Breaking News

While you were distracted by Boris resigning, the UK Gov. published data confirming the COVID Death-Rate per 100k is now highest among Fully Vaccinated; suggesting they’re suffering Antibody-Dependent Enhancement

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

On 7th July, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Boris Johnson, announced he was resigning from the post, resulting in a non-stop 24/7 media frenzy speculating what the future holds for the UK and who will be steering an already sinking ship.

But just hours before Boris made his announcement, his Government quietly published data that has conveniently now been swept under the carpet.

That data shows that since at least April 2022, in terms of deaths per 100,000, the fully vaccinated population in England have been more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated population; meaning the Covid-19 injections now have negative effectiveness against death.

This, in turn, suggests the fully vaccinated are now suffering Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease and Antibody-Dependent Enhancement.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here


Back in March 2022, the UK Health Security Agency announced that from April 1st 2022, they would no longer publish the vaccination status of Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths in England.

At the time, the UKHSA claimed this was because the UK Government had ended free universal Covid-19 testing and this, therefore, affected their “ability to robustly monitor Covid-19 cases by vaccination status”.

However, this was a lie.

Because another UK Government agency, the Office for National Statistics (ONS), has just published a report containing data on deaths by vaccination status in England that includes deaths up to 31st May 2022.

On Monday 11th July, we revealed how that report showed the vaccinated population in England accounted for 94% of Covid-19 deaths between 1st April and 31st May 2022, with 90% of those deaths among the vaccinated.

But now we can also reveal that this is not because the majority of people have been vaccinated, which in turn statistically results in more deaths. It is instead, as the ONS data shows, because the Covid-19 injections are increasing recipients’ risk of death if infected with Covid-19.

The latest dataset from the ONS is titled ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status, England, 1 January 2021 to 31 May 2022‘, and it can be accessed on the ONS site here, and downloaded here.

Table 1 of the latest dataset contains figures on the mortality rates by vaccination status for all-cause deaths, deaths involving Covid-19, and deaths not involving Covid-19. And it is here that we are able to ascertain the death rates per 100,000 by vaccination status of everyone who has died of Covid-19 since the beginning of April 2022, when the UKHSA claimed they could no longer reliably report the figures.

Here’s a snapshot of how the ONS presents the figures in its report –

Source – Table 1

We’ve taken the figures provided by the ONS for both April and May 2022, and produced the following chart showing the Covid-19 death rate per 100,000 person-years by vaccination status for both April and May 2022 –

According to the ONS, the Covid-19 death rate equated to 204.7 per 100,000 person-years among the Unvaccinated in April, and 77.6 per 100,000 person-years in May.

However, the death rate was much higher among both the partly vaccinated and fully vaccinated population in England.

According to the ONS, the Covid-19 death rate equated to 298.6 per 100,000 person-years among the partly vaccinated in April, and 122.4 per 100,000 person-years in May.

Meanwhile, the Covid-19 death rate equated to 243 per 100,000 person-years among the fully vaccinated in April, and 106.3 per 100,000 person-years in May.

Based on Pfizer’s vaccine efficacy formula, this data reveals that the Covid-19 injections are now proving to have negative effectiveness against death, with the real-world effectiveness for April and May being as follows –

Formula:
Unvaccinated Death Rate – Vaccinated Death Rate
/
Unvaccinated Death Rate x 100 =
Vaccine Effectiveness against Death

This plain and simply means, that since at least April 2022, the vaccinated population in England have been more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated population in England. The question is, why?

The answer lies in confidential Pfizer documents, that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been forced to publish by court order.

The Pfizer Covid-19 injection uses a technology that prior to the end of December 2020, had never before been authorised for use in Humans. It is known as mRNA.

And there’s a pretty good reason as to why it had never been authorised for use in Humans. During animal trials for SARS and MERS, it had the opposite of its intended effect and actually worsened disease by inducing antibody-dependent enhancement.

Eighteen months after the administration of the injections in the trials, all the animals had died.

Yet, despite this, the Pfizer jab was granted emergency-use authorisation all around the world and administered to millions.

