Breaking News

Could Climate Change Equity Be a Path to a Global Social Credit System?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

According to an article published by the United States civil space and aeronautics agency (“NASA”) in 2016, a study found carbon dioxide fertilisation caused an increase in plant growth. “Results showed that carbon dioxide fertilisation explains 70 per cent of the greening effect,” said one of the authors of the study.

An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to twice that of the continental United States.

NASA, Rising CO2 Levels Greening Earth, 26 April 2016 (1 min)

NASA explained why rising carbon dioxide levels is good for all life on Earth:

Green leaves use energy from sunlight through photosynthesis to chemically combine carbon dioxide drawn in from the air with water and nutrients tapped from the ground to produce sugars, which are the main source of food, fibre and fuel for life on Earth. Studies have shown that increased concentrations of carbon dioxide increase photosynthesis, spurring plant growth.

Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds, NASA, 26 April 2016

Despite this, the insanity of climate alarmists continues.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Follow The Exposé’s Official Channel on Telegram here
Join the conversation in our Telegram Discussion Group here


Climate Equity

In an article published by Climate Uncensored titled ‘The Inescapable Maths of Equity: Why Fairness Is Key to Addressing Climate Change’, the two authors – both formerly of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research – attempt to argue why fairness is key to staying within 1.5 to 2°C global carbon budget.  One of the authors is Kevin Anderson, whom some refer to as “Mr. Stinky.”  In concluding their article, the authors wrote:

Why is fairness key to staying within the 1.5 to 2°C global carbon budget?

  • First: For poorer nations to raise their level of well-being closer to the global average, fairness demands immediate and deep cuts in emissions by richer nations.
  • Second: If we are not to hand our children a potentially impossible burden for removing our carbon from the atmosphere, fairness demands immediate and deep cuts by the people emitting now.
  • And third: to target the vast bulk of carbon being emitted today, fairness (and effectiveness) demands that the highest emitting, wealthiest citizens should make the biggest cuts.
The Inescapable Maths of Equity: Why Fairness Is Key to Addressing Climate Change, Climate Uncensored, 12 September 2022

The entire article is based in the belief of cutting emissions to “hold global warming” according to the Paris Agreement.  “For a ‘good chance’ of holding warming to below 2°C, we are now limited to emitting a little under 700 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide (about seventeen years’ worth of emissions at the current global rate),” the authors stated.

While the Paris Agreement emphasises the importance of equity in dividing the global carbon budget among individual countries, it doesn’t tell us exactly how to divide it.

We get the budget from science, specifically from our understanding of how the climate and average temperatures respond over time to inputs of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.

The Inescapable Maths of Equity: Why Fairness Is Key to Addressing Climate Change, Climate Uncensored, 12 September 2022

The authors seem to be completely convinced, religiously so, that the driving forces behind the agreement made in Paris can only be noble and good.  They do not even so much as question whether cutting carbon emissions may be bad for the planet.  However, the article does give some insight into how divorced from reality climate alarmists are and that all life on Earth is, as they believe, in the hands of some mathematical wizardry mixed with a dose of equity.

Understanding Equity

The word equity is an important concept to understand as it is a favourite among Great Resetters and is reiterated over and over again as one of their main mantras.  The bottom line is, the proponents of The Great Reset want to replace equality with equity.  Although equity is sold to the public as “fairness” and “justice” it is not. Equity and equality are two very different concepts which are at odds with one another.

Equality means providing the same to all or the state of being equal.

Equity means recognising that we do not all start from the same place and people or systems must acknowledge and make adjustments to imbalances.  The key to understanding the destructive, unfair, unjust and unlawful nature of equity is to understand who decides the rules for “equity.” Which raises questions such as: what is the “starting place” to measure the “imbalances,” what “imbalances” are monitored, and who decides who has to make “adjustments” and the nature of “adjustments” to be made? 

While there may be many who feel they should be the ones making the “equity” rules, the vast majority of them will be left disappointed because of this one thing, at least, we can be certain – these rules will not be made by us or for our benefit and they will not apply to everyone equally.

To understand the broader reaches of equity in the context of the climate agenda, we’ll use examples of the rampant “equity” being touted by critical social justice theories.  This understanding can then be broadened into the global “equity” ideology climate alarmists, such as Mr. Stinky Anderson, are promoting.

