Breaking News

Official Government reports prove the Fully Vaccinated have been suffering Antibody- Dependent Enhancement since the turn of the year

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Intensive research conducted by health experts throughout the years has brought to light increasing concerns about “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement” (ADE), a phenomenon where vaccines make the disease far worse by priming the immune system for a potentially deadly overreaction.

Unfortunately, official data published by the UK Health Security Agency strongly suggests the fully vaccinated population in England have been suffering Antibody-Dependent Enhancement since the beginning of 2022. With figures showing the fully jabbed are up to 2 times more likely to be hospitalised with Covid-19, and 2 times more likely to die of Covid-19.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here


ADE can arise in several different ways but the best-known is dubbed the ‘Trojan Horse Pathway’. This occurs when non-neutralizing antibodies generated by past infection or vaccination fail to shut down the pathogen upon re-exposure.

Instead, they act as a gateway by allowing the virus to gain entry and replicate in cells that are usually off limits (typically immune cells, like macrophages). That, in turn, can lead to wider dissemination of illness, and over-reactive immune responses that cause more severe illness.

Here’s a short video of the Chief Medical Advisor to the U.S. President, Dr Anthony Fauci, explaining the undesirable consequence. In it he confirms it could be a possible danger of the Covid-19 injections and that this would not be the first time it has happened.

Unfortunately, it looks like ADE may now be occurring because of the Covid-19 injections; and it looks as if the UK Health Security Agency have been doing their best to hide it.

At the turn of the year the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) decided to stop publishing the case, hospitalisation and death rates for the double vaccinated, instead choosing to only publish the rates for the triple vaccinated in their weekly Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance report.

The rates are calculated by dividing the total population size of each vaccination status group by 100,000; and then dividing the total number of cases, hospitalisations or deaths among each vaccinated group by the calculated figure.

e.g. – 3 million Double Vaccinated / 100k = 30
500,000 cases among double vaccinated / 30 = 16,666.66 cases per 100,000 population.

However, the UKHSA produces a separate report containing the overall population size by age group and vaccination status, meaning we can take these figures and actually calculate the hospitalisation and death rates per 100,000 among the double vaccinated ourselves.

Here’s the table taken from the Week 12 Influenza and Covid-19 Surveillance Report

And here’s a chart showing the double vaccinated population size by age and week in England. We’ve taken the figures from the chart above, and the Week 8 and Week 4 reports

Now that we know the population size all we have to do is divide each population by 100,000; and then divide the number of hospitalisations and deaths by the answer to that equation, to calculate the hospitalisation and death rates.

Here’s a chart showing the number of Covid-19 hospitalisations among both the unvaccinated and double vaccinated in the Week 5, Week 9 and Week 13 UKHSA Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance reports

The UKHSA provides the hospitalisation and death rates for the unvaccinated population on page 47 of their Week 5 Vaccine Surveillance report, and page 45 of both the Week 9 and Week 13 Vaccine Surveillance reports.

Here’s two charts showing the Covid-19 hospitalisation-rate per 100,000 individuals among both the unvaccinated and double vaccinated population in England by age group and week. The double vaccinated hospitalisation-rates have been calculated using the figures from the ‘population size chart’ and ‘number of hospitalisations chart’ above –

As you can see from the above, all age groups have experienced a higher hospitalisation-rate per 100,000 among the double vaccinated since the turn of the year. However, the youngest age group, 18-29 has suffered a slightly higher hospitalisation rate among the unvaccinated in week 13.

Unfortunately, we’re seeing the same when it comes to deaths.

Here’s a chart showing the number of Covid-19 deaths among both the unvaccinated and double vaccinated in the Week 5, Week 9 and Week 13 UKHSA Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance reports

Here’s two charts showing the Covid-19 death-rate per 100,000 individuals among both the unvaccinated and double vaccinated population in England by age group and week. The double vaccinated death-rates have been calculated using the figures from the ‘population size chart’ and ‘number of deaths chart’ above –

As you can see from the above, all age groups have suffered a higher Covid-19 death-rate per 100,000 among the double vaccinated except for 18-29-year olds. But this age group only suffered a higher death-rate among the unvaccinated in week 5, with week 9 and week 13 seeing an identical death-rate among the unvaccinated and double-vaccinated.

The only other age-group to break the trend is 30-39-year-olds, who flip-flopped back to a slightly higher death rate among the unvaccinated in week 13. But apart from this all other age groups have suffered a higher death rate among the double vaccinated since the beginning of the year.

