Breaking News

Government reports suggest COVID Vaccination is causing Cancer at an unprecedented rate

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Cancer begins when genetic changes interfere with the normal replication and replacement of cells in the body. Cells start to grow uncontrollably and may form a tumour. It is the No. 2 leading cause of death in the United States.

Unfortunately, it appears the disease may be on the rise thanks to the experimental Covid-19 injections. Because official U.S. Government data confirms the risk of developing cancer following Covid-19 vaccination is 1433x greater than the background risk.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) hosts a Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) which contains historical data on adverse reactions reported against every vaccine that has been administered in the United States of America.

A quick search of the CDC VAERS database on the number of cancer cases reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 injections since they were first rolled out in the USA, reveals that from December 2020 up to 5th August 2022, a total of 2,579 adverse events related to cancer were made in just 1 year and 8 months.

Covid-19 Vaccines
Source

But performing a similar search of the VAERS database on the number of cancer cases reported as adverse events to all other available vaccines between 2008 and 2020, a period of 13 years, reveals there were just 791 adverse events related to cancer.

All other Vaccines
Source

Many would simply argue without backing their claim up with any evidence, that this is just because of the volume of Covid-19 injections administered compared to all other vaccines. But unfortunately, anyone who argues this is wrong.

We can see this by looking at the number of doses administered.

The following chart shows the total number of flu vaccine doses administered in 13 full flu seasons all the way from the 2008/2009 flu season to the 2019-2020 flu season. The data has been extracted from the CDC info found here.

In all between the 08/09 flu season and the 19/20 flu season, there were a total of 1,720,400,000 (1.7204 billion) doses of the flu jab administered in the USA.

The CDC also confirms that between 2008 and 2020, a period of 13 years, there were just 64 events related to cancer reported as adverse reactions to the influenza vaccines.

Flu Vaccines
Source

Based on the number of adverse events related to cancer alone, we can see that there have been 40.3x as many cancer cases related to Covid-19 vaccination than there have been related to flu vaccination.

But whilst shocking, this statistic doesn’t properly represent the severity of the situation. To do that we need to know the number of cancer cases per 100,000 doses administered.

Based on the above numbers provided by the CDC, the number of adverse events related to cancer reported per 100,000 doses of flu vaccine administered equates to just 0.0003 per 100,000 doses.

According to ‘Our World in Data’, as of 9th August 2022, 606 million doses of the Covid-19 vaccines have been administered in the USA. This means there have been actually nearly 3x as many flu vaccines administered between 2008-2020 than Covid-19 injections since the end of 2020, let alone all of the other vaccines that have been administered.

Therefore, the number of adverse events related to cancer reported per 100,000 doses of Covid-19 vaccine administered equates to 0.43 per 100,000 doses.

This means Covid-19 vaccination is 1433.33x / 143,233.33% more likely to cause cancer than flu vaccination. It can be argued that because the numbers are so extraordinarily low for the flu vaccine, that flu vaccination does not cause cancer. Therefore, it can be argued that the risk of developing cancer following Covid-19 vaccination is 1433x greater than the background risk.

This should however not come as much of a surprise considering we already have scientific proof that the Covid-19 mRNA injections can cause cancer of the ovaries, pancreas and breast.

The homologous recombination DNA repair pathway is one of the mechanisms that the body uses to stop your cells from turning cancerous in response to environmental stress.

And in October 2021, two revered scientists, called Jiang and Mei, had a paper published, after peer review, in MDPI, showing that the SARS-Cov-2 spike protein obliterated the DNA repair mechanism in lymphocytes.

The viral spike protein was so toxic to this pathway that it knocked 90% of it out. If the whole spike protein got into the nucleus (in the ovaries), and enough of it was produced and hung around long enough before the body was able to get rid of it all, it would cause cancer.

Fortunately, in the case of natural infection, this is unlikely to occur. But the experimental mRNA “vaccines” induce spike protein to be produced in and around the cell nucleus and this occurs for at least 60 days and almost certainly longer.

This is probably why cases of ovarian cancer are now at an all-time high.

Official UK data published by Public Health Scotland, which can be found here, reveal the number of women suffering ovarian cancer from the introduction of the Covid-19 injection to the general population. Unfortunately, the known trend in 2021 was significantly higher than 2020 and the 2017-2019 average.

Click to enlarge
Ovarian Cancer – Source

The above chart shows up to June 2021, but the charts found on Public Health Scotland’s dashboard now show figures all the way up to December 2021 and unfortunately reveal that the gap has widened even further with the number of women suffering from Ovarian cancer increasing significantly.

Click to enlarge

If you still wish to get a jab that doesn’t stop you from getting Covid-19, doesn’t stop you from spreading Covid-19, increases your risk of mortality significantly (see here), and increases your risk of suffering cancer by 143,233% then that’s up to you. But perhaps you can now be a little more understanding of why many others simply refuse to do so.

Share this page to Telegram
4 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ministry of Truth
Ministry of Truth
1 month ago

Again, this article claims it “appears”, and “data confirms risk”, but still don’t show any direct correlation between the injection and increased cancer. The peer reviewed paper story quoted to be MDPI of Jinag & Mei in Oct 2021, after a search in MDPI using there names as the key words, and authors, and topic, show no results.

