

What Covid? PCR Covid? PCR is not diagnostic. People died of something, without definitive testing no one can know. All cause mortality has increased since experimental injections foisted on populations.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Pablo
8 months ago

Well said. That’s why you were down voted by someone. Half truth is ok, full truth is not. 🙂

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
8 months ago

Well done. Great Research. The UKHSA is trying to hide the effect of the vaccine on the double jabbed because they show what you have exposed.

Kariarker
Kariarker
8 months ago

 [ Work at Home ] I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site… 
Here is I started.…………>>  http://Www.NETCASH1.Com

Last edited 8 months ago by Kariarker
Kdubya
Kdubya
8 months ago

Great work. Please keep doing these articles – they provide a trail of investigation that can’t be erased from the record.

Fast Eddy
Fast Eddy
8 months ago

The CovIDIOTS are too stupid to understand that they’ve wrecked their bodies hahaha

big nigga
big nigga
8 months ago

eat a dick nigger

Biglongone
Biglongone
Reply to  big nigga
8 months ago

😂

W. Corey Trench
W. Corey Trench
8 months ago

Not a surprise to vaccine skeptics. Never made sense that one could safely short circuit drug approval process. First Red Flag. Implementing a brand new gene therapy shot program globally? Second Red Flag. And, how is that vaccinated natural immunity is a real thing? Third Red Flag. Well, we were proved correct.

LaurWright
LaurWright
8 months ago

 [ Work at Home ] I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site… 
Here is I started.…………>>  http://Www.NETCASH1.Com

Last edited 8 months ago by LaurWright
Kolaka
Kolaka
8 months ago

It’s more fun to “stand with Ukraine” than to think about covid shots killing people. There’s no way to wake up America the Oblivious.

Glen Murphy
Glen Murphy
8 months ago

While I’ve always supported vaccine choice, and I have decided not to get vaccinated in this instance, I still have questions about the study. Could these statistics be influenced by the likelihood that the very healthy could possibly be the ones who chose not to be vaccinated?

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Glen Murphy
8 months ago

That sounds like a great point to investigate!

I decided to pull out a random old Scottish report to check this idea out. (Scottish data is good to use because it prints death rates per 100,000 whereas, I believe, for the UK data you have to calculate them yourself like The Expose does).

According to the 21 September, 2021 Public Health Scotland report ( https://www.publichealthscotland.scot/media/10861/21-09-22-covid19-publication_report.pdf ), the age standardised rate of death per 100,000 for the period 14-20 August 2021 was:

2.7 for unpoisoned and
0.53 for double poisoned

Compare this with The Expose article for https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/18/phs-refuse-publish-covid-data-shows-fully-vaccinated-have-aids/ , which revealed that the age standardised rate of death per 100,000 for the period 15-21 Jan 2022 in Scotland was:

7.6 for unpoisoned and
16.15 for double poisoned

It’s possible that the unpoisoned are healthier than the poisoned but remember that the death rate for the unpoisoned was several times higher than the doubly poisoned.

In fact, that’s a switch of:
5.1x higher death rate for unpoisoned over double poisoned Aug 14-20 to
2.1x higher death rate for double poisoned over unpoisoned Jan 15-21

So I’m not sure how relevant the various original health rates are (although bear in mind that in the later Scottish report 29 Jan – 4 Feb 2022, the death rate of double poisoned was only slightly higher than unpoisoned, so the rates are somewhat variable).

Legrand Rosemarie
Legrand Rosemarie
8 months ago

Traduction en français s’il vous plais,thank you.verymuch

Hannah5454
Hannah5454
8 months ago

I get paid more than £145 to £395 per HOUR for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily £23k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…

Here’s what I do…………>>>    http://www.fuljobz.com

Last edited 8 months ago by Hannah5454
HealhtySkeptics
HealhtySkeptics
8 months ago

you could simply explain this by the fact that people at risk of covid have all been vaxed

trackback
8 months ago

[…] Whilst you’ve been distracted by Russia’s invasion, the UK Gov. published data confirming the Fu… […]

trackback
8 months ago

[…] Whilst you’ve been distracted by Russia’s invasion, the UK Gov. published data confirmin… […]

trackback
8 months ago

[…] The Expose  1 User 34 PocketsWhilst you’ve been distracted by Russia’s invasion, the UK Gov… indeep.jp  1 User 17 Pockets「6回目ぐらいで全部死んでしまう」 : […]

trackback
8 months ago

[…] to The Expose website, the UK Government has published data confirming that the fully vaccinated are now up to 3.2 times […]

trackback
8 months ago

[…] to The Expose website, the UK Government has published data confirming that the fully vaccinated are now up to 3.2 times […]

trackback
8 months ago

[…] to The Expose website, the UK Government has published data confirming that the fully vaccinated are now up to 3.2 times […]

trackback
8 months ago

[…] to The Expose website, the UK Government has published data confirming that the fully vaccinated are now up to 3.2 times […]

Adam Brownstein
Adam Brownstein
8 months ago

So here’s the problem with the data….if the author had shown data for the triple vax the trend reverses.

Go here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1058464/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-9.pdf

Page 44, it shows 3005 deaths in the over 80 triple vaccinated.

If you scroll up in this article to table 9, you see that the pool of 80+ that are triple vaccinated is 2,504,568.

So that’s 3005 deaths per 2,504,569 which equals 119 deaths /100,000 triple vaccinated. That’s actually better than the unvaccinated who at age 80+ are listed as 191 dead per / 100,000 unvaccinated.

Still trying to work out why this might be.

Adam Brownstein
Adam Brownstein
Reply to  Adam Brownstein
8 months ago

Ran the numbers for the 70-79 and the same things happened.

Triple Vax : 19/100,000
Unvax: 57.5/100,000
Double Vaxed: 178/100,000

Heinrich Burkhardt
Heinrich Burkhardt
Reply to  Adam Brownstein
6 months ago

Hi Adam. It’s nice to see someone write a reasonable comment on this page, among so much spam. So you are 3X less likely do die when you have a recent booster compared to no vaccine. But shouldn’t we expect the people that have already gotten 2 shots to be in between, or better off than unvaccinated? Why are they more than 3X more likely to die than unvaccinated? How is this making any sense?

trackback
7 months ago

[…] about high vaccine coverage.The blog, published on March 4 and shared online more than 1,750 times (here), states: “The latest data published by the UK Health Security Agency confirms fully vaccinated […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Blog, der am 4. März veröffentlicht und mehr als 1.750 Mal online geteilt wurde (Hier), heißt es: „Die neuesten von der britischen Gesundheitssicherheitsbehörde veröffentlichten […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] Whilst you’ve been distracted by Russia’s invasion, the UK Gov. published data confirming the Fu… […]

trackback
3 months ago

[…] The Fully Vaccinated are now up to 3.2x more likely to die of Covid-19 than the Unvaccinated. […]