But data forcibly published by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reveals all of this could have been avoided if only they’d actually bothered to read the documents submitted by Pfizer.

The FDA attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years despite approving the injection after only 108 days of safety review on December 11th, 2020.

But in early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered them to release 55,000 pages per month. They released 12,000 pages by the end of January.

Since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website.

One of the documents contained in the data dump is ‘reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf’. Page 11 of the confidential document contains data on important potential risks, with one of these being Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (V-AED).

Vaccine-associated enhanced disease (V-AED) occurs when an individual who has received a vaccine, develops a more severe presentation of that disease when subsequently exposed to that virus, compared with when infection occurs without prior vaccination.

Enhanced responses are triggered by failed attempts to control the infecting virus, and VAED typically presents with symptoms related to the target organ of the infection pathogen. According to scientists, VAED occurs as two different immunopathologies, antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and vaccine-associated hypersensitivity (VAH).

Intensive research conducted by health experts throughout the years has brought to light increasing concerns about “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement” (ADE), a phenomenon where vaccines make the disease far worse by priming the immune system for a potentially deadly overreaction.

ADE can arise in several different ways but the best-known is dubbed the ‘Trojan Horse Pathway’. This occurs when non-neutralizing antibodies generated by past infection or vaccination fail to shut down the pathogen upon re-exposure.

Instead, they act as a gateway by allowing the virus to gain entry and replicate in cells that are usually off-limits (typically immune cells, like macrophages). That, in turn, can lead to wider dissemination of illness, and over-reactive immune responses that cause more severe illness.

Pfizer claim in their confidential document that up to 28th Feb 2021, they had received 138 cases reporting 317 potentially relevant events indicative of Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease. Of these 71 were medically significant resulting in 8 disabilities, 13 were life-threatening events, and 38 of the 138 people died.

Of the 317 relevant events reported by 138 people, 135 were labelled as ‘drug ineffective’, 53 were labelled as dyspnoea (struggling to breathe), 23 were labelled as Covid-19 pneumonia, 8 were labelled as respiratory failure, and 7 were labelled as seizure.

Pfizer also admitted that 75 of the 101 subjects with confirmed Covid-19 following vaccination, had severe disease resulting in hospitalisation, disability, life-threatening consequences or death.

It can be difficult to distinguish between vaccine failure (also known as breakthrough disease) and V-AED. Identification of a case of VAED requires the recognition that a clinical presentation is different, atypical, modified or more severe in comparison to the natural disease presentation.

And Pfizer made sure to use that fact to their advantage, claiming not of the cases of potential V-AED identified could be definitely considered to be V-AED.

Therefore, for the purposes of their submitted safety data to the Food and Drug Administration, the very data that was needed to gain emergency use authorisation and make them billions and billions of dollars, Pfizer concluded that ‘None of the 75 cases could be definitively considered as VAED’.

But Pfizer then went on to confirm that based on the current evidence, VAED remains a theoretical risk.

However, now that we have real-world data quietly published by the UK Government just hours before a media frenzy was sparked by the resignation of Boris Johnson as Prime Minister, showing a higher Covid-19 death rate per 100,000 among the fully vaccinated than the unvaccinated, we are now able to distinguish between vaccine failure and Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease.

If the vaccine was simply failing, we would see a similar death rate among both the unvaccinated and vaccinated. But as it happens, we’re instead seeing a much higher death rate among the fully vaccinated, with figures revealing a real-world negative vaccine effectiveness against death of minus-37% for the fully vaccinated in May 2022.

So there you have it, whilst you’ve been distracted by Boris Johnson’s resignation as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, the UK Government quietly published a report just hours before his announcement containing data they previously claimed they didn’t have, which confirmed the fully vaccinated are much more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated.

With news like this being swept under the rug by the mainstream media, it makes you wonder what else they will attempt to hide in the coming weeks?

Share this page to Telegram
4.3 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

45 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
hazelnut
hazelnut

Thankyou for this article., but your bar charts show that it is the partly vaccinated who are suffering higher rates than the fully vaccinated, although both are worse off than the unvaccinated. Please clarify if this is correct.