People keep an open mind, there are many contributing factors other than the injection present from the pandemic that could be causing these increased cancers. Example: unprecedented lockdowns in your home for months being exposed in your home to radiation, carbon dioxide, and a whole host of environmental chemicals not normally exposed to for long periods of time. I’m not saying this is a cause and effect, but “could be” as simply as it’s the injection. It’s as dangerous to blame one thing over another, look at all the stupidity of the pandemic that was just not true, why would you think for a moment that the injection claim 100% true..

Mark Deacon
Mark Deacon
Reply to  Ministry of Truth
1 month ago

It is not possible to prove causality because you never seen the cell mutate – simple as that and how smoking initially was not considered dangerous.

But came to the conclusion the imune system (CD4/CD8) T-cell levels need to be monitored in all people. If the covid vaxxes damages those levels then you can infer the body cannot now clear mutated cells.

Friend died of stomach cancer … diagnosis until death was only 5 weeks and he was vaxxed.

That should create caution.

Michael
Michael
Reply to  Ministry of Truth
1 month ago

Dear Ministry, reporting on data is not going to often tell you they why or even the how, just only suggesting what the data… suggests.

The reader gets to make their own conclusions based on what they know or think they know. That is where CNN loves to jump in and tell people what they should think.

My thoughts align to the idea that the goal of these jabs are to produce antibodies. To produce antibodies needs an antigen, which is a toxin. The spike protein in very toxic, which is why it was “the” chosen viral protein its toxicity would ensure antibodies. mRNA is used to create a large/massive number of these spike proteins which creates… a bunch of toxicity with those antibodies. Bodies attempt to detox (eliminate) toxins in many ways but requires a bunch of resources to do so, even more resources for toxins that are novel as this spike protein is. To over simplify this part, one resource group used to detox is alkaline minerals. As these mineral are used up and not replenished fast enough, the body will become more acidic. Cells don’t operate well in acidic environments (a.k.a. low PH) and at a low enough point (~PH 4 to 5), will turn cancerous to survive. Them turning cancerous will allow for them to continue living though a bit out of control which means that growth (replication) is not timed anymore but is based on the fuel they get which is sugar. This body process was created to survive short term problems but don’t do well for longer issues. So, many cancers start and the body wipes them out when cell live gets better. But if we have a process like the mRNA one that keeps adding spike proteins over an extended period of time and the body keeps trying to detox them while using more and more minerals, the body won’t be able to keep that balance PH levels and the big C starts happening, probably in the weakest tissues in the body which is different for different people. Now we get that booster and add another round of spike proteins for 9 months of replication. Now, I will leave off any of the what to do about all this as that will be your thoughts along with this just being a wild story or seeing this is the direct linkage to creating cancerous conditions that will happen in many based on your own ability to detox and keep solid resources (including minerals) to keep healthy.

George
George
Reply to  Ministry of Truth
1 month ago

Do you work for big Harma perhaps? My friend just got diagnosed with ovarian cancer you idiot after taking the death shots. Put your face diaper on and go bow in front of your demon eugenicists. You make me sick. I’m sure you’re boosted up to date. Troll.

Kelea
Kelea
Reply to  Ministry of Truth
1 month ago

If you do a search in MDPI with just the words “Jinag Mei” the article does appear but it appears as “retracted”. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/5/1011/htm

It was retracted in 2021. It’s hard to share this info with those we care about if the info isn’t meticulously backed up and citations can be found to be legitimate. Granted, we don’t know the fine details of the retraction (who, why, influences, etc) but we need unshakable sources.

GundelP
GundelP
1 month ago

Let’s start with an image, tells everything.

cancer(1).png
GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Then the actual article which mentioned radiation among other causes, as graphene gets boosted by radiation (charged) it should be a good enough proof that how these ‘vaccines’ cause cancer. The presence of graphene was proven, the graphene’ properties were proven by many studies = denying graphene, denying the connection.

But they always did this.
Did you know that AstraZeneca, manufacturer of two blockbuster breast cancer drugs (one of which is classified as a known human carcinogen), was the originator of Breast Cancer Awareness Month?”

https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/covering-causes-breast-cancer-1985-astrazenecas-bcam-2

“By subjecting their breasts to radiation-based diagnostic screening that we now know actually causes breast cancer, and which has lead to over one million cases of falsely diagnosed and unnecessarily treated breast cancers in the past 30 years in U.S. women alone. One recent review on the topic of mammography concluded that they are harmful and should be avoided, and yet you will hear countless messages this month that breast screenings are safe and effective for reducing breast cancer mortality — technically, a lie.”

trackback
1 month ago

[…] – Government reports suggest COVID Vaccination is causing Cancer at an unprecedented rate […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read More: Government reports suggest COVID Vaccination is causing Cancer at an unprecedented rate […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read More: Government reports suggest COVID Vaccination is causing Cancer at an unprecedented rate […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Based on the number of adverse events related to cancer alone, we can see that there have been 40.3x as many cancer cases related to Covid-19 vaccination as there have been related to flu vaccination in the USA. (Source) […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Based on the number of adverse events related to cancer alone, we can see that there have been 40.3x as many cancer cases related to Covid-19 vaccination as there have been related to flu vaccination in the USA. (Source) […]

trackback
23 days ago

[…] Based on the number of adverse events related to cancer alone, we can see that there have been 40.3x as many cancer cases related to Covid-19 vaccination as there have been related to flu vaccination in the USA. (Source) […]