Breaking News

WEF’s Polycrisis: The rhetoric follows the plan

Please share our story!


Former BlackRock fund manager Ed Dowd recently joined the Coffee and a Mike Show to discuss how big finance shaped covid aid.  During the discussion, he highlighted that the World Economic Forum has been promoting the idea of a “polycrisis” for years.

“WEF told us… three years ago in a paper called ‘Polycrisis’ [this would happen] … You got war, you got a hantavirus, and let’s just toss in aliens … You need people begging for money printing,” he said.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


The clip in the tweet above is taken from a discussion with Michael Farris and Dave Collum  uploaded on to Rumble on 10 May 2026.  You can watch the full video HERE.  In the clip, Dowd said:

Polycrisis Meets A New Competitive Order

There appears to be no paper titled ‘Polycrisis’ as Dowd had mentioned.  The World Economic Forum (“WEF”) propagated the term “polycrisis” in its 2023 Global Risks Report.

According to the Institute of Development Studies (“IDS”), “the term ‘polycrisis’ was popularised by Columbia University academic Adam Tooze, and in early 2023 the World Economic Forum followed suit by warning in its annual Global Risks Report that the world was on the brink of a polycrisis in relation to ‘shortages in natural resources such as food, water, and metals and minerals’.”

While reading IDS’ article, it’s worth noting that IDS is not as “independent” as it claims.

IDS is located at and has close links with the University of Sussex.  And, “The UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) is the Institute’s largest funder. IDS also receives funds from UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), the European Union, various UN agencies and a wide range of aid agencies, trusts and foundations,” IDS says.

Related:

We highlighted WEF’s dystopian Global Risk Report 2023 in an article titled ‘Davos 2023: Referring to The Great Reset is out but censorship, hypocrisy and god complexes are still in’.  We wrote that “the report has the expected alarmism, fear-mongering, hysterical narratives and predictions of chaos and collapse.  The authors even managed to link climate change to terrorism.”

All WEF’s alarmism is summed up in a table of risks ranked by WEF in order of severity priority.  Here is the top 20 from the table for 2023:

Global risks ranked by severity in two columns: short-term and long-term, with colored bars for each risk item.
Figure E Global risks ranked by severity The Global Risks Report 2023 18th Edition World Economic Forum January 2023

Ursula von der Leyen referred to WEF’s table of risks during her speech at WEF’s annual meeting in Davos in 2024.  She referred to the table of 10 risks produced in WEF’s Global Risks Report 2024:

Global risks ranked by severity for 2- and 10-year horizons; color-coded by category (economic, environmental, geopolitical, societal, technological).
Figure C Global risks ranked by severity over the short and long term The Global Risks Report 2024 19th Edition World Economic Forum January 2024

In its 2026 Global Risks Report, WEF boasted, “Three years ago, the 18th edition of the Global Risks Report considered the possibility of a ‘polycrisis’, as risks from multiple domains unfold at the same time. This 21st edition of the Global Risks Report explores how a new competitive order is taking shape and its impact across multiple concurrent risk domains.”

So, it seems they have now combined a ‘polycrisis’ with a “new competitive order.”

Here is the same table, adjusted for WEF’s new severity priority ranking for 2026:

Global risks ranked by severity for short term (2 years) and long term (10 years): left column shows 20 short-term risks (e.g., geoeconomic confrontation, misinformation, societal polarization, extreme weather, state-based armed conflict, cyber insecurity, inequality, pollution, migration, economic downturn, online harms, lack of opportunity, censorship, debt, resource shortages, disruptions to supply chains, infrastructure gaps); right column shows 20 long-term risks (e.g., extreme weather, biodiversity loss/ecosystem collapse, critical Earth system changes, misinformation, adverse AI outcomes, resource shortages, inequality, cyber insecurity, pollution, societal polarization, strategic resource concentration, state-based armed conflict, migration, opportunity gaps, surveillance, erosion of rights, debt, online harms, geoeconomic confrontation, biological/chemical/nuclear hazards).
Figure 10 Global risks ranked by severity short term 2 years and long term 10 years The Global Risks Report 2026 21st Edition January 2026

All is ticking along nicely according to the plan … well, as far as political and corporate media rhetoric is concerned, anyhow.  Be warned, throughout WEF’s age of “polycrisis” and “a new competitive order,” there are the overriding aims of tackling “misinformation and disinformation” and “climate change.”  These two goals are still very much on their agenda, for at least the next 10 years.

Note: When reading WEF reports and articles, remember that WEF uses Globalese and doublespeak.  For example, “misinformation” and “disinformation” translate to commentaries, remarks and evidence that have not been approved by the establishment.  “Climate change” is a catchall phrase to enable them to do as they please, as long as they can spin it so it “mitigates climate change.”  And “adverse outcomes of AI technologies” means “artificial intelligence” is not having the desired results, for example, it is not being rolled out fast enough or giving them as much control over our lives as they are aiming for.

Featured image taken from ‘Geopolitical Fractures 2026 : Where the Next Crisis Already Lives’, Polycrisis.org (a project of the Cascade Institute working in consultation with the polycrisis community and the support of the V. Kann Rasmussen Foundation)

Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.

The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.

Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.

Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.

Stay Updated!

Stay connected with News updates by Email

Loading


Please share our story!
author avatar
Rhoda Wilson
While previously it was a hobby culminating in writing articles for Wikipedia (until things made a drastic and undeniable turn in 2020) and a few books for private consumption, since March 2020 I have become a full-time researcher and writer in reaction to the global takeover that came into full view with the introduction of covid-19. For most of my life, I have tried to raise awareness that a small group of people planned to take over the world for their own benefit. There was no way I was going to sit back quietly and simply let them do it once they made their final move.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
:Stuart-James:
:Stuart-James:
24 minutes ago

The WEF have lost the plot completely compared to China.