Steve
Steve
Reply to  hazelnut
1 month ago

Research Gert Vanden Bossche it’s a very interesting subject. This man has correctly predicted everything so far!

Raymond Mikal Gabrielsen
Raymond Mikal Gabrielsen
1 month ago

First time I se a document that explain what I feel is the truth from inside 🙏
I been myself taking 3 doses of Pfizer vacation, the last in February I think.
But never again, if I came through this in this body 🙏 Thanks for sharing this important knowledge 🙏

Jack
Jack
Reply to  Raymond Mikal Gabrielsen
1 month ago

What should scare EVERYONE, it seems the demarcation point might be 18 months between life and death; vaxd for obvious reasons, but unvaxd due to the forced vax on the medical field and them not being there to do their job, due to illness at best and death at worst. Still for the unvaxd, supply chain issues and the hospitals being overran.

I think we are, at the earliest, at month 17 for the early takers and maybe at month 12 for a large chuck of others. I do feel like sudden deaths are accelerating.

Jack
Jack
Reply to  Raymond Mikal Gabrielsen
1 month ago

One more thing….DON’T JUST SIT THERE DOING NOTHING!!! There are things you can do that MIGHT help. First, you need to understand what you are fighting…the Spike Proteins that you body was instructed to make.

Search: worldcouncilforhealth Yes, You Can Detox From COVID “Vaccine” Spike Proteins: Here’s How

Go to: covid19criticalcare

Remember, ivermectin binds to the Spike Protein. I’ve been on it for WELL over a year and have yet to get Rona. ivermectin has been around for 60+ years and is super safe.

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Jack
1 month ago

For G’ sake, there is NO spike protein, what about to make your homework properly? They’ve just lied to you about a viral pandemic, they just poisoned you with graphene oxide, the building stone of their nanotech in you – check it, what is your MAC address? Android + the app Bluetooth Scanner will show it.
Then what about not to fall for their newest lies? They want to keep alive the virus tale, THEY LIED ABOUT ANTOBODIES (how they work, what are they) just how they LIED about spike proteins, no such thing!

It’s ‘probably’ not a co incidence that the Expose never writes about Dr Kaufman or Cowan or Lanka or Ricardo Delgado, Patricia (one of their journalists who wrote about sensitive topics has disappeared and no one among them writes about the truth anymore like graphene oxide in you, like the MAC which makes you a target to kill anytime if they wish).

Watch it, this is how your antibodies ‘work’…
at 02:02:59 THAT FRAUD

https://truthcomestolight.com/the-end-of-germ-theory-documentary-an-easy-to-understand-step-by-step-analysis-of-the-history-of-germ-virus-theory-the-erroneous-science-behind-vaccination-a-close-look-at/

Lancer
Lancer
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

I’ve no idea what to believe, what you describe could very well be legitimate. I suppose one’s first avenue of recourse would be to check which batch you were injected with (note DE’s pinned article linking to the ‘How Bad Is My Batch’ app) given it would seem (at least so far) many are not impacted at all. Whether that’s due to a swathe of saline injections masquerading as what they said they were, or you did have an mRNA injection to facilitate the creation of deadly spike to which an adverse reaction has yet to manifest and so perhaps a course of anti-virals, which are reportedly a good idea by some, might be worth trying before this reaction – or as you say an activation of some sort gets triggered. I’ve no idea how graphene can be detoxified but perhaps the same way as any toxin – it sounds stupid but a frequent sauna regiment to raise your temperature on a consistent basis may be worth looking in to.

Jack
Jack
Reply to  Raymond Mikal Gabrielsen
1 month ago

Go to: covid19criticalcare then Protocols at the top and I-RECOVER

Freedomone
Freedomone
1 month ago

What animals were used in the trial you reference that died by 18 months? If the mRNA animals were lab mice with a life expectancy of up to 36 months then the life span may be halved, if injected at maturity, 2 months old. It would be interesting to know at what age (and type) the animals were injected/tested to determine the % of life span that was shortened. Then possibly an extrapolation could be made as to expected life span shortening of human subjects if the vaccines have the same effect on humans as on the study animals. I could go on with more questions about the details of the trial but my point is that you should not assume that all human recipients will die by 18 months of receiving the vaccine. It may be the % of life span that needs to be considered. I do agree the CAUTION alarm is ringing as to the longer effects of the vaccine.
This experiment may not be over by the phase 3 trial reports due in 2024-2026.