Diversity, inclusivity and equity (“DIE”) is a mantra increasingly being forced onto the world in the name of “social justice.” “Of these three, equity is the most egregious, self-righteous, historically ignorant and dangerous,” wrote Jordan Peterson.  He explained:

Equity means “equality,” in some manner, and is a term designed to appeal to the natural human tendency toward fairness, but it does not mean the classic equality of the West, which is (1) equality before the law and (2) equality of opportunity.

Let’s ignore all [of its shortcomings], and assume for a moment that we should aim at equity, and then actually think through what policies would inevitably have to be put in place to establish such a goal … we would [ ] have to establish targets … [and an] implementation period … Failure to meet the appropriate targets would be obviously and necessarily met with fines … [and] scrutiny [to implement improvements] … That’s not going to be good enough, however … [Because] it [then] becomes clear that [ ] practices [ ] must be radically restructured.

Are we really up for these large-scale interventions? Do we really believe that they are necessary and, even more naively, that they would solve more problems than they would cause?

The truth of the matter is that there is no excuse for the equity doctrine.

Equity: When the Left Goes Too Far, Jordan B. Peterson
Jordan Peterson, D-I-E must DIE, 19 January 2022 (18 mins)

In the video above, Jordan Peterson reads this article: ‘Why I am no longer a tenured professor at the University of Toronto’.

To give another practical example of how equity will be used for behaviour modification and control, watch the Project Veritas video below in which a New York educator stated:

“We have very specific questions, and ultimately our Diversity-Equity-Inclusion question, our DEI question is — it’s very telling if somebody has done a lot of work within themself, within the profession…if people don’t answer that question right, they are just an automatic not hire.

“If they [candidates] say that diversity is about — if they say something that lends itself to be colourblind, which could happen, like, ‘Oh, it’s like, you know, like everyone is equal.’ Those things that are well-intentioned statements, but they’re missing the depth of understanding of how the intersections of our identity live out in the world. So, that person wouldn’t get hired.”

Project Veritas: The secret Curriculum, 6 September 2022 (5 mins)

Equity is not equality.  Nor is it fair, just or even lawful.  Instead, it is a virus poised to take control of every aspect of our lives – looking to punish those who do not conform to a ruler’s ideology or diktats. 

Additionally, we should all feel uncomfortable that “equity” appears to be preparing societies to effortlessly slide into a social credit system

Globalist criminals are not only using governments and corporate media to achieve these aims. They are also tearing societies apart by using our colleagues, our friends, our neighbours and our family members to usher it in. The aim is to not only shape one or two societies but to shape all societies. As Climate Uncensored’s article demonstrated, they are attempting to make the equity doctrine global using, for example, their “net zero,” “climate crisis” ideology. 

In equity doctrine, there will be those who will benefit but not because they are deserving or in need. There will be those who are punished but not because they have committed a crime.  Benefits and punishments will be determined by the equity rule makers. Equality – striving for equal fairness and justice for all – will be replaced by a mechanism, equity, to control societies according to the whim and wishes of the rule makers.  No man or woman is worthy to have that much power over anyone’s life, let alone a multitude of people’s lives.  There is no equality in equity. Say no to equity!

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

23 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
john
john
19 days ago

The real issue that is not being addressed is the continued depletion of oxygen in the atmosphere.
In the past, Earth had oxygen levels at 28%. ALL life flourished.
Today, oxygen levels are down to 15-16%.
This is discussed, along with much more, in the latest webinar from the Fiduciary of the ACTUAL American Government.
The password is Annatruth4all!
https://annavonreitz.webex.com/recordingservice/sites/annavonreitz/recording/e17351f6152b103baafd00505681fff1/playback?rcdKey=4832534b0000000543b79b928833c344dd84499b90ab1eb9caebe73824e5e19d71adafd0371bb142&timeStamp=1663219179274&reviewId=441088227

Bob - Enough
Bob - Enough
Reply to  john
19 days ago

Not quite sure where you are getting your information from, but it does not seem correct to me. Here is what we are TOLD =comment image

But and to quote – “The amount of oxygen in the atmosphere has fluctuated over the last 600 million years, reaching a peak of about 30% around 280 million years ago, significantly higher than today’s 21%. Two main processes govern changes in the atmosphere: Plants using carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and releasing oxygen, and then plants using some oxygen at night by the process of photorespiration while the remaining oxygen is used to break down organic material. Breakdown of pyrite and volcanic eruptions release sulfur into the atmosphere, which reacts with oxygen and hence reduces its amount in the atmosphere. However, volcanic eruptions also release carbon dioxide, which plants can convert to oxygen. The cause of the variation of the amount of oxygen in the atmosphere is not known. Periods with much oxygen in the atmosphere are associated with the rapid development of animals.”