Again, these aren’t the kind of figures we should be seeing if a vaccine is effective. These aren’t even the kind of figures we should be seeing if a vaccine is ineffective. What we’re seeing here is a vaccine that is having the opposite of its intended effect, and the figures show the double vaccinated are more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated.

If the rates per 100,000 are higher among the vaccinated, which they are, then this means the Covid-19 injections are proving to have a negative effectiveness in the real-world. And by using Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness formula we can accurately decipher what the real world effectiveness among each age group actually is.

Pfizer’s vaccine formula:
Unvaccinated Rate per 100k – Vaccinated Rate per 100k / Unvaccinated Rate per 100k x 100 = Vaccine Effectiveness

The following two charts shows the real world Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation among the double vaccinated population in England by age group and week, based on the hospitalisation rates provided above –

These charts show 18-29-year-olds are the only age group which the Covid-19 injections have proven to have a positive effectiveness against hospitalisation. But this was only in week 13, and it was only a positive effectiveness of +14%. Prior to this a negative effectiveness of minus-16% was recorded in both weeks 5 and 9.

But it’s a different story for all other age groups, and the figures show things get worse the older a person is. Which means things are getting worse for those who were vaccinated first.

Vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation has been as low as minus-90% among double vaccinated 60-79-year-olds, and minus-86% among double vaccinated people over the age of 80.

The following chart shows the real world Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against death among the double vaccinated population in England by age group and week, based on the death rates provided above –

This tells a slightly different story to effectiveness against hospitalisation among the youngest age-groups, but shows effectiveness is a lot worse against death among everyone over the age of 60. A vaccine effectiveness against death of minus-111% was recorded among 60-69-year-olds, minus-138% among 70-79-year-olds, and minus-166% among people over the age of 80 in week 9.

But just look at the figures for the 40-49-year-olds. In week 5 a vaccine effectiveness against death of +16% was recorded. Then in week 9 this fell to minus-32%. But then in week 13 this fell to a shocking minus-121%.

These figures show that most double vaccinated individuals are twice as likely to die of Covid-19 than unvaccinated individuals. Why? Because they are suffering Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED), and Pfizer knew it was going to happen.

Vaccine-associated enhanced diseases (VAED) are modified presentations of clinical infections affecting individuals exposed to a wild-type pathogen after having received a prior vaccination for the same pathogen.

Enhanced responses are triggered by failed attempts to control the infecting virus, and VAED typically presents with symptoms related to the target organ of the infection pathogen. According to scientists VAED occurs as two different immunopathologies, antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and vaccine-associated hypersensitivity (VAH).

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years despite approving the injection after only 108 days of safety review on December 11th, 2020.

But in early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered them to release 55,000 pages per month. They released 12,000 pages by the end of January.

Since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents to their website. The latest drop happened on 1st April 22.

One of the documents contained in the latest data dump is ‘reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf’. Table 5, found on page 11 of the document shows an ‘Important Potential Risk’, and that risk is listed as ‘Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED), including Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Respiratory Disease (VAERD)’.

Pfizer claim in their confidential document that up to 28th Feb 2021, they had received 138 cases reporting 317 potentially relevant events indicative of Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease. Of these 71 were medically signifiant resulting in 8 disabilities, 13 were life-threatening events, and 38 of the 138 people died.

Of the 317 relevant events reported by 138 people, 135 were labelled as ‘drug ineffective’, 53 were labelled as dyspnoea (struggling to breathe), 23 were labelled as Covid-19 pneumonia, 8 were labelled as respiratory failure, and 7 were labelled as seizure.

Pfizer also admitted that 75 of the 101 subjects with confirmed Covid-19 following vaccination, had severe disease resulting in hospitalisation, disability, life-threatening consequences of death.

But Pfizer still definitively concluded, for the purposes of their submitted safety data to the Food and Drug Administration, the very data that was needed to gain emergency use authorisation and make them billions and billions of dollars, that ‘None of the 75 cases could be definitively considered as VAED’.

But Pfizer then went on to confirm that based on the current evidence, VAED remains a theoretical risk.

This confidential data proves that the Covid-19 injections should never have been granted emergency use authorisation, and should have been pulled from distribution by the FDA as soon as they sighted the figures.

But the FDA failed to act, and that is precisely why the UK Health Security Agency chose to exclude the double vaccinated hospitalisation and death-rates per 100,000 from their Vaccine Surveillance reports at the turn of the year. Because they would have had to officially confirm that the Covid-19 injections are causing Antibody-Dependent Enhancement.

