---

Since Hamas attacked Israel on 7 October 2023, we have been witnessing a strange phenomenon whereby corporate media and independent media are pushing the same narrative, except for some outlets in America. This phenomenon is particularly noticeable in the UK.  Yet few people pause long enough to ask why. 

Why are the majority of corporate media and independent media generally following the same narrative relating to events in Gaza?

In a recent essay, Vince Barwinski addresses some well-publicised theories circulating in the “freedom movement” regarding Zionism, Jews and Israel and delves into who is behind the narrative.

At around 14 mins depending on how fast you read, this is a long read so grab a cuppa, settle in and then draw your own conclusions.

Last week, author Vince Barwinski published an essay titled ‘I Am A Zionist; But George Soros And The UN Are Not’.  It begins with the lede: “Hamas’ attack on Israel on 7 October 2023 and the subsequent Globalist engineered propaganda was to obliterate Israel’s right to exist.”

For most of his life, Barwinski has been fascinated by how much this tiny sliver of land, Israel, has consumed world news.

Further reinforcing this perspective was the book ‘Disinformation: Former Spy Chief Reveals Secret Strategies for Undermining Freedom, Attacking Religion, and Promoting Terrorism’ written by the highest-ranking Eastern Bloc Cold War defector to the US, Romanian defector Lieutenant General Ion Michal Pacepa, and University of Mississippi Law Professor Ronald Rychlak.  In their book, Pacepa and Rychlak document the pivotal role the Holy Land played in the Cold War.

Adding to his already piqued interest about Israel in the news is “the inexorable barbarity of Hamas on 7 October 2023, and since with its cavalier use of its own people as human shields, revealing amidst skyrocketing global anti-Semitism, and rising global Islamic persecution of Christians, the agenda of the Red-Green Axis to obliterate Israel and Christianity from existence, towards the ultimate facilitation of global tyranny,” Barwinski wrote.

In his essay, Barwinski goes through history that is seldom, if ever, seen or discussed in Western, and particularly in the UK, corporate media, independent media or social media.  As his essay’s lede implies, he believes the reason for this radio silence is no coincidence.  We highly recommend setting aside a couple of hours to read his 41-page essay, with 380 references, and make up your own mind.  You can read Barwinski’s essay HERE.

Below we have focused on the points Barwinski made regarding George Soros and the United Nations. Or, in Barwinski’s words, the discussion about “the motivation and true agenda behind the pro-Palestinian, in effect, pro-Hamas protests globally, and how the nefarious globalist but anti-Zionist players of George Soros and the United Nations, fit into all this.”

By “this” Barwinski was referring to previous pages in his essay relating to Ashkenazi Jews and the “Khazarian theory,”  the role played by the Rothschilds in creating the modern-day state of Israel, the history of events surrounding Gaza and Israel, and Russia’s involvement in current events in the Middle East, to name a few.

George Soros Backs Pro-Hamas Groups

As Barwinski points out, since 2016, groups behind the “Israel-bashing protests” backing the 7 October 2023 Hamas attacks, have received more than US$16 million from the radical-left Jewish-Hungarian-American billionaire and Globalist George Soros.

It must be pointed out that many, due to Soros’ Jewish heritage, perceive Soros as being a staunch pro-Zionist. However, Soros’ actions clearly suggest otherwise, as Barwinski discussed beginning on page 16 of his essay. 

After demonstrating Soros’ worldview using Soros’ own words, Barwinski highlighted a paper published on 1 April 2016 titled  ‘Colonialism and Apartheid Against Fragmented Palestinians: Putting the Pieces Back Together’ by Rinad Abdulla. It was published by “the ultra-woke Pluto Journals,” he said. “At the bottom of the introductory page, it is stated; ‘This article was written while the author held an Open Society Fellowship at Birzeit University’.”

The pro-Hamas Birzeit University is located in the Palestinian West Bank, and Rinad Abdullah, while at the time of the publishing of his paper, held a George Soros-sponsored Open Society Fellowship at Birzeit University, is now the Chairperson for the University’s Department of Law.

In the paper, Abdullah documents what he perceives as Israeli-perpetrated apartheid against Palestinians.

However, the Israeli-Arab, yes, I repeat, the Israeli-Arab Yoseph Haddad, CEO of Together – Vouch For Each Other, an organisation bridging the gap between the Arab sector of Israeli society with Israeli society as a whole, in a five-and-a-half-minute presentation on the Prager University YouTube channel [see below], presents an array of compelling evidence contrary to the line of Rinad Abdullah – and indeed, as stated on placards of pro-Hamas-Soros-funded protests globally.