Jack
Jack
Reply to  Freedomone
1 month ago

The bells were ringing when they said they had a vax in 4 months instead of 10-15 years…even 5 years. This is why I took a you-first stance and maintain that stance.

Steve
Steve
Reply to  Jack
1 month ago

I agree with you but not only that, 4 companies came up with the same type of process. Listen the Dr Mike Yeadon resigned as VP of pfizer, hope the link works.

https://odysee.com/@MaajidNawaz:d/EP8-Radical:9

Stephanie
Stephanie
Reply to  Jack
1 month ago

Chances are the snake oil was prepared long before the convid existed. convid was created for the vax, not the vax created for the convid

Jayna Dinnyes
Jayna Dinnyes
Reply to  Stephanie
1 month ago

IMPO (In My Prayerful Opinion) I believe that you are
right. I heard that the jabs were created as early as in 2017.

Bill Gates.jpg
GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Freedomone
1 month ago

There is NO mRNA involved, only graphene oxide.
Everything you experience is due to that poison, the rest are just diversions.

Here he tells it all and him / they were the first to examine the vials with proof (chain of custody), the truth is out for a year!!!

How many more must die because people are lazy to research or at least learn from others’?

https://www.brighteon.com/936df8eb-df02-4cc4-bd83-6b14e9cbaa27

Steve
Steve
1 month ago

After listening to the eminent Gert Vanden Bossche, you search for results. The jab damages your natural immune system. Then another variant comes along and your antibody response is compromised. People that did not catch covid but had the jab first are the most vulnerable because their bodies did not produce any antigen. The current policy of constant shots for each new variant, that will always appear, is erroneous. Stop the shots now. Stop jabbing people. The future is not looking good but lets hope for the best!

Jayna Dinnyes
Jayna Dinnyes
Reply to  Steve
1 month ago

But prepare for the worst!

A Quote From Einstein.gif
GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Jayna Dinnyes
1 month ago

Exactly.
If you want to get rid of your MAC in your body vaxxed watch this. Till then you are an easy target to them, even your thoughts are.

https://www.brighteon.com/34b1dc95-6c1a-4c35-b98c-012a47060e5a

This is how the MACs work in you:

https://www.brighteon.com/470607bc-7d99-4d87-9f97-3dc7a9a564a4

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Steve
1 month ago

They are liars, because there are NO pathogenic viruses, they are not the cause, they are exosomes and our helpers to recover. Also they are lying because NO mRNA, ONLY POISON AND RADIATION ACTING TOGETHER.

THERE ARE NO VARIANTS EITHER.

This is what’s happening, this is your covid and it’s MORONic variants:

https://www.brighteon.com/936df8eb-df02-4cc4-bd83-6b14e9cbaa27

Stephanie
Stephanie
1 month ago

Well they were warned… we did tell them but it fell on deaf ears. you rep what you sow

Jayna Dinnyes
Jayna Dinnyes
Reply to  Stephanie
1 month ago

“reap”

GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Stephanie
1 month ago

We will all rep. Because they are easy to manipulate to do and accept ANYTHING. Computers are faster than the human brain, the vaxxed are basically walking zombies, who won’t even recognize that a certain thought would not theirs but will act accordingly.

This is just so dark, I understand they don’t want to believe, but have you given a thought how could they drag toddler’s from their closed parents in China and put who knows where? How parents obediently allowed it? How that there was no revolution? Even an animal will attack you if you are a danger for its offspring. But that’s ok for the vaxxed. WOW.

