---

The biotechnology industry has a culture of extreme risk-taking.  And there is a lack of regulation by authorities and a tendency to ignore the dangers of the research biotechnologists are undertaking.

Despite significant gaps in knowledge about genetic functions and potential risks to human health and the environment, biotechnologists are pushing forward with gene editing and synthetic biology.

Take the covid gene therapy injections, called “covid vaccines,” as an example.  Studies have found links between covid vaccination and increased cancer risk, as well as elevated mortality rates. Instead of acknowledging these risks, governments are deregulating biotechnology experimentation.

Dr. Guy Hatchard argues that the industry’s focus on biotechnology solutions is misguided.  Simple, cost-effective approaches like natural diets and exercise have been shown to improve health outcomes.  The billions of dollars spent on biotechnology research would be better spent on promoting these proven natural solutions.

Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe to our emails now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…

The Long Read: There Is Already Enough Evidence To Design A Health Policy That Works

By Dr. Guy Hatchard

Introduction

On the 25th January 2026, two men stepped off an arriving plane at Detroit Metropolitan Airport en route from the Congo carrying a black case. At the border, they declared that the case contained instruments, but customs officials found it contained vials of Monkeypox (or Mpox) virus and human DNA in violation of federal law.

Both men worked at the National Institute of Health (“NIH”) Rocky Mountain Laboratory, where one of them was Chief of the Virus Ecology Section in charge of research on “emerging viral pathogens.” Given their seniority, they should have been well aware of the risks, but both men appeared to have difficulty understanding that there are very common circumstances where aeroplane luggage is damaged, potentially exposing passengers and ultimately the public to deadly pathogens. They even protested that what they were doing was routine. This goes to show just how much dangerous behaviour in the biotech research community has become normalised. On 2 June, the two men were indicted on serious criminal charges. 

The incident in Detroit is not an isolated event; a pathological culture of extreme risk has taken hold of the entire biotechnology industry with an entrenched assumption that biotechnology research and many products should be exempt from regulation. In effect, anything goes. In part, this is due to the sense of excitement and hype that surrounds the as-yet-unrealised (and unrealistic) expectation that biotechnology research will ultimately lead to miracle cures for a long list of human diseases and environmental problems.

It is also due to a failure to face up to known serious risks, particularly those that showed up during the covid pandemic.

At its core, the biotechnology industry has an almost messianic belief in its mission to edit life as it sees fit in pursuit of its improbable dreams that are actually fraught with danger for the whole human race. This verges on the psychopathic.

A Little Knowledge Is A Dangerous Thing

Biotechnologists are faced with a long list of unknowns and unknowables that they seem determined to ignore. The foremost of these is how our genome supports our consciousness.* You couldn’t devise a bigger hole in our understanding of life than that. Editing genes before you know how they might affect our ability to think is like sawing through the tree branch on which we sit.

*Note from The Exposé:  We have noted before (see HERE) that Dr. Guy Hatchard follows a quasi-religious, quasi-scientific belief promoted by some as science.  Science is not a religion, and religion is not a science.  The two should never be cojoined. People who attempt to do so, to varying degrees, will cite scientific evidence to support their religion, so we must learn to separate the scientific aspects from the overriding religion.  We should protect our souls as we would protect our bodies.  Aside from personal motivation to protect ourselves, we should bear in mind the overarching goals of the Globalists.  Dressing up a religion as a science is one of the tools they will use to move the world towards a satanic One World Religion enforced by a One World Government.

The scale of ignorance about genetic functions is mind-bogglingly huge. Last week, The New York Times interviewed John Glass, a synthetic biologist at the prestigious J. Craig Venter Institute in La Jolla, California, for an article entitled ‘This Cell Feeds, Grows and Reproduces. And It’s Manmade’, Glass said: “Our own DNA contains tens of thousands of genes, as well as millions of molecular switches turning those genes on and off. Scientists barely have a clue as to what many of those pieces of DNA are doing.”

Yet somehow, editing the structure and function of DNA is routinely designated safe and sure to be the only future remedy for ill health.

To begin to get a handle on the vast gaps in our knowledge about genetic function, in the 1990s, a team led by the late biologist Craig Venter began studying the simplest microbe they could find. It had fewer than 1,000 genes. The team, now led by Dr. Glass, went on to strip the microbe’s genome down to 525 essential genes. In 2016, after 26 years of research, the team reported it didn’t know what a third of those genes were doing. Dr. Glass and his colleagues have spent the subsequent decade trying to solve the puzzle (30 years in all), and they still can’t say what 56 of them do. “There are still significant tasks that every cell has to do that we don’t know,” Dr. Glass said.

Diseases Arising From Covid Vaccine Technology Are Being Identified Even Now

An article published in the journal Oncotarget is entitled ‘Covid vaccination and post-infection cancer signals: Evaluating patterns and potential biological mechanisms’. It studied the results of 60 papers linking cancer incidence with Covid vaccination. It identified several recurrent themes: 

1. unusually rapid progression, recurrence, or reactivation of preexisting cancer in remission or previously only slowly developing, 
2. atypical or localised tissue findings, including involvement of vaccine injection sites or regional lymph nodes, and
3. immune system deficiencies associated with vaccination and tumour reactivation.