I Am A Zionist; But George Soros and the UN Are Not, Vince Barwinski, 16 March 2024, page 21

On 10 December 2023, the DC Daily Journal reported Soros’ shocking ties to terrorism as revealed in a “bombshell report.” According to watchdog group Capital Research Centre, a foundation that has received money from Soros has been funding groups that have held pro-Palestinian rallies.

Tides Foundation, a nonprofit established in San Francisco, has received approximately $22 million in donations from Soros for various causes. According to the report, the Tides Foundation then gave millions to leftist organisations that all planned pro-Palestinian protests:

• $650,000 to Jewish Voice for Peace
• $710,000 to Adalah Justice Project, a pro-Palestinian group.
• $86,000 to IfNotNow
• $38,000 to the progressive Centre for Constitutional Rights
• $600,000 to the Mass Liberation Project, a “progressive” organisation working to “end mass incarceration and abolish the criminal legal system.”
• $132,000 to the WESPAC Foundation, the group over Students for Justice in Palestine.

The Mass Liberation Project endorses left-leaning candidates running for local and state offices through its social media accounts, Barwinski wrote and continued:

The Project supports the Marxist Black Lives Matter (“BLM”) movement, which is devoted to the destruction of the traditional nuclear family, of which has proven devastating to black communities and encourages its followers to participate in Black Lives Matter protests and vote for left-of-centre candidates who support the movement.

The Arizona chapter of the Mass Liberation Project, which is a direct associate of the Tides Foundation, has accused the US administration of “ethnic cleansing of Palestinian people,” while also praising Hamas.

I Am A Zionist; But George Soros and the UN Are Not, Vince Barwinski, 16 March 2024, page 18

What are Hamas’ Principles

To understand what pro-Hamas groups and the likes of Soros are advocating, we need to understand what the Islamic Resistance Movement, or Hamas, is and what it stands for.

As we noted in a previous article about groups organising the pro-Palestinian protests in the UK,  the Hamas takeover of the Gaza Strip in 2007 was the first time since the Sudanese coup of 1989, that a Muslim Brotherhood group ruled a significant geographic territory.

That Hamas is a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood is confirmed by ‘The Covenant Of The Islamic Resistance Movement – Hamas’, which is more commonly known as the “Hamas Charter.”  Article Two of the Charter states:

The Islamic Resistance Movement is one of the wings of the Muslim Brotherhood in Palestine.  The Muslim Brotherhood movement is a global organisation and is the largest of the Islamic movements in modern times. It is distinguished by its profound understanding and its conceptual precision and by the fact that it encompasses the totality of Islamic concepts in all aspects of life, in thought and in creed, in politics and in economics, in education and in social affairs, in judicial matters and in matters of government, in preaching and in teaching, in art and in communications, in secret and in the open, and in all other areas of life. [Emphasis added]

The Covenant Of The Islamic Resistance Movement – Hamas (1988), Middle East Media Research Institute

As a footnote to the Hamas Charter, Middle East Media Research Institute (“MEMRI”) notes that Hasan Al-Banna founded the Muslim Brotherhood in 1928 and was its director general until his assassination in 1949.  The Charter quotes Al-Banna as saying “Israel will exist, and will continue to exist, until Islam abolishes it, as it abolished that which was before it.”

Beginning on page 19 of his essay, Barwinski quoted extracts from the Hamas Charter. One was from Article Fifteen which proclaims:

The day the enemies conquer some part of the Muslim land, jihad becomes a personal duty of every Muslim. In the face of the Jewish occupation of Palestine, it is necessary to raise the banner of jihad. This requires the propagation of Islamic consciousness among the masses, locally [in Palestine], in the Arab world and in the Islamic world. It is necessary to instil the spirit of jihad in the nation, engage the enemies and join the ranks of the jihad fighters.

The indoctrination campaign must involve ulama, educators, teachers and information and media experts, as well as all intellectuals, especially the young people and the sheikhs of Islamic movements.

The Covenant Of The Islamic Resistance Movement – Hamas (1988), MEMRI

“The Muslim Brotherhood and their offshoots have the propensity to pretend to be political and non-violent until they can seize power – which was quintessentially embodied in the Battle of Gaza from 10 to the 15 June 2007, also referred to as Hamas’ takeover of Gaza,” Barwinski cautioned.

