Breaking News

Children’s risk of Death increases between 8100% and 30,200% following Covid-19 Vaccination compared to Unvaccinated Children according to official ONS data

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Office for National Statistics has revealed without meaning to that children are 82 to 303x more likely to die following Covid-19 vaccination than children who have not had the Covid-19 vaccine.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


On 16th May 2022, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) published a dataset containing details on ‘deaths by vaccination status in England’ between 1st Jan 2021 and 31st March 2022.

The dataset contains various tables showing details such as, ‘Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for deaths involving COVID-19’, and ‘Monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status for non-COVID-19 deaths’.

Here’s an example that has been taken from table 2 of the latest dataset

As you can see, the ONS has chosen not to include children in the calculated mortality rates despite the fact children as young as 5 are now eligible for Covid-19 vaccination. They also grouped young adults as a group ranging from age 18 to 39, a period of 22 years, while all other age groups are a period of 10 years (40-49, 50-59 etc).

It’s things like this that make you believe they must have something to hide, and it turns out they definitely have.

Because on table 9 of the ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status’ dataset, the ONS have inadvertently provided enough details on deaths among children and teenagers by vaccination status for us to calculate the mortality rates ourselves, and they are horrendous.

Here are the figures published by the ONS in table 9 for 10 to 14-year-olds –

And here are the figures published by the ONS in table 9 for 15 to 19-year-olds –

As you can see, the ONS has given us both the number of deaths and person-years by vaccination status. This means we can perform simple math to calculate the mortality rates per 100K person-years ourselves.

All we need to now do is divide the person-years by 100,000, and then divide the number of deaths by the answer to that equation.

So for unvaccinated 10-14 year-olds we perform the following calculation to work out the all-cause death mortality rate –

2,684,874 (person-years) / 100,000 = 26.84874

164 (deaths) / 26.84874 = 6.1

Therefore, the all-cause mortality rate per 100,000 person-years among unvaccinated 10-14-year-olds is 4.58 deaths per 100,000 person-years between 1st Jan 21 and 31st March 22.

Now all we have to do is use the same formula to calculate the mortality rates per 100K person-years for all vaccination statuses among 10 to 14-year-olds and 15 to 19-year-olds.

Here are the calculated mortality rates by vaccination status among 15-19-year-olds based on the ONS calculated person-years –

And here are the calculated mortality rates by vaccination status among 10-14-year-olds based on the number of deaths and ONS calculated person-years –

These figures are horrifying. The ONS data shows that between 1st Jan 21 and 31st March 22, double vaccinated children aged 10-14 were statistically up to 39 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children, and double vaccinated teenagers aged 15-19 were statistically up to 4 times more likely to die than unvaccinated teenagers.

But it’s the triple vaccinated figures that are truly frightening when it comes to children.

The ONS data shows that between 1st Jan 21 and 31st March 22, triple jabbed children aged 10-14 were statistically 303 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children of Covid-19, 69x more likely to die of any cause other than Covid-19 than unvaccinated children, and 82x more likely to die of all-causes than unvaccinated children.

This suggests that three doses of a Covid-19 injection increase the risk of all-cause death for children by an average of 8,100%, and the risk of dying of Covid-19 by an average of 30,200%. Whilst two doses increase the risk of all-cause death by an average of 3,600%.

But as things currently stand it’s the other way round for teenagers. Two doses of a Covid-19 injection increase the risk of all-cause death for teens aged 15 to 19 by an average of 300%. Whilst three doses increase the risk of all-cause death by an average of 100%.

The figures for children though, are in fact even worse than they first appear. This is because the unvaccinated mortality rate among 10-14-year-olds includes children aged 10 and 11 who were only offered the Covid-19 injection from the beginning of April 2022, despite the UK Medicine Regulator questionably granting emergency use authorisation for it to be administered to young children in late December 2021.

Whereas the vaccinated mortality rates include only a handful of 10 and 11 year-olds. We know this from the fantastic news that only 7% of 5 to 11-year-olds have had the Covid-19 injection as of 14th May 2022.

Therefore, if the Covid-19 injections were not causing the untimely deaths of children then we would actually expect to see a mortality rate that is lower among the vaccinated population than the mortality rate among the unvaccinated population, not a mortality rate that is similar, and certainly not a mortality rate between 8,100 % and 30,200% higher.

The statistics are horrendous, but it’s important to remember that behind those statistics are real people who are suffering and who have lost their lives, and unfortunately this time around they are children. Children who have never been in danger of suffering serious complications due to the alleged Covid-19 disease. Therefore, children who have never, ever needed an experimental, poor-performing, deadly (these statistics prove it) Covid-19 injection.

