Breaking News

Moderna’s Covid “Vaccines” Are Injecting Toxic Lab-Grade SM102 into People

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Moderna’s Covid injection — which has been administered more than 121 million times since the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) granted it an emergency use authorisation in December — includes 10 ingredients,” Factcheck.org wrote in May 2021, “it uses an ingredient called SM-102 to deliver the mRNA.”

So, what is SM-102 and is it harmful? Let’s find out wrote Jessica Rose.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


By Jessica Rose

SM-102 is a lipid that you can order online for laboratory use. It is referred to as an ‘ionisable amino lipid’.

The first thing that any good ‘chemist’ does when ordering a new ‘chemical’ is to check out the Material Safety Data Sheet (“MSDS”) safety sheet.1 2 See the MSDS for SM-102. I will list 3 pages here as per Cayman’s SM-102 product listed online.

The symbols listed above are quite self-explanatory but I will explain them anyway. This lipid is listed as having the following hazards: flammable in liquid and vapour form, acute toxicity if swallowed or inhaled, hazardous to health, and mutagenic (causes cancer). It is listed as being 90% ethanol and 10% SM-102 and is known to cause anaemia, cough, CNS depression, drowsiness, headache, heart damage, lassitude (weakness, exhaustion), liver damage, narcosis, reproductive effects and teratogenic effects as per the First-Aid Measures and treatment from potential exposure.

Below is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA quick card for quick and easy recognition of the meanings of the pictograms.)

The little pictogram with the blue red and yellow set of diamonds at the bottom of the second page means that this product can cause temporary incapacitation or residual injury and will burn (flashpoint greater than room temperature) and is stable. Below are the analogous pictograms for gasoline and diesel. SM-102 is more dangerous from a health (blue) point of view than both gas and diesel.

The third page reinforces what page 2 primarily shows which are the protective conditions/measures one must apply or use when handling SM-102.3 I always made sure I followed these recommendations to the letter.

Now everyone should know that this ‘story’ has been ‘fact-checked’ by ‘FactCheck.org’ and their claim is that, quote:

Cayman Chemical offers a version of SM-102 for research purposes that is packaged in chloroform, a potentially toxic chemical. So, the safety data sheet from Cayman Chemical for that product includes warnings related to chloroform – not SM-102.

I don’t even know what they are trying to say here. It seems they are claiming that since the product is packaged in chloroform, which is toxic, that the SDS sheet pictograms refer to chloroform and not the listed product itself. As far as I know, this is not how it works. There is an SDS for chloroform, and there is an SDS for SM-102. They are separate and different. The product, as far as I can ascertain, has nothing to do with chloroform. It is suspended in ethanol.

I know how to read MSDS sheets. It’s a vital part of doing safe work in the laboratory environment. It’s the very first thing I do. I have actually been made fun of for being ‘too cautious’ for being very stringent about reading and abiding by SDS sheets, but when I see a skull and crossbones, I take it to mean that I should try not to be the skull and crossbones. Furthermore, if one does get hurt or damaged from not handling a product properly, asses are covered.

Without bias, I checked out the MSDS for SM-102 as I would for any chemical or new product I might be interested for using in assays or lab work. And I found the above. Now, digging deeper into this, or rather staying in the mindset of purchasing this product and using it in the lab context, I clicked on the link to the ‘Kit, Mixture & Library Option(s)’ tab, and it took me to the neat little ‘build-your-own-LNP’ kit (Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP-102) Exploration Kit) of which SM-102 comprises the cationic lipid456 in this kit. (Just to remind everyone, the cationic lipid for the P-fizer p-f-roducts is ALC-0315.) The analogous cationic lipid in the Mod(e)rna LNPs is this SM-102.

Notice in the SDS for the LNP-102 kit materials that the Application of the substance / the mixture reads, quote:

This product is for research use – Not for human or veterinary diagnostic or therapeutic.

Now then. Are you sitting down?

Go to the UK government website listed here. Here’s a screenshot that made me do a double-take.

[With regard to genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies], in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity studies were conducted with the novel lipid component SM-102 of the ‘vaccine’. Results suggests the genotoxicity potential to humans is very low. Carcinogenicity studies were not performed.

Oh. So, it’s very low. In in vitro and in vivo models. And how many animals were tested? Ok. Hmm. And no carcinogenicity studies. They aren’t meant to cause cancer. Right.