United Nations and Hamas

“The ultra-corrupt Globalist entity that is the UN is Israel’s enemy and friends of the Arab nations and terrorist states such as the Hamas backing and Islamic fundamentalist state Iran,” Barwinski wrote.

The actions of the UN ever since UN Resolution 181 mandating the birth of modern-day Israel in 1948, have hardly been pro-Israel. For one thing and to reiterate, the never-ending resolutions against Israel, but hardly any ever passed against any Arab nation. But most damning, is their ultra-corrupt agency of UNRWA – United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees – the only such agency in the world devoted to the refugees of just one supposed nation.

I Am A Zionist; But George Soros and the UN Are Not, Vince Barwinski, 16 March 2024, page 28

The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (“UNRWA”) distributed school materials to Palestine in 2020 that referred to neighbouring Israel as “the Enemy” and made references to martyrs and jihad.

A January 2021 report by the non-governmental organisation The Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education (“IMPACT-se”), stated:

Our extensive research of PA [Palestinian Authority] school textbooks has consistently shown a systematic insertion of violence, martyrdom and jihad across all grades and subjects, with the proliferation of extreme nationalism and Islamist ideologies throughout the curriculum, including science and math textbooks; rejection of the possibility of peace with Israel; and complete omission of any historical Jewish presence in the modern-day territories of Israel and the PA. Yet, it is this material that is taught in UNRWA schools throughout the Palestinian Territories.

UNRWA officially claims that it is unable to alter any of the problematic material that appears in PA textbooks under its mandate as this would impede the PA’s “national sovereignty.”

Encouragement of violence, jihad, terrorism and martyrdom. UNRWA-produced material frequently references, and sometimes directly reproduces, texts and phrases from the PA textbooks that glorify violence and sacrificing one’s life and blood to defend the “motherland.” Such examples include Arabic grammar exercises that use the language of jihad and sacrifice … and passages that celebrate known terrorists such as Dalal Mughrabi. In past statements, UNRWA officials have explicitly denied teaching students the sections of the PA curriculum that discuss Dalal Mughrabi, making the inclusion of these passages even more surprising and concerning. We were unable to find any direct condemnation of violence or approach to resolve conflict within the UNRWA-produced material.

Conflict-oriented discourse. UNRWA-produced material discusses the national Palestinian conflict as a central theme throughout its content and makes frequent references to violence and war. These include comparisons between the Spanish Inquisition and Israeli prisons and math exercises that ask students to tally the number of dead “martyrs” in the First Intifada (1987–93). UNRWA-produced material presents Israel as “the Enemy,” creating an “us versus them” dichotomy. This violates the UN principle of peacemaking and peaceful resolution of conflicts.

Review of UNRWA-Produced Study Materials in the Palestinian Territories, IMPACT-se, January 2021

In July 2022, another review of school materials produced by UNRWA confirmed the problem of indoctrinating children was ongoing.  IMAPCT-se summarised the report as follows:

Along with other school curricula across the MENA region, IMPACT-se has been analysing the PA school curriculum used by UNRWA for over two decades, assessing compliance with UN values, such as tolerance, non-violence, and peace-making. Our continued and unavoidable impression is that UNRWA, as a UN organisation, knowingly teaches material that is inconsistent with UN values in its Gaza Strip and West Bank schools. In addition, UNRWA’s lack of transparency in addressing such problematic issues makes it impossible to properly evaluate its effectiveness.

Review of 2022 UNRWA-Produced School Materials, IMPACT-se. You can read the full report ‘Review of 2022 UNRWA-Produced Study Materials in the Palestinian Territories’, July 2022 HERE.

Barwinski also highlighted an article by Bassam Tawil, a Muslim Arab based in the Middle East, from the Gatestone Institute.   Tawil wrote that in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip, UNRWA has, in fact, long been operating as the de facto government.

By providing the residents of the Gaza Strip with various services, UNRWA exempted Hamas from its responsibilities as the governing body, such as creating a working economy that would pay for education and healthcare, and allowed it, instead, to invest resources in building tunnels and manufacturing weapons. If UNRWA were not there, Hamas would have been forced to fill the vacuum and, for example, build hospitals and schools and find solutions to economic hardship, including unemployment and poverty.