Sources/References

Share this page to Telegram
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Roslyn Ross
Roslyn Ross
5 months ago

Experts warned about this before any Jabs began. They were ignored.

Brooklyn
Brooklyn
Reply to  Roslyn Ross
5 months ago

*I am making $92 an hour working from home. i was greatly surprised at the same time as my neighbour advised me she changed into averaging $ninety five however I see the way it works now. I experience mass freedom now that I’m my non-public boss. 
that is what I do….. http://www.incomehd.com

Last edited 5 months ago by Brooklyn
Marissa White
Marissa White
Reply to  Brooklyn
5 months ago

I make more then $12,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 11 to 12 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried it… 🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)

HERE====)> https://www.hmjobz.com
      

Last edited 5 months ago by Marissa White
9C1 LT1
9C1 LT1
Reply to  Roslyn Ross
5 months ago

I warned about this in Spring of 2020. Untested (or Worse: failed tested) vaccine candidates are worse than nothing. I am not medically trained ( first aid, buddy care, CPR) but can read published information. mRNA modtech should be done only on elderly terminally ill humans, or younger humans who have have been surgically sterilized.
The current injection strategy is no less than genocide in combination with damaged progeny of survivors.
Elites, and their technicians, who did not actively oppose and expose this crime will be judged and disposed of.

Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
5 months ago

“Vaccine efficacy is generally reported as a relative risk reduction (RRR). It uses the relative risk (RR)—ie, the ratio of attack rates with and without a vaccine—which is expressed as 1–RR. Ranking by reported efficacy gives relative risk reductions of 95% for the Pfizer–BioNTech, 94% for the Moderna–NIH, 91% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the J&J, and 67% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford vaccines.
“However, RRR should be seen against the background risk of being infected and becoming ill with COVID-19, which varies between populations and over time. Although the RRR considers only participants who could benefit from the vaccine, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a vaccine, considers the whole population. ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs: 1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1·2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1·2% for the J&J, 0·93% for the Gamaleya, and 0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.”
The Lancet Study
Doctors for COVID Ethics
On The accompanying chart:
Pfizer/BioNtech RRR 95.03%   ARR From Jab 0.84%
Moderna (NIH) RRR 94.08%   ARR 1.24% From Jab
Janssen          RRR 66.62%    ARR 1.19% From Jab
Astrazeneca/ Oxford RRR 66.84% ARR 1.28% From Jab
The Lancet

frankenfauci
frankenfauci
5 months ago

And yet still no great die off. Where are all the dead? For two years we’ve been continually told millions or billions will die. I’m still waiting…

Faith55
Faith55
Reply to  frankenfauci
5 months ago

Google pay 97$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12k for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it out it.. 🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)..

open this site .…………>> https://www.fuljobz.com

Last edited 5 months ago by Faith55
9C1 LT1
9C1 LT1
Reply to  frankenfauci
5 months ago

Are you blind? CV19 was engineered flu, not deadly enough without complete neglect. The JABS and the panic are the weapon. Silent weapon for a quiet war, slow-kill attributable to fatty food or behavior.

trackback
5 months ago

[…] 7.  !! Official Government reports prove the Fully Vaccinated have been suffering Antibody- Dependent Enhan… […]

Dale Casto
Dale Casto
5 months ago

I submit the increased deaths may be due, at least in part, to Vaccine induced Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VIAIDS, or VAIDS). I say that because the increased death rate from Covid mirrors the All Cause deaths rates. This would also track with the increased death rate in the Senior (over 60) group. Since they (including me) already have an Age Acquired Immune Deficiency (or as I call it, AAIDS), the would tend to have fewer antibodies to create a ‘Trojan Horse Pathway’ leading to ADE. However the kill shot (A/K/A Jab) further depletes their immune system, creating VADS.
The only to tell would be to do a standards AIDS blood count on the jabbed.

BluesDaddy
BluesDaddy
5 months ago

While this is pretty damning evidence on the face of it, I think there are additional variables that need to be considered that differentiate the vaxxed population from the unvaxxed, principally co-morbidities. A pretty obvious hypothesis is that the vaxxed population is made up of a larger percentage of people with severe co-morbidities that make COVID far more dangerous (e.g. extreme obesity) and would give these results. Data correlation is useful, but is no conclusive. Need actual lab research that demonstrates the core hypothesis of this article.

Jeannette
Jeannette
5 months ago

Would be great if you could add a phrase to locate and a direct link (I think you sometimes do the latter)