Share this page to Telegram
4 5 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

52 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sara K
Sara K

I get paid more than $90 to $100 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $10k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…

Here is I started.…………>> http://Www.BUZZJOIN.Com

Last edited 6 months ago by Sara K
Ava
Ava
Reply to  Sara K
6 months ago

Im making over $23k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do.
https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/13.1.0/svg/1f642.svg
 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://Www.Fbweb1.com

Last edited 6 months ago by Ava
EsmeRaelyn
EsmeRaelyn
Reply to  Ava
6 months ago

I get paid more than $200 to $400 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this I have earned easily $30k from this without having online working skills . Simply give it a shot on the accompanying site…qw

Here is I started.…………>> http://Www.BizPay1.com

Last edited 6 months ago by EsmeRaelyn
Ashley
Ashley
Reply to  Ava
6 months ago

I make more then $12,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 11 to 12 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried it… 🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)

HERE====)> https://www.hmjobz.com

Last edited 6 months ago by Ashley
MargaretLewis
MargaretLewis
Reply to  Sara K
6 months ago

★Makes $340 to $680 per day online work and I received $45894 in one month online acting from home. I am a daily student and work simply one to a pair of hours in my spare time. Everybody will do that job and online ask extra cash by simply open this link HERE↠↠↠☛☛☛ http://Www.WorkSite24.Com

Last edited 6 months ago by MargaretLewis
Ellen Miller
Ellen Miller
Reply to  Sara K
6 months ago

I make more then $12,000 a month online. It’s enough to comfortably replace my old jobs income, especially considering I only work about 11 to 12 hours a week from home. I was amazed how easy it was after I tried it… 🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)

HERE====)> https://www.hmjobz.com

Last edited 6 months ago by Ellen Miller
calesiw
calesiw

This year now its very very easy to earn more income online. start using this job and earn more than $15000 every month very easily. now its time for you to change your life. check this website for info.
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://Www.Homzjob.Com

Last edited 6 months ago by calesiw
sbptlivecouk
sbptlivecouk
6 months ago

Correction: the data for 10 to 14 and 15 to 19 year olds appears to be in Table 6 of the ONS dataset, not Table 9 as reported.

LizetteYoung
LizetteYoung
Reply to  sbptlivecouk
6 months ago

Make money by creating an easy and quick strategy to work part time and get extra 30k or more on the internet. I earned 30,485 in my overtime in the previous month and am extremely happy with this work now. You can try this now by:- 

Following this information:- http://www.workstar24.com

Last edited 6 months ago by LizetteYoung
trackback
6 months ago

[…] 20. Mai 2022 The Expose: Children’s risk of Death increases between 8100% and 30,200% following Covid-19 Vaccination compar… […]

Nancy
Nancy
6 months ago

Dollars earning easy job to work and earn online. start now making every day more than $500 simply working from home. i received $19517 previous month and i gave this job only 2 hrs a day online. so simple and it doesn’t required any kind of special skills. you can run facebook then you can do this job.

Go here for info…….. http://www.LiveJob247.com

Last edited 6 months ago by Nancy
geraldina07
geraldina07
6 months ago

I wouldn’t say it was ‘fantastic news’ that ONLY 7% of 5 to 11 yr olds had taken the shit within the first 6 weeks!!! – as it was merely ‘offered’ rather than mandated. In-fact it’s ALARMING!!!
.
It says to me: WHERE’S THE OUTRAGE for a start!!!
.
But that even under the softest conditions 2 kids in every class will have vAIDS and be shedding it.
.
IT IS UNIMAGINABLE THAT THEY HAVE EVEN BEEN ALLOWED TO OFFER IT !!!
.
It would have been to, say 70’s parents – they’d have been burning down the hospitals!! I remember some of those parents – there were some rough ones, but they used to take no-shit when it came to their kids!!
.

.
UNIMAGINABLE and demonstrates how ‘softened’ they already are, they’re psychologically broken, in the pen and awaiting THE PLANDEMIC coming next.

geraldina07
geraldina07
Reply to  geraldina07
6 months ago

Are the Expose going to clear-out these British Army cck-sckrs b.t.w.

You have to do a daily sweep out and keep it up – it’s our place now and if you want us to stay then you should have a caretaker to shovel up the British Army shit.
.
I’ll volunteer to delete the pure spam and nothing else – just the “I work at home for $195….”
.
But I’ll need ‘the keys’ – I’d love to be the 77th ‘cutioner!!

Last edited 6 months ago by geraldina07
Nick
Nick
Reply to  geraldina07
6 months ago

Its called Mass Formation Psychosis. The fake Mainstream Media is responsible for a lot of disinformation and censoring of the truth. I hope most if not all see prison time & charged for man slaughter and/or murder.

M_G_
M_G_
Reply to  geraldina07
6 months ago

his article is misleading. 164 unvaxxed children died and “only” 33 vaccinated children died. table 6 from the ONS statistic

Screenshot 2022-05-23 020318.png
geraldina07
geraldina07
Reply to  M_G_
6 months ago

Yes, I thought that too!! Sometimes I don’t say anything just in case I’m missing the obvious and might look a bit thick.

They do drop some clangers at the Expose that’s for sure – and celebrating ‘JUST’ 7% of kids or 2 in every classroom within the 1st 6 weeks of merely offering the poison is surely another one!!

I think you’re right, and that’s 2 of us so I feel a bit more confident about that.

