Breaking News

Covid vaccine mandates for police and ambulance workers were unlawful, an Australian court has found

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In a landmark decision, the Queensland Supreme Court ruled yesterday that covid vaccine mandates for police officers and paramedics were unlawful.

“This decision by the Queensland Supreme Court makes it paramount we have a Royal Commission into the covid-19 pandemic,” Senator Pauline Hanson said.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


The Queensland Supreme Court on Tuesday delivered its judgments in three lawsuits brought by 86 parties against the Queensland Police Service and Queensland Ambulance Service for their directions to workers issued in 2021 and 2022. The Supreme Court ruled that covid vaccine mandates for Queensland frontline workers were unlawful based on human rights grounds.

The court found the directions limited the human rights of workers because they were required to undergo a medical procedure without full consent.

Senior Judge Administrator Glenn Martin delivered a 115-page judgment stating that the directives issued by Police Commissioner Katarina Carroll failed to give proper consideration to human rights.

Former Queensland Health Director-General John Wakefield was unable to prove he issued the vaccine mandate under an implied term of the employment agreements for ambulance service workers.

As a result, both vaccine mandates were found by the court to be “unlawful” and to have no effect.

Outside court, businessman and former politician Clive Palmer said he had provided at least $2.5 million to support the case.  “We can celebrate because this is the first precedent in the Western world where a trial has gone the full distance and the court has found a trampling of human rights,” Palmer said.

This ruling sets a precedent for similar challenges to vaccine mandates in other industries.

9 News Australia: Covid vaccine mandates for emergency workers found to be unlawful, 27 February 2024 (3 mins)

“Today has seen an important victory in the fight for freedom and human rights in Australia. The Queensland Supreme Court today determined that covid-19 vaccine mandates imposed on police and health workers were unlawful,” Senator Pauline Hanson said in the Australian Parliament yesterday.

She called for a Royal Commission.  “This decision by the Queensland Supreme Court makes it paramount we have a Royal Commission into the covid-19 pandemic,” she said.

Sources for this article include:

Featured image: Former Queensland Health Director-General John Wakefield (left). Source: Brisbane Times. Police Commissioner Katarina Carroll (right) Source: Daily Mail

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gerald
Gerald
2 months ago

Luvvly Jubbly!

Dave Owenhttps://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/for
Dave Owenhttps://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/for
Reply to  Gerald
2 months ago
Anderson
Anderson
2 months ago

Slowly but surely the Covid scam is crumbling.

Ken Hughes
Ken Hughes
2 months ago

But why just for the police and ambulance workers? Surely they were unlawful for all mandated.

Brad
Brad
Reply to  Ken Hughes
2 months ago

Of course, police were starting to die but no mention of this. The government under attack by big pharmaceutical losing their protection can’t have that.

The people that will no matter. Watch next the police contract for employment will change when a police officer doesn’t comply with the government the government will JAB this disobedient cop.

The government will keep stacking and rigging the laws until all rights are lost until a generation of zombies exists

Mark Deacon
Mark Deacon
2 months ago

All indemnity for big pharma should be removed to make them produce safe products that would not bankrupt them. If this cannot be done then the product should not be on the market for any reason.

This court case does nothing about this.

Lisa Franklin
Lisa Franklin
2 months ago

Yeehah. Go Aussies.

treborfur
treborfur
2 months ago

the damage is done, reverse that and all will be better. until then, all will be moot.

trackback
2 months ago

[…] – Australia has finally realized that its pandemic response was not in accordance with the law based on human rights […]

trackback
2 months ago

[…] – Australia has finally realized that its pandemic response was not in accordance with the law based on human rights […]

trackback
2 months ago

[…] Australia has finally realized that its pandemic response was not in accordance with the law based on human rights […]

trackback
2 months ago

[…] Quatre ans après le début de l’épidémie de coronavirus de Wuhan (COVID-19) – lorsque des mesures de santé publique telles que le confinement, la distanciation sociale et la vaccination ont été mises en place – l’Australie a finalement réalisé que sa réponse à la pandémie n’était pas conforme à la loi fondée sur les droits de l’homme . […]