john
john
Reply to  Bob - Enough
17 days ago

From a better and more honest source than you.

trackback
19 days ago

[…] Could Climate Change Equity Be a Path to a Global Social Credit System? […]

Jimmy Jukebox
Jimmy Jukebox
19 days ago

Hi,
All my life I understood Equity was like:
The more monthly mortgage payments ya made the more equity ya built up in your house.

john
john
Reply to  Jimmy Jukebox
19 days ago

It is not your house if you or the fraudulent bank registered it with the land registry. They now own your house. Anything registered is a transferal of ownership.

John
John
Reply to  john
18 days ago

I think more correctly it’s a transfer of legal title equitable title remains with the buyer but legal title has control over the res or thing registered
however none of this is openly disclosed I’ve even tried getting land registration and other public bodies to define legal title and they refuse to do so
this makes it all fraudulent and null and void

john
john
Reply to  John
16 days ago

The property was acquired using a legal fiction NAME.
Which is Corporate, dead, and only exists on paper.
A legal fiction can NEVER own property of any description. Period.
The Land Recording offices in England have all been closed (bar 1 in the inner city of london) to prevent people from exercising their reversionary Trust interests.
I.E Changing ones political status from being a dead Corporate legal fiction devoid of soul, to a living sentient Man or Woman in the jurisdiction of the Land and Soil.

Mark Deacon
Mark Deacon
19 days ago

I ignore all BS on climate change it is just an agenda.

The truth is the planet is overpopulated with humans way too many.

While in the west we keep paying people too breed or hand out free resources to the rest the population keeps growing.

Socialism has ocnsequences … a far larger human population than there should be.

End that and then we can talk and that means people have to pay for their own children in full and not expect others too pay for them.

The population would shrink really quickly after that.

Then the CO2 emissions / climate change BS can vanish which is why the likes of Gates wants to cull the humna population. Just they intend to cull you with death by vaxx of the living instead of addressing the cause.

Mark Deacon
Mark Deacon
Reply to  Mark Deacon
19 days ago

Apologies with spelling … either you get it or you don’t.

john
john
Reply to  Mark Deacon
19 days ago

It appears you advocate for population reduction. Are you willing to give up your own life and do your bit for “over population?”
At a time in the past, Earth housed 70 billion people. That’s 9 times todays population.
All the people on Earth, can fit into a third of Texas with a front and back garden.

3wire42
3wire42
Reply to  john
18 days ago

Thank you. I often encourage people to look up the total area of Texas – I’ve started throwing in Oklahoma as a bonus – and figure out how many people could live there allowing 2,000+ s/f each. The problem is not overpopulation, the problem is man/governments trying to play God and micromanage creation. Well, that and stupid people…

Jayna Dinnyes
Jayna Dinnyes
Reply to  Mark Deacon
19 days ago

Well one BIG cause is increased radiation like what happened on 3~11~11 Fukushima melt downs and now 5G towers everywhere and possibly implanted in the jabbed victims’ bodies.
Yeah! What do we NOT know?
SURVIVE AND STAY WELL NATURALLY!
I post publicly and freely on MeWe.
ETERNAL LIFE BLESSINGS FOR YAHWEH’S SAINTS!

Bill Gates.jpg
Jayna Dinnyes
Jayna Dinnyes
19 days ago

Maybe. But financial collapse could be a greater cause.
And, it could be happening NOW!
The BIBLE = Best Instructions Before Leaving Earth!
ETERNAL LIFE BLESSINGS FOR YAHWEH’S SAINTS!

GREAT ADVICE!.JPG
MissHellKitten
MissHellKitten
18 days ago

Most definitely! And we all know the elites will only have to pay some fees to be exempt from it too! Just like they do now.

mattinthefens
mattinthefens
18 days ago

Here’s “Equity” in action: how much death duties and taxes will be paid by the royal estate?

trackback
18 days ago

[…] via Expose-News […]

trackback
18 days ago

[…] Despite this, the insanity of climate alarmists continues.  Read More […]

trackback
17 days ago

[…] WILSON ON SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 • ( 18 […]