Jayna Dinnyes
Jayna Dinnyes
1 month ago

Every thing about COVID-19 and the jabs IS VERY BAD!
What we all must do NOW is take natural preventatives that
will shield us from Coronavirus’ and blood clots. Swanson Vitamins’ NAC
600 mg. capsules have kept me from having all Coronavirus’
since 2009. Child: 1/Day Adult: 2/Day
Doctor’s Best Nattokinase (natural Japanese blood thinner)
will heal and prevent blood clots.) These two WORK!
I post publicly on MeWe. STAY WELL NATURALLY!
ETERNAL LIFE BLESSINGS FOR YAHWEH’S SAINTS!

The Destination!.jpg
GundelP
GundelP
Reply to  Jayna Dinnyes
1 month ago

There is no viruses only poisons, we breath in, we eat, we injected with and environmental radiation is also a poison, hence its name: ELECTRO SMOG. The body tries to protect itself, the poisoned cells release ‘viruses’ (exosomes) messengers and a special protein to help the cells to survive.

Now we are poisoned with a new poison, one of the deadliest, graphene oxide. Not only the covid vaxxed, it was found in other vaxxes, including a ‘toddler’ vax (Prevenar 13), in masks, swabs, drugs, food.
It’s a russian roulette now, when radiation hit you and the grapgene accumulated on the ‘wrong place’ eg lungs, you end up with ‘covid lungs’ aka bilateral radiation pneumonitis.

I hope that all that docs who knew – because many surely knew – identical to radiation symptoms – but remained silent for money or because of fear will ROT IN HELL.

David A
David A
Reply to  GundelP
1 month ago

Thousands of scientists from dozens of organizations from many nations are solidly against the clot shots. They have risked careers and reputations to report on the vaccine harms, on the spike protein harms. Pathologist doing autopsies have reported on the harm caused by spike protein generated from the vaccines.

I have no reason to accept your 100 percent certain view.
I am equally against the vaccines either way, and consider the perpetrators evil.

At thus point you are spamming.

Paisley
Paisley
1 month ago

what’s kind of messed is mortality rates per 100k person years was lowest among those more recently completing a 2nd or 3rd vaccination (suggesting we subject ourselves to more frequent boosting for short-term effects). But then, rates of death involving COVID skyrocket after 6 months after the 2nd dose. Unfortunately data is not yet bracketed for >6 months after THIRD dose–my current status. I’m eager to see future months data. Not sure frequent injections to achieve diminished risk of death are sustainable given evidence of long term risks (more cost-benefit analyses, please!!), and unfortunately it’s looking like those of us who choose to remain unboosted will reach highest risk profile based on this dataset.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] While you were distracted by Boris resigning, the UK Gov. published data confirming the COVID Death-… On 7th July, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Boris Johnson, announced he was resigning from the post, resulting in a non-stop 24/7 media frenzy speculating what the future holds for the UK and who will be steering an already sinking ship. […]

Nickolai
Nickolai
1 month ago

Why are you leaving out column “Age-standardised mortality rate / 100,000 person-years” and trying to make your own math to justify an argument? The spreadsheet clearly shows that for May: Mortality rate for un-vaccinated is about 2.1x higher than ever-vaccinated.

Yas
Yas
1 month ago

This could have been a very good article but it is unfortunate that the author(s) have not been transparent and have not shown the complete data for the months of April and May 2022. While they show the data for the unvaccinated and those with a single shot as well as those with two shots (labelled “Fully vaccinated”), they do not show the data for those who have had the booster shot (which comprise about 78% of the vaccinated population in terms of person-years).

Looking at the COVID-19 death rate per 100,000 person-years for the boosted (3rd dose) population (at least 21 days since the booster), we have:

Deaths in April 2022: 91.2
Deaths in May 2022: 33.1

These are clearly much lower than all populations in the other groups of different vaccination status – including the unvaccinated). So, according to the ONS data, having had the booster (3rd shot) means a lower risk of death involving COVID-19. The caveat here is that in order to benefit from this lower risk of death, one has to spend some non-insignificant amount of time in the partially and fully vaccinated groups which both have a higher risk of death than the unvaccinated group!

Furthermore, the author(s) also omit the Confidence Limits that are included in the ONS data. These limits provide very important information that allows us to get an idea of the potential errors in the Mortality Rate per 100,000 Person-Years.