Nick
Nick
6 months ago

What is with all the SPAM making money scam posts? They should automatically be deleted & blocked from posting.

trackback
6 months ago

[…] Read More: Children’s risk of Death increases between 8100% and 30,200% following Covid-19 Vaccina… […]

Markus
Markus
6 months ago

Love the work. What’s disturbing is the fact that main stream and officials/politicans not picking it up and at least discuss it. They don’t need to agree but an open scientific discussion is needed. One important fact that is not mentioned here are con-founding factors. We have to ask ourselves: Whick kids take two or three jabs? Which kids don’t get vaccinated? It could well be that already sickly, compromised children get vaccinated while healthy children don’t which could explain some of high numbers for double and triple jabbed, especially 6 months after the jab – it’s not all the vaccine but also the cohort that took the vaccine that’s more vulnerable maybe? Of course, that’s only a theory and in a normal world there would have been properly set up trials and research from many different scientists to answer these very important questions. The fact that the scientific discourse was so heavily stiffled and censored might be the biggest damage this so called pandemic has done to us. On the other hand, if we can’t trust anyone anymore we are forced to think for ourselves which might be a good thing on the long run for society. Time will tell. Definetly very grateful to have alternative sources like the Expose (please support them) although they also have to be checked by a critical mind.

M_G_
M_G_
Reply to  Markus
6 months ago

Because this article is misleading. 164 unvaxxed children died and “only” 33 vaccinated children died. table 6 from the ONS statistic

Screenshot 2022-05-23 020318.png
trackback
6 months ago

[…] Children’s risk of Death increases between 8100% and 30,200% following Covid-19 Vaccination compar… […]

Dave
Dave
6 months ago

Disappointing article because it doesn’t note that the few children being vaccinated could be much more vulnerable on average (e.g., immune deficient) and therefore a lot more likely to die to begin with. We can’t infer anything from these numbers until this is investigated.

Marco
Marco
Reply to  Dave
6 months ago

It is equally reasonable to assume that some sensible parents would not jab their very frail children with a notoriously aggressive vax. And since you are considering one-sided scenarios, it is equally reasonable to assume that most COVID-19 deaths are caused by the vax, as we know that it depresses the immune system for two weeks after the first and second jab, causing a peak of cases that get miscounted.

Formed
Formed
Reply to  Marco
4 months ago

Still, its an unknown factor that could be mentioned without harm in the article

trackback
6 months ago

[…] The statistics are horrendous, but it’s important to remember that behind those statistics are real people who are suffering and who have lost their lives, and unfortunately this time around they are children. Children who have never been in danger of suffering serious complications due to the alleged Covid-19 disease. Therefore, children who have never, ever needed an experimental, poor-performing, deadly (these statistics prove it) Covid-19 injection.  Read More […]

B. Allz
B. Allz
6 months ago

You don’t calculate deathrates by using person hours you need the number of person in that sample which is not in the ONS data. Aren’t you embarrassed you can’t do simple maths?

M_G_
M_G_
6 months ago

Table 6 clearly shows that 164 children that didnt get vaxxed died, while only a total of 33 children that got the jab died. This article is just misleading.

Screenshot 2022-05-23 020318.png
trackback
6 months ago

[…] News) An alarming data from the U.K. Office for National Statistics (ONS) shows that children are 82 to 303 times more likely to die after Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccination compared to children who are […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] News) An alarming data from the U.K. Office for National Statistics (ONS) shows that children are 82 to 303 times more likely to die after Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccination compared to children who are […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] News) An alarming data from the U.K. Office for National Statistics (ONS) shows that children are 82 to 303 times more likely to die after Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccination compared to children who are […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] alarming data from the U.K. Office for National Statistics (ONS) shows that children are 82 to 303 times more likely to die after Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccination compared to children who are […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] دهنده دفتر آمار ملی بریتانیا (ONS) نشان می دهد که کودکان احتمال مرگ 82 تا 303 برابر بیشتر است پس از واکسیناسیون علیه کروناویروس ووهان (COVID-19) در […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] Children’s risk of Death increases between 8100% and 30,200% following Covid-19 Vaccination compared to Unvaccinated Children according to official ONS datahttps://expose-news.com/2022/05/20/kids-death-risk-increases-8100percent-covid-vaccination/ […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] We also now know that Covid-19 vaccination increases children’s risk of death between 8,100% and 30,200%. […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] We also now know that Covid-19 vaccination increases children’s risk of death between 8,100% and 30,200%. […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] READ: Children’s risk of Death increases between 8100% and 30,200% following Covid-19 Vaccination compar… […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] We also now know that Covid-19 vaccination increases children’s risk of death between 8,100% and 30,200%. […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] We also now know that Covid-19 vaccination increases children’s risk of death between 8,100% and 30,200%. […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] Ahora también sabemos que la vacunación contra el covid-19 aumenta el riesgo de muerte de los niños entre un 8100 % y un 30 … […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] We also now know that Covid-19 vaccination increases children’s risk of death between 8,100% and 30,200%. […]

trackback
4 months ago

[…] Ahora también sabemos que la vacunación contra el patógeno aumenta el riesgo de muerte de los niños entre un 8.100 % y un 3… […]

medcomctr123
medcomctr123
2 months ago

This article is mainly based on conjecture and assumptions not based on the data. It should be disregarded and retracted