In other words, there is strong evidence that “covid vaccine-induced turbo cancers” do exist. The study found that cancer occurrence and/or acceleration can develop relatively quickly, in even a matter of weeks, following mRNA vaccination. The authors concluded, “there is a need for rigorous epidemiologic, longitudinal, clinical, histopathological, forensic, and mechanistic studies to assess whether and under what conditions COVID-19 vaccination may be linked with cancer.”

A study published in Medical Research Archives is entitled  ‘Temporal patterns of all-cause mortality among U.S. nursing home residents across covid-19 vaccination strata, May 2022-June 2023’. It analysed mortality patterns in more than 15,000 US nursing homes and found:

“All-cause mortality rates rose during weeks with more covid-19 positive residents. Relative to unvaccinated residents, mortality elevations persisted for about three weeks in partially vaccinated and five weeks in fully vaccinated groups.”

In other words, covid-vaccinated rest home residents were affected by elevated mortality rates following covid infection for far longer than unvaccinated residents.

Elevated mortality associated with covid vaccination is not limited to rest home residents. Steve Kirsch, writing on Substack, notes that covid national vaccination programmes were followed by peaks in all-cause mortality among all age groups in countries across the globe. In other words, covid vaccination not only didn’t work, but it came with unquantified risks to health and life. Unquantified because biotechnology scientists across the globe are reluctant to admit that they got anything wrong during the pandemic. Counterfactual findings are simply ignored if they don’t fit the rosy future paradigm of biotechnology hype.

Forging Ahead To Make Artificial Life Out Of Viral DNA

The New York Times reports that a team of synthetic biologists at the University of Minnesota have succeeded in throwing together a mixture of proteins, simple molecules that are known to operate in natural cells, and 36 genes extracted from bacteria and viruses to produce a kind of artificial cell that competes for food and reproduces itself through a lab-enforced process that mimics cell division. There are some severe limitations; the cells can’t make their own proteins, known as ribosomes, which read the DNA to produce proteins, and they cease functioning entirely within 5 to 10 generations. Biotechnologists are so excited that they plan to spend hundreds of millions of dollars further developing these synthetic cells dubbed SpudCells. 

It is believed that at some time in the future these cells will be used to eat up the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The cell’s inventors have already warned that someone may use artificial cells to create a biological weapon. Step back and consider, fragments of DNA culled from pathogenic bacteria and viruses are being given a new lease of life in artificial cells. All this is happening while scientists don’t know how these synthetic cells might interact with the natural environment and what the extent of the risks might be. Perhaps they might out-compete natural cells essential to maintain ecological stability or human health. No one knows or can even begin to predict what might happen. And those involved still want the freedom to self-regulate their experimentation.

Apparently in sympathy, poorly informed legislators across the globe are rushing to deregulate biotechnology experimentation under the mistaken idea that it has already saved lives and will usher in an era of economic prosperity. The latest to go down this rabbit hole is the EU, which is deregulating biotechnology using the infantile “Simon Says” justification – other countries are doing it, so we should too.

In New Zealand (“NZ”), the National Party is fuming because its attempt to pass a Gene Technology Bill that mandated NZ approval if any other countries did, has been frustrated by its coalition partner NZ First, which asked some inconvenient questions about safety, science and economic miracles. Segueing to avoid this roadblock, National is already in the process of amending existing legislation and regulations to open the back door to largely unfettered gene experimentation. What could possibly go wrong, given the huge holes in our understanding of genetic functions, almost everything? 

Take the case of the Tunisian soccer team at the World Cup in Mexico. Eight players tested positive for a banned synthetic bodybuilding substance, clenbuterol.  This was not secretly administered to the team or deliberately ingested by the players. On investigation, it was found that the substance is approved in Mexico and routinely given to animals. Thereby, it accumulates in meat in the food chain, in concentrations sufficient to trigger drug tests. Clenbuterol significantly alters genetic expression by binding to β₂-adrenergic receptors. Thereby, it sets intracellular cascades in motion that turn specific genes associated with metabolism on or off. You can immediately see that predicating gene regulation on what other countries do can rapidly lead to genetic pollution in the world’s food chain. In fact, this is already happening on a grand scale and needs to stop.

Biotechnology Has Become Too Big To Fail

Over the last few weeks, we have been publishing articles at the Hatchard Report and on our Substack page which examine recent research and established theoretical principles which point to the central role of consciousness in biological processes. This should not seem strange to anyone; awareness is the central substance of our daily existence. Observer, observed and the process of observation are linked together within the wholeness of our being. As we pointed out in our articles ‘How does DNA actually work?’ and ‘The Structure of Consciousness’,* this three-in-one structure forms a kind of intelligence which cannot be mimicked by AI. How our DNA supports the expression of consciousness is unknown, yet the biotechnology juggernaut continues to believe it has discovered the standalone secret of life in the DNA code. 