To summarise, the Mod(e)rna injectable products utilise the LNPs from the LNP-102 kit which in turn utilises the cationic lipids SM-102 that are highly toxic according to the MSDS. It also means that a lab-grade LNP product is being used in humans.

Unless there is a new version of the SM-102 that is non-lab-grade on the go, then Houston, we have a problem.

And by the way, there’s this paper entitled: “The mRNA-LNP platform’s lipid nanoparticle component used in preclinical vaccine studies is highly inflammatory”.7

References:

About the Author

Dr. Jessica Rose is a Canadian researcher with a Bachelor’s Degree in Applied Mathematics and a Master’s degree in Immunology from the Memorial University of Newfoundland. She also holds a PhD in Computational Biology from Bar Ilan University and two Post-doctoral degrees: one in Molecular Biology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and one in Biochemistry from the Technion Institute of Technology. Her recent research efforts are aimed at descriptive analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (“VAERS”) data in an effort to make this data accessible to the public.

To find out more about Jessica Rose and what her research is uncovering watch her interview with PANDA (Pandemics Data & Analytics) HERE.

Subscribe to Unacceptable Jessica on Substack HERE and follow her research on VAERS data HERE.

[dd-owl-carousel id=”89366″]

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
20 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Clive
Clive

If people are dumb enough to have an” alien” ( injected )dangerous substance put into their body , (A.I.D.S.)they are the dumb- arses within the global CULL.

Dan
Dan
2 years ago

So what’s the prognosis? How long would the author estimate for cancer to become apparent?

Anonymous
Anonymous
2 years ago

Ethanol is evil and deadly.

trackback
2 years ago

[…] Moderna’s Covid “Vaccines” Are Injecting Toxic Lab-Grade SM102 into People […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] Go to Source Follow altnews.org on Telegram […]

bill
bill
2 years ago

I was going to get jabbed but now you’ve told me it has sm102 in it I won’t. If it were sm101 or 103 I’d have it, but that 102 is bad news.

I wonder how many people there are in the world that ever bother to think about the crap they allow others to put into them. If a brat gets “sick” the parent will reach for some pill or other. If an adult has a runny nose they’ll swallow whatever the “dr” prescribes. It’s continually amazing that any of these people are able to tie their own shoelaces.

Bacon
Bacon
2 years ago

Rhoda Wilson,

Holy Mother of God, please help all the people injected. It would have been safer to have injected yourself with gasoline.

I can see no reason why the people involved should not be picked up today.

trackback
2 years ago

[…] Read more: Moderna’s ‘Covid’ Fake Vaccines Are Injecting Toxic Lab-Grade SM102 into People […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] Moderna’s Covid “Vaccines” Are Injecting Toxic Lab-Grade SM102 into People […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] !! Moderna’s Covid “Vaccines” Are Injecting Toxic Lab-Grade SM102 into People   BY RHODA […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] by Rhoda Wilson, Daily Expose: […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] – Moderna’s Covid “Vaccines” Are Injecting Toxic Lab-Grade SM102 into People […]

ttrottier
ttrottier
2 years ago

It is very sad that this is how little they value life.

Charles
Charles
2 years ago

There’s absolutely no way they developed this vaccine not knowing the risk far outweighed the virus itself. Call it what it is, folks. This is deliberate depopulation. The vaccine is an extermination tool.

J.C.
J.C.
Reply to  Charles
2 years ago

Bit late on the uptake there, Charles.

trackback
1 year ago

[…] “If people have had multiple injections, there are toxic agents [within the vaccines] that have a different mechanism of killing people.  So, the ones we see in Open VAERS, of people who die within the first month … one in four dies within 48 hours.  And it probably is that they are dying with a different mechanism, that they are hyper allergic to ingredients that are in the injection like polysorbate 80 … or polyethylene glycol (“PEG”) or SM-102.” […]

trackback
1 year ago

[…] “Als mensen meerdere injecties hebben gehad, zijn er toxische stoffen [in de vaccins] die een ander mechanisme hebben om mensen te doden. Dus, degenen die we zien in Open VAERS, van mensen die binnen de eerste maand sterven … één op de vier sterft binnen 48 uur. En het is waarschijnlijk dat ze sterven met een ander mechanisme, dat ze hyperallergisch zijn voor ingrediënten die in de injectie zitten, zoals polysorbaat 80 … of polyethyleenglycol (“PEG”) of SM-102.” […]