For example, in one of the graphs in this article, we have the following data for the April 2022 COVID-19 death rate per 100,000 person-years (I have added the Confidence Limits from the ONS data in square brackets):

Unvaccinated: 204.7 [175.9 – 233.5]
Partly vaccinated: 298.6 [213.4 – 405.2
Fully vaccinated: 243.0 [211.3 – 274.6]

So what do these Confidence Limits mean? Taking the unvaccinated as an example, we can interpret the data as follows:
The death rate per 100,000 person years is 204.7, but because of the various potential errors and uncertainties that can be part of the calculations, we can be 95% confident that the real-world number is between 175.9 and 233.5.

So, because the confidence limit for the unvaccinated overlaps the confidence limits of both the Partly and fully vaccinated, we CANNOT make the conclusion that there is a lower risk of death in the unvaccinated. Why? The limits tell us that the death rate for the unvaccinated could be, for example, 230, and the death rate for the fully vaccinated could be 215 (both these numbers are within the confidence limits of their respective vaccination status categories). In this case, the fully vaccinated would have a lower death rate than the unvaccinated. So as long as confidence limits overlap, one cannot make any definitive conclusions!

There is so much abuse of statistics as well as mis- and dis-information from the groups intent of making us all get vaccinated that it is vitally important every effort to fight this is backed by honest and transparent discourse and presentation of the data.

There is another possible source of error in the ONS data. For example, is the number for the denominator of the unvaccinated taken from the NIMS (National Immunisation Management Service) or the UK 2011 census? Using numbers from these two different sources would give quite different results…

Always review the original source data and question everything while remaining sane…

BKMart
BKMart
1 month ago

Or vaxx caused deaths being blamed on the virus…

GundelP
GundelP
1 month ago

They are suffering because of graphene oxide poisoning, the rest is BS including antibody dependent enhancement.

There is no such thing.

LongTimeTexan
LongTimeTexan
1 month ago

More people will die from the covid “vaccines” than have or will die from covie itself. The coronovirus came directly from a lab in China, our government knew it as well as other governments of the world and we the people were completely hood-winked and lied to about this virus.

Katey
Katey
1 month ago

If you think April and May are bad, wait till you look at this year’s January death rate: 584.6 for unvaxed vs. a whopping 838 for Second dose post 6 months.

Interesting that this coincides with the massive spike Canada had at the same time. At the time on Ontario’s Covid data site, the graph for unvaccinated infections very visibly overtook the unvaxed, both in numbers and rate per 100,000. They’ve since removed this from the site, but you can still view it on Wayback Machine here:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220204225234/https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data

Scroll down to the “COVID-19 cases by vaccination status” graph and change it from “Past 7 days” to “All time”

Katey
Katey
Reply to  Katey
1 month ago

Sorry about the typo, meant to say:
the graph for vaccinated infections very visibly overtook the unvaxed”

FishGirl
FishGirl
1 month ago

Keep up the good work! ☕️

trackback
30 days ago

[…] Boris Johnson resigned from his post on July 7, the British government quietly and strategically dropped a major bombshell confirming that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” are not saving […]

trackback
30 days ago

[…] Boris Johnson resigned from his post on July 7, the British government quietly and strategically dropped a major bombshell confirming that Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” are not saving […]

trackback
18 days ago

[…] tipping point. Are you aware that the UK government’s own data show that, on a percentage basis, more fully-vaccinated people are dying than unvaccinated? […]

trackback
18 days ago

[…] tipping point. Are you aware that the UK government’s own data show that, on a percentage basis, more fully-vaccinated people are dying than […]

trackback
18 days ago

[…] tipping point. Are you aware that the UK government’s own data show that, on a percentage basis, more fully-vaccinated people are dying than […]

trackback
18 days ago

[…] point. Are you aware that the UK government’s own data show that, on a percentage basis, more fully-vaccinated people are dying than […]

trackback
7 days ago

[…] tipping point. Are you aware that the UK government’s own data show that, on a percentage basis, more fully-vaccinated people are dying than […]