*Note from The Exposé: Please reread our note above about the quasi-religious, quasi-scientific philosophy Dr. Guy Hatchard follows.  In recent articles, he has been pushing this religious philosophy more and more.  Protect your soul by using discernment as to what is science and what is religious belief dressed up to appear as if it were science.  Just as you wouldn’t allow someone to inject poison into your body, don’t allow someone to inject poison into your mind and heart (i.e. your soul).

More to the point, as we investigated in our article ‘The Sacred Cell and Conscious Genes’, the actual operation of DNA is now known to have abstract field-like properties that cannot be explained by a linear code. When Galileo saw the moons of Jupiter through his telescope, the self-appointed guardians of science embedded in the church hierarchy looked through the lens and said they saw nothing. The rich world of consciousness-based medicine that lies behind and beyond the incomplete paradigm of DNA is being ignored, despite the evidence of its high efficacy building up. A wicked leader in antiquity is recorded as saying, “I know what is right but I can’t bring myself to do it; I know what is wrong but I can’t refrain from it.”There comes a point in every incomplete scientific paradigm when progress can only be made when its inadequacies are admitted. Eventually, after a period of crisis, this old order will be overtaken by revolutionary new ideas. We only hope that realisation dawns before biotechnology mistakes like those of the covid era again engulf the world.

What Are The Health Problems Biotechnology Is Promising To Solve and How Can They Actually Be Solved?

The leading causes of mortality worldwide come from the threat of chronic non-communicable diseases like heart disease, cancer, diabetes and respiratory illness. Other major illnesses include infectious diseases like HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, dengue, ebola and recurring viral outbreaks which pose massive public health threats.

Mental ill health and substance abuse have surged globally. Environmental problems like food security, air quality and access to clean water are particularly associated with poverty and displacement.

You are probably aware of studies that we have extensively reported which have shown that many, if not most, of these conditions became elevated during the covid pandemic, driven by either covid infection, which is now almost universally recognised as emerging from a biotechnology laboratory, or by adverse reactions to covid vaccination. Relying on biotechnology experimentation to save the world and cure disease is not a safe bet. 

Moreover, the biotechnology industry has become heavily involved with global food production and processing. Ultra-processed foods are linked to ill health, along with agri-chemicals, and crops now almost universally contain genetically modified components. In contrast, diets rich in natural, fresh foods are linked with improved health and increased longevity. Likewise, exercise, fresh air, sunshine and clean water. These are the components of a healthy society that the biotech industry is wantonly polluting with genetically modified components.

As we have reported extensively, simple meditation* is linked with holistic improvements in health outcomes. This is because consciousness plays a holistic leading role in human physiology. For example a five year study of the health insurance utilisation of 2000 people practicing transcendental meditation published in 1987 found inpatient admissions per 1000 were lower for the TM group than the norm for all of 17 major medical treatment categories, including -55.4% for benign and malignant tumours -87.3% for heart disease, -30.4% for all infectious diseases, -30.6% for all mental disorders, and -87.3% for diseases of the nervous system. Numerous other studies since have found comparable results, including recent research finding biomarkers of younger biological age among meditators. 

Note from The Exposé: The word “meditation” is a catch-all phrase to describe a variety of types and techniques.  A number of these are religion-based.  Dr. Guy Hatchard has previously promoted Transcendental Meditation practised in Hinduism, as if it were spiritually innocent and a scientific fact (see HERE). Religion-based meditation and incantations or chanting are not innocent; unless we are dwelling on God (YHWH) or God’s word (the Bible), religion-based meditation attracts spirits of the wrong kind who will seek to interfere with your life in any way that they can. Incantations and chanting can be used as methods of indoctrination or brainwashing; be cautious about using any meditation techniques that require these rituals.  God does not require us to perform rituals; all He requires is that we have faith in Him, the one true God, who is one God but three Persons: God the Father (YHWH, Yahweh, Adonai, Jehovah), God the Son (Jesus, Yeshua, the Christ, the Messiah) and God the Holy Spirit.

In conclusion, there are well-tested and cost-effective drivers of improved health known to science which are being ignored in favour of dangerous and expensive biotechnology interventions being developed by an industry whose knowledge base is limited and whose primary driver is profit before people. Billions of dollars being spent on biotechnology research, including government funding, private investment and corporate profits, would be better spent on promoting proven natural solutions. Numerous studies show there would be an instant improvement in mental and physical public health outcomes, quality of life and well-being for all age groups – children, adults and the retired. Governments have been sidetracked by baseless promises; it’s time to get real.

About the Author

Guy Hatchard, PhD, is a New Zealander who was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food testing and safety company (now known as FoodChain ID). 

You can subscribe to Dr. Hatchard’s websites, HatchardReport.com and GLOBE.GLOBAL, for regular updates by email. GLOBE.GLOBAL is a website dedicated to providing information about the dangers of biotechnology.  You can also follow Dr. Hatchard on Twitter HERE, Facebook HERE and Substack HERE.