How UNRWA Grooms Terrorists, Bassam Tawil, 26 December 2023

Providing proof for the point Tawil made, senior Hamas official Mousa Abu Marzouk said, in explaining why no cement could be spared from terror tunnels to build bomb shelters for Gazan citizens:  “The tunnels were built to protect the fighters of Hamas from [Israeli] airstrikes. As you know, 75% of the residents of the Gaza Strip are refugees. It is the responsibility of the United Nations to protect the refugees.”

Hamas was effectively saying: We are responsible for what happens underground, while UNRWA is responsible for what happens above ground. Which includes it seems, indoctrinating Gazan children with a perpetual hatred for Jews.

It’s not just in Palestinian schools that UNRWA is fostering terrorism.  Barwinski noted:

On 3 January 2024, the Israeli government released a video interview of a Gaza civilian who said a Hamas operative herded his group into Al Shifa Hospital when they were trying to follow IDF instructions to flee south. Terrorists were living under the hospital, but knowing Israeli soldiers were coming, they emerged and hid among the civilians.

“I felt that we are human shields,” the civilian said.

The Israeli military said on 3 January that it had dismantled an 800-foot [244 metre] tunnel underneath Al Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, which UNRWA operates.

I Am A Zionist; But George Soros and the UN Are Not, Vince Barwinski, 16 March 2024, page 30

Adding to the UN’s complicity in terrorism, during an interview with Sky News in February 2023, Martin Griffiths, the United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, stated: “Hamas is not a terrorist group for us, of course as you know, it’s a political movement.”

If you are unable to watch the video above on Rumble, you can watch it on WVW Broadcast Network HERE.

“If you donate the UN instrument of UNRWA, please be aware where your hard-earned dollars will be spent! Namely tunnels and jihad indoctrination, but certainly not on basic infrastructure,” Barwinski wrote.

Albert Pike’s Three World Wars

Barwinski concluded his essay by reminding us of the infamous Albert Pike letter about three world wars, which may help us to understand the bigger picture and possibly why anti-Israel rhetoric is being widely pushed in corporate media, independent media and on social media, as well as through some activist groups organising pro-Palestinian protests.

We have previously published an article about this letter exploring whether it is genuine or not.  However, below we follow Barwinski’s commentary on the letter before reproducing its contents.  An important point to note is that the letter refers to “political Zionists.”  This is not the same as “Zionists.”

For background reading to gain some understanding of the difference between “Zionists” and “political Zionists” please read ‘What is Zionism? 6 different types of Zionist thinking’ as a starting point, and then ‘The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion: Separating fact from fiction’ and a series of articles which ends with ‘Kissinger’s role as a midwife to Satan’.  These articles offer a variety of perspectives on this complex subject and there are sure to be others.  But all these perspectives demonstrate the same thing: the anti-Zionist rhetoric we see frequently brandished about, implicating all Zionists regardless of nationality or religion as the same, is utter nonsense.  This rhetoric is without substance and purely serves as a racist anti-Jewish mantra, most likely originating from those who wish to eliminate Jews and their homeland.  The world has been here before; we must learn from history, not repeat it.

Now onto Albert Pike’s letter.

In 1871, the year of the birth of the German Empire in the Hall of Mirrors in the French Palace of Versailles, in the wake of the Prussian victory in the 1870-71 Franco-Prussian War, that took Germany into World War I, it is claimed Albert Pike wrote a letter to Giuseppe-Mazzini which is titled ‘The Illuminati Plan for 3 World Wars, dated 15 August 1871’.

Albert Pike (1809-1891) was the American Civil War Confederate Brigadier General and Freemason of the Scottish Rite.  Giuseppe-Mazzini (1805-1872) was a Genoese propagandist, revolutionary, founder of the secret revolutionary society Young Italy (1832), and a champion of the movement for Italian unity known as the Risorgimento.

This letter, it is claimed, was on display in the British Museum Library in London until 1977, where it is claimed by numerous internet sites to reside in the British Library in London, which denies the letter exists. “Make of that what you will,” Barwinski wrote. “In any event, the Illuminati Plan for 3 World Wars purportedly documented by Pike in the letter he wrote, subsequent to a Satanic vision he earlier experienced, is as follows”:

The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the ‘agentur’ (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.

The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm.

The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the ‘agentur’ of the ‘Illuminati’ between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.

Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion… We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil.

Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view.

This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.

Albert Pike Letter to Mazzini, The Illuminati Plan for 3 World Wars, 15 August 1871

Featured image: George Soros (right). “Free Palestine” rally, London, 17 May 2003 (right).